 |
|
|
| |
|
| Chapter 10.0 - Transportation |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| 10.1 |
The future economic and social well-being of the district will
be largely dependent upon efficient systems of transportation.
People should be able to move easily between their homes and centres
of employment, shopping and recreation. Efficient transportation
systems may also help to attract new investment into the area.
Transportation infrastructure and the traffic which uses it should,
however, be environmentally acceptable and safe.
|
| 10.2 |
Responsibility for transport matters rests, generally, with agencies
other than the District Council. The Highways Agency, on behalf
of the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the
Regions, is responsible for the provision and maintenance of trunk
roads, and Nottinghamshire County Council is the Highway Authority
for the remainder of the road network and also the Public Transport
Co-ordinating Authority. The District Council's principal
role, therefore, is to seek to ensure, through consultation and
discussion, that land use proposals and their traffic implications
are fully considered through the Local Plan process.
|
| 10.3 |
This chapter deals with the proposed highway schemes of the Department
of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, and the County Council.
It also outlines the various highway improvements and traffic management
measures proposed to alleviate some of the traffic problems of the
district. In addition, policies are included on car parking,
pedestrian and cycle routes and horse riding.
|
| |
|
| |
Background, Problems and
Issues |
| 10.4 |
The accessibility of the District to the rest of Nottinghamshire
and the UK is important to the area's economy, particularly
the potential to attract new industry and commerce. The District
benefits from a central location in the national transport network.
Main roads forming the strategic network include all trunks roads,
County primary roads and County non-primary routes of more than
local importance, which, in Newark and Sherwood District, are the
A1(T), A17(T), A46(T), A614(T), A617 and A6097. The County
Council has also included the A612 and A1133 as part of the strategic
road network in the Structure Plan Review. The A616 and A6075,
which are major secondary roads, also serve the District (see Figure
10.1). The District's trunk road network is of national
importance and connects the area with regions lying beyond the East
Midlands. The remainder of the network referred to above connects
locally important centres of population.
|
| 10.5 |
The north-south road movements through
the district are catered for by the A1(T) and A614(T). However,
in recent years, the rapid growth of traffic, particularly heavy goods
vehicles, has resulted in a deterioration in conditions on the A1(T)
and congestion at the A614(T)/ A616/A6075 junction. Schemes
for the upgrading of the A1(T) to motorway status between Stamford
and Blyth were withdrawn from the National Roads Programme in November
1996. Notwithstanding, there is a need to improve unsatisfactory
links to the A1 in the east and the M1 in the west. The County
Council proposes various improvements to these roads, which aim to
increase capacity of existing highways and/or alleviate traffic congestion
in some of the settlements in this area. The District Council
will continue to support improvements to the main road network, taking
into account public transport provision and initiatives, and environmental
considerations. |
| 10.6 |
In July 1998, the Department of the Environment, Transport and
the Regions published "A New Deal for Trunk Roads in England".
Among the proposals contained in that document were the following:
|
| |
- A46 Newark to Lincoln Improvement: included within a proposed
Targeted Programme of Improvements
- A46 Newark to Widmerpool Improvement: withdrawn from the National
Trunk Road Programme
- A17 Newark to Kings Lynn and A614 Nottingham to Bawtry: proposed
for de-trunking.
|
| 10.7 |
The District Council favours the re-instatement of the A46 Newark
to Widmerpool Improvement in the National Trunk Road Programme.
The Council is concerned that, on completion of the proposed dualling
between Newark and Lincoln, the single carriageway section between
Newark and Widmerpool would become an unacceptable bottleneck.
It intends to make these views known in the course of the consultation
process linked with the proposed Review of Regional Planning Guidance.
|
| 10.8 |
The Nottinghamshire Structure Plan Review makes provision for the
following Nottinghamshire County Council major highway schemes:
|
| |
- A617 Rainworth By-pass;
- A612 Southwell By-pass;
- A1133 Collingham By-pass; and
- A617 Kelham By-pass.
|
| |
The District Council will urge the early
completion of these schemes, subject to satisfactory environmental
safeguards. |
| 10.9 |
While the District Council accepts some new road building is required,
it considers that it is also important to undertake traffic management
and calming schemes to limit the impact of vehicles and provide
an improved environment for residents, pedestrians, cyclists and
horse riders. Newark and many of the larger villages are affected
by heavy goods vehicles using unsuitable roads, particularly in
residential areas. These problems may be alleviated by weight
restrictions, traffic calming and other traffic management measures,
including bus priority schemes, where appropriate.
|
| 10.10 |
The district is well placed on the rail network (see Figure 10.1).
There is a fast and efficient rail link from Newark to the north
and south on the East Coast Main Line, soon to include a direct
link to the Continent. In addition, the villages in the Trent
Valley are served by the Nottingham-Lincoln railway line, part of
which is embraced by Nottinghamshire County Council's Greater
Nottingham Area Rail Development Strategy. There are also
opportunities to extend passenger use onto the existing mineral
lines in the western part of the District, which are safeguarded,
in their own right, in accordance with Nottinghamshire Structure
Plan Review Policy 5/3. There is potential to link the villages
of Edwinstowe, Ollerton and Boughton to the Robin Hood Line.
|
| 10.11 |
The District Council will seek to safeguard the place of the rail
network within the wider transportation system and levels of rail
service provision.
|
| 10.12 |
The bus network is focused on Newark, with links to Nottingham
and Lincoln. The larger settlements also
have bus services, with the villages in
the western part of the District linked to Mansfield.
The more rural villages have limited services. Over the last
few years, there has been a growing awareness that unchecked growth
in car usage cannot be sustained and that a greater proportion of
movement should be met by public transport. The District Council
will support efforts to extend the bus network and increase the
frequency of existing services to meet prevailing needs.
|
| 10.13 |
At present, water transport plays only a small part in the distribution
of goods. The River Trent is a commercial waterway providing
a direct link to Gainsborough and the Humber ports, as well as the
commercial waterways of Yorkshire. The Council will support
the increased use of the River Trent, subject to environmental safeguards
in accordance with Policy 5/15 of the Nottinghamshire Structure
Plan Review.
|
| 10.14 |
In managing traffic growth, it is important to plan settlements
in a manner which will ensure development is located where it is
most efficiently served by a variety of modes of transport.
The spatial strategy set out in this Plan seeks to focus development
in Newark and the main settlements, where existing services are
accessible to all sections of the community. The strategy
also seeks to make use of derelict and under-used land and to enhance
opportunities for public transport, cycling and pedestrian movement.
In general terms, this follows the guidance in PPG13 "Transport"
and RPG8 "Regional Planning Guidance for the East Midlands."
It also accords with the policy emphasis of the Government's White
Paper on the Future of Transport, published in July 1998.
|
| 10.15 |
There is an extensive network of public
rights of way across the district which provides considerable opportunities
for recreation. These routes need to be extended and improved
if they are to reach their full potential. There are a number
of disused railway lines which could provide safe and attractive routes
for cyclists, riders and walkers. |
| |
 |
| |
|
| |
Policy Context for the
Plan |
| |
Central Government Guidance
|
| 10.16 |
The District Council has taken account of PPG12, which includes
guidance on the content of local plans, specifically on the need
to include policies and proposals relating to the development of
the transport network, the management of traffic, the control of
car and lorry parking and the improvement of cyclist and pedestrian
safety. The PPG also advises that local plans should elaborate
on proposals for improving the primary route network and identify
other proposed new roads and improvements of a non-strategic nature.
Land required for road schemes to be commenced within about 10 years
should be safeguarded.
|
| 10.17 |
PPG13 "Transport" updates and broadens earlier advice,
in the light of the new status of development plans and the need
to develop sustainable settlement patterns and transportation systems.
The key aim of the guidance is to ensure that Local Authorities
implement their land use policies and transport programmes in ways
which help to:
|
| |
- reduce growth in the length and number of motorised journeys;
- encourage alternative means of travel which have less environmental
impact; and
- reduce reliance on the private car.
|
| 10.18 |
In particular, the PPG indicates that development plans should
aim to influence the location of different types of development,
relative to transport provision, and to foster forms of development
which encourage walking, cycling and public transport use.
They should also seek to revitalise traditional urban centres, improve
their attractiveness as places to live, work and shop, and maintain
their competitiveness.
|
| 10.19 |
PPG13 also sets out the Government's policy on development control
in relation to the trunk road network. In general, the policy
on all-purpose trunk roads is to restrict the formation of new accesses,
so that they may continue to perform their functions as roads for
the safe and expeditious movement of long-distance traffic.
This policy is applied most strictly to fast sections of rural trunk
roads and roads of near-motorway standard.
|
| 10.20 |
The Government's White Paper on the Future of Transport, published
in July 1998, develops the policy emphasis of PPG13 and embodies
new thinking on integrating transport with other aspects of Government
policy. It also establishes a framework within which the Government's
detailed transport policies will be taken forward. Some of
the proposals will require legislation. Supporting documents,
which set out fuller details of what is intended, will be published
in due course.
|
| |
|
| |
Regional Planning Guidance for the East
Midlands
|
| 10.21 |
The Guidance states that land use planning and the planning of
transport policies and infrastructure should be co-ordinated, to
provide a better relationship between homes, workplaces and other
activities, so as to minimise the need to travel. In addition,
plans should also encourage the use of energy efficient modes of
transport and facilitate environmental improvement, at both a local
level and in the wider global context.
|
| 10.22 |
The Guidance emphasises that the efficient, cost-effective and
safe movement of people and goods is essential for the economic
prosperity of the East Midlands. The need for improvements
to cross-regional routes between the A1 and the M1, to the north
of Nottingham, which could assist in regenerating economic activity
in the Nottinghamshire/Derbyshire Coalfield, is also highlighted.
|
| |
|
| |
Nottinghamshire Structure Plan Review
|
| 10.23 |
The Nottinghamshire Structure Plan Review
contains a policy emphasis which takes account of PPG13. A major
element of the overall strategy is to encourage people to travel in
ways that have less environmental impact than the car. This
will involve measures to help increase the availability and quality
of public transport throughout the County, and help relate new development
to public transport provision. Measures to encourage non-motorised
means of travel will also be promoted. |
| |
|
| |
Objectives |
| 10.24 |
In order to achieve the aims of the Local Plan, the District Council
will seek to secure implementation of the following objectives:
|
| |
- early implementation of the dualling of the A46, including by-passes
for Farndon, East Stoke and Brough;
- early implementation of by-passes for Rainworth, Southwell,
Collingham and Kelham;
- highway improvements in the western part of the District - to
facilitate improved access to employment sites;
- a traffic-free shopping environment in Newark;
- to safeguard road improvement lines;
- to ensure there are sufficient and conveniently located parking
spaces in existing centres;
- to encourage a comprehensive public transport system and easily
accessible termini;
- to meet the transport needs of all residents, including pedestrians,
cyclists, horse riders and those with limited mobility;
- to ensure that development which generates substantial amounts
of traffic is located on, or close to, the main road network;
and
- to provide for roadside services and facilities.
|
| |
|
| |
Highway Schemes |
| 10.25 |
The Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions and
Nottinghamshire County Council have various proposals for the improvement
of the highway network in the District. These schemes will
be safeguarded by the District Council and are briefly outlined
below.
|
| |
|
| |
A1(T)
|
| 10.26 |
The A1(T) provides the District with good
road links to the north and south. However, it is becoming increasingly
unable to cope with a rapid growth in traffic. Schemes for the
upgrading of the A1(T) to motorway status between Stamford and Blyth
were withdrawn from the National Roads Programme in November 1996.
Route protection for those schemes was revoked shortly thereafter.
All planning work on the schemes has been terminated. |
|
|
| |
Policy T1
Dualling of the A46(T) (Newark - Lincoln) - This policy is no longer saved |
| Planning permission will not be granted for
development which would inhibit the dualling of the A46(T) between
Newark and Lincoln, which includes the provision of a by-pass
for the village of Brough. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.27 |
Developing proposals for the upgrading of the
A46(T) to dual carriageway standard between Lincoln and Widmerpool
were among the schemes reviewed in "A New Deal for Trunk Roads
in England" - published by the Department of the Environment,
Transport and the Regions, in July 1998. The outcome of that
Review and the District Council's response to it are set out at
paragraph 10.6, above.
|
| 10.28 |
Considerable care will need to be taken
to minimise the effects of the current dualling proposals on existing
properties, the landscape and the setting of villages. Where
proposals result in the splitting of farm holdings, proper access
will need to be provided to both sides, by means of an overbridge
or underpass. The planting of verges will help ensure that the
schemes are assimilated into the surrounding landscape. Where
the destruction of existing verges is inevitable, alternative planting
schemes will need to be provided. Such planting will also
provide new habitats for wildlife. |
|
|
| |
Policy T2
Rainworth By-pass - This policy is no longer saved |
| Planning permission will not be granted for
development which would inhibit the construction of the A617
Rainworth By-pass to the north of the village. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.29 |
Heavy traffic passing through Rainworth creates environmental problems
of noise and pollution. There is also conflict between pedestrians
and other road users, as Kirklington Road passes through the village
centre and alongside Python Hill School. The District Council
considers that a by-pass is urgently needed, both to relieve problems
in the village and improve strategic highway links. Land will
therefore be safeguarded for that purpose and the District Council
will encourage the early implementation of a scheme. The route approved
for the By-pass is to the north of the village and is illustrated
on the Proposals Map. The District Council will encourage
the provision of a multi-user route, alongside the road, as part
of the scheme.
|
| 10.30 |
The Structure Plan Review makes provision
for a Rainworth By-pass. Start of work is programmed for 1999. |
|
|
| |
Policy T3
Southwell By-pass |
| Planning permission will not be granted for
development which would inhibit the construction of an A612
Southwell By-pass. The District Council will enter into
discussions with the County Council to consider alternative
routes for the proposed by-pass. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.31 |
Road traffic passing through Southwell creates environmental problems
and increases conflict between pedestrians and road users.
The approved Nottinghamshire Structure Plan Review indicates that
land will be safeguarded for an A612 Southwell By-pass. That scheme
is included in the County Council's current Transport Policies and
Programme as a long-term project.
|
| 10.32 |
While supporting, in principle, the provision
of an A612 By-pass for the town, the District Council wishes to ensure
that the chosen route does not spoil the setting and local environment
of Southwell. The District Council feels that consideration
should therefore be given to alternatives to the line currently identified
by the County Council, which is shown on the Proposals Map, in conjunction
with possible traffic management measures in the town. In discussions
with the County Council, the District Council will reflect the principal
concerns of consultees who made representations on the Local Plan.
|
|
|
| |
Policy T4
Collingham By-pass |
| Planning permission will not be granted for
development which would inhibit the construction of an A1133
Collingham By-pass. The District Council will enter into
discussions with the County Council to consider alternative
routes for the proposed by-pass. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.33 |
Heavy traffic passing through the village of Collingham creates
environmental problems of noise and pollution, and increases conflict
between pedestrians and road users. The approved Nottinghamshire
Structure Plan Review indicates that land will be safeguarded for
an A1133 Collingham By-Pass. That scheme is included in the
County Council's current Transport Policies and Programme as a long-term
project (2006-2011).
|
| 10.34 |
The County Council is currently safeguarding
a route for a Collingham By-pass (shown on Inset Map 16 and the Proposals
Map). In addition to this route, which has been safeguarded
for many years, the County Council has announced its intention to
also safeguard an alternative route, which would link the A1133, to
the north of the village, with the A46(T) Improvement envisaged at
Brough. In view of the recent Government decision to include
that Improvement within a proposed Targeted Programme of Improvements,
the County Council will now undertake a review of the overall position
and a preferred route will be determined. The District Council
supports the principle of a Collingham By-pass and will enter into
discussions with the County Council to consider which of the alternative
routes will best alleviate traffic problems in the village, minimise
environmental intrusion and be in accordance with the wishes of local
people. |
|
|
| |
Policy T5
Kelham By-pass |
| Planning permission will not be granted for
development which would inhibit the construction of the A617
Kelham By-pass. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.35 |
Heavy traffic passing through the village of Kelham creates environmental
problems of noise and pollution, and increases conflict between
pedestrians and road users. The Structure Plan Review makes
provision for a Kelham By-pass. A line for a by-pass has been
identified to the south of the village and this is illustrated on
the Proposals Map. Land is to be safeguarded for its construction.
|
| |
|
| |
Southern Relief Road, Newark
|
| 10.36 |
The District Council considers that a new road to the south of
Newark (joining the A1(T) at Balderton with the A46(T) at Farndon)
is necessary. A Southern Relief Road would,
in the Council's view, remove existing heavy vehicles and
other traffic from Hawton Lane, Bowbridge Lane and Boundary Road.
It would also reduce traffic in the residential suburbs in the southern
part of the town and Hawton village, as well as on London Road.
Furthermore, it would facilitate access between the proposed new
community at the former Balderton Hospital and the A46(T).
|
| 10.37 |
The Inspector who conducted the Inquiry
into the Newark and Sherwood Local Plan concluded that it would be
premature to include a policy for the construction of a Southern Relief
Road in the Plan. However, he considered it reasonable to anticipate,
within the text of the Plan, the likelihood of development-led proposals
emerging from a Review, linked with the potential for development
on land south of Newark. He had separately concluded that a
new community on land south of Newark was one of the few available
options for the expansion of Newark, when the Local Plan came to be
reviewed. He therefore believed that the Local Plan should remain
open about the development potential of that area, instead of suggesting
that only employment development was likely. The District Council
accepts the Inspector's conclusions and will therefore be prepared
to give further consideration to Southern Relief Road proposals when
the Local Plan is reviewed. |
| |
|
| |
Averham Relief Road
|
| 10.38 |
National Power has been granted permission for a new power station
at Staythorpe, adjacent to the existing power station. To
accommodate traffic generated by the proposal, the power company
has constructed an Averham Relief Road, linking the A617 to Staythorpe
Road, and undertaken improvements to Staythorpe Road.
|
| |
|
| |
Improvements to the Highway Network in
the Western Part of the District
|
| 10.39 |
The accessibility of the western part of the District to the rest
of Nottinghamshire and beyond will have an important bearing on
its future economic well-being, particularly its ability to attract
new industrial investment. A number of important primary routes
pass through that area. However, many highways, notably east-west
routes, are in need of considerable improvement, due to their limited
capacity and because some pass through village centres and residential
areas.
|
| 10.40 |
The District Council considers that there
is an overwhelming need for highway investment which will assist in
the regeneration of the area. The Council considers it especially
important that all industrial areas have good links to the strategic
road network. The implementation of highway improvements should
therefore be co-ordinated with proposals for those areas identified
for employment development in the Local Plan. The Council will
therefore urge the relevant Highway Authorities to give the highest
possible priority to the implementation of appropriate improvements
during the Plan period. Specifically, the District Council considers
that improvements to the A614(T) and Ollerton Roundabout are essential.
The Council will therefore urge the Department of the Environment,
Transport and the Regions to undertake priority improvements to this
bottleneck. However, there are currently no proposals for major
improvements of the junction and it seems extremely unlikely that
a major improvement promoted by the Department could be implemented
within the Plan period. |
|
|
| |
Policy T6
Boughton Bends |
| Planning permission will not be granted for
development which would inhibit the improvement of the bends
on the A6075 to the west of Boughton Industrial Estate. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.41 |
The District Council wishes to attract significant new industrial
investment to Boughton Industrial Estate, in order to provide much
needed employment opportunities for local residents. The existing
highway infrastructure detracts from the attractiveness of the Estate
and is in need of improvement, particularly the bends to the west
of the Estate. Nottinghamshire County Council has a scheme
for the improvement of these bends which will be safeguarded.
The proposed improvement line is illustrated on the Proposals Map.
The District Council will encourage the early implementation of
the scheme.
|
| |
|
| |
Assessment of Improvements to the Highway
Network
|
| 10.42 |
The District Council will wish to give very careful consideration
to emerging proposals for new roads and improvements to existing
highways. When commenting on such proposals, the Council will
assess schemes in relation to the following criteria:
|
| |
- the effect on the amenity and safety of non-motorised users,
particularly in relation to horse riders using bridleways and
roads in the area affected by the scheme;
- the impact upon sites of nature conservation interest, important
landscape features and areas of archaeological importance;
- the impact upon the best and most versatile agricultural land
and the management of farming enterprises;
- the impact upon rivers, floodplains, washland areas and upon
other watercourses; and
- the effect on the amenities of nearby residents, particularly
in relation to noise and visual intrusion.
|
| |
|
| |
Traffic Management in
Newark |
| 10.43 |
PPG13 acknowledges that local authorities
can help maintain and revitalise town centres by implementing local
plan policies designed to improve their quality and competitiveness.
This section of the Local Plan considers the inter-related policies
which are linked with the District Council's commitment to pedestrianisation
and improvements to the environment of Newark town centre. |
|
|
| |
Policy T7
Newark Town Centre - Pedestrian Priority Area |
| A pedestrian priority area will be maintained
and consolidated covering the historic core of Newark, namely:
the Market Place, Church Street, Bridge Street, the eastern
end of Stodman Street, Cartergate and part of Baldertongate.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.44 |
In accordance with the general guidance contained in PPG13, the
County and District Councils are working closely together to give
pedestrians priority in the core area of the town, where streets
are being re-surfaced in high quality traditional materials. Both
Councils consider that pedestrianisation is likely to boost the
attractiveness of the town centre, principally for shopping.
|
| 10.45 |
Many streets within the historic core of Newark, with their narrow
carriageways, footways and awkward junctions, are unable to accommodate
both vehicles and pedestrians safely. With a view to ameliorating
vehicular/pedestrian conflict, Nottinghamshire County Council first
introduced a restriction on vehicular access to the Market Place,
Church Street, Bridge Street and Stodman Street (part) in the mid-1980s.
At the same time, restrictions were placed on Cartergate between
10.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m. These measures established the benefits
of pedestrianisation.
|
| 10.46 |
In 1992, the County Council introduced a comprehensive
traffic management scheme for Newark town centre - to improve and
reinforce pedestrian priority measures. The proposals included pedestrianisation
measures for the north-western end of Baldertongate, between Cartergate
and London Road Car Park, and also for Cartergate itself.
|
| 10.47 |
Further measures will be advanced in due
course, following discussions involving the recently established Newark
Town Centre Forum. |
|
|
| |
Policy T8
London Road Car Park Improvements - This policy is no longer saved |
| Further measures will be taken to prevent
London Road Car Park being used as a through route and safe
pedestrian routes will be clearly defined. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.48 |
London Road Car Park continues to be used by motorists as a through
route between London Road and Baldertongate. The layout of
the majority of parking bays, with a wide central corridor, allows
vehicles to be driven through the car park at relatively high speeds,
endangering unsuspecting pedestrians. The opening of Newark
Library, at Beaumond Gardens, has increased pedestrian movements
across the car park.
|
| 10.49 |
An environmental improvement scheme at
the north-eastern end of the car park, adjacent to Baldertongate,
which was carried out in 1990, included the provision of a "sleeping
policeman". Although that has been successful in slowing
vehicles, there still remains a need to reduce speeds in the remainder
of the car park, to define pedestrian routes and to discourage through
traffic. |
|
|
| |
Policy T9
Access for the Disabled in Newark Town Centre |
| The District Council will ensure that the
needs of disabled people are taken into account when implementing
environmental works which are designed to complement the town
centre traffic management scheme and/or enhance the Conservation
Area. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.50 |
Disabled people encounter a wide range of problems in moving around
Newark town centre, whether by car, on foot or in a wheelchair.
The District Council will therefore endeavour to ensure that the
needs of disabled people are taken into account when implementing
environmental works, which are designed to complement the Town Centre
Traffic Management Scheme and to enhance the Conservation Area.
The District Council will also seek to ensure that improvements
are made to the public transport system, to increase accessibility
for people with mobility handicaps.
|
|
|
| |
Policy T10
Orbital and Cross-Town Routes for Local Traffic in
Newark |
| Planning permission will not be granted for
development which would inhibit the improvement of Sherwood
Avenue and Friary Road. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.51 |
If pedestrian priority measures in Newark town centre are to be
successful, it is essential that routes around that area are able
to carry traffic safely and efficiently. Sherwood Avenue and
Friary Road form one side of an orbital route. The other roads
comprising that route include London Road, Lombard Street, Castlegate,
Bargate, Queens Road and Sleaford Road.
|
| 10.52 |
Sherwood Avenue, Beacon Hill Road and Friary Road have very different
characteristics. Sherwood Avenue has mixed residential/ commercial
development fronting the highway. As redevelopment has taken
place on its eastern side, new development has been set back to
allow for possible road improvements.
|
| 10.53 |
Beacon Hill Road is only 6 metres wide at its western end.
Residential properties front both sides of the highway for most
of its length. Many of the properties do not have good off-street
parking facilities and the free flow of traffic is therefore frequently
interrupted by parked vehicles. Parking in the area is a problem
which is made worse by the daily influx of students to Newark and
Sherwood College.
|
| 10.54 |
Friary Road is by far the widest of these three roads, with residential
properties on its eastern side and Newark and Sherwood College and
Friary Gardens to the west.
|
| 10.55 |
Pedestrian movements in the area are considerable, particularly
across Sherwood Avenue, in the vicinity of the Barnby Gate junction.
There are also heavy pedestrian flows in the area surrounding Newark
and Sherwood College.
|
| 10.56 |
The injury accident record for 1985/86 showed that a considerable
number of accidents occurred on the eastern section of the orbital
route. In response to a high incidence of accidents at the
Sherwood Avenue/Barnby Gate junction, a scheme to install traffic
signals, including pedestrian crossing facilities, and an advanced
stop line for cyclists, was carried out in 1987.
|
| 10.57 |
The County Council's proposed strategy for Sherwood Avenue/Friary
Road will follow the principle that, as property is redeveloped,
it should be set back to permit carriageway improvements to take
place. Land would thus be safeguarded for the carriageway
and junction improvements required to bring the route up to an appropriate
standard. A scheme for the improvement of the Beacon Hill/Friary
Road junction was carried out in 1995.
|
| 10.58 |
The length of Beacon Hill Road between
Sherwood Avenue and Sleaford Road is considered unsuitable for use
as a major through route and the County Council will therefore be
encouraged to introduce measures to restrict its use to local traffic
only. |
| |
|
| |
B6326 London Road
|
| 10.59 |
London Road is an important highway linking Newark town centre
with Balderton and the A1 to the south. The road is wide,
with a large number of side roads and accesses throughout its length.
Five schools and a sports complex are either served directly from,
or are located in the vicinity of, London Road. These institutions
generate large numbers of young pedestrians and cyclists, creating
a serious conflict. With the existing background traffic level
at about 14,000 vehicles per day, the Newark Relief Road has had
little effect on traffic conditions on London Road.
|
| 10.60 |
In response to a high incidence of accidents on the Baines Avenue-Grove
Sports Centre length of the road, a scheme involving central refuges
and lay-bys was carried out in May 1987. The London Road Cycle
Track, which extends from Baldertongate, Newark to Mount Road, Balderton,
was officially opened in September 1993. An improvement to
the southbound capacity of the junction of London Road, Sherwood
Avenue and Bowbridge Road was completed in June 1994.
|
| 10.61 |
The proposed new community at the former
Balderton Hospital site will significantly increase the number of
vehicles on London Road and the County Council considers that improvements
are likely to be required at key junctions. Measures will also
be required to reduce the conflict between vehicles and pedestrians. |
| |
|
| |
Bowbridge Road
and Boundary Road |
| 10.62 |
These roads are used as part of a cross-town
route between London Road at Balderton and the A46(T). Through
traffic using this route is aiming to avoid the busy London Road/Sherwood
Avenue/Bowbridge Road and Beaumond Cross junctions. The District
Council considers that a new road, to the south of Newark, would help
to alleviate the resulting traffic and environmental problems.
Once completed, weight restriction orders could be introduced, to
remove a high proportion of heavy goods vehicles from Bowbridge Road
and Boundary Road. Nottinghamshire County Council has stated
that the construction costs of a Southern Relief Road cannot be justified
from highway funds within the foreseeable future (see paras 10.36
and 10.37). |
| 10.63 |
The County Council's Heavy Goods Vehicle County-wide Survey
Annual Review (1993-1994) noted that the Boundary Road area was
the highest scoring location in the County where no scheme to deal
with HGVs was programmed. However, the County Council considers
that a weight restriction could not be applied to Boundary Road
until an alternative route for HGVs is established. The area
over which restrictions would need to apply would extend to routes
through the Hawtonville Estate. The length of the necessary
diversion would therefore be extensive. Enforcement would
be difficult and HGV traffic could be diverted onto routes such
as London Road.
|
| 10.64 |
Mini-roundabouts were introduced at the
junctions of Boundary and Bowbridge Roads, and Hawton Lane and Bowbridge
Road, in the Spring and Summer of 1994, respectively. Traffic
calming schemes have since been introduced on Bowbridge Road and Boundary
Road. All those measures were intended to reduce vehicle speeds
and reduce personal injury accidents. |
| |
|
| |
Car Parking in Newark |
| 10.65 |
The District Council considers that satisfactory provision for
car parking close to Newark town centre is vital, if that area is
to function effectively as a shopping and service centre, as well
as a place of employment. The District Council acknowledges that
provision for town centre car parking should also take account of
Government Guidance in PPG13 (Transport) and PPG6 (Town Centres
and Retail Developments), and emerging guidance linked with the
development of integrated transport policies, as well as Nottinghamshire
County Council's car parking guidance.
|
| 10.66 |
Taking all these factors into account, the District Council's
strategy for car parking in the town centre is based on the following
aims:
|
| |
- to ensure that there are sufficient spaces to cater for anticipated
needs, particularly for short-term parking (notwithstanding, the
Council also intends to relate the management of car parking provision
to proposals for the promotion of improvements to the availability
and quality of public transport);
- to ensure a good geographical distribution of parking space
within and around the town centre;
- to remove on-street parking where it is prejudicial to the amenities
of local residents; and
- to regulate provision of private parking spaces in the town
centre, in ways which are likely to encourage the more widespread
use of modes of transport other than the private car.
|
|
|
| |
Policy T11
Newark Town Centre Car Parks |
| The existing number of spaces in the town
centre car parks will be retained. Planning permission
will only be granted for the redevelopment of surface car parks
in Newark, if the spaces lost could be replaced in appropriate
and convenient locations. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.67 |
There are over 2,400 off-street parking spaces in Newark's
managed car parks. All the surface car parks and the two multi-storey
car parks are well used, particularly on Wednesdays, Fridays and
Saturdays, and there are very few vacant spaces at peak times.
Most of the cars using the car parks are parked for a short period
of time, in connection with shopping trips. However, there
is a significant amount of parking in excess of 4 hours - at the
Tolney Lane Car Park and the new Livestock Market Car Park.
|
| 10.68 |
In view of the need for short-term parking spaces, particularly
for shoppers, in the town centre, the District Council considers
it essential that the existing number of car parking spaces in town
centre managed car parks be retained. Planning permission
will therefore only be granted for the redevelopment of the town
centre's managed surface car parks, if the spaces lost could be
replaced in appropriate and convenient locations.
|
| 10.69 |
The unrestricted on-street parking spaces
around Newark town centre, many of which are on residential streets,
are well used throughout the week by people working or shopping in
the town centre. On certain streets, particularly on Barnby
Gate and in the Albert Street area, this means that, at certain times
of the day, residents find it difficult to park their cars near to
their properties. In order to improve the amenities of local
residents, the District Council will encourage the County Council
to introduce parking restrictions and/or Residents' Parking Schemes
on Barnby Gate, in the Albert Street area and on other adjacent streets. |
|
|
| |
Policy T12
Newark Town Centre - Private Car Parking Spaces - This policy is no longer saved |
| Planning permission will be granted for development
in Newark town centre which involves the loss of private car
parking spaces, provided that operational provision remains
consistent with the proposed use and the loss of existing parking
spaces would not cause traffic problems in nearby streets. The
District Council will seek, by means of a planning obligation,
a contribution by the developer towards appropriate transportation
initiatives intended to compensate for the loss of parking provision
within the site. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.70 |
There are some 900 spaces in private car parking areas around Newark
town centre. The loss of some of those spaces, through redevelopment
or the extension of existing premises, for example, would accord
with the objectives of PPG13. The latter document urges that
parking requirements be kept to the operational minimum and that
"Authorities should seek to encourage appropriate redevelopment
or re-use of existing private parking ….. to revised standards
……". The District Council will therefore
be prepared to grant planning permission for development in the
town centre which involves the loss of private car parking spaces,
provided that operational provision remains consistent with the
proposed use and the loss of existing parking spaces would not cause
traffic problems in nearby streets. The Council will seek,
by means of a planning obligation, a contribution from a developer
towards appropriate transportation initiatives (including measures
to assist public transport, walking and/or cycling) intended to
compensate for the loss of parking provision within the site.
In assessing the merits of individual planning applications, the
Council will have regard to both the Guide to Car Parking Standards
for New Developments, published by Nottinghamshire County Council
in conjunction with the District Council, and the County Council's
Interim Parking Standards (see Policy T25 and supporting text).
|
|
|
| |
Policy T13
Newark Town Centre - Car Parking for New Commercial
Development - This policy is no longer saved |
| In considering proposals for commercial development
within Newark town centre, the Council will expect on-site parking
to meet only the operational requirements of the proposed use
and will seek, by means of a planning obligation, a contribution
by the developer towards appropriate transportation initiatives
intended to compensate for the absence of non-operational parking
within the site. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.71 |
PPG13 urges that parking requirements be kept to the operational
minimum and declares that authorities should refuse planning permission
for private car parks which do not meet the strategic aims of the
plan. In considering proposals for commercial development
within the town centre, the District Council will, in accordance
with that Guidance, therefore expect on-site parking to meet only
the operational requirements of the proposed use and will seek,
by means of a planning obligation, a contribution from a developer
towards appropriate transportation initiatives (including measures
to assist public transport, walking and/or cycling) intended to
compensate for the absence of non-operational parking within the
site. In assessing the merits of individual planning applications,
the Council will have regard to both the Guide to Car Parking Standards
for New Developments, published by Nottinghamshire County Council
in conjunction with the District Council, and the County Council's
Interim Parking Standards (see Policy T25 and supporting text).
|
| |
|
| |
Provision for Pedestrians
and Cyclists in Newark |
| 10.72 |
PPG13 indicates that local plans should
include policies to develop the implementation of specific measures
which encourage pedestrian movements and the use of bicycles.
The District Council welcomes this emphasis and will seek to ensure
that adequate provision is made in Newark. |
|
|
| |
Policy T14
Newark Pedestrian Routes |
|
The District Council will seek to improve, extend and
sign the existing network of pedestrian routes, including
routes:
|
| 1. |
Between the central shopping area and the riverside;
|
| 2. |
Along the entire length of the Northgate riverside;
|
| 3. |
Into backland areas within the main retail core; and
|
| 4. |
Between the residential fringe
of the town centre and its core. |
| In addition, the District
Council will seek to improve footpath links between the
town and the countryside beyond. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.73 |
Considerable variety and interest is added to Newark town centre
by the area's footpaths and alleyways. Those routes
often include shops and other features of similar interest.
Recent redevelopment schemes, including the Bargate Centre, have
respected such routes and created new ones. In accordance
with the general guidance contained in PPG13, the District Council
will seek to protect existing pedestrian routes and will encourage
the provision of additional ones in future redevelopment or other
schemes.
|
| 10.74 |
Further afield, the District Council considers that there is a
need to ensure that there are good pedestrian links between residential
areas on the fringe of the town centre, the riverside and town centre
shopping areas. The Council will also explore opportunities
for extending the existing network of rights of way between the
town and the surrounding countryside.
|
| 10.75 |
The District Council has recently implemented
a high-quality scheme for the "finger" signposting, throughout
the town centre area, of important pedestrian destinations. |
|
|
| |
Policy T15
Newark Cycle Routes |
| In co-operation with Nottinghamshire County
Council, the District Council will seek to extend and improve
the existing network of cycle routes in accordance with the
proposals of the Newark Cycling Development Strategy, as shown
on the Proposals Map. Major new developments should provide
for linkages to the cycle network and include secure cycle parking
facilities. The District Council will also seek the provision
of secure cycle parking in the town centre, at educational institutions
and at public transport interchanges. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.76 |
The 1991 Census revealed that, at that time, just under 3.5% of
Nottinghamshire's workforce travelled to work by bicycle.
The comparable figures for Wards within Newark, Balderton and Farndon
were as follows:
|
| |
|
Wards
|
% Cycling to Work |
|
Beacon
|
11.95 |
|
Bridge
|
12.02 |
|
Bullpit/Pinfold
|
17.96 |
|
Castle
|
10.04 |
|
Devon
|
23.46 |
|
Farndon
|
10.00 |
|
Magnus
|
15.91 |
|
Milton/Lowfield
|
15.85 |
| All |
14.51 |
|
| |
|
| 10.77 |
Even so, there is judged to be potential for increased cycle use
in the town. Accordingly, a Newark Cycling Development Strategy
has been developed by the Newark Cycle Working Group, a body established
in 1994 which embraces the following membership: Nottinghamshire
County Council, Newark and Sherwood District Council, Nottinghamshire
Constabulary, Newark Town Council and local cycling groups.
The Strategy forms an integral part of the County Council's
latest Transport Policies and Programme submission to the Department
of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. It lists a
number of specific short-term
cycle route proposals.
|
| 10.78 |
In co-operation with the County Council and in accordance with
Strategy proposals shown on the Proposals Map, the District Council
will therefore seek to improve and extend the existing network of
cycle routes in the town and in its vicinity.
|
| 10.79 |
The London Road Cycle Track, which extends from Baldertongate,
Newark to Mount Road, Balderton, was officially opened in September
1993. A cycle route alongside the A46(T) (from its junction
with the Newark Relief Road to Long Lane) was opened in March 1995.
A Farndon Road cycle route was opened in June 1995 and a Northern
Road route has since been implemented.
|
| 10.80 |
The provision of further cycle parking in Newark is planned.
Off-highway links will also be provided, where appropriate.
|
| 10.81 |
Finally, the District Council is prepared to negotiate with developers
proposing major development schemes potentially offering scope for
significant use by cyclists, in order to achieve:
|
| |
1. |
provision of appropriate extensions or linkages to the cycle route
network shown on the Proposals Map, and
|
| |
2. |
secure and attractive cycle parking, and
other workplace facilities for cyclists, if appropriate. |
| |
|
| |
Traffic Management in
the Rest of the District |
| 10.82 |
PPG13 points out that traffic management can be a useful tool in
improving the quality of local neighbourhoods and making the streets
safer for children and adults. The PPG suggests that measures
to enhance the street environment and improve road safety should
be considered for sensitive locations, such as residential areas,
shopping streets and areas near schools.
|
| 10.83 |
The District Council is aware of a number of traffic problems in
the remainder of the district, which could possibly be alleviated
or solved by the introduction of appropriate traffic management
or traffic calming measures. The Structure Plan Review makes
provision, under a number of headings, for traffic management and
traffic calming measures to be undertaken. The District Council
will therefore co-operate with the County Council, in carrying out
comprehensive surveys of the traffic management requirements of
the area, identifying areas which would benefit from traffic management
and traffic calming measures, and drawing up a list of priorities
for consideration. This information will be used in the formulation
of the County Council's Traffic Management Programmes and
the District Council's Environmental Improvement Programmes.
The District Council will work closely with the County Council,
with a view to drawing up an appropriate programme of schemes and
priorities.
|
| |
|
| |
Western Part of the District
|
| 10.84 |
Settlements in the western part of the
District are affected by heavy goods vehicle traffic using unsuitable
roads, particularly in residential areas, and also by tourist traffic.
In some instances, those problems may be alleviated by weight restrictions,
new direction signs, traffic calming and other traffic management
measures. Nottinghamshire County Council has undertaken traffic
calming schemes on Hardwick Drive/Kingston Road, Station Road and
Bescar Lane, Ollerton. On Mickledale Lane,
Bilsthorpe, calming measures in the form of refuges have been provided.
An environmental weight restriction has been implemented in Edwinstowe
and a similar scheme for the Blidworth area was introduced in 1995.
An HGV restriction on Kirklington Road, Bilsthorpe has also been implemented.
The County Council has carried out a number of road safety measures
on the A617 Kirklington Road and Warsop Lane, Rainworth. |
| |
|
| |
Southern Part of the District
|
| 10.85 |
Largely in response to widespread local concern in many of the
area's settlements, especially those on the A612, the District
Council considers that a need exists for comprehensive surveys of
the traffic management requirements of the area. The Council
will therefore co-operate with Nottinghamshire County Council in
carrying out such surveys, with the main objective of identifying
problem areas and priorities and, ultimately, implementing appropriate
measures designed to improve environmental conditions in the area's
settlements. Initial discussions with the County Council will
be focused on the principal concerns of consultees who made representations
on the emerging Local Plan. Consultation with appropriate
Parish Councils will take place during the evolution of the respective
schemes. The District Council considers that Southwell is
a priority area for suitable measures.
|
| |
|
| |
Car Parking in Villages
|
| 10.86 |
The provision of adequate parking facilities
close to the shopping centres of the larger settlements is important,
if they are to function effectively. The District Council will
seek to ensure that there is adequate provision in these centres. |
|
|
| |
Policy T16
Village Centre Car Parks |
| The existing number of spaces in village centre
car parks will be retained. Planning permission will only
be granted for the redevelopment of surface car parks in village
centres, if the spaces lost could be replaced in appropriate
and convenient locations. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.87 |
There are car parks within the village centres of the larger settlements,
with others served by parking bays and on-street parking.
The car parks are vital, if the village centres are to function
effectively as shopping and service centres. They are well
used and must therefore be retained, if centres are to remain attractive
for shoppers in future. If proposals are brought forward for
their redevelopment, the District Council will ensure that spaces
lost are replaced in appropriate and convenient locations.
The District Council will also seek to remove on-street parking,
where this is prejudicial to road safety, and will examine the options
for additional parking provision in village centres.
|
|
|
| |
Policy T17
Village Centres - Proposed Car Parks |
| The District Council will seek to ensure the
provision of a new car park in the village centre of Ollerton
and will examine the options for additional parking provision
in other village centres. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.88 |
There is an urgent need to increase the number of available car
parking spaces within the village centre of Ollerton. The
District Council will therefore seek to ensure additional provision
in that centre, principally for shoppers.
|
| 10.89 |
The District Council will examine the options for additional parking
provision in other village centres. In particular, the Council
will monitor the adequacy of existing off-street parking provision
in Southwell village centre and will, if necessary, consider proposals
intended to overcome any deficiencies which are identified.
There may also be instances in which the voluntary release of privately
or institutionally controlled parking spaces, for public parking,
would be both feasible and beneficial.
|
| |
|
| |
Provision for Pedestrians,
Cyclists and Horse Riders in the Rest of the District |
| 10.90 |
PPG13 indicates that development plans
should aim to foster forms of development which encourage walking
and cycling. The District Council welcomes this approach and
will endeavour to ensure that a safe and effective network of pedestrian
and cycle routes is provided in the district. The Council will
also seek to secure a safe network of roadside and off-road routes
for horse riders. |
|
|
| |
Policy T18
Pedestrian and Cycle Routes |
| In co-operation with Nottinghamshire County
Council and landowners, the District Council will seek to secure
a safe network of pedestrian and cycle routes, taking account
of recreational needs. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.91 |
In Policy 5/5, the Nottinghamshire Structure Plan Review indicates
that measures will be undertaken to increase safety, convenience
and enjoyment for cyclists and pedestrians.
|
| 10.92 |
Pedestrians are a potentially vulnerable section of the travelling
public, including a high proportion of young and elderly people,
moving about in an environment which is often dominated by motor
vehicles. The District Council will therefore wish to ensure
that every available opportunity is taken to increase pedestrian
safety and to reduce conflicts with other users of the public highway.
In particular, the Council will seek to:
|
| |
- improve environmental standards and introduce additional facilities
within existing pedestrian areas and other areas which could be
accorded pedestrian priority status;
- improve or extend the existing network of pedestrian routes
in and around Southwell town centre and from the town to the surrounding
countryside; and
- investigate the potential for long-distance footpaths and long-distance
routes for joint use by walkers, cyclists and horse riders.
|
| 10.93 |
In Policy 5/5, the Structure Plan Review also makes provision for
the existing network of cycle routes in the Greater Nottingham area
to be extended within the County. The District Council is
concerned that, although cycling offers a potentially relaxing way
of spending leisure time, there are few inviting routes suitable
for the recreational cyclist which are also safe for young people.
The District Council will therefore seek to secure a safe network
of cycle routes, taking account of the needs of the recreational
cyclist, in discussions with the County Council, other organisations
and landowners.
|
| 10.94 |
Finally, the District Council is prepared to negotiate with developers
proposing major development schemes potentially offering scope for
significant use by cyclists, in order to achieve:
|
| |
1. |
provision of appropriate extensions or
linkages to the cycle route network shown on the Proposals Map, and |
| |
2. |
secure and attractive cycle parking, and
other workplace facilities for cyclists, if appropriate. |
| |
|
| |
Provision for Cycling and Horse Riding
along the B6034
|
| 10.95 |
The route between Center Parcs Holiday
Village, Rufford Country Park, Edwinstowe and Sherwood Forest Visitor
Centre is popular with cyclists. Holidaymakers staying at Center
Parcs often hire cycles to explore the surrounding area and use the
B6034 to visit the Sherwood Forest Visitor Centre and Edwinstowe.
There is a particular need for safe cycling facilities along that
road, because of the heavy traffic flows, and an opportunity to introduce
improvements for horse riders as well. The District Council,
in association with the County Council, will therefore seek to bring
about appropriate improvements. |
|
|
| |
Policy T19
Horse Riding |
| In co-operation with Nottinghamshire County
Council and landowners, the District Council will seek to secure
a safe network of roadside and off-road routes for horse riders.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.96 |
Horse riding is a popular leisure activity in Newark and Sherwood
District, although there are few safe routes. In co-operation with
Nottinghamshire County Council and landowners, the District Council
will therefore seek to secure a safe network of roadside and off-road
routes for horse riders. Opportunities to provide multi-user
routes, suitable for horse riders, cyclists and walkers, will also
be considered. Access to all such routes by motorised, off-road
vehicles would be considered inappropriate.
|
| |
|
| |
Public Transport |
| 10.97 |
PPG13 indicates that development plans should aim to foster forms
of development which encourage the increased use of public transport.
The Structure Plan Review includes various measures intended to
help increase the availability and quality of public transport in
Nottinghamshire, and to help relate new development to public transport
provision. The District Council welcomes and endorses these proposals.
|
| 10.98 |
The maintenance and improvement of the local public transport system
is important for two main reasons. Firstly, many people, particularly
the young and the elderly, are dependent upon public transport to
provide access to essential services and employment. Secondly,
greater use of public transport could have environmental benefits,
reducing congestion on the road network and the overall volume of
damaging emissions from motor vehicles. While the provision
of rail and bus services lies outside the control of the District
Council, opportunities will be taken to influence the frequency
and routing of those services, in an effort to ensure that all parts
of the District are adequately served.
|
| |
|
| |
Bus Services
|
| 10.99 |
As a result of the Transport Act 1985, bus services throughout
Nottinghamshire are subject to continuing revision. Operators
may introduce, modify or terminate services merely by giving the
required period of notice. The longer term effects of de-regulation
cannot be predicted but, for the present, the situation remains
fluid and rapid changes to the quality of service provision continue
to occur. The Act requires the County Council to approve and
review policies for public transport throughout the County and "make
arrangements to secure socially necessary services."
This requirement will form the basis on which development of bus
transport in the District is undertaken.
|
| 10.100 |
In determining which settlements would be suitable for new development,
the availability of adequate public transport was taken into account,
in accordance with PPG12 and PPG13. Residents in villages
in which significant development is proposed clearly require regular
services providing access to jobs and essential facilities.
The County Council will therefore be urged to help ensure that most
villages have daily bus services to their nearest employment centre.
The District Council will continue to bring all matters of concern
relating to the adequacy of local bus service provision to the County
Council's attention.
|
| 10.101 |
Local authorities have powers to provide
bus priority measures, bus stations, shelters and information.
The District Council accepts the view, expressed in PPG13, that such
measures may help to make bus use more attractive and may enhance
the effectiveness of other policies designed to reduce the use of
cars. |
|
|
| |
Policy T20
Off-street Bus Terminal in Newark |
| Planning permission will not be granted for
the redevelopment of Newark Bus Station, unless provision is
first made either for an appropriate replacement bus terminal
in situ, or for an appropriate alternative off-street bus terminal
elsewhere, designed to serve Newark town centre. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.102 |
PPG13 indicates that development plans should aim to foster forms
of development which encourage the use of public transport.
The District Council considers that Newark's present Bus Station
is very well located to serve the Central Shopping Area of the town
centre. Ideally, such a facility should therefore be retained at
the present Lombard Street site - in the event of any redevelopment
proposal for that site. Alternatively, a suitably located
off-street bus terminal should be provided elsewhere. The
Council also considers that there is scope for improved pedestrian
access between the present Bus Station and the town centre, and
between the Bus Station and the two railway stations.
|
| |
|
| |
Rail Services
|
| 10.103 |
PPG13 points out that rail services, with their fixed infrastructure,
can provide considerable certainty for developers and a focus for
regeneration and comprehensive redevelopment. The PPG also
indicates that local authorities should encourage the use of railways
for the carriage of freight. The District Council welcomes
this emphasis and will support proposals which facilitate increased
freight usage of the railways serving the district. The Council
will also seek to encourage provision of the best possible rail
facilities and environment for travellers, including: service frequency
and quality, range of destinations, car parking provision, bus access
and other facilities.
|
| 10.104 |
Northgate Station is one of the principal entry points to Newark
and lies adjacent to the Northern Road Industrial Estate.
The District Council considers that the environment surrounding
the Station should be progressively improved. With the electrification
of the East Coast Main Line and the proposed provision of international
services on the line to Europe, following the opening of the Channel
Tunnel, the County and District Councils will continue to press
the rail authorities for improved passenger and freight services
at Newark, in recognition of the importance of the town as a gateway
to Nottinghamshire and the East Midlands. Recently improved bus
links between Northgate Station and the town centre will be monitored.
|
| 10.105 |
Castle Station has recently been refurbished.
|
| 10.106 |
The rail network in the western part of the district is extensive,
but is used solely for the transportation of coal from the area's
collieries to power stations on the River Trent. The main
west-east rail route runs from Warsop, through Edwinstowe and Ollerton,
to High Marnham Power Station. Linked to this route is a north-south
line which serves Rufford, Clipstone and Bilsthorpe Collieries.
In accordance with the guidance contained in PPG13, the District
Council supports the continued use of railways for the transportation
of coal. In recent years, there has been some transfer of
coal away from rail to road transport, which is, unfortunately,
having a significant environmental impact on the area's settlements.
The Council will also support proposals to extend existing rail
connections in the western part of the District, to help improve
provision for the movement of other forms of freight.
|
| 10.107 |
The Structure Plan Review makes provision for development of the
Robin Hood Line, which now provides a passenger service between
Nottingham, Mansfield and Worksop. The existing mineral line,
which passes through Ollerton and Edwinstowe, is linked to the proposed
Robin Hood Line at Shirebrook junction. The District Council
informed the County Council that it considered that the Structure
Plan Review should give a commitment to the extension of passenger
services to Ollerton and Edwinstowe. Such a link would provide
direct access to the national rail network and enhance prospects
for economic regeneration in the area. Provision for passengers
would also facilitate access for work, shopping, leisure and tourism
purposes. The County Council considers that, in accordance
with Structure Plan Review Policy 5/3(f), the Ollerton link has
potential - and that will be subject to a feasibility study.
|
| 10.108 |
In the past, the County and District Councils have worked closely
with the rail authorities in an effort to ensure the provision of
satisfactory rail services on the Nottingham-Lincoln line.
There is a pressing need for such contacts to continue, in order
to help secure and maintain convenient, regular and reliable services,
fitted to the travelling needs of all sections of the community.
|
| 10.109 |
The County Council co-ordinates a number of transport initiatives
targeted at those without ready access to private transport, including:
Community Transport and Voluntary Car Schemes, and Dial-a-Ride.
|
| 10.110 |
The focus of the County Council's Greater Nottingham Area
Rail Development Strategy Study, which Policy 5/3 of the Structure
Plan Review reflects, is to improve rail services in the Greater
Nottingham area. Within Newark and Sherwood District, that
area extends as far as Newark. The District Council endorses
the content of the County Council's latest Transport Policies and
Programme submission - insofar as that document makes provision
for the implementation of the Greater Nottingham Area Rail Development
Strategy within the District.
|
| |
|
| |
Other Transportation Policies |
| 10.111 |
In addition to the provision of an adequate
highway network, it is important that new development does not cause
traffic management or highway safety problems. The following
policies seek to provide guidance on the appropriate location of,
and standards for, new development. |
|
|
| |
Policy T21
Heavy Goods Vehicles |
| Planning permission will not be granted for
development which is likely to produce substantial traffic movements,
especially of heavy goods vehicles, unless there are good links
to the main road network or immediate access to rail links. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.112 |
Heavy goods vehicles contribute to traffic congestion, damage,
danger and environmental problems. The District Council notes
that the Structure Plan Review proposes to regulate the movement
of heavy goods vehicles, which will be directed to use "main
roads". Through traffic will not be encouraged or, where
appropriate, will be positively discouraged, on "local roads".
The District Council welcomes that approach and considers that new
development, which is likely to generate or attract considerable
volumes of heavy goods vehicles, should therefore have good links
to the main road network or immediate access to rail links. Main
roads forming the strategic network include all trunk roads, County
primary roads and County non-primary routes of more than local importance,
which, in Newark and Sherwood District, are the A1(T), A17(T), A46(T),
A614(T), A617 and A6097. The County Council has also included
the A612 and A1133 as part of the strategic road network in the
Structure Plan Review. The A616 and A6075, which are major
secondary roads, also serve the District.
|
|
|
| |
Policy T22
Motorist-Related Services |
|
Planning permission will be granted for the development
of roadside services and facilities provided:
|
| 1. |
There is no adverse effect on the surrounding landscape
and countryside;
|
| 2. |
There is a need for additional facilities in the area;
|
| 3. |
There are no alternative sites in more appropriate
locations; an
|
| 4. |
No traffic problems are caused.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.113 |
There is a need, at intervals along trunk and principal roads,
for motorist-related services, such as petrol filling stations,
refreshment facilities and overnight accommodation. Those
facilities should be grouped together at appropriately sited and
spaced locations. However, the development of motorist-related
services in the open countryside will not normally be acceptable.
The creation of new accesses onto fast, open stretches of trunk
or principal roads is open to objection on traffic grounds, as such
accesses cause interference with the free movement of traffic and
create a greater risk of accidents. Moreover, it is a fundamental
aim of national planning policy to restrict development outside
built-up areas, in the interests of preserving the character of
the countryside. Nottinghamshire Structure Plan Review Policy
3/1 makes provision for roadside services in the countryside where
they "fill a clearly established gap in existing provision
and cannot reasonably be met within built-up areas".
|
| 10.114 |
Applications for roadside services and
facilities will be assessed against the advice in Department of Transport
Circular 4/88 "The Control of Development on Trunk Roads"
and a number of criteria, including: the effect on the surrounding
landscape and countryside; the need for additional facilities; the
availability of alternative sites in more appropriate locations; and
the traffic implications. Consideration will also be given, at key
sites, to the provision of facilities for lorries and lorry drivers. |
|
|
| |
Policy T23
Use of the River Trent |
|
Planning permission will be granted for appropriate freight
facilities on the River Trent, where they will reduce environmental
or congestion problems on the road network and will not have
an adverse impact on the environment.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.115 |
PPG13 indicates that Local Authorities should encourage the carriage
of freight by water rather than by road, wherever it provides a
viable alternative. The District Council will also encourage
the construction of appropriate facilities on the River Trent to
enable minerals to be transported by barge, subject to environmental
safeguards.
|
| 10.116 |
As well as being a recreational resource,
the River Trent is also a commercial waterway. In view of the
environmental problems commonly caused by heavy goods vehicles on
roads and in accordance with the guidance contained in PPG13, the
District Council considers that the use of the River for freight traffic
should be encouraged. Planning permission will therefore be
granted for freight facilities on the River, subject to environmental
considerations. Such facilities should be located and designed
so as not to adversely affect existing recreation/tourist uses, or
prevent the potential for such uses to be developed. |
|
|
| |
Policy T24
Roads in New Development |
|
Planning permission will not be granted for development
unless the road layout and access points are satisfactory.
The layout of new roads should take full account of public
transport requirements and the needs of pedestrians, cyclists
and disabled persons.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.117 |
The District Council can influence the design of roads in new housing,
industrial and other developments. Standards for road widths,
cul-de-sac lengths, dimensions of junctions etc. are set out in
the Highway Design Guide - Residential and Industrial Development
(July 1987), published by Nottinghamshire County Council in conjunction
with the District Council, which the District Council regards as
Supplementary Planning Guidance.The District Council
will normally require that new road layouts comply with the County
Council's published guidance. In designing new road
layouts, conflict between pedestrians and vehicles should be minimised
and safe crossing points provided. Public transport requirements
and the needs of pedestrians, cyclists and disabled persons should
be taken into account in detailed designs.
|
|
|
| |
Policy T25
Car Parking and Servicing in New Development |
|
Planning permission will not be granted for development
unless appropriate vehicle parking and servicing arrangements
are provided.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 10.118 |
Standards for the provision of car parking and servicing for new
development are set out in the Guide to Car Parking Standards for
New Developments, published by Nottinghamshire County Council in
conjunction with the District Council. This is supplemented
by the County Council's Interim Parking Standards: these are maximum
standards, which have been adopted by the District Council as a
basis for development control. The District Council regards
these documents as Supplementary Planning Guidance. The
District Council considers it essential that developers provide
appropriate parking and servicing facilities within their sites,
in order to minimise traffic impact on the surrounding road network.
|
| |
| |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| top |