 |
|
|
CHAPTER 3: Implementation, Monitoring and Review
|
| Page 39 |
| |
|
|
| |
 |
| |
|
| Page 40 |
|
|
3.1
|
Introduction
|
| |
3.1.1This Chapter sets out the how the Council will implement the Plan,
how the effectiveness of the Plan will be monitored and how the Plan will
be kept up-to-date.
|
|
|
3.2
|
Implementation
|
| Policy IMR1: Implementation
(P1 – P14) |
| |
|
The Council will exert influence to achieve the objectives
of the UDP in the following ways:
|
- Through its statutory role as Local Planning Authority,
monitoring and reviewing the Plan, preparing Supplementary
Planning Documents, determining planning applications and
seeking planning obligations;
- By promoting development opportunities and proactively
bringing sites forward e.g. through the use of action plans,
development briefs and compulsory purchase orders;
- By taking direct action under its own capital
and revenue spending programmes and by accessing external
funding;
- By co-ordinating and enabling action largely undertaken
by others, through various forms of partnership, grants
and other types of assistance;
- Through advocacy and lobbying of Central Government
and other agencies for appropriate policies, resources and
action.
|
|
|
| |
|
| 3.2.1 |
The UDP provides a statutory framework for the way in which land is used
and development takes place in the City. It has been prepared on the basis
of consultations with an extensive range of organisations and individuals
and reflects widely held aspirations for the future of Wolverhampton.
The main way that the Council can directly implement the objectives of
the Plan is through its role as Local Planning Authority, responsible
for determining planning applications and preparing Supplementary Planning
Documents, both topic and area-based. The Council has also prepared a
statement of protocol and procedures which provides guidance on the process
used in the determination of planning applications.
|
| 3.2.2 |
However, what actually happens on the ground is also the outcome of a
multiplicity of day to day decisions by a large number of public and voluntary
sector agencies, private companies and individuals. All of these have
their own distinctive objectives and all are in various ways constrained
by the resources at their disposal. Therefore, if the policies and proposals
of the UDP are to be achieved, a close partnership must be maintained
between the Council and other bodies, with the Council providing a co-ordinating
and enabling role.
|
| 3.2.3 |
The Council will continue to ensure that financial resources are directed
towards the achievement of UDP objectives. The UDP will be an important
consideration for the Council when it prepares its annual Capital Programme.
In particular, the Plan will provide the basis for determining priorities
for environmental and conservation programmes and the long-term context
for the Council’s input to the West Midlands Local Transport Plan.
Other Council capital programmes of relevance are the Housing Capital
Programme, the Economic Development Programme and Parks and Recreation
budgets.
|
| 3.2.4 |
The Council will maximise use of external funding to meet
UDP objectives. Significant sources of external funding include New Deal
for Communities, European funding sources and grants from bodies such as
the Countryside Commission, English Nature and English Heritage. Advantage
West Midlands (the Regional Development Agency) will be an important partner
in the mobilisation of such resources. The North Black Country and South
Staffordshire Regeneration Zone will provide a focus for regeneration funding
from a range of sources including AWM and Europe. |
| |
 |
| |
|
| Page 41 |
| |
| 3.2.5 |
Public sector resources are likely to continue to be scarce and so implementation
will depend to a great extent on the private sector. Much of the underlying
philosophy of the UDP is to provide the right circumstances to attract
private sector investment of the right kind to the right places. Scarce
public sector resources will, where necessary, be targeted to encourage
further investment by the private sector.
|
|
|
| Policy IMR2: Planning
Obligations and Agreements (P1 – P14) |
| |
|
In appropriate circumstances planning obligations
will be negotiated with developers to enable development to
proceed and / or secure the proper planning of the development
and of the area.
|
|
In determining the nature and scale of benefits regard
will be had to the following:
|
- Government Guidance;
- The Community Plan and other relevant Council
Strategies;
- The Unitary Development Plan;
- The Local Transport Plan;
- Relevant local action plans, development briefs
and other Supplementary Planning Documents;
- The views of the developer and occupier(s);
- The views of the community;
- The type and location of the development; and
- The economic viability of the scheme and any exceptional
costs associated with the development e.g. reclamation costs
or costs of conversion of an existing building.
|
|
|
| |
|
| 3.2.6 |
To assist in the implementation process, there are occasions in the consideration
of planning applications when there is a need to seek agreements with
developers for measures that cannot be achieved through conditions attached
to a planning permission. Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning
Act 1990 (as amended) enables local authorities to reach agreements with
developers, or for developers to give undertakings, for such measures
to be carried out in association with a development. Such obligations
can enhance the quality of development and enable proposals to go ahead
which might otherwise be refused planning permission. Government guidance
in Circular 5/05 Planning Obligations advises that any obligations should
be necessary, relevant to planning, directly related to the proposed development,
fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the proposed development
and reasonable in all other respects.
|
| 3.2.7 |
Obligations may be sought, for example, where a development will generate
need for improved or additional infrastructure, facilities or services,
or where measures are needed to offset the negative impact of a development
on the environment or local amenity. Table 3.1 lists examples of planning
obligations that may be sought. Reference to the use of planning obligations
in specific circumstances is made in other chapters of the Plan. A development
may be required to fund a number of related measures, which may be located
on-site or nearby. In some cases, a number of developers may be asked
to contribute jointly to an improved facility that will be of benefit
to all of them and the wider community.
|
| |
 |
| |
|
| Page 42 |
|
|
Table 3.1 Examples of Planning Obligations Which May Be Sought
|
|
Type of Measure / Obligation
|
Examples
|
|
1. Transport / Physical Infrastructure
|
- Green Transport Plans
- Public transport e.g. park and ride, bus service improvements
- Cycle and pedestrian facilities
- Highways e.g. improvements to road network and site access
- Improvements to public parking
- Access for people with disabilities e.g. shopmobility
- Land reclamation
|
|
2. Measures To Offset Impacts On The Built And Natural Environment
/ Local Amenity
|
- Physical measures to minimise harm to amenity e.g. traffic management,
landscaping, noise insulation
- Replacement / alternative provision (on-site or nearby) of recreation
/ environmental facilities e.g. recreational open space, playing
field, wildlife habitat
- Replacement / alternative provision (on-site or nearby) of social
and economic facilities e.g. training scheme, community centre
|
|
3. Provision Of Facilities / Services To Support Development And
Secure Proper Planning Of The Area
|
- Affordable housing and lifetime homes
- Use controls e.g. removal of non-conforming use, ensuring balance
of uses in a mixed-use development
- Recreational open space
- Play space
- Sports facilities
- Community and cultural facilities
- Education and health facilities
- Retail facilities
- Childcare facilities
|
|
4. Enhancing The Built And Natural Environment
|
- Archaeology e.g. retention / recording of important features
- Restoration of Listed and Local List buildings
- Nature conservation e.g. protection / enhancement of habitats
- Public access within development
- Public access to open space
- Public art
- Crime prevention measures e.g. CCTV, secure parking spaces
|
|
5. Maintenance
|
- Commuted sums to cover maintenance costs for a limited period
e.g. open space, recreational facilities, public transport
|
|
| |
 |
| |
|
| Page 43 |
|
|
| Policy IMR3:
Compulsory Purchase Orders (P1 – P14) |
| |
| In appropriate circumstances
the Council will use its Compulsory Purchase powers to enable
development to proceed and / or secure the proper planning of
the development and of the area. |
 |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| 3.2.8 |
Compulsory purchase powers are provided to allow authorities to compulsorily
purchase land to carry out a function which Parliament has decided is
in the public interest. Anyone who has land acquired is generally entitled
to compensation. The greatest users of compulsory purchase powers are
Local Authorities and the Highways Agency and the two most commonly used
powers of compulsory purchase are:
|
| |
- A Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO) based on a specific Act of Parliament,
- An Order under the Transport and Works Act 1992.
|
| 3.2.9 |
Wherever possible the Council will negotiate with landowners to assemble
key development sites. However, where negotiations are unsuccessful, the
Council will consider the use of CPO powers, to ensure that key development
opportunities are realised in the City and otherwise allow appropriate
development to proceed.
|
|
|
3.4
|
Monitoring and Review
|
| Policy IMR4: Monitoring
and Review (P1 – P14) |
| |
|
The Council will monitor (i) land use development
taking place within Wolverhampton and (ii) the effectiveness
of the policies and proposals of the UDP. Regular monitoring
reports will be published and will inform the review of policies
and proposals in the UDP and preparation of Supplementary
Planning Documents. Local people will be consulted on and
actively involved in the continuing monitoring and review
of the UDP and its replacement with the Local Development
Framework.
|
|
|
| |
|
| 3.3.1 |
The Council is required by law to keep under review all matters that
are expected to affect the development of the City – in particular
(a) the principal physical and economic characteristics (b) the size,
composition and distribution of population, and (c) the communications,
transport system and traffic. Also of importance are the rate of house-building
activity, changes in floorspace of retail and business premises, the impact
of development in the Green Belt and any loss or creation of open space.
Much of this information is currently monitored on an annual basis to
meet regional and national requirements. There is also a specific requirement
for the Council to monitor the effectiveness of the policies and proposals
of the UDP.
|
| 3.3.2 |
The Council supports the Government’s commitment to maintaining
relevant and up to date development plans and will ensure that its Development
Plan is kept up to date through a continuous process of monitoring and
review which actively involves local people and is co-ordinated with the
monitoring and review of the Community Plan. Both topic and area-based
Supplementary Planning Guidance will also be reviewed on a regular basis
and new Supplementary Planning Documents prepared to complement UDP policies
and proposals.
|
| 3.3.3 |
In line with Government Policy, the Regional Spatial Strategy,
the Community Plan and the requirements of Best Value, a comprehensive set
of key indicators and targets have been selected to enable performance to
be monitored over the UDP period. These are listed in Table 3.2. The Council
will regularly monitor these indicators and publish them in an Annual Monitoring
Report, together with any other indicators required by national guidance.
These reports will also highlight any changes in the principal physical,
social and economic characteristics of the City and other relevant monitoring
information. Monitoring reports will be used to inform preparation of the
new Local Development Framework and Supplementary Planning Documents. |
| |
 |
| |
|
| Page 44 |
| |
| 3.3.4 |
With the new planning legislation now in force, Plan policies and proposals
will be reviewed more frequently. Instead of reviewing the whole Plan
every ten years, as happened in the past, an up-date will take place at
least once every three years. Some core elements of the Plan, such as
Part I policies and Green Belt boundaries, may not need to change, whereas
others, such as housing allocations, will need to be frequently reviewed.
It will also become possible to supplement the Plan with new, area-based
plans as and when necessary.
|
| 3.3.5 |
This more flexible system will allow the Plan to reflect changes in national,
regional and local policy and changing local circumstances and trends
more quickly and effectively. The next review of the Plan will need to
take particular account of the requirements of new planning legislation
and the contents of the West Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy.
|
| 3.3.6 |
The Council will also continue to work with other local authorities
throughout the region to monitor and keep under review the provision of
the West Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy. |
| |
 |
| |
|
| Page 45 |
|
|
Table 3.2 UDP Monitoring Indicators and Targets
|
| 1. Design |
|
Indicator
|
Key policies
|
Monitoring
|
Baseline
|
Target (2011)
|
|
No. of new developments recognised for design quality and excellence
|
All Design Policies
|
Civic Trust Awards & Wolverhampton City Council Environmental
Awards
|
4
|
Maintain at a constant level
|
|
Proportion of planning application design statements that have
addressed crime prevention criteria
|
D2
|
Planning application monitoring
|
Not known
|
100% by end 2006
|
|
Proportion of public art schemes secured on qualifying developments
|
D14
|
Planning application monitoring
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
| |
| 2. Environmental Protection |
|
Indicator
|
Key Policies
|
Monitoring
|
Baseline
|
Target (2011)
|
|
Number of Air Quality Management Zones
|
EP3
|
Council air quality monitoring systems
|
0
|
0
|
|
Area of new development permitted in floodplains contrary to Environment
Agency Advice
|
EP7
|
Planning application monitoring
|
0
|
0
|
|
% of household waste recycled or composted
|
EP13, EP14
|
Council Waste Management Strategy
|
6%
|
30%
|
|
| |
| 3. Nature Conservation |
|
Indicator
|
Key Policies
|
Monitoring
|
Baseline
|
Target (2011)
|
|
Hectares of Local Nature Reserve per 1,000 popn
|
N4
|
LNR management plans
|
0.2 ha
|
0.5 ha
|
|
Hectares of land designated as SINC
|
N3, N5
|
Habitat survey once every 5 years
|
148 has
|
Maintain at 148 has and increase every 5 years
|
|
| |
 |
| |
|
| Page 46 |
| |
|
4. Greenbelt and Rural Landscapes
|
|
Indicator
|
Key Policies
|
Monitoring
|
Baseline
|
Target (2011)
|
|
No. of developments which compromise the open nature of the green
belt
|
G1, G2
|
Planning application monitoring
|
0
|
0
|
|
| |
|
5. Business and Industry
|
|
Indicator
|
Key Policies
|
Monitoring
|
Baseline
|
Target (2011)
|
|
Amount of business and industrial development per annum (ha’s)
|
B1
|
Employment monitoring system
|
8ha pa (1986-02)
|
8ha pa
|
|
Providing a balanced portfolio of employment land as required by
RPG
|
B2
|
Annual monitoring to Regional Employment Land Study (RELS)
|
Achieved
|
Achieved
|
|
| |
|
6. Shopping and the Role of Centres
|
|
Indicator
|
Key Policies
|
Monitoring
|
Baseline
|
Target (2011)
|
|
% of new retail, office and leisure floorspace completed within
or adjacent to defined centres.
|
SH1, SH2, SH3
|
Development monitoring system (completions)
|
42% retail within centres (1991 – 2001)
|
50%
|
|
% of new retail, office and leisure floorspace given permission
within or adjacent to defined centres.
|
SH1, SH2, SH3
|
Planning application monitoring
|
Not known
|
90%
|
|
Number of multiple retail outlets in Wolverhampton City Centre
|
SH1, SH2, SH4
|
Development monitoring system (completions)
|
72 (1995)
|
Increase
|
|
| |
|
7. Open Space. Sport and Recreation
|
|
Indicator
|
Key Policies
|
Monitoring
|
Baseline
|
Target (2011)
|
|
Number of Neighbourhood Park Areas meeting current recreational
open space standard (ha’s per 1,000 residents)
|
R1, R2, R3, R7, R8, R9
|
Regular open space audits
|
22 out of 38
|
Maintain at 22 and increase
|
|
Number of Neighbourhood Parks
|
R2
|
Regular open space audits
|
35 out of 38
|
38 out of 38
|
|
Hectares of accessible playing fields and outdoor playing space
per 1,000 residents
|
R2, R3, R5, R8
|
Regular open space audits
|
0.6 ha
|
Increase
to 0.8 ha and improve distribution
|
|
| |
 |
| |
|
| Page 47 |
| |
| 8. Housing |
|
Indicator
|
Key Policies
|
Monitoring
|
Baseline
|
Target (2011)
|
|
Total new build completions per annum
|
H2, H3, H4, H5
|
Housing monitoring system
|
437
(average 1991-2002)
|
680 per annum
|
|
Total conversion completions per annum (net)
|
H2, H3, H4, H7, H8, H10
|
Housing monitoring system
|
33
(average 1995-2002)
|
60 per annum
|
|
Affordable housing completions
|
H12, H13
|
Housing monitoring system
|
187 per annum
(average 1991-2002)
|
180 per annum
|
|
Proportion of completions on previously-developed land / buildings
|
H1, H3
|
Housing monitoring system
|
87%
(1996–2002)
|
99%
|
|
Average net density of new housing developments (> 5 dwellings,
excluding conversions)
|
H10
|
Housing monitoring system
|
33 dwellings / hectare
(1996-2001)
|
Minimum 40 dwellings / hectare
|
|
| |
|
9. Access and Mobility
|
|
Indicator
|
Key Policies
|
Monitoring
|
Baseline
|
Target (2011)
|
|
% of developments meeting car park standards
|
AM12
|
Planning application monitoring
|
Not known
|
100%
|
|
Publicly available long-stay car parking spaces in the City and
Town Centres
|
CC5
|
Annual monitoring as part of Local Transport Plan
|
100%
|
Reduce by average of 3% per annum
|
|
Share of trips undertaken by public transport
|
AM8
|
Annual monitoring as part of Local Transport Plan
|
1998: to be determined
|
Maintain at 1998 levels
|
|
Number of journeys made by bus per annum
|
AM8
|
Annual monitoring as part of Local Transport Plan
|
1998: to be determined
|
Increase from 1998 baseline by 5% per annum
|
|
Proportion of West Midlands employees working for companies with
a travel plan
|
AM7
|
Annual monitoring as part Regional Transport Plan
|
1998: to be determined
|
40% by 2006
|
|
| |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|