 |
|
|
| |
|
| Chapter 13 |
| Community Services |
| |
|
| |
Context |
| 13.1 |
The Council is committed to promoting
the provision of a full range of community facilities and services
to meet the needs arising from future development in the District.
It seeks to ensure that this provision keeps pace with new development
and that infrastructure and services are in place at the same time
as the development that requires them. This is particularly important
in view of the scale of new housing growth that Wealden is required
to accommodate over the Plan period. The public concerns over this
issue are recognised and will be addressed as fully as possible. |
| 13.2 |
The need to provide the necessary infrastructure
and services for new development is set out in Policies S2 and S3
of the Structure Plan. These policies state that infrastructure agencies
and service providers should plan their longer-term investment programmes
in accordance with the development strategy of the Structure Plan,
and enable local planning authorities to refuse permission for development
proposals where the necessary infrastructure is not available or the
development would overload existing provision. |
| 13.3 |
With the exception of recycling facilities,
the Council is not directly responsible for the provision of public
infrastructure and services. The policies of this Chapter therefore
largely relate to the delivery of services by the County Council or
the statutory utility providers, who now tend to be privately rather
than publicly owned. All the infrastructure agencies and service providers
were consulted during the preparation of this Plan, and the Council
will continue to liaise closely with them to ensure that service provision
and development is properly co-ordinated. |
| 13.4 |
Specific policies relating to open space,
playing fields and other recreation facilities are dealt with in the
Leisure and Recreation Chapter. Roads, footpaths, cycleways and public
transport provision are addressed in the Transport Chapter. Affordable
housing requirements are the subject of policy guidance set out in
the Housing Chapter. Village shops and public houses, which are also
recognised as providing a valuable community service, are dealt with
in the Shopping Chapter. |
| 13.5 |
The Council has also published draft supplementary
planning guidance setting out in more detail its requirements for
the provision of affordable housing and in respect of the provision
of leisure and recreation facilities. It is intended that this SPG
will ultimately be incorporated into the emerging Local Development
Framework. The standard of infrastructure provision that may be expected
for County Council services in association with new development is
also subject of supplementary planning guidance (A New Approach to
Developer Contributions) which has been prepared by the County Council,
in consultation with the District Councils. |
| 13.6 |
The importance attached to the provision
of community services by the public has been shown in their response
to consultations on the Community Strategy. Whilst some community
and leisure facilities were felt to have improved, a number of areas
remain of key importance including the provision of local healthcare
services, good schools and crime prevention. |
| |
Strategy |
| 13.7 |
The Plan's objectives for the provision
of infrastructure, services and community facilities required by new
development are: |
| |
(1) |
to ensure that all new development makes
adequate provision for the physical and community infrastructure required
as a direct result of that development; |
| |
(2) |
to ensure that new development does not
adversely affect the level and quality of service provision enjoyed
by existing residents; |
| |
(3) |
to protect people from risks to their
health and safety; |
| |
(4) |
to assist the relevant service providers
to assess and develop their own co-ordinated programmes to meet the
requirements arising from future developments; |
| |
(5) |
to avoid any delays or other inadequacies
in the availability of community services; |
| |
(6) |
to safeguard the land drainage system and
minimise the risk of flooding; |
| |
(7) |
to promote recycling and encourage the
provision of recycling facilities. |
| |
General Infrastructure
Provision |
| 13.8 |
Infrastructure may be defined as the capital
works and facilities needed to support new development. The Local
Plan aims to ensure that development makes the maximum use of existing
infrastructure, taking advantage of spare capacity wherever possible.
However, where existing infrastructure is inadequate or not available,
development will not be permitted unless the infrastructure required
to service it can be made available at the appropriate time. |
| 13.9 |
For the purposes of the policies in the
Local Plan, in addition to the requirements for affordable housing
(see Policy HG4 in the Housing Chapter), infrastructure includes:- |
| |
|
Water supply
Sewage disposal
Flood prevention
Surface water drainage
Highways and transport facilities
Public open space, including play space
Education facilities
Libraries
Police, fire and rescue services
Health and social care facilities
Community buildings and facilities
Leisure facilities
Civic amenity sites
Recycling facilities
Town Centre improvements |
| 13.10 |
The Council seeks to ensure that any additional
requirements for infrastructure directly resulting from new development
are provided for or financed by the developer. Infrastructure will
normally be provided on or off site as integral part of the development.
Alternatively, it may be secured by means of financial contributions
paid by the developer to the appropriate service provider, who will
then be responsible for provision. |
| 13.11 |
The Council may require infrastructure
and services to be in place before the development commences or, alternatively,
the phasing of the development with the provision of infrastructure
and services. This requirement will be met either by the imposition
of appropriate planning conditions or by means of obligations contained
in legal agreements entered into by the applicant. |
|
|
| |
| Policy CS1 |
| Development will only
be permitted when it can be demonstrated that the necessary
infrastructure to meet the needs arising directly from the development
concerned is either available or will be provided at the appropriate
time. |
| Where appropriate,
planning conditions may be imposed or a legal agreement sought
in order to:- |
| (1) |
require the development
to be phased with the provision of programmed infrastructure;
and/or |
| (2) |
secure the direct
provision, or an appropriate contribution towards, the necessary
infrastructure. |
| Where a large site
is comprised of separate ownerships, or is sub-divided between
different developers, the requirements for infrastructure provision
will be assessed on the basis of the whole site. Where appropriate,
legal agreements will be sought to ensure the proper distribution
and phasing of infrastructure in relation to the whole site. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 13.12 |
The community infrastructure and facilities
necessary for a particular development will largely depend upon the
scale and nature of that development. Wherever possible, the Local
Plan sets out the likely infrastructure requirements associated with
specific development proposals. It also contains separate policies
for the provision of different types of essential infrastructure,
as follows: |
| |
(a) flood prevention measures (Policy CS3
- 4)
(b) surface water drainage (Policy CS5)
(c) affordable housing (Policy HG4)
(d) access/transport measures (Policy TR2)
(e) public open space (Policy LR2)
(f) recycling facilities (Policies CS6 - CS7) |
| |
Education |
| 13.13 |
The County Council, as the local education
authority, is responsible for the assessment and delivery of education
services in Wealden. It has advised that the increase in population
arising from proposed housing developments in the District will require
the provision of additional or improved secondary school facilities
at Hailsham Community College, Uckfield Community College and Willingdon
Community School. The increased population will also lead to a growth
in demand for primary school places, which cannot be fully met through
the existing school provision. |
| 13.14 |
The County Council is not in a position
to find all the necessary education infrastructure required as a direct
consequence of the new housing development proposed in the District.
Hence, where there is a deficiency of educational facilities or establishments,
or where existing facilities or establishments are at capacity, developer
contributions will be sought to provide for the need for additional
school places generated by new residential development. This approach
will apply to developments of a scale where the impact on school provision
is clearly measurable. |
| 13.15 |
Sites are allocated for new primary schools
at Hellingly Hospital or Ingrams Way, Hailsham, Frant and Polegate,
and for an extension of the existing primary school in East Hoathly,
as detailed in the Town and Village Chapters. The expansion of Harlands
Primary School, Uckfield, and either Buxted Primary School or Bonners
Primary School in Maresfield will also be required. These schools
are capable of expanding within their existing sites and consequently
specific allocations need not be made in the Plan. |
| 13.16 |
In addition, the Education Authority advise
that there may be a need for a new Church aided primary school and
a new secondary school to serve the wider Eastbourne area including
Polegate, Willingdon and Stone Cross, the latter for the period beyond
2010-11. The need for these schools and suitable sites will be assessed
as part of work on the Local Development Framework. |
| 13.17 |
Schools and other educational establishments
can make a valuable contribution to the availability of community
and recreational facilities in the District. The Council supports
the principle of the dual use of educational facilities and will seek
to ensure that, wherever possible, educational providers take account
of the potential for community use in the design of new facilities.
This approach will be taken in the case of both the proposed new primary
schools and proposals for the adaptation and extension of existing
facilities. |
| |
Libraries |
| 13.18 |
The County Council is the statutory provider
of library services within Wealden. It has advised that the increase
in population arising from the proposed new housing development in
Hailsham and Crowborough will place additional demands on the existing
inadequate library facilities in both towns. It has prioritised the
provision of new library premises in Hailsham, but is not yet in a
position to identify a site which could be allocated for such use.
In areas where library facilities are deficient, or where existing
facilities are at capacity, new residential development will be expected
to make provision for the demand for additional library facilities
that it will generate, commensurate with the scale of the development.
|
| |
Health Services |
| 13.19 |
Three NHS Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) are
responsible for planning and securing the provision of health services
in the District: the Sussex Downs and Weald PCT, the Eastbourne Downs
PCT, and the Bexhill and Rother PCT. Local hospital services are provided
by separate NHS Trusts. In October 2002, a new Strategic Health Authority
was established (Surrey and Sussex Strategic Health Authority) to
lead the strategic development of health services across the wider
area. |
| 13.20 |
Hospital care for residents in the north
of the District is met by facilities in Tunbridge Wells, and also
by the Crowborough War Memorial Hospital and Uckfield Community Hospital.
The Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust has outline planning permission
for a new District General Hospital at Pembury to serve Tunbridge
Wells and the surrounding area, including north Wealden. |
| 13.21 |
Residents in the southern parts of Wealden
are served by hospitals in Eastbourne. The East Sussex Hospitals NHS
Trust advises that hospital services will require significant investment
to meet the needs arising from the growth in population over the Plan
period. |
| 13.22 |
The Primary Care Trusts anticipate that
there will be a need for new and expanded doctors' surgeries within
the District over the Plan period, in order to both meet increased
patient demand from the new housing development and to achieve a qualitative
improvement to existing services. Doctors' surgeries are an essential
community service and it is important that new surgeries are located
within existing settlements, in close proximity to the population
they are intended to serve. |
| 13.23 |
The Sussex Downs and Weald NHS PCT has
identified as a priority the need to relocate the existing surgery
in East Hoathly to new, purpose-built premises and the Local Plan
makes provision for a site in association with the housing allocation
at South Street (Policy V4). The Trust also advises that the Mead
GP Practice in Uckfield is seeking new premises when its lease expires
in 2004. Otherwise, it is anticipated that health care facilities
in the north of the District are capable of accommodating the necessary
expansion of GP practices to meet increased demand to 2011. |
| 13.24 |
In the south of the District, the Eastbourne
Downs NHS Primary Care Trust has advised that the scale of new development
proposed at Hailsham and at Polegate would necessitate additional
health facilities to be provided. The Plan therefore makes provision
for new purpose-built health centres to be provided on land to the
east of Battle Road, Hailsham (Policy HA12) and within the housing
allocation west of the A22 at Polegate (Policy PW1). These surgeries
will provide accommodation for doctors, district nurses and health
visitors. |
| 13.25 |
Medical practitioners, including doctors,
dentists and therapists, are frequently located within converted residential
dwellings. The Council considers it important that local communities
are adequately provided with such services and proposals for a change
of use from residential to medical use may be acceptable where there
is no conflict with the relevant policies of the Local Plan. Subject
to the policies in the Shopping Chapter, medical uses may also be
appropriately located within town centres. |
| |
Burial Grounds |
| 13.26 |
In the south of the District, there is
a concern at Polegate and Willingdon about the availability of burial
space in local cemeteries. Eastbourne Borough Council is seeking land
for burials for the period post 2015, possibly including sites outside
its own Borough. A combined study with Eastbourne Borough Council
may therefore be appropriate during the Plan period to identify potentially
suitable locations. |
| |
Town Centre Improvements |
| 13.27 |
The Council will continue to work with
the respective Town Councils and Town Partnerships to further revitalise
the town centres by improving their attractiveness through traffic
management and environmental improvements. Developer contributions
may be sought towards the cost of such measures. |
| |
Social Services |
| 13.28 |
The County Council works with other agencies
to provide personal and community services to help individuals or
groups in need. This includes the provision of day centres for the
elderly, family resource centres, respite care units, etc. Whilst
it is preferable for such facilities to be located within or easily
accessible to the communities they serve, the County Council is currently
unable to identify specific local deficiencies or the level of need
likely to arise from the proposed housing allocations in the District.
Future proposals will therefore be considered on a site by site basis. |
| |
Emergency Services |
| 13.29 |
Sussex Police, East Sussex Fire Brigade
and Sussex Ambulance Service have not advised the Council of any intentions
to relocate their services within the District. Adequate access for
fire fighting vehicles and equipment must be available in all developments
and, in the case of large developments, may require additional works
on or off site. Developer contributions may be sought towards the
cost of the provision of adequate fire hydrants or other measures
that may be necessary to ensure adequate supplies of water for fire
fighting purposes. |
| |
Utilities |
| 13.30 |
Developers and property owners should
contact the respective utility service providers at an early stage
regarding water and power supplies, surface water drainage, sewerage
and telephones. This will help to ascertain particular site requirements
and costs where appropriate. Generally, there are no significant constraints
on the provision of gas, electricity or telephones. Issues relating
to water supply, foul drainage, and surface water drainage are addressed
below. |
| |
Water Supply |
| 13.31 |
South East Water is responsible for the
supply of water in Wealden. They have confirmed that significant steps
have been taken to improve their management of infrastructure and
resources to supply the area over the Plan period and having regard
to meeting the future demand arising from development identified in
this Plan. These include an ongoing mains rehabilitation and renewal
programme to improve infrastructure capacity and water quality, and
engineering schemes to increase resources available in the area such
as the Bewl-Darwell transfer scheme which will increase water resources
available in and around the Eastbourne, Hailsham and Polegate areas
and will allow existing water resources to be channelled into other
areas where future demand is predicted to rise. Developers are nevertheless
advised to contact the relevant water company at an early stage in
order to ensure that an adequate water supply can be provided to individual
sites. Developers will be required to contribute to the off-site costs
of supplying new development. |
|
|
| |
| Policy CS2 |
| New development will
only be permitted where adequate water resources are available
and where it would not present an unacceptable risk to such
resources. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Foul Drainage |
| 13.32 |
Southern Water Services is the statutory
sewerage undertaker for the District. In addition, the Environment
Agency has powers with regard to wastewater treatment. It is the Council's
policy that foul sewerage from all new development should be connected
to the public sewerage system. In accordance with DETR Circular 03/99,
other options (e.g. private sewage treatments, septic tanks, cesspits
or other more sustainable forms of sewage treatment) will only be
considered if it can be clearly demonstrated by the developer that
disposal to the public foul sewer is not feasible, taking into account
cost and/or practicability. |
| 13.33 |
In general, where new wastewater treatment
infrastructure is required by new developments that accord with the
Local Plan, this will be planned for and provided by Southern Water
Services. Where it is not physically possible to provide additional
capacity as soon as developers might wish, the Council may restrict
the occupancy of new development. In the case of large new developments,
it is essential that a technical consultation is carried out with
Southern Water Services to enable a full assessment to be made for
the provision of additional process plant and works capacity if required. |
| 13.34 |
Where public sewers or sewer capacity
is not available to serve new development sites, developers will be
expected to requisition or otherwise fund new sewers either to connect
to the sewerage system or connect to a point in the system where capacity
exists. The sewer requisition procedures are set out in the Water
Industry Act 1991. This requirement will depend upon individual circumstances
and developers are advised to consult Southern Water Services at an
early stage. |
| 13.35 |
Foul sewerage arrangements should be agreed
in principle prior to the grant of planning consent and put in place
prior to occupation of the development. New sewers should be constructed
to the adoption standards of Southern Water Services. Proposals for
the long-term maintenance of unadopted foul drainage systems should
be included in any scheme submitted. |
| |
Flood Risk |
| 13.36 |
Unless new development is carefully sited
and designed, it could itself be at risk from flooding, or could increase
the risk of flooding elsewhere. Such flooding can cause substantial
damage to property and threaten human life. Flood risk can be increased
as a result of development (including land raising) within a floodplain;
development which jeopardises the integrity of or the ability to maintain
and improve a flood defence or drainage system; and increased rates
of surface water run-off. |
| 13.37 |
In recent years a number of areas within
the District have been subject to severe flooding. These include the
river valleys of the Uck, Cuckmere and Medway, and low-lying areas
such as the Willingdon Levels. There are also extensive low-lying
areas of land adjacent to the coast, particularly the Pevensey Levels,
which are at risk from tidal flooding in the event of a breach or
overtopping of the sea defences. The Environment Agency has awarded
a 25 year contract to import large amounts of shingle to bolster the
defences in order to reduce the level of risk. |
| 13.38 |
Since the severe flooding experienced
in October 2000, the Council has been working closely with the Environment
Agency, Southern Water, the County Council, Lewes District Council
and the relevant town and parish councils to identify schemes that
can reduce the risk of flooding in the River Ouse catchment and in
particular Uckfield. |
| 13.39 |
Towards the end of 2002 the Environment
Agency's (EA) Sussex Ouse Flood Management Strategy was submitted
to the Department of the Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)
for its technical approval and to seek grant aid. The recommended
strategy included the following elements that are relevant to Wealden
District: |
| |
- Improvement of the hydraulic performance of the High Street
bridge in Uckfield to the maximum extent that is economically
justifiable, with the aim of halving the incidence of flooding
of the High Street;
- Implement cost effective schemes that improve flood management
locally, provided that they do not interfere with the proper function
of the floodplain;
- Encouragement of the planning authority to identify and support
opportunities in the short and medium term for reinstatement of
a functioning floodplain through Uckfield to achieve the standards
of flood protection recommended by PPG25;
- Continued management of the river, structures and flood plain
to ensure that they progressively provide a sustainable drainage
system without adverse impacts on riverside property and interests
and having due regard for environmental enhancement; and
- Maintain an effective flood warning system for all flood prone
parts of Uckfield.
|
| 13.40 |
DEFRA requested that the EA carry out
further work and approved funding for the EA to produce a physical
model of Uckfield Town Centre, representing the channel of the River
Uck. |
| 13.41 |
The EA has used the model to investigate
a number of potential measures that could improve the hydraulic capacity
of the system, whilst not increasing flood risk elsewhere. These included
the impact of new floodwalls within the town centre; relocating the
sewer pipe and other services that cross the channel; increasing the
flow capacity through the Mill and the High Street Bridge and enlarging
the existing channel and improved vegetation clearance. |
| 13.42 |
The results of the modelling are now being
used by the EA to develop potential schemes. These will be the subject
of a Project Appraisal Report in accordance with DEFRA guidelines
which will assess the economic, technical and environmental viability
of the schemes. |
| 13.43 |
A revised strategy, renamed as the Sussex
Ouse Flood Management Strategy is presently being considered by DEFRA
and its publication is anticipated towards the end of 2004 once DEFRA's
response to the strategy is known. |
| 13.44 |
The Council has set aside funding to contribute
towards suitable flood defence works that are identified by the Environment
Agency. |
| 13.45 |
Over the next 50 years it is predicted
that peak fluvial flows could increase by up to 20%. In addition sea
levels are predicted to rise in the region of 6mm/year due to climate
change and the secular effect (lower land levels due to the south-east
of England sinking). These predicted effects of climate change are
likely to increase the risk of flooding. |
| 13.46 |
Because the potential damage from flooding
is both uncertain and unpredictable, the Government in PPG25, Development
and Flood Risk, advises that the planning system should manage development
and flood risk based on the precautionary principle. In July 2004,
a DEFRA consultation exercise (Making Space for Water - Developing
a new Government Strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management
in England) reiterated this approach pending the proposed revision
of PPG25 in 2005. In the context of flood risk, PPG25 advises that
the onus is placed on the applicant to demonstrate to the satisfaction
of the District Council that development is good enough to approve
rather than not causing demonstrable harm. |
| 13.47 |
Policies CS3 - CS5 seek to ensure that
development does not take place in locations or in such a manner that
could cause new flooding problems or contribute to existing problems.
The Council will resist development within areas at high risk from
flooding unless appropriate alleviation or mitigation measures can
be incorporated to ensure that the development itself is not at risk
from flooding and that it will not increase the risk of flooding elsewhere.
|
| 13.48 |
Appropriate mitigation/ alleviation measures
might include confirmed good levels of protection, including protected
access, prudent design of development (e.g. site layout and raised
floor levels), satisfactory means of surface water disposal and effective
public warning systems. It should be noted that whilst such works
can reduce the risk of flooding, they cannot eliminate it entirely.
The principle of such works will only be accepted where they are funded
and built by the developer and their long-term maintenance can be
assured. |
| 13.49 |
In accordance with PPG25, an area is considered
to be at high risk from flooding if it lies within the Environment
Agency's Flood Zone 3, which comprises the 1 in 100 year fluvial floodplain
(i.e. an annual probability greater than 1%) and/or the 1 in 200 year
tidal floodplain (i.e. an annual probability greater than 0.5%). |
| 13.50 |
The approximate extent of Flood Zone 3
is shown in Figure 13.1. The figure also shows the approximate extent
of Flood Zone 2, which comprises land where the annual probability
of flooding is greater than 0.1% and there is a medium to low risk
from flooding. Flood Zone 1 is not however shown in Figure 13.1. It
comprises land beyond Flood Zone 2, where there is little or no risk
from flooding (where the annual probability is less than 0.1% and
there should be no constraints in terms of river, tidal and coastal
flooding. The information in Figure 13.1 has been provided by the
Environment Agency, and represents the best available current information.
The Flood Zone boundaries are therefore only indicative. There will
be additional areas at risk from flooding that are not shown, such
as floodplains associated with minor watercourses and areas subject
to localised flooding. As such, the Flood Zones shown in Figure 13.1
are not used as the sole basis for deciding where policy CS3 applies. |
| 13.51 |
The acceptability of individual proposals
within areas at risk from flooding will be determined on their individual
merits, adopting the risk-based approach set out in Table 1 of PPG25
(see Appendix 10) and taking into account the advice of the Environment
Agency. In assessing acceptability of development, the following factors
will be taken into consideration: |
| |
- the area liable to flood;
- the probability of flooding occurring (including the impact
of climate change);
- the extent/standard of existing flood defences and their effectiveness
over time;
- the likely depth, routes and flow rates of flood water;
- the possible impact on other areas, properties or wildlife habitats;
and
- the nature and currently expected lifetime of the development
proposed and the extent to which mitigation/alleviation measures
can be incorporated to deal with flood risk.
|
| 13.52 |
In accordance with the precautionary principle
advocated in PPG25, where insufficient information is available regarding
potential flood risk, the applicant will be required to carry out
a detailed flood risk assessment to evaluate the extent of risk. Such
an assessment will need to take into account the potential impact
of climate change. |
|
|
| |
| Policy CS3 |
| Development within
areas at risk from flooding will not be permitted unless adequate
mitigation and/or alleviation measures are incorporated and
constructed prior to development commencing, subject to there
being: |
| (a) |
No increased flood
risk elsewhere; |
| (b) |
No risk to life in
the event of a breach or overtopping of a flood defence; |
| (c) |
No requirement for
new artificial flood defences in undeveloped high risk areas
solely to protect the new development, unless that location
is essential for the particular development or there are no
suitable alternative locations in low risk areas; and |
| (d) |
No detriment to the
conservation and recreation value of the natural environment,
including river corridors and wetlands. |
| Proposals for the
long-term management of any flood alleviation/mitigation works
must be included in any scheme submitted. |
| In considering planning
applications in areas at risk from flooding particular regard
will be given to the appropriate planning response referred
to in Table 1 of Planning Policy Guidance Note 25. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Integrity of Flood Defences |
| 13.53 |
It is essential that new development,
over its lifetime, does not jeopardise the stability and continuity
of flood defences, or hinder the ability to carry out maintenance
and improvement works. As such, adequate undeveloped margins (including
fences and gardens) must be retained between a development and a flood
defence. In this context, the layout of development should be designed
so that watercourses are readily accessible, preferably at the front
of new development, rather than concealed at the rear. This enables
future maintenance works to be more easily undertaken and minimises
the risk of blockages to water flows. It should be noted that the
consent of Environment Agency is required for development involving
the culverting of a watercourse and that consent is likely to be withheld
unless it is essential to gain access to a site. |
|
|
| |
| Policy CS4 |
| Development will not
be permitted where it would be detrimental to the integrity
of flood defences or watercourse channels, or would impede access
to and along these for future maintenance and improvement work. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Surface Water Drainage
|
| 13.54 |
Development, particularly on greenfield
sites, often results in increased impermeable areas, increasing rates
of surface water run off that is invariably discharged either to a
watercourse (via a system of drains and sewers) or to soakaways. Increased
rates of discharge to watercourses cause erosion of the banks and
bed, and exacerbate the risk of downstream flooding. Where soakaways
are poorly distributed or where soil permeability is inadequate, it
can lead to concentrations of groundwater, waterlogging and overflowing. |
| 13.55 |
It is essential that such risks are taken
into account at an early stage in the planning process. In accordance
with PPG25, new development should not increase run-off from the undeveloped
situation and proposals for redevelopment should reduce the rate of
run-off. Developers will be required to provide appropriate attenuation
measures and/or provide improvements to watercourses where this can
be achieved without detriment to the natural water habitat. Attenuation
may be achieved by the provision of surface water storage areas, flow-limiting
devices in conjunction with surface or sub-surface storage or, where
ground conditions permit, the use of infiltration areas or soakaways. |
| 13.56 |
It should be noted that subsoil permeability
is poor in much of the District and where drainage systems reliant
of infiltration are proposed, soil permeability tests will need to
be undertaken prior to the issue of planning approval in order to
confirm the adequacy of the proposals, particularly where there is
no other means of surface water disposal readily available. |
| 13.57 |
Wherever possible surface water should
be managed through the utilisation of Sustainable Drainage Systems
(SuDS), as alternatives to conventional drainage systems. Examples
include; grass swales and filter strips, infiltration basins or trenches,
soakaways, attenuation ponds, wetlands and porous surfaces. The use
of rainwater recycling and greywater systems should also be considered. |
| 13.58 |
Such systems, as well as controlling water
at source and reducing the risk of flooding, can also reduce the pollution
loads to watercourses, encourage groundwater recharge and, where they
involve the use of open wet ponds to attenuate flow, can enhance conservation
and recreation value. Applicants will be required to make provision
for the long-term future maintenance requirements of such facilities,
putting them forward for adoption by an appropriate body, wherever
possible. |
| 13.59 |
Further guidance can be obtained from
the Environment Agency document, Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems
- an introduction, and best practice publications from the Construction
Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA). Engineering
design standards for SuDS are the subject of national multi-agency
discussions and drainage proposals should be consistent with these,
when available. The Council also intends to produce its own good practice
document to assist developers and builders on what considerations
should be taken into account in determining drainage requirements
and what information will be needed to accompany planning applications. |
|
|
| |
| Policy CS5 |
| Development will only
be permitted where the following criteria are met: |
| (a) |
adequate means of
surface water drainage, including all appropriate alleviation
and mitigation works, have been investigated, designed, and
will be constructed by the developer prior to the commencement
of development; |
| (b) |
sustainable drainage
systems are utilised, where appropriate; |
| (c) |
adequate proposals
for the long-term management of such works are included in any
scheme submitted; and |
| (d) |
flood risk will not
be exacerbated elsewhere. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Waste Disposal |
| 13.60 |
The Environment Agency is responsible
for waste regulation, and the County Council is responsible for waste
planning and the disposal of municipal waste. The County Council's
strategy for the management and disposal of waste generated in the
Plan area is contained in the Structure Plan and the second deposit
draft of the Waste Local Plan. The latter sets out in more detail
how waste should be dealt with in the County, identifying sites for
waste developments and providing a policy framework for the consideration
of planning applications. The Waste Local Plan, when adopted, will
form part of the Development Plan for the District. |
| 13.61 |
The County Council's waste policies are
based upon a hierarchical approach in which the order of preference
will normally be the reduction or minimisation of waste, re-use of
products and materials, recovery of resources through recycling, composting
and energy recovery, with disposal to landfill as a last resort. The
emphasis on the re-use and recovery of waste requires the further
provision of material recovery/waste transfer facilities, and within
Wealden, the emerging Waste Local Plan identifies the Bellbrook Industrial
Estate, Uckfield to serve the north of the District and Tutts Barn
Farm, Eastbourne to serve the Eastbourne and Polegate area. In addition,
a new household waste site to serve Crowborough opened in 2004 and
a new site is being sought to serve Uckfield. |
| 13.62 |
The District Council shares the County
Council's commitment to the reduction, recycling and reprocessing
of waste, not only to assist the conservation and sustainable use
of natural resources, but also to reduce the demand for landfill and
energy from waste incineration sites. Some new incineration facilities,
in the form of energy from waste plants will however be required,
although the Waste Local Plan has not identified any such sites within
Wealden. In accordance with the emerging Waste Local Plan, all development
proposals employing or attracting a large number of people will be
expected to make provision for the following as an integral part of
the development: |
| |
- facilities for the public to recycle/compost waste; and/or
- facilities within individual or groups of properties or premises
for the source separation and storage of waste for collection
or on site re-use or composting.
|
| 13.63 |
The types of development which can benefit
from the provision of such facilities include supermarkets, major
business developments, community facilities (including schools) and
public car parks. Applicants should therefore ensure that sufficient
space is provided for the separation and storage of recyclable waste,
such as paper, glass and cans, and to compost other waste. Such areas
should be conveniently located, be accessible by vehicles and normally
be screened. The management and maintenance of public recycling facilities
will be the responsibility of the District Council. |
|
|
| |
| Policy CS6 |
| Within new commercial
and community development, where appropriate, an area for recycling
facilities should be provided which should be conveniently located,
accessible by vehicles and should normally be screened. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 13.64 |
Encouragement of domestic waste recycling
is a vital component of reducing the waste stream to landfill. The
District Council is responsible for collecting household waste within
Wealden and is also responsible for the majority of domestic waste
recycling. In response to the Environmental Protection Act 1990, the
Council's Recycling Plan seeks to achieve levels of domestic waste
recycling that will at minimum achieve Government targets. |
| |
13.65 Within new housing developments over
40 dwellings, a purpose-built enclosure should normally be provided
to accommodate recycling facilities for use by the residents. Screen
walls and a roof should be provided to minimise its environmental
impact, both in terms of appearance and noise. The facility should
be suitably located to avoid excessive disturbance to residents but
should be adjacent to an access road for convenient emptying of the
containers; for safety reasons, it should not be near to a children's
play area. The management and maintenance of neighbourhood recycling
centres will be the responsibility of the District Council. |
|
|
| |
| Policy CS7 |
| Within new housing
developments over 40 dwellings, a purpose-built enclosure should
be provided within which recycling facilities, appropriate for
the waste generated by the increase in households, can be located
if adequate facilities do not exist in the vicinity. This should
be located where it can be used safely and conveniently, without
causing undue harm to residential amenities. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
| Click map for larger image |
|
|
 |
| Click map for larger image |
| |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| top |