 |
|
|
| |
|
| Chapter 8.0 - Countryside
and the Natural Environment |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| 8.1 |
This chapter outlines the District Council's approach to the countryside
and the natural environment. It contains policies which seek
to limit development in rural areas as well as ensuring the protection
and enhancement of areas of wildlife, landscape and conservation
value. It describes the District Council's policies towards
agriculture and outlines various environmental proposals and initiatives
for the District.
|
| 8.2 |
The District Council will seek to maintain a healthy rural economy,
while protecting and enhancing the natural environment. It
will also seek to ensure that all development in rural areas should
have due regard to the interests of the environment, by encouraging
energy efficient land use patterns and by not compromising the capacity
of the natural environment to accommodate the level of development
proposed.
|
| |
|
| |
Background, Problems and
Issues |
| 8.3 |
There are many changes taking place in
the countryside, the consequences of which could alter radically the
future appearance and character of rural areas in years to come.
Agriculture, being the dominant land use, is perhaps the principal
driving force behind this change. There is also a growing recognition
of the need to create a sustainable rural environment, whilst safeguarding
the wildlife and landscape value of the countryside as a whole.
The District Council has recognised the following as major issues
to be addressed in the Local Plan. These issues include the
need to: |
| |
- halt the loss of landscape or geological features, and maintain
and enhance biodiversity;
- diversify the rural economy;
- consider alternative appropriate land use options for agricultural
land which may be of a lower quality; and
- manage and safeguard the countryside for future generations.
|
| |
|
| |
Landscape Quality and the Natural Environment
|
| 8.4 |
The landscape quality of much of the District has been badly affected
by intensive farmingpractices and mineral extraction. Perhaps, more
significantly, the biodiversity of the district has also suffered
as habitats have been destroyed or isolated by the removal of hedgerows
and other wildlife corridors. Despite an awareness of the
need to conserve existing habitats, wildlife sites still continue
to be lost at an alarming rate.
|
| 8.5 |
New opportunities exist to create wildlife areas within the district,
as a result of changes in farm subsidies. These changes may encourage
more woodland planting and less intensive farming practices. The
Countryside Appraisal prepared by Nottinghamshire County Council
has provided valuable information about the landscape of the District.
The District Council will attempt to protect Mature Landscape Areas,
identified as part of the Appraisal, and encourage appropriate management
of such areas. The Greenwood Community Forest Plan, Heathland
Strategy, Nottinghamshire Local Biodiversity Action Plan, and English
Nature's Natural Area Profiles also provide a framework for landscape
restoration and enhancement across much of the district.
|
| |
|
| |
Agriculture and the Diversification of the Rural
Economy
|
| 8.6 |
Agriculture remains the principal land use in the countryside.
It therefore has a major influence over its appearance and the health
of the rural economy. The agricultural industry is undergoing a
prolonged period of change as a result of CAP (Common Agricultural
Policy) Reform and the recent GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs
and Trade) Agreement. These changes will force many farm businesses
to undergo restructuring to remain competitive. As the agricultural
industry rationalises itself, the need to find new sources of employment
in rural areas increases. In the 1980s, full time agricultural employment
declined in Nottinghamshire by 18%. The District Council is
committed to helping to diversify the rural economy. It will
also treat sympathetically proposals from farmers to diversify their
incomes, thereby helping to maintain the viability of individual
farm businesses and ensure appropriate management of the countryside.
However, the District Council will not normally welcome proposals
which take whole farm units completely out of agricultural production.
|
| 8.7 |
Not only is the rural economy likely to
undergo a period of change as a result of agricultural policy reform,
but the appearance and perception of rural areas may alter radically
as well. The area given over to new crops, including oilseed
rape, linseed and, in future, short-term rotation coppice for fuel,
is set to increase. The area "set aside" from
agricultural production is also presenting opportunities for habitat
creation and various recreational and leisure activities. |
| |
|
| |
Policy Context for the
Plan |
| |
Central Government Advice
|
| 8.8 |
The Government's planning policies for the countryside are contained
within PPG7 "The Countryside - Environmental Quality and Economic
and Social Development". The PPG advocates policies based
on the sound stewardship of the countryside heritage and on creating
the right conditions for a healthy and vibrant rural economy.
It outlines the many changes that have taken place in the countryside
in the last thirty years and continues to emphasise the need to
strictly control new development outside existing settlements.
|
| 8.9 |
PPG7 seeks to protect the best and most
versatile agricultural land from development. It also outlines
how the planning system affects farming activities, for example, with
regard to permitted development rights, and the re-use and adaptation
of rural buildings. |
| |
|
| |
Regional Planning Guidance for the East
Midlands
|
| 8.10 |
The District Council has shaped its aims and policies to take account
of guidance contained within RPG8. This Guidance Note describes
the countryside as one of the East Midlands principal assets, along
with its many varied natural landscapes and habitats. The
policies contained within the Plan therefore seek to protect and
improve the countryside.
|
| 8.11 |
Policies contained within this plan also seek to protect agricultural
land and woodlands, in accordance with RPG8, as well as seeking
to extend tree cover through the establishment of the Greenwood
Community Forest in the west of the District.
|
| 8.12 |
In accordance with RPG8, Sites of Special
Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and Local Nature Reserves will be afforded
the "fullest protection" in the policies of this Plan.
|
| |
|
| |
Nottinghamshire Structure Plan Review
|
| 8.13 |
The Structure Plan Review acknowledges that a balance must be struck
between economic activities and the natural, historic and aesthetic
value of the landscape. The County's agricultural landscape,
along with its wildlife, has suffered significantly from changes
in land management over the last ten years. However, there
are now many new opportunities to restore damaged landscapes across
the District, not least the re-establishment of Sherwood Forest.
|
| 8.14 |
Policy 3/1 of the Plan seeks to control development in the countryside.
|
| 8.15 |
The Structure Plan Review includes many
specific policies relating to landscape protection, the protection
of areas of value to the human heritage and the safeguarding of areas
of ecological value. |
| |
|
| |
Objectives
|
| 8.16 |
The aims of the Local Plan will be achieved through the implementation
of the following objectives:
|
| |
- to protect the countryside from inappropriate development;
- to encourage the re-use and adaption of existing rural buildings
in order to provide opportunities for appropriate employment,
community, recreation or tourist uses;
- to retain the best and most versatile agricultural land;
- to ensure new development in the countryside is sensitively
located, designed and landscaped;
- to protect and enhance areas of landscape importance, including
Sherwood Forest and the Mature Landscape Areas;
- to protect and enhance sites of nature conservation interest
and ecological or geological significance;
- to retain and secure the proper management of trees and woodlands;
- to plant trees and woodlands;
- to establish the Greenwood Community Forest, and restore traditional
Sherwood Forest habitats;
- to protect the countryside for its own sake;
- to enable the diversification of the rural economy; and
- to promote a greater awareness and understanding of wildlife,
and encourage the use and enjoyment of areas of nature conservation
interest.
|
| |
|
| |
The Countryside |
| 8.17 |
New development will be strictly controlled
in the countryside. Any development considered appropriate to the
countryside should be well located and designed. New development
should also avoid sensitive locations and landscape designations. |
|
|
| |
Policy NE1
Development in the Countryside |
|
Planning permission will not be granted for development
in the countryside. Exceptions, which will be
assessed against the provisions of Policies DD1-6 may
be made for:
|
| 1. |
Agriculture, forestry and associated activities which
contribute to diversifying the rural economy, consistent
with Policies NE6 or S14;
|
| 2. |
Appropriate recreation and tourist uses, consistent
with Policies R23 or TO1;
|
| 3. |
Utility installations requiring a rural location;
|
| 4. |
Changes of use of rural buildings to uses consistent
with Policy NE2;
|
| 5. |
Roadside services consistent with Policy T22;and
|
| 6. |
Dwellings for agricultural
or forestry workers, which comply with Policy H28. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.18 |
It is national government policy to protect the countryside for
its own sake and not simply for its agricultural value. Since
the 1940s, there have been unprecedented pressures on traditional
landscapes and wildlife habitats found in rural areas. The
realisation that so much has been lost, in terms of landscape quality
and ecological value, has resulted in a growing awareness of the
need to safeguard the natural beauty of the countryside, as a whole,
and not just specially designated areas. The countryside is
also valued for its many natural and non-renewable resources and
increasingly as a recreational and tourist resource.
|
| 8.19 |
New development in the countryside will be strictly controlled.
Some activities, however, by their nature, must take place in the
countryside, for example agriculture, forestry and, subject to need,
mineral extraction. An exception will therefore be made for
such development, where appropriate. This accords with Policy
3/1 of the Nottinghamshire Structure Plan Review.
|
| 8.20 |
Agricultural development which requires planning permission should
meet high standards of design and should respect the character and
appearance of the countryside. Furthermore, it should not
be located in prominent locations or be visually intrusive nor should
it be insensitively landscaped.
|
| 8.21 |
The rapid growth in countryside based leisure activities has been
well documented by many agencies, including the English Tourist
Board and the Countryside Commission. In general, tourist
and recreational uses will be viewed favourably, particularly where
they help to diversify the local rural economy. However, such
development should not destroy or adversely affect sensitive ecological,
geological or archaeological sites, or specified landscape designations.
Planning permission will not be granted for tourist or recreational
development where it would destroy or detract from the overall quality
of the countryside and especially from those features that are of
interest to visitors to the area. The District Council will
normally expect tourist development to be located within, or close
to, existing settlements. Only in very special circumstances
will large tourist related developments be acceptable in the countryside.
In these exceptional cases, it should be clearly demonstrated that
no alternatives are either suitable or available and that the site
is located close to existing public transport routes, which minimise
the need to travel by car.
|
| 8.22 |
New residential dwellings will not be allowed in the countryside,
unless they are necessary to house an agricultural or forestry worker.
The District Council will apply rigorous tests to any proposal for
such a dwelling to ensure that the need is genuine.
|
| 8.23 |
Traditional sources of employment in the countryside have been
in sharp decline for many years. Agriculture is no longer
a major employer, the rationalisation and intensification of farming
activities has taken its toll on rural employment. This and
the gradual removal of farm subsidies has resulted in a pressing
need to diversify the nature of the rural economy as a whole and,
at a more local level, to introduce policies to enable farmers to
explore new initiatives to support their main farming enterprise.
In doing so, it is hoped that farmers will be enabled to continue
to manage the countryside as an economic, environmental and recreational
resource. Therefore, the policies of the Plan seek to allow
the development of non-agricultural enterprises associated with
existing farms which are consistent with the environmental objectives
of the Plan and national planning guidance.
|
| 8.24 |
The conversion of buildings of architectural or historic value
to other uses should respect the character and setting of the buildings
concerned. The proposal should not have an adverse impact
on either the building itself or the character of the area.
|
| 8.25 |
Employment uses in the countryside will
be welcomed where they make use of suitable buildings. Such
re-use or adaptation can help to reduce the need for new building
elsewhere in the countryside, as well as helping to aid the diversification
of the rural economy. |
|
|
| |
Policy NE2
The Conversion of Rural Buildings |
|
Planning permission will be granted for the conversion
or re-use of agricultural and other rural buildings
in the countryside for employment, community, recreation
or tourist uses where:
|
| 1. |
The building is of permanent and substantial construction,
in generally sound structural condition and capable
of conversion without substantial alteration or extension;
|
| 2. |
Its form, bulk, design and general appearance are in
keeping with its surroundings and would not be adversely
affected by the conversion proposals; and
|
| 3. |
The proposals are acceptable
in relation to the provisions of Policies DD1. |
|
Planning permission will be granted for conversion
to residential use subject to the above and provided
also that:-
|
| 4. |
The creation of a residential curtilage would not have
a harmful impact on the character of the surrounding
countryside;
|
| 5. |
Existing uses in the vicinity would not lead to an
unsatisfactory standard of amenity for occupiers of
the converted building; and
|
| 6. |
The creation of a residential unit would not prejudice
the future use of associated buildings or structures
for employment, community, recreation or tourist uses;
or
|
| 7. |
Residential conversion satisfies
1-5 of the above and is a sub-ordinate part of a scheme
for an employment, community, recreation or tourist use. |
|
Any application for a residential re-use outside settlements
should be accompanied by a statement outlining:
|
| (a) |
The efforts that have been made to secure an employment,
community, recreation or tourist re-use; and
|
| (b) |
The reasons why such a use
could not be accommodated within the buildings concerned. |
|
Where the re-use of an agricultural building is proposed,
the District Council will take into account the history
of the building and likely future requirements for new
farm buildings on the holding.
|
| Permitted development
rights will be removed, by means of a planning condition,
where minor additions or alterations to a building or
curtilage would be likely to adversely affect the general
appearance of the building or its setting. Where
such a condition has been imposed, subsequent applications
will beconsidered in the light of the above provisions.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.26 |
The re-use and adaptation of existing rural buildings has an important
role in meeting the needs of rural areas for commercial and industrial
development, as well as for sport, tourism and recreation.
Policy NE2 seeks to establish criteria against which any proposal
for conversion can be tested. These criteria are based on
guidance contained within PPG7 "The Countryside - Environmental
Quality and Economic and Social Development".
|
| 8.27 |
The District Council will prefer to see buildings converted to
employment uses rather than residential uses. Therefore, an
applicant seeking to pursue a new use for a rural building will
be required to make every reasonable attempt to secure an appropriate
employment, community, recreation or tourist re-use, in preference
to a residential conversion. Any application for a residential
use should be supported by a statement outlining the efforts that
have been made to achieve one of the alternative uses outlined above
and the reasons why such uses could not be accommodated within the
building concerned.
|
| 8.28 |
The District Council examines proposals for residential development
in the countryside with particular care. The District Council
will assess proposals in accordance with its expressed aim of promoting
sustainable development. It may be appropriate to apply the
same strict control over residential conversions as that operated
over new housing in the open countryside, especially if the building
is unsuitable for conversion without extensive alteration, rebuilding
or extension, or if the creation of a residential curtilage would
have a harmful effect on the character of the countryside.
|
| 8.29 |
In recent years, the District Council has
become increasingly concerned that the original character and appearance
of many traditional buildings in the area has been lost through unsympathetic
changes of use and alterations. In recognition of this problem, the
District Council adopted a Supplementary Planning Guidance Note in
1989 for the conversion of agricultural buildings to new uses.
This was most recently reviewed and updated in November 1995.
This guidance lays down basic guidelines on acceptable uses which
have been incorporated into the policy. The guidance also provides
design advice to ensure that, where conversion is acceptable in principle,
proposals do not have any adverse affect on either the building itself
or the character of the area. |
| |
|
| |
Ecological Surveys for Protected Species
|
| 8.30 |
Rural buildings have also considerable importance for a variety
of protected species and other species prioritised within National
and Local Biodiversity Action Plans. Several species of bats,
as well as barn owls, swallows, swifts and other birds, regularly
make use of such buildings as roosts or breeding sites. The
cumulative effect of the loss of these buildings and structures
is to place further stress on already threatened and declining species.
|
| 8.31 |
Prior to determining an application to convert an appropriate rural
building to a new use, the District Council will usually request
the submission of a competent ecological survey carried out using
appropriate methods and undertaken by suitably qualified consultants.
The survey should indicate:
|
| |
- the species targeted in the survey;
- the methodology used and time spent in survey;
- other sources of information used (i.e. desk top surveys and
dates);
- the presence of protected species, or any listed in National
or Local Biodiversity Action Plans; and
- proposed mitigation or compensatory measures
|
| 8.32 |
The presence of a protected species will be regarded as a material
consideration in the determination of any planning application.
Policy NE17 addresses these issues in more detail.
|
| 8.33 |
The District Council will request, where appropriate, that schemes
for the re-use and adaption of rural buildings incorporate habitat
creation initiatives and design solutions that make provision for
protected species.
|
| |
|
| |
Agriculture |
| 8.34 |
Agriculture remains the dominant land use in the countryside.
Changes in agricultural policy can have a dramatic effect on the
character, appearance and economy of rural areas.
|
| 8.35 |
The following policies seek to protect
agricultural land and reduce the impact of new agricultural development
in the countryside. |
|
|
| |
Policy NE3
Agricultural Land |
|
Planning permission will not be granted for development on
the best and most versatile agricultural land, which in the
District comprises grades 1, 2 and 3a.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.36 |
In recent years, there has been a major shift in government policy
concerning agricultural land. In the past, emphasis was put
on increasing agricultural production and protecting agricultural
land from development. With the exception of specially designated
areas, such as National Parks, there was little recognition that
the countryside had value outside its role for agricultural production.
The generation of large food surpluses, through the use of modern
agricultural methods, has resulted in a reappraisal of these policies.
Now the emphasis is on more sustainable forms of agriculture, diversifying
the rural economy and, in some cases, considering appropriate new
uses for lower quality agricultural land.
|
| 8.37 |
While the need to protect all agricultural
land has reduced in recent years, it is still government policy, as
outlined in PPG7, to safeguard the best and most versatile agricultural
land from development, in the event of a need arising in future years.
This approach accords with the principles of sustainable development.
The protection of land in grades 1, 2 and 3a is seen as having great
importance. Land in these grades is the most flexible, productive
and efficient in response to inputs. It is best suited to the
changing needs of the agricultural industry in both the short and
long term national interest. As a result of the reasons explained
above, the District Council will attach considerable weight to protecting
such land against development. PPG7 states that once agricultural
land is developed for "soft" uses such as golf courses,
it's seldom practicable to return it to its original state.
The precise quality of agricultural land will be determined through
detailed surveys of specific sites, where appropriate. |
|
|
| |
Policy NE4
Agricultural Development |
|
Planning permission will be granted for agricultural
development, requiring planning permission, provided:
|
| 1. |
The proposal is, wherever possible, well integrated
with existing farm buildings;
|
| 2. |
The development has regard to the character of the
surrounding landscape and adjoining buildings and is
located and designed accordingly;
|
| 3. |
The scheme makes provision for the prevention of pollution
of ground and surface water;
|
| 4. |
The design, type and colour of the materials used in
the development are appropriate and it is sensitively
landscaped to reduce its impact on the surrounding area;
and
|
| 5. |
The amenities of nearby residents
are not adversely affected. |
|
For the purposes of this policy, agricultural development
involves the erection of new buildings or structures,
the extension or alteration of existing buildings or
structures, the construction of farm roads and the excavation
and filling of land.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.38 |
Most farm buildings and operations lie outside planning control.
However, where planning permission is required, the District Council
will demand a high standard of layout, design and landscaping, especially
in prominent locations and sensitive areas, such as the Sherwood
Forest Heritage Area, Historic Parks and Mature Landscape Areas.
Where possible, new agricultural buildings should avoid exposed
sites and be located close to existing farm complexes.
|
| 8.39 |
Where it is proposed to introduce a new use for a recently erected
agricultural building, the history of the site will be investigated
to determine if the original building has been utilised for the
purpose intended.
|
| 8.40 |
Where a scheme has the potential to pollute
ground or surface waters, the District Council will require a statement
outlining what provisions have been made to prevent such an incident
occurring. |
|
|
| |
Policy NE5
Intensive Livestock and Food Production Units |
|
Planning permission will be granted for the development
of intensive livestock and food production units provided:
|
| 1. |
The requirements of Policy NE4 are satisfied;
|
| 2. |
The proposal creates no adverse effects on protected
buildings by reason of noise, dust, smell or general
disturbance;
|
| 3. |
There is adequate means of effluent retention, treatment
and disposal; and
|
| 4. |
There is satisfactory access,
servicing and parking facilities. |
|
A protected building includes most residential and
other permanent buildings that are normally occupied
by people, as defined in the Town and Country Planning
General Development Order.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.41 |
Although intensive livestock units are an appropriate land use
in rural areas, they can, on occasions, create serious problems
of dust, smell and noise pollution. They should be carefully
located and designed, so as to minimise their impact on the countryside
and any nearby residential properties. The District Council
will also need to be satisfied that adequate provision has been
made for the management and disposal of waste, particularly within
Aquifer Protection Zones and Nitrate Sensitive Areas. The
District Council may require an Environmental Impact Assessment
for proposals listed in Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning
(Assessment of Environmental Effects) Regulations 1988. Such
an assessment should discuss in detail the likely impacts of the
proposal on the local environment and should be prepared by competent
independent consultants.
|
| |
|
| |
Agricultural Development - Permitted Development
Rights
|
| 8.42 |
The Town and Country Planning General Development Order 1988, (as
amended), grants planning permission for a wide range of development
associated with agricultural and forestry uses. In certain
circumstances, (e.g. on agricultural holdings
of 5 hectares or more), planning permission cannot be
implemented, unless a farmer or landowner has first applied to the
District Council for a determination on whether prior approval is
required for certain details relating to siting, design and external
appearance. This requirement applies in respect of proposals
for new agricultural and forestry buildings, significant extensions
and alterations, agricultural and forestry roads, certain excavations
or waste deposits, and the placing or assembly of fish tanks.
|
| 8.43 |
In accordance with PPG7, the Council will normally require additional
details where agricultural or forestry development would affect
landscapes of special value, Listed Buildings, Scheduled Ancient
Monuments, Sites of Special Scientific Interest, Local Nature Reserves,
and other sites of known archaeological or ecological interest.
|
| 8.44 |
Where additional information is required, the Council will be concerned
with the siting, design and external appearance of new, agricultural
and forestry buildings, the siting and construction materials of
roads, the siting of excavations or waste deposits, and the location,
appearance and environmental impact of fish tanks.
|
| 8.45 |
Such development should be located away
from sensitive areas, including highly visible sites in areas of special
landscape importance and known sites of nature conservation or archaeological
interest. Furthermore, it should not adversely affect the setting
of Listed Buildings and should not spoil the character of Conservation
Areas. The Council will encourage good standards of design and
will seek to minimise the impact of new development, by means of appropriate
landscaping and the use of traditional building materials. |
|
|
| |
Policy NE6
Farm Diversification |
|
Proposals to diversify the range of economic activities
on a farm will be permitted if all the following criteria
are met:
|
| (a) |
The proposal is complementary to the agricultural operations
on the farm and is operated as part of the farm holding;
|
| (b) |
The character, scale and location of the proposal is
compatible with its landscape setting and any area of
nature conservation importance;
|
| (c) |
The likely amount of traffic generated by the proposal
could be accommodated on the local highway network without
reducing road safety;
|
| (d) |
The proposal should re-use or adapt any farm building
which is available, unless it can be clearly demonstrated
that a new building is the only practicable alternative;
|
| (e) |
If a new building is justified, it should be sited
in or adjacent to an existing group of buildings, be
of compatible scale and blend satisfactorily into the
landscape in its design, siting and use of materials;
|
| (f) |
The proposal would not cause noise, air or water pollution;
and
|
| (g) |
The proposal would not harm
the amenity of local residents. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.46 |
The District Council will seek to encourage a diverse and buoyant
rural economy. As part of this approach, the District Council
will encourage farm based rural enterprise provided that it meets
the environmental safeguards outlined in Policy DD1 and other policies
concerning the conservation of the built and natural environment.
In particular, this policy seeks to address those proposals which
are part of an existing farm, or other agricultural activity.
Examples may include rural crafts, workshops, farm interpretation,
agricultural services and other uses necessary to ensure the continued
viability of the farm business.
|
| |
|
| |
Nitrate Sensitive Areas
|
| 8.47 |
Agricultural productivity, over much of the area to the west of
the district, is heavily dependent upon the widespread application
of nitrogen-based fertilisers and extensive irrigation. This
is due primarily to the presence of relatively infertile soils on
the Sherwood Sandstones and a low average annual rainfall.
Concern has been expressed at the rising levels of nitrates found
in groundwater supplies. High levels of nitrate in drinking
water sources require an expensive blending programme to maintain
the 50mg/litre EU limit. In response to this contamination
of ground water, Nitrate Sensitive Areas (NSAs) have been declared
at Boughton, Far Baulker and Amen Corner (see Figure 8.1).
|
| 8.48 |
Through a combination of significant and some very major changes
to farming practices, encouraged with compensatory payments, it
is hoped that the recent rising trend in nitrate levels may be checked
and, in time, reversed. The designation of these and future
NSAs within the district may have a significant impact on land use
patterns. The District Council appreciates the problems associated
with farming on these sandlands and will work closely with landowners
and farmers to investigate alternative land uses and options, which
could include farm diversification, re-afforestation programmes,
such as the Greenwood Community Forest and Sherwood Initiative,
as well as heathland restoration.
|
| |
|
| |
Landscape Protection |
| 8.49 |
The Nottinghamshire countryside has suffered
considerably from agricultural intensification resulting in the loss
of valuable habitats and landscapes. The District Council will
seek to protect and enhance the appearance of the countryside and
protect landscapes of aesthetic, ecological and historic value. |
|
|
| |
Policy NE7
Protection of the Countryside |
|
The visual quality and amenity of the countryside will
be conserved and enhanced. In particular, the
Local Authority will seek to:
|
| 1. |
Protect the countryside for its own sake;
|
| 2. |
Ensure the retention and management of important and
historic landscape features such as woodlands, meadows,
trees, hedgerows, wetlands, ponds, lowland heaths and
geologically important sites;
|
| 3. |
Ensure high standards of design for development in
the countryside;
|
| 4. |
Reclaim wasteland and derelict areas, unless they are
designated nature conservation or earth science sites
considered by the District Council to be of important
ecological or geological value;
|
| 5. |
Secure planting and other
landscape enhancement schemes including, where appropriate,
the replacement or relocation of existing important landscape
features which would otherwise be lost as a result of
development. |
| The District Council will
seek to co-operate with landowners, tenants, farmers and
those involved with the conservation of the countryside.
It will make use of planning conditions or seek to enter
into Section 106 Agreements under the Town and Country
Planning Act 1990 where conservation or enhancement can
reasonably be secured in association with development
proposals. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.50 |
The protection and enhancement of the district's historic and ecological
interest is a fundamental objective of the Plan. While only
certain aspects of countryside management are under the direct control
of the District Council, there are many ways it can promote the
good practice and sensitive management of natural resources in rural
areas.
|
| |
These aims can be achieved through its own actions, or in co-operation
with other bodies, or by the influence and persuasion of landowners.
The District Council will continue to work closely with organisations
with strong interests in the future of the countryside, such as:
English Nature; the Nottinghamshire Wildlife Trust; Forest Enterprise;
the Nottinghamshire Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group; Groundwork
Newark and Sherwood; Environment Agency; Nottinghamshire County
Council; and the Countryside Commission.
|
| 8.51 |
The District Council is strongly committed to the safeguarding
and enhancement of the natural environment for the benefit of present
and future residents, as well as visitors to the area. The
countryside has always been a place of transition and change.
It is as a result of our past management of the landscape that we
have inherited the attractive scenery we see today. While
the District Council does not wish to see rural areas become fossilised,
it does seek to protect and enhance those features which have become
an important part of the rural scene.
|
| 8.52 |
The loss of rural landscape features and
wildlife habitats have been well documented in recent years and particularly
by the Countryside Survey (DOE 1990). This survey has highlighted
the fact that ecological and landscape losses are still continuing
today. The District Council will prepare detailed landscape
appraisals where development is likely to have any effect on the landscape,
in order to halt this process and to begin to help to restore many
of the habitats that have been lost in recent years. |
|
|
| |
Policy NE8
Mature Landscape Areas |
|
Development which would have an adverse effect on the visual
or nature conservation importance of a Mature Landscape Area
will be permitted only where it can be shown that there are
reasons for the proposal that clearly outweigh the need to
safeguard the area's intrinsic value. Where development
is permitted, proposals should minimise the harm to the area.
The District Council will make use of planning conditions
or negotiate planning obligations in order to secure appropriate
conservation measures.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.53 |
The County Council has recently undertaken a "Countryside
Appraisal" of Nottinghamshire. The principal objectives
of the Appraisal are as follows:
|
| |
- to assess and describe the pattern of the Nottinghamshire countryside
through an understanding of its inherent landscape character;
- to prepare guidelines which will facilitate the conservation
and management of the Nottinghamshire countryside, based on an
understanding of the landscape character associated with each
landscape zone; and
- to highlight "Mature Landscape Areas" within each
landscape zone.
|
| 8.54 |
The methodology used in assessing landscape character has been
adapted from the work of the Warwickshire landscape project, undertaken
by Warwickshire County Council and the Countryside Commission. A
number of local authorities, public bodies and private consultants
are now using this approach for landscape assessment work.
|
| 8.55 |
One of the most important features of this
Appraisal has been the identification of Mature Landscape Areas (MLAs).
MLAs have been identified on the basis of objective land use led criteria
rather than a qualitative assessment of the "value" of particular
landscapes. MLAs represent those areas of the countryside least
affected by intensive arable production, mineral extraction, commercial
forestry, housing, industry and associated infrastructure. These
areas share a number of common features which impart a sense of unity
to the landscape, including intact field patterns, species rich hedgerows,
permanent grassland/heathland, mature woodlands and river/ stream
courses. The District Council, whilst not precluding all development
within MLAs, will seek to ensure that MLAs are protected from development
which would damage or detract from their interest. Any development
which is considered appropriate to an MLA should be sensitively designed
and located and should, where possible, achieve some physical improvement
to the MLA, in accordance with the management guidelines laid down
within the Countryside Appraisal. |
|
|
| |
Policy NE9
Sherwood Forest Special Landscape Area |
|
Planning permission will be granted for appropriate development
within the Sherwood Forest Special Landscape Area, defined
on the proposals map, provided the proposal would conserve
and enhance the landscape and ecology of the area, and maintains
its function as a recreation and tourist area.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.56 |
Sherwood Forest has become increasingly popular as a tourist destination
and a recreational resource. Its success in this respect,
in addition to demands from other competing land uses, has placed
this landscape and its wildlife under immense pressure. In
an attempt to reconcile these conflicts, Nottinghamshire County
Council, in co-operation with the relevant local authorities, prepared
the Plan for Sherwood Forest in 1989. This non-statutory Plan
provides a framework for the future protection and management of
the Sherwood Forest area. It is currently being reviewed to
provide detailed guidance on the management of the landscape. The
dual aims of promoting an acceptable form of recreational and tourist
development, whilst protecting the area's special landscape and
ecological value, will remain.
|
| 8.57 |
The Plan for Sherwood Forest designates a Special Landscape Area.
This area is defined on the Proposals Map. It is considered
to have landscape and ecological importance and includes
Rufford Country Park and the Center Parcs Holiday Village.
The Special Landscape Area also includes many sites of nature conservation
importance, including four Sites of Special Scientific Interest
(SSSIs) at Clipstone Heath, Sherwood Forest Golf Course, Rainworth
Lakes and Rainworth Heath.
|
| 8.58 |
All development within the Special Landscape Area and outside villages
will be carefully controlled and directed away from sensitive locations,
although the area will continue to provide a focus for recreation
and tourism. Appropriate development, for the purposes of
this policy, are those categories considered as exceptions to the
general restraint in the countryside, defined in policy NE1.
|
| 8.59 |
Existing farming activities are also expected
to continue and new agricultural facilities will normally be permitted
if the criteria in Policies NE4 and NE5 are fulfilled. The Special
Landscape Area also includes pockets of land of little aesthetic or
ecological value, often having been scarred by mining and the tipping
of waste. The District Council will encourage the enhancement of these
areas, in accordance with the Plan's aim to promote nature conservation
and tourism. |
|
|
| |
Policy NE10
Sherwood Forest Heritage Area |
|
Planning permission will not be granted for development
in the Sherwood Forest Heritage Area, defined on the proposals
map, where it would have an adverse effect on its ecology
or environment.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.60 |
The Heritage Area lies at the heart of Sherwood Forest and has
enormous ecological and historic significance. The District
Council, in accordance with Policy 3/3 of the Structure Plan Review,
will seek to protect this area from any development, including proposals
for recreation and tourism, that would have a detrimental impact
on its wildlife, landscape and historic interest. This policy
does not seek to unnecessarily restrict development within the Heritage
Area, but to acknowledge both its special value and fragility.
|
| 8.61 |
The Heritage Area is defined on the Proposals Map and contains
remnants of ancient oak woodland and heath that once typified Sherwood
Forest. The best examples of this habitat are found at Sherwood
Country Park, part of the Birklands and Bilhaugh SSSI, now recognised
as being of international importance as a candidate Special Area
of Conservation (cSAC). The District Council will work closely
with the Sherwood Forest Trust in its attempts to restore Sherwood
Forest through the Sherwood Initiative and welcomes the existing
conservation work already being undertaken by a variety of agencies,
including the Ministry of Defence at Proteus Camp.Furthermore,
it will continue to promote the appropriate management of oak/birch
woodland and lowland heath found in this area. The District
Council will also seek to implement and actively promote the aims
and policies of the Nottinghamshire Heathland Strategy, prepared
by the Heathland Forum, particularly within the Heritage Area.
|
| 8.62 |
All new development in the Heritage Area
should have regard to local building styles and materials. It
should also be sensitively located so as to minimise its impact on
the environment. In certain circumstances, an Environmental
Assessment may be required where the District Council believes there
may be serious environmental consequences resulting from a particular
scheme. |
| |
|
| |
Nature Conservation |
| 8.63 |
Government advice, in PPG9 "Nature
Conservation", outlines the important role that local authorities
have to play in wildlife conservation and the management of the natural
environment. The District Council will make use of its powers
to promote nature conservation, undertake research, and safeguard
sites of wildlife value from development. It is becoming increasingly
apparent that, if the biodiversity of the District is to be maintained
and enhanced, wildlife sites and the countryside in general need to
be managed in a much more sympathetic way. The District Council
will therefore seek to work closely with all interested bodies, including
English Nature, the Nottinghamshire Wildlife Trust, Nottinghamshire
County Council and other organisations and individuals, to prepare
a nature conservation strategy for the District. |
|
|
| |
Policy NE11
Birklands and Bilhaugh Candidate Special Area of Conservation
(SAC) |
|
Proposals for development or land use change which
may affect the Birklands and Bilhaugh candidate SAC
or other European sites will be subject to the most
rigorous examination. Development or land use
change not directly connected with or necessary to the
management of the land and which is likely to have significant
effects on the site (either individually or in combination
with other plans or projects) will not be permitted
unless the authority is satisfied that:-
|
| i) |
there is no alternative solution; and
|
| ii) |
there are imperative reasons
of over-riding public interest for the development or
land use change. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.64 |
In May 1992, the Government welcomed the adoption of the European
Habitats Directive. Amongst the measures included in the Directive
is the designation of a series of key areas as candidate Special
Areas of Conservation (SAC). These sites, together with Special
Protection Areas (SPAs) designated under the Wild Birds Directive
1979, will form the basis of a network of sites across the European
Union which collectively will be known as Natura 2000.
|
| 8.65 |
Part of the Birklands and Bilhaugh SSSI
(Sherwood Forest) has been selected as a candidate SAC. It is
one of only four outstanding dry oak dominated woodlands in the United
Kingdom. It owes much of its exceptional interest to the presence
of many rare dead wood invertebrates and lichens. As a candidate
SAC, Birklands and Bilhaugh will receive special protection. |
| |
|
| |
Planning Permission and
Special Areas of Conservation
|
| |
New applications
|
| 8.66 |
As with SSSIs, candidate Special Areas of Conservation (SACs)
are already safeguarded by planning law. Planning applications
must be submitted in order to develop land within a SAC. Planning
authorities must consult English Nature and take the nature conservation
interest of SACs fully into account when making land use planning
decisions. If a development is proposed that will have a significant
effect on the wildlife of a SAC, the Secretary of State will normally
call it in to make the decision himself. It is expected that
few planning applications will affect the Birklands and Bilhaugh
SAC.
|
| |
|
| |
Existing permissions
|
| 8.67 |
Under the Regulations governing Special Areas of Conservation,
planning authorities have to review all existing planning permissions
which have not been fully carried out that might affect a SAC.
If carrying out the planned activities would significantly damage
the site, the authority will make sure that the site will not be
damaged. A planning authority could, for instance, restrict
or regulate the use of the land. Alternatively, if the permission
is modified or revoked, the planning authority may pay compensation.
|
| |
|
| |
Permitted development rights in Special
Areas of Conservation
|
| 8.68 |
Land owners and public bodies have permitted
development rights for some development activities. This means
that they do not have to seek planning permission for them.
On SSSIs, if these activities were listed as Potentially Damaging
Operations, permitted development would need English Nature's approval.
The Regulations now require any permitted development that is likely
to significantly affect a SAC to need planning permission, unless
the local planning authority has decided, after consultation with
English Nature, that the development would not affect the integrity
of the site. Compensation may be payable by the planning authority
if the permitted development rights are removed. |
|
|
| |
Policy NE12
Sites of National Nature Conservation Importance |
|
Proposals for development in or likely to affect Sites of
Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) will be subject to special
scrutiny. Where a proposed development would adversely
affect a SSSI, directly or indirectly, it will not be permitted,
unless the reasons for the development clearly outweigh the
value of the SSSI itself and the national policy to safeguard
the intrinsic nature conservation value of the national network
of such sites.
Where the site concerned is a National Nature Reserve (NNR)
or a site identified under the Nature Conservation Review
(NCR) or Geological Conservation Review (GCR), particular
regard will be paid to the individual site's national importance.
Where development is permitted, the authority will consider
the use of conditions or planning obligations to ensure the
protection and enhancement of the site's nature conservation
interest. |
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.69 |
Within the Plan area, there are eighteen Sites of Special Scientific
Interest, which are defined on the Proposals Map and listed in Appendix
C. The District Council will protect these sites from any
development which would be likely to damage them either directly
or indirectly. Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs)
should not be viewed as ecological islands. Their interest
can be enhanced or reduced by the management of surrounding land.
Some forms of development, whilst not located on the site of a SSSI,
may have an adverse effect on its ecology by, for example, lowering
water tables or creating pollution problems. In accordance
with the "UK Biodiversity - Action Plan", the District
Council will adopt the "precautionary principle" when
assessing development likely to affect SSSIs within the District,
even when located at a distance from the protected site.
|
|
|
| |
Policy NE13
Sites of County and District Nature Conservation Importance
|
|
Development and land use change likely to have an adverse
effect on a Local Nature Reserve (LNR), a Site of Importance
for Nature Conservation (SINC) or a Regionally Important
Geological/Geomorphological Site (RIG), or which would
adversely affect the continuity and integrity of the
habitats listed below, will not be permitted, unless
it can be clearly demonstrated that there are reasons
for the proposal which clearly outweigh the need to
safeguard the intrinsic nature conservation value of
the site or habitats.
|
|
Specified Landscape Features and Habitats
|
| |
|
| Woodland: |
Wet broadleaved woodland
Oak-birch woodland
Mixed ash dominated woodland
Planted coniferous woodland
Lowland wood pasture and parkland
|
| |
|
| Heathland: |
Lowland heathland
|
| |
|
| Farmland: |
Ancient and/or species rich hedgerows
Ditches
Cereal field margins
|
| |
|
| Grassland: |
Lowland wet grassland (floodplain grazing marsh)
Unimproved neutral grassland (lowland hay meadow)
Lowland dry acid grassland
Lowland calcareous grassland
|
| |
|
| Wetland: |
Reedbeds
Fens
Marsh
Eutrophic standing waters (nutrient rich)
Mesotrophic lakes (intermediate nutrient level)
Rivers and streams
Saline lagoons
|
| |
|
|
(N.B. Bold type denotes UK Biodiversity Action
Plan Priority Habitats).
|
 |
 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.70 |
Whilst the protection and enhancement of sites remains an important
aim of the Plan, Government guidance makes it clear that local authorities
are expected to take a broader view with regard to nature conservation.
It states that plans should be concerned, not only with designated
areas, but also with other land of conservation value and the possible
provision of new habitats.
|
| 8.71 |
The list of specified habitats and landscape features shown in
policy NE13 is drawn from the UK Biodiversity Action Plan and the
Nottinghamshire Local Biodiversity Action Plan. By including
this list, the District Council is seeking to ensure that development
takes full account of the intrinsic value of such habits and features
to the benefit of the overall biodiversity of the District.
This approach accords with PPG9, the UK Biodiversity Action Plan
and Article 10 of the European (Habitats and Species) Directive
(92/43/EC).
|
| 8.72 |
Wildlife interest cannot and should not
be confined to just formally designated areas. The District
Council will, therefore, seek to protect those areas which it considers
to be Sites of Importance to Nature Conservation (SINCs). These sites
are listed in Appendix D. A review of non-statutory wildlife
sites is currently underway as part of the Nottinghamshire Nature
Conservation Audit. When this review is completed, the District
Council will have regard to the new list of SINCs for the purpose
of this policy. The District Council will also make use of specific
surveys undertaken on request and the botanical survey of Newark prepared
by the Nottingham Urban Wildlife Scheme (NUWS), when assessing the
value of wildlife sites. |
|
|
| |
Policy NE14
Habitat Replacement |
|
Where development would destroy or adversely affect features
or sites of nature conservation importance, the District Council
will make use of planning conditions or negotiate planning
obligations in order to secure appropriate compensatory habitat
replacement measures.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.73 |
If the biodiversity of the District is to be maintained and enhanced,
provision should be made for the creation of new habitats where
sites of nature conservation importance are lost as a result of
development. This approach seeks to nsure that the District's critical
natural capital is not eroded further to the detriment of
the biodiversity of the District or the enjoyment of wildlife by
future generations. It should be noted that replacement habitats
are rarely of equivalent value to those lost and, where possible
the District Council will always prefer to see that sites are safeguarded
in situ, in accordance with the UK Biodiversity Action
Plan.
|
| 8.74 |
It may also be possible, through sensitive layout, design and siting,
to minimise the impact of development on sites with nature conservation
interest. Developers will also be expected to make maximum provision
for the implementation of appropriate rescue or recording work,
prior to the commencement of development, and/or provide alternative
habitats as compensation or as a receptor site for species displaced
as a result of the development.
|
| |
|
| |
The Importance of Earth Science and Conservation
|
| 8.75 |
Earth science conservation seeks to maintain and enhance our natural
heritage of rocks and landforms and includes the study of both geology
and geomorphology. For its size, Britain has the most varied
geology in the world. The science of geology started here.
Britain is also rich in geomorphological features and particularly
in glacial and periglacial landforms. Yet opportunities to study
the Earth's history through its rocks, fossils, minerals and landforms
are rapidly disappearing because of changes in land use and the
pressure for development.
|
| 8.76 |
The Nottinghamshire Geological Records Centre, based at the Natural
History Museum at Wollaton Hall, has selected defined Regionally
Important Geological and Geomorphological Sites (RIGS) for the District.
The District Council will seek to protect these sites from development
and ensure that they are made available for study and interpretation,
where possible. The protection of geological sites need not preclude
development provided that a site's geological interest can be accessed
and preserved in situ. It is also likely that new
development may expose new sites of geological interest. The District
Council will attempt to ensure that their interest is considered
in the layout and design of development proposals and opportunities
are made for investigation and recording.
|
| |
|
| |
Habitat Creation
and Site Management |
|
|
| |
Policy NE15
Management of Wildlife Sites |
|
The District Council will encourage the creation and appropriate
management of wildlife habitats. It will, where
appropriate, use planning conditions or negotiate planning
obligations, or use local nature reserve designation to secure
these aims.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.77 |
Local Nature Reserves have the dual function of protecting areas
of wildlife interest, whilst providing an educational and recreational
resource. The District Council has already created two Local
Nature Reserves at Sherwood Heath, Ollerton and Devon Park Pastures,
Newark, and will seek to declare additional sites, including Potwell
Dyke Meadows, Southwell and at Vicar Water Country Park, Clipstone.
|
| 8.78 |
The restoration of former sand and gravel
workings along the Trent Valley provides major opportunities for nature
conservation gains within the District. At Besthorpe, one of the Nottinghamshire
Wildlife Trust's major wetland reserves has been created by sand and
gravel extraction. Over the next twenty years, a nature reserve
is being established in association with the Royal Society for the
Protection of Birds (RSPB), as part of the after use of the mineral
workings at Langford Lowfields, Collingham. Through the creation
of new wetlands and reedbeds, it is hoped that nationally threatened
species, such as the bearded reedling and bittern will one day return
to breed in the Country. |
|
|
| |
Policy NE16
Management Agreements |
|
The District Council will use its powers, under the Wildlife
and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), to enter into management
agreement, as well as planning conditions, or negotiate planning
obligations to safeguard the natural beauty and amenity of
nature conservation sites.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.79 |
The District Council may enter into management agreements, under
the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), in order to
conserve the natural beauty or amenity of an area. The District
Council may impose restrictions and obligations on agricultural
works or operations and provide compensation, where appropriate,
to secure the protection of ecological sites. The District
Council will actively pursue such agreements with the co-operation
of landowners and tenants where the purchase or lease of strategic
nature conservation sites is not available or feasible.
|
| |
|
| |
Promotion of Nature Conservation
|
| 8.80 |
The District Council will promote the conservation of wildlife
on its land holdings and encourage other managers of land to adopt
similar principles. It will also seek an improvement in the
ecological value of open space and other landscape features, through
habitat creation, sympathetic landscape design and management techniques.
The District Council will establish working practices, including
design principles and management techniques, which promote the conservation
of the District's ecological resource and may offer new opportunities
for wildlife.
|
| 8.81 |
The promotion of nature conservation can be regarded as a tool
for securing significant environmental improvements. Many social,
environmental, economic and educational benefits can be gained from
sympathetically managed open spaces, especially in school grounds,
villages and built-up areas. A greener, more attractive and
stimulating environment, can also help to lure inward investment
and generally improve the quality of life for residents.
|
| 8.82 |
It is a duty, under Section 25 of the Wildlife
and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), for local authorities to bring
provisions relating to the protection of wildlife to the attention
of the public and especially school children. It will seek to
involve school children in its nature conservation work and will encourage
schools to assess the role school grounds can play in stimulating
the interest of young people in ecological issues. The District
Council will promote a greater awareness and understanding of wildlife
within the Plan area and will encourage the use, enjoyment and, where
appropriate, increased access to areas of nature conservation interest.
It will also seek to provide interpretative material where appropriate,
and will liaise with other bodies to fulfil these objectives. |
|
|
| |
Policy NE17
Species Protection |
|
Planning permission will not be granted for development
which would adversely affect species protected under the Wildlife
and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), unless provision is
made to protect the species and their habitats. Where
appropriate, planning conditions or obligations will be used
to secure the protection of the species concerned.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.83 |
The best way of ensuring the long-term survival of the district's
wildlife is by protecting and managing the many and varied wildlife
habitats which are known to exist. However, some species need
additional protection, if they are to maintain their existing distributions
and population levels. The District Council will, therefore,
seek to ensure that full consideration is given to the protection
of species safeguarded under the provisions of the Wildlife and
Countryside Act 1981 (as amended). Further guidance on the
need for surveys and their format is contained in paragraphs 8.30
to 8.33.
|
| 8.84 |
It is an offence to deliberately kill, injure or take a specially
protected species, or to damage, destroy, or obstruct a place used
by such a species for shelter or protection. The disturbance
of protected species occupying a place of shelter or protection
is also an offence. However, no offence is committed if a person
carrying out an action which causes harm can show that this was
the incidental result of a lawful operation and could not reasonably
have been avoided. This provision does not apply to bats, outside
the living area of a dwelling, unless prior notification of development
is given, by the developer, to English Nature. On
discovery of a "protected species" English Nature and/or
the District Council should be notified immediately.
|
| 8.85 |
The presence of a protected species will be regarded as a material
consideration when planning applications are determined. The
District Council will seek to ensure that all possible precautions
are taken to prevent offences taking place. It will, where
appropriate, attach planning conditions or require developers to
enter into legal agreements, to secure the necessary protection
of the species concerned.
|
| |
|
| |
Badgers Act 1991
|
| 8.86 |
English Nature is responsible for issuing licences, in accordance
with Section 9(1)(f) of the Badgers Act 1991, to permit interference
with a badgers' sett in the course of development. The District
Council will advise developers of this requirement in cases where
development affects known badger setts. The Council, and all
other public bodies, also need a licence for development affecting
badger setts.
|
| |
|
| |
Heathland Strategy
|
|
|
| |
Policy NE18
Heathland Strategy |
|
The District Council will encourage the creation and appropriate
management of heathland in the Plan area and will make use
of appropriate planning conditions and obligations to implement
these aims.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.87 |
In March 1994, the Heathland Forum, a partnership of local authorities,
government agencies, private organisations and voluntary conservation
bodies, published the Nottinghamshire Heathland Strategy. The Strategy
outlines the history and importance of heathlands and indicates
how best this particular habitat can be protected, managed and restored.
The District Council adopted the Heathland Strategy and will take
the importance of heathlands into account where new development
either directly or indirectly affects existing heathland sites.
The District Council will welcome heathland restoration proposals
when associated with new development on appropriate sites. Heathland
restoration is also an important element of the establishment of
the Greenwood Community Forest.
|
| |
|
| |
Trees and Woodlands |
| 8.88 |
The District Council has an important role to play in the protection
of trees and woodlands. It has a duty, under the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990, to make adequate provision for the preservation
and planting of trees, when considering planning applications.
It will seek to ensure the retention of trees of important amenity
value, where they are under threat from development, by means of
Tree Preservation Orders. There are approximately 250 Tree Preservation
Orders in the district, covering a variety of trees, ranging from
individual specimens to small woodlands. Trees within Conservation
Areas are also protected and owners intending to carry out works
to such trees must give the District Council six weeks notice prior
to the commencement of work. The District Council considers that
trees on development sites should be retained, where possible, and
buildings and structures sited to prevent damage to them.
|
| 8.89 |
The District Council also recognises the
wildlife value of hollow trees and deadwood to bats, invertebrates
and nesting birds. Where it is safe to do so, the District Council
will seek the retention of such trees. |
|
|
| |
Policy NE19
Amenity Woodland |
|
Planning permission will not be granted for development
which would result in loss of or damage to an area of amenity
woodland. Exceptions may be made, only if there are
reasons for the proposal which clearly outweigh the amenity
value of the woodland, or if replacement or compensatory planting
could be provided.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.90 |
Amenity woodlands, whilst not necessarily of the age, in terms
of continuous woodland cover, of ancient woodlands, can frequently
provide excellent habitats for a wide variety of plants and animals.
They are also important landscape features, benefiting both visual
amenity and in some cases, providing an important recreational resource
for local people. Any proposals for their removal will be resisted,
unless there are clearly established overriding needs for the development
and no alternative sites exist.
|
|
|
| |
|
Policy NE20
Ancient Woodland
|
|
Planning permission will not be granted for development
which would result in any loss or damage to an area of ancient
woodland, defined on the Proposals Map.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.91 |
The District Council regards ancient woodland as an important element
of the District's critical natural capital. Itwill
seek to protect all ancient woodland from development. Ancient woodlands
are defined on the Proposals Map. The classification of ancient
woodland is based on historical evidence and species diversity.
English Nature, in its "Nottinghamshire Inventory of Ancient
Woodlands", has gathered together historical, map and some
biological information on large woodland blocks, to determine whether
they are likely to be ancient. The Inventory is provisional
and may be subject to revision in the light of new information or
further study. The District Council will use the Inventory
as a starting point in assessing which areas should be protected.
Ancient woodlands have considerable ecological value and will be
regarded as Sites of Importance to Nature Conservation, apart from
any other formally designated status.
|
|
|
| |
|
Policy NE21
Woodland Management
|
|
The District Council will promote the retention and management
of trees and woodland of important ecological and amenity
value.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.92 |
The District Council will actively promote the appropriate management
of amenity and ancient woodlands, and particularly coppiced woodlands.
Wildlife interest and plant diversity has been shown to reduce dramatically
when traditional management practices cease or are reduced in scale.
The District Council will also seek to safeguard trees and woodlands
of ecological and amenity value, where they are affected by development.
|
| |
|
| |
New Woodland Planting
|
| 8.93 |
The District Council will encourage the planting of new areas of
woodland which make a significant contribution to enhancing the
environment. Particular emphasis will be given to proposals
which seek to promote the planting of new woodlands in the Greenwood/Sherwood
areas and around major settlements. Grant aid is available
from the Forestry Authority for both tree planting and future management
of woodlands.
|
| 8.94 |
The suitability of any proposals will be
assessed against the following criteria: |
| |
- the physical form and effects of afforestation on the landscape
of the area;
- the use of a mix of species, including broadleaves, particularly
in sensitive landscape areas;
- the nature conservation interests;
- the provision for public access and recreational use of the
area, where appropriate;
- the extent to which proposals adhere to the guidelines arising
from the landscape character assessment of the County Council's
Countryside Appraisal; and
- the creation of jobs in the forestry industry.
|
| 8.95 |
Planning permission is not required for
the creation of new woodlands. However, the District Council
will expect to be consulted by the Forestry Authority via Nottinghamshire
County Council on planting proposals seeking grant aid. The
District Council would wish to ensure that the landscape, wildlife
and recreational opportunities of newly planted amenity and commercial
woodlands are fully exploited. The District Council will also
welcome proposals for sensitive new planting within Sherwood Forest,
the Greenwood Community Forest and elsewhere in the District, in accordance
with the provisions of the Structure Plan Review, the Greenwood Community
Forest Management Plan and the guidelines laid down above. |
|
|
| |
|
Policy NE22
Stapleford Woods
|
|
Planning permission will not be granted for development which
would damage the recreational/ecological value or landscape
importance of Stapleford Woods.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.96 |
While the District Council accepts that Stapleford Woods is a commercial
woodland, it is also a prominent and attractive feature in the landscape,
it is well used for informal recreational purposes and is of ecological
value and as such merits special protection.
|
|
|
| |
|
Policy NE23
Greenwood Community Forest
|
|
Prior to granting planning permission for development within
the Greenwood Community Forest Area, defined on the proposals
map, the District Council will negotiate with developers to
secure new tree or woodland planting as part of the development.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Justification |
| 8.97 |
The Greenwood is one of twelve Community Forests being promoted
by the Countryside Commission and Forestry Commission in England.
The Greenwood covers some 40,000 hectares of western Nottinghamshire
between Nottingham and Mansfield, and includes the western edge
of Newark and Sherwood District (see Figure 8.2).
|
| 8.98 |
A Plan for the Forest was completed in June 1994 by a project team
on behalf of a partnership, consisting of the two Commissions, Nottinghamshire
County Council, and six District Councils, including Newark and
Sherwood. The Forest Plan has now been approved by the Department
of the Environment and provides wide ranging and long-term advice
on land management, which will help create the Greenwood over a
period of, perhaps, thirty years. The Forest Plan is to be
treated as a material consideration in the determination of planning
applications. The process of reviewing the Forest Plan is
to begin in 1999.
|
| 8.99 |
The aim of all community forests is not to create continuous woodland,
but to diversify the use and appearance of the landscape which surrounds
urban areas through selective planting and land management.
The creation of new areas of woodland is intended to both improve
the environment and to create new opportunities for recreation,
including walking, riding, organised sport and responsible motor
activities, education and employment.
|
| 8.100 |
The Greenwood Forest Plan acknowledges that a wooded landscape
is capable of absorbing a wide range of different needs and
activities, from the formal to informal, intensive to relaxed, quiet
to noisy. However, great care must be taken to ensure that
neighbouring uses are complementary and not in conflict with each
other.
|
| 8.101 |
Agriculture will remain as the dominant
land use within the Community Forest and long established planning
policies which seek to protect and enhance areas of open countryside
are unchanged. Where new built development is considered acceptable
within the Greenwood, the District Council will now negotiate with
developers to seek to secure new tree or woodland planting as part
of the development scheme, where appropriate. This will contribute
to the objectives of the Greenwood to gradually extend the amount
of tree cover within the area, and to integrate built development
more effectively with the surrounding countryside. The nature
and extent of planting that is appropriate or possible will vary with
the type and scale of development proposed and the characteristics
of the surrounding landscape and guidelines contained within the approved
Greenwood Forest Plan. It must also be emphasised that planting
schemes will not be a means of securing planning permission for development
which is either unacceptable in principle, or inappropriate on a particular
site. |
| |
|
| |
Sherwood Initiative
|
| 8.102 |
The Sherwood Initiative aims to restore
the traditional landscape of Sherwood, through the conservation and
sympathetic management of existing woods, and the creation of new
woodland and heathland. Prior to granting planning permission
for development within the remit of the Sherwood Initiative, the District
Council will, if appropriate, negotiate with developers to secure
new planting or habitat creation as part of the development. |
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| top |