Page Header Graphic

CHAPTER 3: Implementation, Monitoring and Review

Page 39
 
Para

Page

     

3.1

Introduction

40

     

3.2

Implementation

40

  Policy IMR1:  Implementation 40

Policy IMR2:  Planning Obligations and Agreements

41

Policy IMR3:  Compulsory Purchase Orders

43

     

3.3

Monitoring and Review

43

Policy IMR4:  Monitoring and Review

43

     

Table 3.1

Examples of Planning Obligations Which May Be Sought

42

Table 3.2

UDP Monitoring Indicators and Targets

44

 
Page Footer Graphic
   
Page 40
Top of chapterReturn to contents

3.1

Introduction

 

3.1.1This Chapter sets out the how the Council will implement the Plan, how the effectiveness of the Plan will be monitored and how the Plan will be kept up-to-date.

Top of chapterReturn to contents

3.2

Implementation

Policy IMR1: Implementation (P1 – P14)
 

The Council will exert influence to achieve the objectives of the UDP in the following ways:

  • Through its statutory role as Local Planning Authority, monitoring and reviewing the Plan, preparing Supplementary Planning Documents, determining planning applications and seeking planning obligations;
  • By promoting development opportunities and proactively bringing sites forward e.g. through the use of action plans, development briefs and compulsory purchase orders;
  • By taking direct action under its own capital and revenue spending programmes and by accessing external funding;
  • By co-ordinating and enabling action largely undertaken by others, through various forms of partnership, grants and other types of assistance;
  • Through advocacy and lobbying of Central Government and other agencies for appropriate policies, resources and action.
 

 

3.2.1

The UDP provides a statutory framework for the way in which land is used and development takes place in the City. It has been prepared on the basis of consultations with an extensive range of organisations and individuals and reflects widely held aspirations for the future of Wolverhampton. The main way that the Council can directly implement the objectives of the Plan is through its role as Local Planning Authority, responsible for determining planning applications and preparing Supplementary Planning Documents, both topic and area-based. The Council has also prepared a statement of protocol and procedures which provides guidance on the process used in the determination of planning applications.

3.2.2

However, what actually happens on the ground is also the outcome of a multiplicity of day to day decisions by a large number of public and voluntary sector agencies, private companies and individuals. All of these have their own distinctive objectives and all are in various ways constrained by the resources at their disposal. Therefore, if the policies and proposals of the UDP are to be achieved, a close partnership must be maintained between the Council and other bodies, with the Council providing a co-ordinating and enabling role.

3.2.3

The Council will continue to ensure that financial resources are directed towards the achievement of UDP objectives. The UDP will be an important consideration for the Council when it prepares its annual Capital Programme. In particular, the Plan will provide the basis for determining priorities for environmental and conservation programmes and the long-term context for the Council’s input to the West Midlands Local Transport Plan. Other Council capital programmes of relevance are the Housing Capital Programme, the Economic Development Programme and Parks and Recreation budgets.

3.2.4 The Council will maximise use of external funding to meet UDP objectives. Significant sources of external funding include New Deal for Communities, European funding sources and grants from bodies such as the Countryside Commission, English Nature and English Heritage. Advantage West Midlands (the Regional Development Agency) will be an important partner in the mobilisation of such resources. The North Black Country and South Staffordshire Regeneration Zone will provide a focus for regeneration funding from a range of sources including AWM and Europe.
 
Page Footer Graphic
   
Page 41
 
3.2.5

Public sector resources are likely to continue to be scarce and so implementation will depend to a great extent on the private sector. Much of the underlying philosophy of the UDP is to provide the right circumstances to attract private sector investment of the right kind to the right places. Scarce public sector resources will, where necessary, be targeted to encourage further investment by the private sector.

Top of chapterReturn to contents
Policy IMR2: Planning Obligations and Agreements (P1 – P14)
 

In appropriate circumstances planning obligations will be negotiated with developers to enable development to proceed and / or secure the proper planning of the development and of the area.

In determining the nature and scale of benefits regard will be had to the following:

  • Government Guidance;
  • The Community Plan and other relevant Council Strategies;
  • The Unitary Development Plan;
  • The Local Transport Plan;
  • Relevant local action plans, development briefs and other Supplementary Planning Documents;
  • The views of the developer and occupier(s);
  • The views of the community;
  • The type and location of the development; and
  • The economic viability of the scheme and any exceptional costs associated with the development e.g. reclamation costs or costs of conversion of an existing building.
   
3.2.6

To assist in the implementation process, there are occasions in the consideration of planning applications when there is a need to seek agreements with developers for measures that cannot be achieved through conditions attached to a planning permission. Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) enables local authorities to reach agreements with developers, or for developers to give undertakings, for such measures to be carried out in association with a development. Such obligations can enhance the quality of development and enable proposals to go ahead which might otherwise be refused planning permission. Government guidance in Circular 5/05 Planning Obligations advises that any obligations should be necessary, relevant to planning, directly related to the proposed development, fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the proposed development and reasonable in all other respects.

3.2.7

Obligations may be sought, for example, where a development will generate need for improved or additional infrastructure, facilities or services, or where measures are needed to offset the negative impact of a development on the environment or local amenity. Table 3.1 lists examples of planning obligations that may be sought. Reference to the use of planning obligations in specific circumstances is made in other chapters of the Plan. A development may be required to fund a number of related measures, which may be located on-site or nearby. In some cases, a number of developers may be asked to contribute jointly to an improved facility that will be of benefit to all of them and the wider community.

 
Page Footer Graphic
   
Page 42
Top of chapterReturn to contents

Table 3.1 Examples of Planning Obligations Which May Be Sought

Type of Measure / Obligation

Examples

1. Transport / Physical Infrastructure

  • Green Transport Plans
  • Public transport e.g. park and ride, bus service improvements
  • Cycle and pedestrian facilities
  • Highways e.g. improvements to road network and site access
  • Improvements to public parking
  • Access for people with disabilities e.g. shopmobility
  • Land reclamation

2. Measures To Offset Impacts On The Built And Natural Environment / Local Amenity

  • Physical measures to minimise harm to amenity e.g. traffic management, landscaping, noise insulation
  • Replacement / alternative provision (on-site or nearby) of recreation / environmental facilities e.g. recreational open space, playing field, wildlife habitat
  • Replacement / alternative provision (on-site or nearby) of social and economic facilities e.g. training scheme, community centre

3. Provision Of Facilities / Services To Support Development And Secure Proper Planning Of The Area

  • Affordable housing and lifetime homes
  • Use controls e.g. removal of non-conforming use, ensuring balance of uses in a mixed-use development
  • Recreational open space
  • Play space
  • Sports facilities
  • Community and cultural facilities
  • Education and health facilities
  • Retail facilities
  • Childcare facilities

4. Enhancing The Built And Natural Environment

  • Archaeology e.g. retention / recording of important features
  • Restoration of Listed and Local List buildings
  • Nature conservation e.g. protection / enhancement of habitats
  • Public access within development
  • Public access to open space
  • Public art
  • Crime prevention measures e.g. CCTV, secure parking spaces

5. Maintenance

  • Commuted sums to cover maintenance costs for a limited period e.g. open space, recreational facilities, public transport
 
Page Footer Graphic
   
Page 43
Top of chapterReturn to contents
Policy IMR3:   Compulsory Purchase Orders (P1 – P14)
 
In appropriate circumstances the Council will use its Compulsory Purchase powers to enable development to proceed and / or secure the proper planning of the development and of the area.
 

 

3.2.8

Compulsory purchase powers are provided to allow authorities to compulsorily purchase land to carry out a function which Parliament has decided is in the public interest. Anyone who has land acquired is generally entitled to compensation. The greatest users of compulsory purchase powers are Local Authorities and the Highways Agency and the two most commonly used powers of compulsory purchase are:

 
  • A Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO) based on a specific Act of Parliament,
  • An Order under the Transport and Works Act 1992.
3.2.9

Wherever possible the Council will negotiate with landowners to assemble key development sites. However, where negotiations are unsuccessful, the Council will consider the use of CPO powers, to ensure that key development opportunities are realised in the City and otherwise allow appropriate development to proceed.

Top of chapterReturn to contents

3.4

Monitoring and Review

Policy IMR4: Monitoring and Review (P1 – P14)
 

The Council will monitor (i) land use development taking place within Wolverhampton and (ii) the effectiveness of the policies and proposals of the UDP. Regular monitoring reports will be published and will inform the review of policies and proposals in the UDP and preparation of Supplementary Planning Documents. Local people will be consulted on and actively involved in the continuing monitoring and review of the UDP and its replacement with the Local Development Framework.

 

 

3.3.1

The Council is required by law to keep under review all matters that are expected to affect the development of the City – in particular (a) the principal physical and economic characteristics (b) the size, composition and distribution of population, and (c) the communications, transport system and traffic. Also of importance are the rate of house-building activity, changes in floorspace of retail and business premises, the impact of development in the Green Belt and any loss or creation of open space. Much of this information is currently monitored on an annual basis to meet regional and national requirements. There is also a specific requirement for the Council to monitor the effectiveness of the policies and proposals of the UDP.

3.3.2

The Council supports the Government’s commitment to maintaining relevant and up to date development plans and will ensure that its Development Plan is kept up to date through a continuous process of monitoring and review which actively involves local people and is co-ordinated with the monitoring and review of the Community Plan. Both topic and area-based Supplementary Planning Guidance will also be reviewed on a regular basis and new Supplementary Planning Documents prepared to complement UDP policies and proposals.

3.3.3 In line with Government Policy, the Regional Spatial Strategy, the Community Plan and the requirements of Best Value, a comprehensive set of key indicators and targets have been selected to enable performance to be monitored over the UDP period. These are listed in Table 3.2. The Council will regularly monitor these indicators and publish them in an Annual Monitoring Report, together with any other indicators required by national guidance. These reports will also highlight any changes in the principal physical, social and economic characteristics of the City and other relevant monitoring information. Monitoring reports will be used to inform preparation of the new Local Development Framework and Supplementary Planning Documents.
 
Page Footer Graphic
   
Page 44
 
3.3.4

With the new planning legislation now in force, Plan policies and proposals will be reviewed more frequently. Instead of reviewing the whole Plan every ten years, as happened in the past, an up-date will take place at least once every three years. Some core elements of the Plan, such as Part I policies and Green Belt boundaries, may not need to change, whereas others, such as housing allocations, will need to be frequently reviewed. It will also become possible to supplement the Plan with new, area-based plans as and when necessary.

3.3.5

This more flexible system will allow the Plan to reflect changes in national, regional and local policy and changing local circumstances and trends more quickly and effectively. The next review of the Plan will need to take particular account of the requirements of new planning legislation and the contents of the West Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy.

3.3.6 The Council will also continue to work with other local authorities throughout the region to monitor and keep under review the provision of the West Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy.
 
Page Footer Graphic
   
Page 45
Top of chapterReturn to contents

Table 3.2   UDP Monitoring Indicators and Targets

1. Design

Indicator

Key policies

Monitoring

Baseline

Target (2011)

No. of new developments recognised for design quality and excellence

All Design Policies

Civic Trust Awards & Wolverhampton City Council Environmental Awards

4

Maintain at a constant level

Proportion of planning application design statements that have addressed crime prevention criteria

D2

Planning application monitoring

Not known

100% by end 2006

Proportion of public art schemes secured on qualifying developments

D14

Planning application monitoring

100%

100%

 
2. Environmental Protection

Indicator

Key Policies

Monitoring

Baseline

Target (2011)

Number of Air Quality Management Zones

EP3

Council air quality monitoring systems

0

0

Area of new development permitted in floodplains contrary to Environment Agency Advice

EP7

Planning application monitoring

0

0

% of household waste recycled or composted

EP13, EP14

Council Waste Management Strategy

6%

30%

 
3. Nature Conservation

Indicator

Key Policies

Monitoring

Baseline

Target (2011)

Hectares of Local Nature Reserve per 1,000 popn

N4

LNR management plans

0.2 ha

0.5 ha

Hectares of  land designated as SINC

N3, N5

Habitat survey once every 5 years

148 has

Maintain at 148 has and increase every 5 years

 
Page Footer Graphic
   
Page 46
 

4. Greenbelt and Rural Landscapes

Indicator

Key Policies

Monitoring

Baseline

Target (2011)

No. of developments which compromise the open nature of the green belt

G1, G2

Planning application monitoring

0

0

 

5. Business and Industry

Indicator

Key Policies

Monitoring

Baseline

Target (2011)

Amount of business and industrial development per annum (ha’s)

B1

Employment monitoring system

8ha pa (1986-02)

8ha pa

Providing a balanced portfolio of employment land as required by RPG

B2

Annual monitoring to Regional Employment Land Study (RELS)

Achieved

Achieved

 

6. Shopping and the Role of Centres

Indicator

Key Policies

Monitoring

Baseline

Target (2011)

% of new retail, office and leisure floorspace completed within or adjacent to defined centres.

SH1, SH2, SH3

Development monitoring system (completions)

42% retail within centres (1991 – 2001)

50%

% of new retail, office and leisure floorspace given permission within or adjacent to defined centres.

SH1, SH2, SH3

Planning application monitoring

Not known

90%

Number of multiple retail outlets in Wolverhampton City Centre

SH1, SH2, SH4

Development monitoring system (completions)

72 (1995)

Increase

 

7. Open Space. Sport and Recreation

Indicator

Key Policies

Monitoring

Baseline

Target (2011)

Number of Neighbourhood Park Areas meeting current recreational open space standard (ha’s per 1,000 residents)

R1, R2, R3, R7, R8, R9

Regular open space audits

22 out of 38

Maintain at 22 and increase

Number of Neighbourhood Parks

R2

Regular open space audits

35 out of 38

38 out of 38

Hectares of accessible playing fields and outdoor playing space per 1,000 residents

R2, R3, R5, R8

Regular open space audits

0.6 ha

Increase

to 0.8 ha and improve distribution

 
Page Footer Graphic
   
Page 47
 
8. Housing

Indicator

Key Policies

Monitoring

Baseline

Target (2011)

Total new build completions per annum

H2, H3, H4, H5

Housing monitoring system

437

(average 1991-2002)

680 per annum

Total conversion completions per annum (net)

H2, H3, H4, H7, H8, H10

Housing monitoring system

33

(average 1995-2002)

60 per annum

Affordable housing completions

H12, H13

Housing monitoring system

187 per annum

(average 1991-2002)

180 per annum

Proportion of completions on previously-developed land / buildings

H1, H3

Housing monitoring system

87%

(1996–2002)

99%

Average net density of new housing developments (> 5 dwellings, excluding conversions)

H10

Housing monitoring system

33 dwellings / hectare

(1996-2001)

Minimum 40 dwellings / hectare

 

9. Access and Mobility

Indicator

Key Policies

Monitoring

Baseline

Target (2011)

% of developments meeting car park standards

AM12

Planning application monitoring

Not known

100%

Publicly available long-stay car parking spaces in the City and Town Centres

CC5

Annual monitoring as part of Local Transport Plan

100%

Reduce by average of 3% per annum

Share of trips undertaken by public transport

AM8

Annual monitoring as part of Local Transport Plan

1998: to be determined

Maintain at 1998 levels

Number of journeys made by bus per annum

AM8

Annual monitoring as part of Local Transport Plan

1998: to be determined

Increase from 1998 baseline by 5% per annum

Proportion of West Midlands employees working for companies with a travel plan

AM7

Annual monitoring as part Regional Transport Plan

1998: to be determined

40% by 2006

   
Page Footer Graphic
Top of chapterReturn to contents