 |
|
|
CHAPTER 8: The Green Belt and Rural Landscapes
|
| Page 111 |
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
|
| Page 112 |
| |
|
|
8.1
|
Introduction
|
| 8.1.1 |
Wolverhampton is a highly urbanised, industrial area, with limited areas of green open space. Such space provides opportunities for recreation and valuable wildlife habitats (see Chapter 7: Nature Conservation and Chapter 12: Open Space, Sport and Recreation), particularly where it forms part of a wider network of open space, but it is often under pressure from a variety of uses and demand for development land. Open space on the urban fringe can play a vital role in separating settlements and linking the urban open space network into the surrounding countryside. Green Belt and other designations help to protect such areas from inappropriate development.
|
| |
|
| |
National Planning Policy context |
| 8.1.2 |
Planning Policy Guidance Note 2 (PPG2): Green Belts (1995) states that Green Belt boundaries should endure over a longer time period than the life of the Development Plan and should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. In accordance with this guidance, Green Belt boundaries as defined in the 1993 UDP have largely been retained.
|
| 8.1.3 |
The principal change in PPG2 from that used as the basis for the 1993 UDP is the removal of ‘institutions standing in large grounds’ from the list of appropriate uses in Green Belts. To compensate, PPG2 introduces the concept of Major Developed Sites (MDS) for the first time. The UDP identifies a number of MDS’s, as set out in Policy G4.
|
| |
|
| |
Supporting documents |
| 8.1.4 |
A background paper has been produced to support the Plan’s Green Belt policies. This paper contains a full appraisal of the purpose and role of each Green Belt area in the City, in response to the revised PPG2. This appraisal highlights the need to remove certain small areas from the Green Belt because they do not fulfil a Green Belt function, as defined by PPG2, and their amenity, historic or nature conservation value is protected by other UDP policies. A number of minor alterations to the Green Belt have also been made to take account of the 1994 Local Authority boundary changes. These few and minor revisions to the Green Belt boundary (shown on Plans in the Green Belt Background Paper) do not compromise the purposes of the Green Belt. |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
| Page 113 |
| |
|
|
8.2 |
The Function and Role of the Green Belt |
| Policy
G1: Protection of the Green Belt (Part I) |
| |
Within the Green Belt, inappropriate development will not be permitted except in very special circumstances, where the harm caused is clearly outweighed by other considerations. Any such case will be referred to the Secretary of State as a departure from the UDP. |
|
|
| |
|
| 8.2.1 |
Many of the significant open spaces in Wolverhampton have been given long term protection as Green Belt. Many areas of Green Belt are also protected by other Plan policies. There are four purposes of including land in the Green Belt in Wolverhampton:
|
| |
- To check the further growth of the conurbation;
- To prevent the conurbation from merging into neighbouring settlements, such as Bilbrook and Perton;
- To assist in safeguarding the South Staffordshire countryside from encroachment;
- To assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land in the conurbation.
|
| 8.2.2 |
The areas of Green Belt in Wolverhampton are shown on the Proposals Map. The majority is in the form of wedges which stretch from the open countryside into the built up area. These wedges are located at:
|
| |
(a) |
Tettenhall / South Staffordshire golfcourse
|
| |
(b) |
Smestow Valley / Valley Park
|
| |
(c) |
Goldthorn / Lower Penn
|
| |
(d) |
Bushbury
|
| 8.2.3 |
Wolverhampton Green Belt areas also have a number of positive roles, helping to retain attractive landscapes and agricultural uses, and providing facilities for recreation, dedicated nature conservation areas and access to the open countryside for the urban population. Watercourses, canals and a significant number of education facilities are also located in the Green Belt, adding to its value. |
|
|
8.3
|
Control of Development Affecting the Green Belt |
| Policy
G2: Control of Development in the Green Belt |
| |
Within the Green Belt, appropriate development, as defined in PPG2, will only be permitted where the siting, scale, materials and design of the proposed development (including its relationship to any existing buildings) will be in keeping with the purposes of the Green Belt and its openness. |
Re-use of existing buildings in the Green Belt will be permitted subject to criteria defined in PPG2. |
|
|
|
|
| Policy G3: Control of Development Conspicuous from the Green Belt |
| |
Any development in a location conspicuous from the Green Belt will be permitted only where it can be shown that the proposed use and the siting, scale, materials and design of the development would not harm the visual amenity or visual character of the Green Belt. |
|
|
| |
|
 |
| |
|
| Page 114 |
| |
| 8.3.1 |
Within the Green Belt, development will be strictly controlled. PPG2 states that the construction of new buildings in a Green Belt area is inappropriate, unless it is for one of the following purposes:
|
| |
- agriculture and forestry;
- essential facilities for outdoor sport and recreation, cemeteries and other uses of land which preserve the openness of the Green Belt and do not conflict with the purposes of including land in it;
- limited extension, alteration or replacement of existing dwellings;
- limited infilling or redevelopment of major existing developed sites (see below);
- park and ride schemes.
|
| 8.3.2 |
The countryside surrounding urban areas will often be the most sustainable location for park and ride schemes. For this reason, park and ride development may not be inappropriate in the Green Belt, providing that the proposal complies with criteria listed in PPG2. Park and ride schemes are also subject to Policy AM11.
|
| 8.3.3 |
The re-use of buildings in the Green Belt is also appropriate development, providing that:
|
| |
- the proposed use will not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than the existing use;
- there is strict control over extensions to buildings and uses of land surrounding buildings;
- the buildings are of permanent and substantial construction and capable of conversion;
- the design of buildings is in keeping with their surroundings.
|
| 8.3.4 |
If proposals for appropriate development are made within the Green Belt, the Council will expect provision to be made to minimise any impact on the environment and opportunities taken to develop the positive roles of the site, as outlined in 8.2.3. It is also important that development, both within and conspicuous from the Green Belt, does not harm the visual amenity or character of the Green Belt. |
|
|
8.4 |
Major Developed Sites |
| Policy
G4: Major Developed Sites in the Green Belt |
| |
Within designated major developed sites in the Green Belt re-use of buildings, limited infilling and redevelopment will be permitted where it can be shown that the proposed development will: |
- Have no greater impact on the purposes of including land in the Green Belt than the last known use of the site; and
- Will not exceed the height of any existing buildings.
|
Any infill development should not, either in itself or cumulatively, lead to a major (>10%) increase over and above the original developed area of the site. |
Any complete or partial redevelopment should result in environmental improvements and should not occupy a larger area than the buildings which previously occupied the site, unless this would achieve a reduction in height which would benefit visual amenity. |
|
|
| |
|
 |
| |
|
| Page 115 |
| |
| 8.4.1 |
PPG2 states that major developed sites may be designated within the Green Belt. The Council has adopted the following criteria for the designation of major developed sites in Wolverhampton, based on guidance in PPG2:
|
| 8.4.2 |
All Major Developed Sites should:
|
| |
- be of a substantial size to include a substantial built footprint, totalling more than 5,000 sqm, which has a significant impact on the openness of the Green Belt;
- have an identifiable core of buildings which could accommodate limited infill development without having any greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than existing development;
- offer the prospect for environmental improvement through complete or partial redevelopment without having any greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than existing development.
|
| 8.4.3 |
Using this definition, eleven major developed sites have been designated. These sites are identified on the proposals map and listed below. Most are in active use, but a few include redundant buildings which could be released for other, appropriate, uses. On other sites, improvements to facilities could be made which would benefit the economy and the local community or provide environmental enhancements. The Council will allow re-use, limited in-filling or redevelopment on these identified sites, providing this does not increase any impact on the character of the Green Belt.
|
| 8.4.5 |
The Major Developed Sites identified in the UDP are: |
|
|
8.5 |
Access to the Green Belt |
| Policy
G5: Access to the Green Belt |
| |
Existing public access to, through and within the green belt will be protected and, wherever possible, enhanced, giving reasonable access for all sections of the community to the amenities provided by the green belt, subject to the need to protect nature conservation areas from disturbance. |
|
|
| |
|
| 8.5.1 |
Adequate access to open areas at the urban fringe is particularly important for urban dwellers, particularly those living in inner city areas and those without private transport. The Council will continue to try to make areas of Green Belt and the wider countryside more easily accessible to as many people as possible. This can be achieved, for example, through the negotiation of access agreements, improving public rights of ways, signposting and the production of leaflets for self-guided walks. |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
| Page 116 |
| |
|
|
8.6 |
Northycote Farm Country Park
|
| Policy G6: Northycote Farm Country Park |
| |
Within Northycote Farm Country Park, development which will improve visitor facilities, including the provision of car parks, picnic sites, footpaths and nature trails, will be actively encouraged, as long as such facilities are located and designed so as not to intrude on the character and appearance of the countryside or harm areas of nature conservation value, in line with the area's future status as a Local Nature reserve (see Policy N4). |
|
|
| |
|
| 8.6.1 |
A Country Park is an area of land which offers the public, with or without charge, the opportunity to enjoy recreational activities in the countryside. Northycote Farm Country Park is the only Country Park in Wolverhampton and a proposed Local Nature Reserve. The site was acquired by the Council over a period of time and the buildings were restored with grant aid from the Countryside Commission in the early 1990’s. The Country Park boasts a restored seventeenth century Grade II listed farmhouse and large areas of pasture, parkland and woodland, designated as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation. The Park also forms part of the Bushbury Wedge Area of Special Character and provides opportunities for informal public access for residents of Wolverhampton to the countryside of South Staffordshire.
|
| 8.6.2 |
The Country Park is managed by an Advisory Group, including officers and Members of the Council and representatives of the Friends of Northycote Farm. A range of visitor facilities have been developed, including a model working farm, guided walks around the farmhouse and public events and school visits throughout the year. There is scope to develop these facilities further and encourage greater public participation in a range of leisure, recreational and nature conservation activities. The Council, through the Advisory Group, will continue to prepare management plans and seek to take advantage of grants and other sources of funding in order to further the aims of the Country Park. |
| |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|