 |
|
|
| |
| PART 2 - 10. IMPLEMENTATION,
RESOURCES, AND MONITORING |
| |
|
|
|
| |
INTRODUCTION |
| 10.1 |
The policies and proposals in the Plan
are aimed at securing more sustainable development in Harrow over
the next 10 to 15 years. Their effective implementation is clearly
aimed at addressing the identified and anticipated problems and opportunities
in the Borough, and insofar as Harrow can contribute to dealing with
those of London as a whole. Whilst some development will emanate from
joint working between the Council and a variety of partners and agencies,
as well as its own departmental service plans, most development will
be undertaken by the private sector. It is therefore of fundamental
importance to achieving the strategic objectives of the Plan that
its policies continue to attract substantial private sector investment,
and direct development to appropriate locations. The Council will
continue to explore opportunities for funding and joint working which
promote acceptable development. As a statement of the Council's intentions
to facilitate development, Proposal Sites have been identified, including
the preferred uses. |
| 10.2 |
For the Plan to be genuinely dynamic,
and responsive to changed circumstances, it is imperative that effective
monitoring of development trends occurs, and other factors affecting
the way land and buildings are used. The identification of strategic
indicators will assist the process of assessing whether or not progress
is being made towards securing a more sustainable Harrow. As the Plan
must be kept up-to-date, appropriate policy revisions may need to
be brought forward in advance of the next statutory review. |
| 10.3 |
An integral part of the development control
process is the securing of community benefits as part of a new development.
In appropriate circumstances, and particularly on larger-scale developments,
additional infrastructure may be required to support the development.
Policies need to give clear guidance to developers on the circumstances
in which Planning Obligations will be sought. Planning briefs for
specific sites will also provide additional guidance on the way in
which land is to be developed. |
| 10.4 |
In determining planning applications,
the Council will pay due regard to the policies in the Plan. As required
by Section 54A of the 1990 Town and Country Planning Act, decisions
will be in accordance with the Plan unless material considerations
indicate otherwise. In addition to providing guidance on what matters
are taken into account in determining individual planning applications,
there needs to be clear guidance on the approach the Council will
take in situations where breaches of planning control occur. Positive
enforcement actions remain an important activity in protecting the
environment, and can also ensure continued public support for the
planning system. |
| 10.5 |
In addition to consultation on individual
planning applications, public consultation is an inherent part of
the statutory development plan process. Consideration has been given
to the appropriate mechanisms for continued public consultation on
any policy changes which might be necessary in advance of the next
formal review of the Plan. |
| |
|
| |
NATIONAL AND REGIONAL
POLICY CONTEXT |
| 10.6 |
Government Circular 1/97 on Planning Obligations,
and PPG 1, state that Local Planning Authorities may seek certain
kinds of benefit of Planning Obligation which are related to new development
and are necessary for the grant of planning permission. These are
to be secured by Legal Agreements associated with the grant of planning
permission. |
| 10.7 |
PPG18: Enforcing Planning Control, and
Circular 10/97, provide detailed guidance on the powers available
to Local Planning Authorities to enforce the planning control given
to them by the Planning and Compensation Act 1991. Additional powers
are also afforded by other specialist legislation, for example, in
relation to Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas, and hazardous
substances. |
| 10.8 |
PPG1 sets down the general principles
relating to the imposition of planning conditions, and more detailed
advice on their use and appropriateness is contained in Circular 11/95. |
| 10.9 |
The regional strategic planning context
is provided by the spatial development strategy for London, the Mayor's
London Plan (February 2004). The policies in this chapter have been
drafted in the light of the vision, objectives and strategic policy
content of the Plan. |
| |
|
| |
IMPLEMENTATION, RESOURCES
AND MONITORING OBJECTIVES |
| 10.10 |
i) |
To maximise the amount of planning benefits
secured by legal agreements; |
| |
ii) |
To ensure that planning permissions are
properly implemented, and breaches of planning control addressed;
and |
| |
iii) |
To effectively monitor development of
achievement of identified targets and amending policies as necessary. |
| |
|
| |
PART 1 POLICIES |
| 10.11 |
Strategic policies for Implementation,
Resources and Monitoring (Policies SI 1 & SI 2), and reasoned justifications
are set out in Chapter 2 of the Plan. They cover the following matters:- |
| |
SI 1 - Implementation and Resources
SI 2 - Monitoring and Review. |
| |
|
| |
Planning Obligations
and Legal Agreements |
| 10.12 |
Besides the imposition of conditions when
granting planning permission, the Council may also enter into an agreement
with a developer in order to enhance the quality of development and
enable proposals to go ahead which might otherwise have been refused.
Such Planning Obligations will normally be secured by way of a Legal
Agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act (as
amended by the Planning and Compensation Act 1991), but in rare circumstances,
they may be in the form of a unilateral undertaking by the developer
(usually only used in appeal cases). The Government's policy with
regard to Planning Obligations is set down in Circular 1/97, which
sets down a number of policy tests which should be satisfied before
a Planning Obligation is sought. Planning Obligations should be:- |
| |
i) |
Necessary; |
| |
ii) |
Relevant to planning; |
| |
iii) |
Directly related to the proposed development; |
| |
iv) |
Fairly and reasonably related in scale
and kind to the proposed development; |
| |
v) |
Reasonable in all other respects. |
| |
|
| 10.13 |
In order to retain public confidence,
the Council re-affirms the advice set out in Circular 1/97 that the
seeking of Planning Obligations will be pursued in accordance with
the fundamental principle that planning permission should not be bought
or sold. Accordingly, therefore, it will be important for the Council
to demonstrate why a particular Obligation may be justified. In this
connection, the variety of needs existing in the Borough and the circumstances
where Obligations may be sought will be identified in relevant policies
throughout the Plan, as well as in the list in para. 10.14, thereby
forewarning potential landowners and developers. For example, the
Council will aim to secure an appropriate level of on-site affordable
housing provision on qualifying schemes, Travel Plans for businesses
and schools, and contributions to educational facilities from the
developers of residential schemes. Such benefits will be secured via
a Planning Obligation or Legal Agreement. |
|
|
|
| |
(Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
I 3 |
THE COUNCIL MAY SEEK
TO SECURE PLANNING BENEFITS BY MEANS OF A PLANNING OBLIGATION IN CONNECTION
WITH A DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. SUCH BENEFITS WOULD BE NECESSARY, RELEVANT
TO PLANNING, DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, FAIRLY
AND REASONABLY RELATED IN SCALE AND KIND TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT,
AND REASONABLE IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. SUCH AN OBLIGATION SHOULD ENHANCE
THE QUALITY OF A DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL WHICH WOULD OTHERWISE BE REFUSED.
|
| |
|
|
|
| 10.14 |
Whilst PPG1 sets the background principles
for seeking Planning Obligations, Circular 1/97 sets out the Government's
policy for their use. The Council will only seek Planning Obligations
on individual proposals where the relevant tests have been met, as
set down in the policy. Furthermore, the Council will only seek Planning
Obligations in situations which enable proposals to go ahead which
might otherwise be refused. |
|
|
|
| 10.15 |
To assist developers by providing an indication
of what might be sought, by way of a Planning Obligation, the following
examples are included:- |
| |
i) |
securing an element of on-site affordable
housing in larger residential development or a mixed-use development; |
| |
ii) |
ensuring an acceptable balance of uses
in a mixed-use development; |
| |
iii) |
provision of low cost residential accommodation
and community facilities to meet local needs where the development
leads to an opportunity loss in terms of their provision or, where
necessary, to maintain a 'mixed use environment'; |
| |
iv) |
primarily with larger developments, providing
improved measures for pedestrians or cyclists, improved access to
public transport, bus-stops and facilities providing (or contributing
towards) improved junction or road layouts, including at a railway
terminus and interchanges; |
| |
v) |
provision of primary and secondary health
care facilities to meet an identified need as a result of the development; |
| |
vi) |
provision of special benefits in the form
of buildings, open space, streetscape, pedestrian access and other
facilities for the use of the public related to the development itself
or the pedestrian movements which are generated and attracted by it; |
| |
vii) |
replacement of open space, nature conservation
habitat or other suitable recreational facility in situations where
such land is lost or harmed in a proposal; |
| |
viii) |
conservation and re-use of buildings or
places of historic or architectural interest, and preservation and
establishment of areas of nature conservation significance; |
| |
ix) |
making a contribution towards the provision
of school accommodation for additional school places, or additional
education provision, generated by a development; |
| |
x) |
commuted payments to meet the full cost
of the additional activity arising from the development and its implications
for transport and infrastructure, including the need for highway access
and public transport; |
| |
xi) |
employment training and/or apprenticeship
provisions to meet the requirements of model agreements developed
in the light of local and London-wide inefficiencies in the labour
market; |
| |
xii) |
support to the upgrading of poorer quality
accommodation for employment related activity, for which otherwise
there would be no effective demand; |
| |
xiii) |
requiring major employers and institutions
to prepare and implement a Travel Plan which promotes less vehicle
use and will contribute effectively to the Council's Local Transport
Strategy; |
| |
xiv) |
provision of childcare and other indoor
community facilities related to the development; |
| |
xv) |
requiring agreements on building envelopes
on appropriate sites e.g. education and Green Belt sites; |
| |
xvi) |
requiring agreements on proposals for
doctors' surgeries relating to the size of the patient list, the number
of practitioners in the practice, the number of non-medical staff,
and the opening hours;. |
| |
xvii) |
provision for appropriate public art. |
| |
xviii) |
energy-saving measures and other matters
promoting good practice towards achieving sustainable development. |
| |
xix) |
improvements to local water quality. |
| |
xx) |
measures that will improve land quality. |
| |
xxi) |
waste and re-cycling initiatives. |
| |
In seeking a Planning Obligation on any
individual proposal, the Council will indicate the problem which it
is addressing and the effect that the proposed development would have.
In this way the Council will be clearly identifying a direct link
between the proposed development and the Planning Obligation being
sought. The range of problems which may form the subject of a Planning
Obligation have been identified throughout the Plan. |
|
|
|
| |
Enforcement (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
I 4 |
THE COUNCIL WILL TAKE
ENFORCEMENT ACTION IN THE FOLLOWING SITUATIONS :- |
| |
|
1) |
WHERE THERE HAS BEEN A
BREACH OF PLANNING CONTROL GIVING RISE TO HARM TO AN INTEREST OF ACKNOWLEDGED
IMPORTANCE AND WHERE THE COUNCIL CONSIDERS IT EXPEDIENT TO DO SO;
AND |
| |
|
2) |
WHERE THE CONDITION OF
A SITE IS DETRIMENTAL TO THE AMENITIES OF THE AREA IN WHICH IT IS
LOCATED. |
| |
|
|
| 10.16 |
In assessing whether it is expedient to
take enforcement action, or not, the Council will take into account
the objectives of the Plan. The public has a right to expect that
the implementation of development proposals which have been the subject
of a planning permission should proceed in accordance with the conditions
imposed on that permission. There are also situations where development
or works are undertaken which are unauthorised and where there will
be a need to secure a planning permission. Where a planning permission
is not being implemented in accordance with a permission and in situations
where necessary planning consents have not been sought, the Council
will consider the appropriate enforcement action required, having
taken into account what measures would be appropriate in the public
interest. Wherever possible, the Council will seek to negotiate fully
with those in breach of planning control. |
| 10.17 |
The main enforcement powers available
to the Council as Local Planning Authority under planning legislation
include the right to:- |
| |
i) |
Enter onto privately-owned land to investigate
possible or alleged breaches of planning control; |
| |
ii) |
Serve a 'planning enforcement notice'
- this would specify the actions need to remedy an alleged breach
of planning legislation; |
| |
iii) |
Serve a 'breach of condition notice' -
this would apply where there has been a failure to properly discharge
a planning condition attached to a planning permission; |
| |
iv) |
Serve a 'stop notice' - this can prevent
the continuation of any activity which is specified in an accompanying
enforcement notice; and |
| |
v) |
Seek an 'injunction' - this can cause
the cessation of an unacceptable activity, in appropriate circumstances. |
| 10.18 |
The Council will also consider pursuing
enforcement action to secure an improvement in the appearance of any
site which is vacant and detrimental to the amenities of the area
in which it is located. It will consider the value of vacant and derelict
land for its nature conservation interest, both while it is temporarily
vacant and in determining its future use. In some cases the Council
would hope to involve local residents' and amenity groups in clearance,
nature conservation and landscaping works. In other cases where new
building is appropriate, the Council will seek to ensure speedy development,
taking into account the most suitable use for a particular site. In
the Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land, the fact that land is lying
vacant or is under-used is not a sufficient reason to allow an inappropriate
change of use. |
|
|
|
| |
Proposals Map and Proposal
Sites Schedule |
| |
I 5 |
THE COUNCIL WILL CONSIDER
APPLICATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT ON SITES LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE OF PROPOSAL
SITES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROPOSALS, DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND
CONSTRAINTS THERE SET OUT. |
| |
|
|
| 10.19 |
The Schedule at the end of this Chapter
contains sites where the Council expects to see development in the
next 15 years, or where a particular use is to be safeguarded, or
where the Council is currently considering alternative uses. The Schedule
is based on an assessment of the availability of land that is known
to the Council; the development of the sites will be dependent on
obtaining necessary planning permissions. All the sites shown in the
schedule can be identified on the Proposals Map by the appropriate
site reference number. |
|
|
|
| |
Supplementary Planning
Guidance and Planning Briefs (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
I 6 |
THE COUNCIL, WHERE APPROPRIATE,
WILL PREPARE SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING GUIDANCE AND PLANNING BRIEFS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICIES IN THE PLAN. |
| |
|
|
| 10.20 |
Whilst the Plan sets out a wide range
of policies which will be applied to development proposals, depending
on location, there will be situations where it will be helpful to
a wide range of interested persons such as developers, local residents
and amenity groups, to set down how policies may be applied on a particular
site. Planning briefs, which may also be subject to public consultation,
will be used to provide guidance which supplements and expands upon
the policies in the Plan. As set out in Government good practice,
planning briefs should be consistent with, and referenced to the Plan.
This reflects the fact that planning briefs are normally adopted as
Supplementary Planning Guidance, and are therefore produced outside
the Plan. This also enables individual briefs to be revised and updated
to take account of changed circumstances. It is the Council's intention
to consult on Supplementary Planning Guidance and planning briefs. |
| 10.21 |
A planning brief may, therefore, set down
how general policies in the Plan are to be applied and interpreted
in a specific location. It is important to acknowledge that such a
brief should not contradict, rewrite or introduce new policies. To
highlight the importance attached to planning briefs, the Council
will subject development briefs on major sites to public consultation.
To enhance their significance, individual planning briefs will normally
be prepared in liaison with site owners. The Proposal Sites Schedule
(see below) provides an indication of sites where the preparation
of planning briefs would be helpful. |
|
|
|
| |
Public Consultation (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
I 7 |
THE COUNCIL WILL CONSULT
THE PUBLIC ON MAJOR CHANGES TO THE PLANNING POLICIES IN THE ADOPTED
PLAN AND APPROVED SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING GUIDANCE. |
| |
|
|
| 10.22 |
Whilst the statutory processes ensure
that the public can play a full and effective part in the policies
and proposals included in the adopted Plan, wide public or neighbour
consultation also takes place on individual planning applications.
However, it is equally important that members of the public and interested
bodies are also given the opportunity to comment on major policy changes,
as these are brought forward when individual policies in the Plan
are reviewed. Whilst it would be inappropriate to introduce such changes
through a full statutory process, substantial weight should be accorded
at planning appeals and inquiries to policies which have been the
subject of appropriate public consultation and revised accordingly.
Full weight would then attributed to such policies if they went unaltered
through the statutory planning process at a later stage. |
|
|
|
| |
PROPOSAL SITES
|
| |
| Site Ref. |
Site Address |
Area
(ha) |
Proposal |
Development Objectives and Constraints |
Central Harrow
PS 1 |
Land south of Greenhill Way, r/o Debenhams. |
0.8 |
Mixed use scheme that could include, amongst others commercial,
leisure or residential use, or other appropriate town centre
uses, including replacement parking and the option for a central
lending library. |
The site is currently in use as a public pay and display car
park. It is a key town centre site and its development potential
forms an essential part of the Council's strategy to revitalise
the northern part of Station Road. The urban design of the site
should be of the highest quality, and special attention should
be paid to the elevation to Greenhill Way. The current access
arrangements to the site are inadequate and would need to be
improved to serve a major development. Development of the site
may also require highway improvements on Station Road and Greenhill
Way. |
| PS 2 |
Land north of Greenhill Way. |
0.2 |
Small scale, commercial, residential or community use. |
The release of this site is unlikely to be considered until
the redevelopment of land to the rear of Debenhams (Proposal
Site 1) has been completed and related car parking and access
issues have been resolved. Development potential is constrained
by poor access and the awkward shape of the site. |
| PS 3 |
2 St John's Road. |
0.05 |
Small scale commercial, community or residential use. |
Due to its restricted size, the site is unlikely to attract
office development, though it is well located in this respect.
Other commercial or community uses would be suitable and there
may be opportunities to utilise part of the adjoining highway
in conjunction with the development of the site. Residential
use would also be appropriate within a mixed use scheme. Proposals
must retain the mature tree on the St John's Road frontage. |
| PS 4 |
9-11 St John's Road. |
0.2 |
Office, leisure, residential or community use. |
This is an under-utilised site in an area of mixed development,
just outside the main shopping core. The site is well-located
and suitable for a range of town centre uses. Development of
up to four storeys would be appropriate and restraint-based
parking would apply. Any development must provide for the completion
of a rear service road, as shown on the Proposals Map. |
| PS 5 |
Gayton Road car park, lending library and Sonia Court. |
1.3 |
Mixed use scheme, which could include commercial and residential
uses including replacement housing. |
The site is located on the south east edge of Harrow Metropolitan
Centre in an area of mixed commercial/residential character.
It comprises a long-stay public car park and central lending
library, separated by a block of 9 flats, and has good accessibility
especially by rail.
The site has the potential to be developed comprehensively
for a range of town centre uses, though preference would be
given to a mixed use scheme, including replacement housing.
A small element of retail use may be appropriate but should
be restricted to the western part of the site. Development
would need to ensure a suitable transition between commercial
activities to the west and the predominant residential character
of land to the north and east.
The release of the site for development would be subject
to decisions regarding the future of the car park and library.
|
| PS 6 |
Harrow-on-the-Hill Station, and land in College Road and Lowlands
Road. |
5.8 |
Public transport improvements and mixed use development for
office, education, civic, residential, leisure and retail use
and open space. |
This significant site and major public transport interchange
provides the opportunity for high quality, higher density,
mixed use development and enhanced interchange facilities.
In order to achieve these objectives, the Council in conjunction
with landowners and key stakeholders, will prepare an urban
design framework for the site to facilitate a comprehensive
approach to development and enable developments on any part
of the site to be brought forward provided that they are in
accordance with the development objectives. The design framework
should apply Transport Development Area (TDA) principles,
to optimise the development potential of the site, integrate
land use and transport functions and ensure an appropriate
built form at a key town centre location. A wide range of
uses would be suitable, particularly those that attract large
numbers of people, including office, retail, leisure, civic
and residential uses.
Specifically, the site offers the potential for Harrow College
to locate its core functions at a single site within Harrow
Metropolitan Centre.
Harrow Baptist Church occupies an important position within
the Proposal Site boundary and represents a significant community
asset in the town centre. The retention of the church and
the opportunity to integrate it with other proposed facilities,
as part of the development framework, should be carefully
considered. However, if a suitable scheme cannot be designed
to respect the church's presence, relocation to a more appropriate
part of the site, or elsewhere within the town centre, will
be encouraged.
The ground floor to College Road should provide commercial
activities that create an active and vibrant frontage, including
retail, food and drink and other service uses. Pedestrian
access thorough the development, and links to that part of
the site to the south of the station, should be enhanced to
overcome the railway barrier and ensure the integration of
the whole development within the town centre boundary.
The site includes Lowlands Recreation Ground, an area of
Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) within the Harrow Town Centre
boundary. This provides a visual break within the commercial
frontage to Lowlands Road and a link to the more extensive
area of open space on the lower slopes of Harrow on the Hill.
The current amount of open space would need to be retained
in any comprehensive development of the site and laid out
in a manner that reflects its MOL characteristics. However,
there may be scope to remodel the open space as part of the
detailed design, to provide a landscaped setting for development,
improve pedestrian access to the town centre, and secure an
enhanced open space that would make a positive contribution
to the range of town centre facilities.
Lowlands Recreation Ground also forms part of the Roxborough
Park and The Grove Conservation Area. In addition, the Harrow
College site includes a Grade II listed building - the "White
House". Proposals for the site must preserve the character
and setting of the listed building and preserve or enhance
the character or appearance of the conservation area.
Harrow-on-the Hill station is a key interchange and has been
identified for priority treatment in the West London Transport
Strategy. Significant infrastructure improvement should be
made to ensure the modernisation of the station to fulfil
its function as a modern interchange and as a key part of
the town centre.
|
| PS 7 |
Land north of Junction Road. |
0.3 |
Residential, commercial or leisure use. |
This is a very prominent site on the western edge of the town
centre but is constrained by the adjoining elevated section
of the Roxborough Bridge flyover. |
| PS 8 |
16-24 Lowlands Road. |
0.1 |
Residential. |
The site occupies a prominent position on the boundary of
Harrow Metropolitan Centre and a high standard of design would
be required in any scheme.
Development for residential purposes would make a useful
addition to the housing stock and would extend the range and
choice of housing in the area. Use of the whole site for affordable
housing may be appropriate. The site is well-related to public
transport, and within the town centre Controlled Parking Zone,
which may justify a lower parking requirement. "Resident Permit
Restriction" would apply in these circumstances. The limited
site depth will also restrict the amount of amenity space
available and particular care will need to be taken to ensure
the privacy of adjoining occupiers.
Permission was granted in June 2000 for 8 flats in a 2/3
storey building.
|
| PS 9 |
St Ann's Service yard & College Rd frontage. |
0.7 |
Mixed use scheme for retail, leisure or commercial use, including
an element of residential. |
The St Ann's Centre is serviced from two large service areas
on either side of the main mall, with the yard to east of
the Centre accessed from Havelock Place. Havelock Place also
provides rear service access to properties fronting College
Road and Station Road and to several other sites, most notably
the Fitz Health Club.
The closure of Havelock Place is a long-standing Council
objective which would enable the complete pedestrianisation
of St Ann's Road. Alternative access would have to be provided
which could only be achieved on the redevelopment of some
or all of the properties at 2-36 College Road.
With modern servicing methods, the St Ann's service yard
is a much under-used asset, bearing in mind its location immediately
adjoining the main retail part of the town centre, and its
proximity to Harrow-on-the-Hill station. Together with the
properties in College Road, it offers considerable scope to
expand retail or other town centre facilities and sufficient
land to justify redevelopment and provision of the alternative
access to Havelock Place. An element of replacement residential
accommodation would be appropriate as part of a mixed use
scheme.
|
| PS 10 |
YWCA Sheepcote Road. |
0.1 |
Residential or community use. |
The site is located on the eastern edge of Harrow Metropolitan
Centre. Three storey residential uses adjoin to the east and
west. Interim access arrangements were adopted in 1997 on a
left-in, left-out basis, following the widening of Sheepcote
Road. On any redevelopment of the site for residential purposes,
access will be required from the rear, from Brandreth/Hanbury
Court. |
Belmont
PS 11 |
Belmont Health Centre and adjacent land, Belmont Circle. |
0.6 |
Appropriate Local Centre uses and car parking. |
The proposed service road to the rear of Belmont Circle adjoins
the site, and it is also affected by the designated Green Chain
along the former Belmont Line. Although site constraints restrict
its development potential, the site is suitable for a range
of uses, including education, that could support the vitality
and viability of Belmont Local Centre. The Health Centre should
be retained in any proposals, and public car parking should
be retained to serve the Local Centre. Any development should
not impinge on the adjacent nature trail. |
| PS 12 |
Prince Edward Playing Fields Whitchurch Lane/Camrose Avenue. |
17.3 |
Outdoor leisure use, incorporating community stadium, tennis
courts and sports pitches. |
This large area of open space is located to the west of Edgware
District Centre, close to Canons Park underground station.
The Jubilee Line runs along the western boundary. Prior to
its closure in early 1997 the site was intensively used, providing
pitches for both football and cricket, and hardsurfaced tennis/netball
courts.
The amount of built development should be restricted in order
to maintain the open character of the site and should be ancillary
to any outdoor leisure activities. Vehicular access should
be from Camrose Avenue. The site is well served by bus and
tube and restraint based parking will apply. Development of
the site for leisure use would safeguard its future as a focus
for local sports provision.
Outline planning permission was granted in May 2001, subject
to the completion of a legal agreement, for a football stadium
with clubhouse, health & fitness facilities, artificial pitch,
tennis courts and sports pitches.
The Edgware Brook runs through the site and the Environment
Agency has submitted proposals for flood storage works as
part of the Silk Stream Flood Alleviation Scheme.
|
Harrow on the Hill
PS 13 |
Former Harrow Hospital, and nurses hostel, Roxeth Hill. |
1.5 |
Residential or community use. |
The Harrow Hospital site lies within the Roxeth Hill Conservation
Area and Area of Special Character, and is accessed from Roxeth
Hill, a borough distributor road. The main hospital building
is Grade II listed and the site is adjoined to the west by
the Grade II listed Christ Church and to the east by Siddons
House, a locally listed building. The main hospital building
is also included on the English Heritage Register of Buildings
at Risk in Greater London. The former nurses hostel is located
some 55m west of the hospital site.
There would be a strong presumption against the demolition
of the main part of the hospital, and any other buildings
that make a positive contribution to the Conservation Area.
Conversion of retained buildings to residential use would
be appropriate. Residential infill over the remainder of the
site may be acceptable but would require careful design to
take account of the amenities of adjoining properties, especially
to the south and east, and the location of the site on the
lower slope of Harrow on the Hill. Vehicular access to Roxeth
Hill presents a particular constraint. This is likely to affect
developments which would result in significant peak-time traffic
generation. The aim should be for an imaginative scheme achieving
high density provision whilst suitably recognising the prevailing
constraints and design implications of all these factors.
The Council has endorsed a Planning Brief for the site prepared
on behalf of the Harrow and Hillingdon Healthcare NHS Trust.
|
| PS 14 |
Former Kings Head Hotel, High Street, Harrow on the Hill. |
0.56 |
Hotel, A3, Residential. |
The Kings Head Hotel is a Grade II listed building, and an
architecturally and historically important site at Harrow
on the Hill. The Kings Head is also included on the English
Heritage Register of Buildings at Risk in Greater London.
The Council's first preference for the site would be for
a development of a viable hotel. Should the development of
an hotel not be viable, then the Council will consider as
an alternative scheme based on the following principles:
a) The conversion of the most historic parts of the building
for residential and A3 use (subject to viability/sustainability
issues being addressed);
b) The demolition of Assembly Rooms as part of a comprehensive
scheme; and
c) The provision of purpose built new housing on the site
consistent with the need to ensure the character of the Conservation
Area and historic interest of the listed building is preserved;
the relationship with adjacent properties is not materially
harmed; adequate areas are set aside for amenity purposes
and account is taken of existing trees covered by TPO's.
This is a key site in the context of Harrow on the Hill.
Comprehensive development is required to ensure that the special
historic interest of the former hotel, and all land within
its curtilage, is preserved. If necessary, the Council will
consider using its compulsory purchase powers to ensure that
this is achieved. Before any scheme is considered there should
be a thorough site evaluation, including a detailed historic
buildings survey.
|
Harrow Weald
PS 15 |
Harrow Weald Park, Brookshill. |
6.9 |
Public open space. |
This Green Belt site is being improved as public woodland
by annual incremental work with the intention of bringing it
into public use at a future date. |
Hatch End
PS 16 |
Harrow Arts Centre, Uxbridge Road and associated land and
buildings. |
3.4 |
Arts and leisure development. |
The site provides one of the main focal points for arts and
leisure activity in the Borough. Elliott Hall is the principal
building on site and is Grade II listed. The southern part
of the site, and playing fields to the east, are located in
the Green Belt. Vehicular access is shared with the adjacent
Safeway retail store. A purpose-built Medical Centre occupies
part of the Uxbridge Road frontage.
A number of buildings within the complex are in poor condition
and there are opportunities to rationalise and develop the
arts and leisure facilities currently available in conjunction
with existing uses.
|
Kingsbury
PS 17 |
TA Centre, Honeypot Lane. |
1.4 |
Retail, housing or community use. |
The Ministry of Defence has announced that, following the
review of the future structure of the Territorial Army, the
site in Kingsbury is to close. No indication has been received
about the likely closure date.
As an edge of centre location, the site offers a clear opportunity
for retail development, subject to the need for additional
facilities being established. The views of the London Borough
of Brent, where the greater part of Kingsbury District Centre
is located, will also be relevant. Residential (including
affordable housing) and community use would both be viable
options, given the good public transport links. The site is
surrounded on three sides by housing, some very close, and
this will influence the type and form of development, especially
the siting of any new buildings. Vehicular access, which can
only be achieved from Honeypot Lane, may also affect the site's
development potential and will require further study.
|
North Harrow
PS 18 |
149 and 151 Pinner View. |
0.16 |
Residential or community use. |
The site occupies a prominent position on the main vehicular
access to Headstone Manor. Two storey residential uses adjoin
to the south and east, museum storage uses abut the site directly
to the north and Metropolitan Open Land and a car park to
the west. The site is currently in use as a builders yard
and car repair workshop. Headstone Manor is a Grade I Listed
Building and Scheduled Ancient Monument, and redevelopment
of the site would provide an opportunity to enhance the "gateway"
to this important visitor attraction and so improve the amenity
of the area.
Although close to Headstone Manor, the surrounding area is
predominantly residential in character. Residential or community
uses would therefore be appropriate new development for the
site. The site has housing on two sides, particularly close
to the eastern boundary, and this will influence the siting
of any new buildings. Development of up to two storeys would
be appropriate, with continued use of the access from Pinner
View.
Any development proposal should be of the highest quality
of design and create an attractive frontage to Pinner View
and the access to the Headstone Manor complex. Special attention
should be paid to the landscape design on the road frontage
due to the site's visual prominence in the context of the
Headstone Manor complex.
|
South Harrow
PS 19 |
Eastern Electricity Plc land, the Brember Day Centre and land
in Stanley Road. |
1.5 |
Industrial development. |
The Eastern Electricity site is an unused parcel of land
which has only limited access to Roxeth Green Avenue. This
would not be suitable to serve a more extensive use of the
site. The Brember Road Industrial Estate adjoins to the east
and land adjoining the Piccadilly Railway Line forms the western
boundary.
Biro House, located south of the Eastern Electricity site,
is allocated for Industrial and Business Use in the UDP. A
planning application for two 3 storey blocks of 24 flats was
dismissed at appeal in January 2000.
The Brember Day Care Centre is located within the Brember
Road Industrial Estate. Replacement facilities are planned
to be completed in 2002-2004, when the centre will close.
The redevelopment of all or part of the Brember Centre would
provide an appropriate access to the vacant Eastern Electricity
site to the rear and create an opportunity for a comprehensive
industrial development of the combined site.
Provision for a new access road, linking the Brember Road
Estate with Northolt Road, and thereby removing industrial
traffic from Stanley Road, is shown on the Proposals Map.
Development of the site in advance of the link road would
not be acceptable.
|
| PS 20 |
Roxeth Allotments. |
0.8 |
Public Open Space, subject to release from allotment use. |
Release from allotment use would allow the site to be developed
for public open space purposes in conjunction with the adjoining
park. |
| PS 21 |
201-209 Northolt Road. |
0.08 |
Housing, B1 offices or Class A uses. |
This near derelict site forms part of the Northolt Road Business
Use Area and is located just outside the boundary of South
Harrow District Centre, north of South Harrow tube station.
Two storey residential properties adjoin the north and east
and a Public House car park abuts the southern boundary. Mixed
B1 offices and retail use lie opposite.
The site would be suitable for a range of uses, including
B1 offices, housing and all types of Class A use. Development
potential and opportunities for a mixed-use scheme are limited
by the size of the site and its shallow depth. On-site parking
may not be required due to the proximity of tube and bus services.
Continued use of the existing site access is unsuitable on
highway safety grounds.
If necessary, the Council will consider using its compulsory
purchase powers to secure the assembly of the site for redevelopment.
|
| PS 22 |
Roxeth Nursery,
The Arches. |
0.38 |
Residential and/or business use. |
The site is located north of South Harrow town centre. The
Rayners Lane Estate is directly to the west and the South
Harrow Arches (Industrial and Business Use Area) located to
the east of the site. The site is currently in use as a nursery.
In the event of the current use ceasing, development for residential
or business use would be appropriate. Business use should
be limited to B1 use to safeguard the amenity of the surrounding
residential area.
The redevelopment of the site provides an opportunity to
contribute to the wider regeneration of the area. A regeneration
strategy has been prepared for the South Harrow Arches and
Rayners Lane Estate. This includes proposals for the comprehensive
redevelopment of the Estate, replacing the flats with housing.
The existing vehicular access to the site from Roxeth Green
Avenue presents a particular constraint and would need improving
to cater for any increase in use. Any development for business
use should be accessed from Roxeth Green Avenue, and highway
improvements would be required at this access and along the
railway arches. This access would be unsuitable for any redevelopment
of the site for residential purposes, and access would then
be required from Coles Crescent. Although the site is capable
of independent development, particularly for commercial uses,
if a residential development is proposed a comprehensive scheme
in conjunction with the Rayners Lane Estate project would
be preferred due to the access from Coles Crescent.
The site is bounded by railway arches which will influence
the type and form of development, especially the siting of
buildings. Business development would need to ensure a suitable
buffer and transition between the residential uses to the
west and commercial uses to the east.
Redevelopment of the site would provide an opportunity to
upgrade the pedestrian link from Coles Crescent as this is
an important link from the Rayners Lane Estate to South Harrow.
Particular attention would have to be paid to the area along
the railway arches in terms of highway safety, lighting and
landscaping.
|
Stanmore
PS 23 |
Glenthorne, Common Road. |
3.3 |
Use in association with Bentley Priory Open Space. |
The site was transferred to the Council as part of the agreement
to construct new and replacement facilities at RAF Bentley Priory.
It is currently being assessed to identify any items of public
nuisance, arising from its previous military use, or areas that
may have particular environmental importance. When the site
is in a suitable condition, restricted access will be made available
for nature conservation use. |
| PS 24 |
Land at Stanmore Station and adjacent land, London Road. |
6.6 |
Residential or B1 use with the retention of the station use
and adequate parking. |
This narrow site includes the station buildings, car park
and the airspace over the railway. Housing adjoins to the
east, although there is a significant difference in site levels,
and part of the site is of nature conservation interest.
A footpath should be provided through the site between its
frontages to London Road and Dalkeith Grove, as part of a
link to Canons Park and Stanmore Country Park.
|
| PS 25 |
BAE Systems Site, Warren Lane, Stanmore. |
4.4 |
Housing. |
The site has been identified as a Major Developed Site in
the Green Belt. It is intensively developed, containing approximately
35,000sq.m (375,000 sq.ft.) of B1 accommodation. PPG2 recognises
that redevelopment of Major Developed Sites offers the opportunity
for environmental improvements without adding to their impact
on the openness of the Green Belt. Affordable housing policy
would apply. In view of the site's isolated location, public
transport services and other measures to improve the site's
accessibility for housing will be sought. |
| PS 26 |
Anmer Lodge. |
0.6 |
Housing or community use. |
The site is located just outside the boundary of Stanmore
District Centre. The Broadway multi storey car park adjoins
to the south with housing on its northern boundary, off Rainsford
Close. Housing or community use would be appropriate in the
longer term. The site may be suitable for wholly affordable
housing purposes.
Planning permission was granted in October 1999 for a change
of use of the building from care home to residential hostel
for a temporary period of 5 years.
|
| PS 27 |
Former Government Offices, Honeypot Lane. |
4.1 |
Comprehensive development for B1/B2/B8 use or business/Residential. |
The site occupies a prominent location to the east of Honeypot
Lane and forms part of the Stanmore Industrial Business Park.
It is the largest vacant industrial site in the Borough and
has considerable potential to be developed for business, industrial
or warehousing use.
Planning permission was granted in June 2000 for an affordable
housing scheme of some 1.2 hectares on the eastern part of
the site. An element of residential use, including work/live
units, would therefore be acceptable, as part of the comprehensive
development of the whole site, principally for employment
use. This form of development would require employment-related
activities immediately adjacent to any residential use, to
be restricted to B1 use to safeguard the residential component
of the scheme.
In order to improve public transport accessibility, the footpath
link in the north east corner of the site to Canons Park station
would need to be maintained and enhanced in any future development.
Particular attention would also have to be paid to the eastern
and western boundaries of the site to protect the nature conservation
interest of adjacent land.
|
Wealdstone
PS 28 |
24-38 Station Road. |
0.4 |
Community use (place or worship) and affordable housing. |
There is an opportunity for the adjoining Central Mosque
to expand on to the site as their facilities are currently
constrained. All residential development on the site should
be affordable housing. It will be important to improve the
frontage to Station Road.
Planning permission for a mosque and ancillary facilities
was granted in June 2000.
|
| PS 29 |
Land adjacent to the Leisure Centre/former outdoor pool. |
0.6 |
Leisure or Housing. |
The site consists of a former outdoor swimming pool and ancillary
Leisure Centre uses. The main Leisure Centre building abuts
the eastern boundary of the site, which may affect the layout
of development. Any adverse impact on future occupants could
be overcome by sensitive design and orientation of new buildings.
The initial presumption would be to retain the former pool
site for recreational use, although its relative isolation
from the main Leisure Centre building and car park would have
to be taken into account.
|
| PS 30 |
Parks depot site & former mortuary, Peel Road. |
0.3 |
Community Use. |
The site is considered suitable for a community use. Building
height should not exceed two storeys. The boundary with residential
property in Byron Road should be suitably fenced and landscaped.
Planning permission was granted in November 2000 for a 60
place Community Resource Centre for people with learning difficulties
and an ancillary 12 bed residential unit, with associated
car parking.
|
| PS 31 |
Land north of the Bridge Day Care Centre adjacent to the Leisure
Centre car park. |
0.23 |
Leisure or community use. |
This is a small vacant site adjacent to The Bridge Day Care
Centre in Christchurch Avenue and was formed following the development
of the Driving Centre and re-organisation of the Leisure Centre
car park. The operation of the Leisure Centre car park, and
the need to share vehicular access, will limit the site's development
potential. Use in conjunction with the Leisure Centre or for
the development of a community facility to complement the adjoining
Bridge Centre would be appropriate. |
| PS 32 |
Driving Centre, Christchurch Avenue. |
1.4 |
Mixed use scheme which could involve educational, leisure,
community or residential use. |
The site is a purpose-built driving centre that is surplus
to Council requirements. It is largely open in character with
a small, ancillary building near the site entrance. The site
is accessed from Christchurch Avenue via a private road, which
also serves the Leisure Centre complex and The Bridge Day
Centre.
The site would be suitable for use in connection with the
Leisure Centre, as would an independent leisure activity.
Residential, community or business use would also be appropriate,
individually or as part of a mixed use scheme. If the southern
part of the site is developed for residential use, a small
number of dwellings could be accessed from Coxe Place. Current
access arrangements may need to be revised and enhanced to
serve the larger part of the site.
Development must not affect the nature conservation interest
of the adjoining Belmont Walk.
|
| PS 33 |
Land west of High Street. |
1.5 |
Retail use and Housing. |
Sainsburys submitted a planning application in July 2000
for a food store of 2940 sq m with 134 parking spaces and
52 residential units above.
The foodstore should be directly accessible by pedestrians
from High Street, with vehicular access via Ellen Webb Drive
and Headstone Drive. A foodstore is an integral part of the
Wealdstone Regeneration Strategy, and the Council will seek
to ensure that affected businesses can be relocated within
Wealdstone.
|
| PS 34 |
Ex BR Site, Cecil Road. |
0.6 |
Business Use. |
The site adjoins the Tudor Business Park and is allocated
in the UDP for Business Use. Any proposed use of the site
should not give rise to adverse effects on the surrounding
residents. A railway access strip to the west of 23 Cecil
Road should be retained.
Planning permission for a scheme comprising 11 B1 units was
granted in November 1997.
|
| PS 35 |
Wealdstone Library/Youth Centre and Canning Road car park. |
0.6 |
Residential. |
The site occupies a prominent position fronting Grant Road
and George Gange Way. If a replacement library and youth centre
could be secured elsewhere in Wealdstone, the site has considerable
potential for residential use. Development should create a
strong frontage to George Gange Way and make a significant
contribution to the street scene.
The site has good access to public transport and higher density
development would be appropriate. Restraint-based parking
would apply, subject to Resident Permit Restrictions.
If developed comprehensively, access should be from Grant
Road.
|
| PS 36 |
1-33 The Bridge & 6-14 Masons Avenue. |
0.15 |
Residential, B1 offices or commercial use. |
The site would be suitable for residential development, with
no car parking, due to its location opposite Harrow and Wealdstone
station. A high density block of flats would be appropriate,
which could be up to three storeys high. The site also has
commercial development potential, possibly within a mixed
use scheme, which would avoid the loss of employment land.
However, the lack of occupier demand outside Harrow Metropolitan
Centre is likely to discourage office development.
Redevelopment of the site would provide an opportunity to
improve the bus/rail interchange with Harrow and Wealdstone
station. Land should be safeguarded for this purpose along
The Bridge frontage. Vehicle access to the redeveloped site
should be from Masons Avenue.
|
| PS 37 |
Land at Oxford Road and Byron Road. |
0.38 |
Business use and residential. |
The site forms part of the Palmerston Road/Oxford Road industrial
area. The principal building has been vacant for some years
and could be retained/redeveloped for a number of business/industrial
uses. Residential use, in the form of work/live space accommodation,
would be appropriate on the Byron Road frontage, ideally as
part of a comprehensive development of the whole site, principally
for business/industrial use. |
| PS 38 |
87-111 High Street and land to the rear. |
0.45 |
Residential, B1 offices or commercial use. |
The site is located in a prominent High Street position on
the northern edge of the town centre. The ground floor units
are relatively small and few have been modernised to current
standards. Most are occupied by 'tertiary' uses and have poor
townscape value. Land to the rear comprises a number of competing
uses in a muddled site layout.
The site would be suited to high density housing, small B1
offices, or other commercial/service use. This would improve
the street frontage at a key entry point to the town centre,
create a better relationship with adjoining housing, and help
to focus retail interest in the more central part of the town
centre. Completion of the rear service road would also be
secured, improving traffic flows on the adjacent road network.
|
West Harrow
PS 39 |
Land r/o 121-255 Pinner Road. |
0.9 |
Nature Reserve. |
The site forms part of a Green Corridor, and has planning
permission for use as a nature reserve. This will secure the
site's nature conservation value, protect and enhance the various
environments and species and promote its effective management. |
| PS 40 |
Vaughan Centre, Vaughan Road
Wilson Gardens. |
0.3 |
Community Use. |
The site is occupied by the Vaughan Centre, a locally listed
building, and is currently in use as a day centre for people
with learning difficulties. It is proposed to refurbish the
building to enable it to remain in its current use and to construct
an ancillary residential unit fronting Vaughan Road. Building
height will be restricted to two storeys and the design should
reflect the Edwardian terraced character of the surrounding
area. Additional landscaping will be required to the Wilson
Gardens frontage and along the boundary with properties in Drury
Road. Planning permission was granted in November 2000 for a
12 place residential unit, and ancillary works, on the remainder
of the site. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|