PART 2 - 10. IMPLEMENTATION, RESOURCES, AND MONITORING
   
PART 2 POLICIES
I3 Planning Obligations and Legal Agreements (date of deletion 28th September 2007)
  Planning Conditions
I4 Enforcement (date of deletion 28th September 2007)
I5 Proposals Map and Proposal Sites Schedule
I6 Supplementary Planning Guidance and Planning Briefs (date of deletion 28th September 2007)
I7 Public Consultation (date of deletion 28th September 2007)
  Proposals Site Schedule - Individual Site Details
 
  INTRODUCTION
10.1 The policies and proposals in the Plan are aimed at securing more sustainable development in Harrow over the next 10 to 15 years. Their effective implementation is clearly aimed at addressing the identified and anticipated problems and opportunities in the Borough, and insofar as Harrow can contribute to dealing with those of London as a whole. Whilst some development will emanate from joint working between the Council and a variety of partners and agencies, as well as its own departmental service plans, most development will be undertaken by the private sector. It is therefore of fundamental importance to achieving the strategic objectives of the Plan that its policies continue to attract substantial private sector investment, and direct development to appropriate locations. The Council will continue to explore opportunities for funding and joint working which promote acceptable development. As a statement of the Council's intentions to facilitate development, Proposal Sites have been identified, including the preferred uses.
10.2 For the Plan to be genuinely dynamic, and responsive to changed circumstances, it is imperative that effective monitoring of development trends occurs, and other factors affecting the way land and buildings are used. The identification of strategic indicators will assist the process of assessing whether or not progress is being made towards securing a more sustainable Harrow. As the Plan must be kept up-to-date, appropriate policy revisions may need to be brought forward in advance of the next statutory review.
10.3 An integral part of the development control process is the securing of community benefits as part of a new development. In appropriate circumstances, and particularly on larger-scale developments, additional infrastructure may be required to support the development. Policies need to give clear guidance to developers on the circumstances in which Planning Obligations will be sought. Planning briefs for specific sites will also provide additional guidance on the way in which land is to be developed.
10.4 In determining planning applications, the Council will pay due regard to the policies in the Plan. As required by Section 54A of the 1990 Town and Country Planning Act, decisions will be in accordance with the Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. In addition to providing guidance on what matters are taken into account in determining individual planning applications, there needs to be clear guidance on the approach the Council will take in situations where breaches of planning control occur. Positive enforcement actions remain an important activity in protecting the environment, and can also ensure continued public support for the planning system.
10.5 In addition to consultation on individual planning applications, public consultation is an inherent part of the statutory development plan process. Consideration has been given to the appropriate mechanisms for continued public consultation on any policy changes which might be necessary in advance of the next formal review of the Plan.
   
  NATIONAL AND REGIONAL POLICY CONTEXT
10.6 Government Circular 1/97 on Planning Obligations, and PPG 1, state that Local Planning Authorities may seek certain kinds of benefit of Planning Obligation which are related to new development and are necessary for the grant of planning permission. These are to be secured by Legal Agreements associated with the grant of planning permission.
10.7 PPG18: Enforcing Planning Control, and Circular 10/97, provide detailed guidance on the powers available to Local Planning Authorities to enforce the planning control given to them by the Planning and Compensation Act 1991. Additional powers are also afforded by other specialist legislation, for example, in relation to Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas, and hazardous substances.
10.8 PPG1 sets down the general principles relating to the imposition of planning conditions, and more detailed advice on their use and appropriateness is contained in Circular 11/95.
10.9 The regional strategic planning context is provided by the spatial development strategy for London, the Mayor's London Plan (February 2004). The policies in this chapter have been drafted in the light of the vision, objectives and strategic policy content of the Plan.
   
  IMPLEMENTATION, RESOURCES AND MONITORING OBJECTIVES
10.10 i) To maximise the amount of planning benefits secured by legal agreements;
  ii) To ensure that planning permissions are properly implemented, and breaches of planning control addressed; and
  iii) To effectively monitor development of achievement of identified targets and amending policies as necessary.
   
  PART 1 POLICIES
10.11 Strategic policies for Implementation, Resources and Monitoring (Policies SI 1 & SI 2), and reasoned justifications are set out in Chapter 2 of the Plan. They cover the following matters:-
  SI 1 - Implementation and Resources
SI 2 - Monitoring and Review.
   
  Planning Obligations and Legal Agreements
10.12 Besides the imposition of conditions when granting planning permission, the Council may also enter into an agreement with a developer in order to enhance the quality of development and enable proposals to go ahead which might otherwise have been refused. Such Planning Obligations will normally be secured by way of a Legal Agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act (as amended by the Planning and Compensation Act 1991), but in rare circumstances, they may be in the form of a unilateral undertaking by the developer (usually only used in appeal cases). The Government's policy with regard to Planning Obligations is set down in Circular 1/97, which sets down a number of policy tests which should be satisfied before a Planning Obligation is sought. Planning Obligations should be:-
  i) Necessary;
  ii) Relevant to planning;
  iii) Directly related to the proposed development;
  iv) Fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the proposed development;
  v) Reasonable in all other respects.
   
10.13 In order to retain public confidence, the Council re-affirms the advice set out in Circular 1/97 that the seeking of Planning Obligations will be pursued in accordance with the fundamental principle that planning permission should not be bought or sold. Accordingly, therefore, it will be important for the Council to demonstrate why a particular Obligation may be justified. In this connection, the variety of needs existing in the Borough and the circumstances where Obligations may be sought will be identified in relevant policies throughout the Plan, as well as in the list in para. 10.14, thereby forewarning potential landowners and developers. For example, the Council will aim to secure an appropriate level of on-site affordable housing provision on qualifying schemes, Travel Plans for businesses and schools, and contributions to educational facilities from the developers of residential schemes. Such benefits will be secured via a Planning Obligation or Legal Agreement.
  (Date of deletion 28th September 2007)
  I 3 THE COUNCIL MAY SEEK TO SECURE PLANNING BENEFITS BY MEANS OF A PLANNING OBLIGATION IN CONNECTION WITH A DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. SUCH BENEFITS WOULD BE NECESSARY, RELEVANT TO PLANNING, DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, FAIRLY AND REASONABLY RELATED IN SCALE AND KIND TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, AND REASONABLE IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. SUCH AN OBLIGATION SHOULD ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF A DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL WHICH WOULD OTHERWISE BE REFUSED.
       
10.14 Whilst PPG1 sets the background principles for seeking Planning Obligations, Circular 1/97 sets out the Government's policy for their use. The Council will only seek Planning Obligations on individual proposals where the relevant tests have been met, as set down in the policy. Furthermore, the Council will only seek Planning Obligations in situations which enable proposals to go ahead which might otherwise be refused.
10.15 To assist developers by providing an indication of what might be sought, by way of a Planning Obligation, the following examples are included:-
  i) securing an element of on-site affordable housing in larger residential development or a mixed-use development;
  ii) ensuring an acceptable balance of uses in a mixed-use development;
  iii) provision of low cost residential accommodation and community facilities to meet local needs where the development leads to an opportunity loss in terms of their provision or, where necessary, to maintain a 'mixed use environment';
  iv) primarily with larger developments, providing improved measures for pedestrians or cyclists, improved access to public transport, bus-stops and facilities providing (or contributing towards) improved junction or road layouts, including at a railway terminus and interchanges;
  v) provision of primary and secondary health care facilities to meet an identified need as a result of the development;
  vi) provision of special benefits in the form of buildings, open space, streetscape, pedestrian access and other facilities for the use of the public related to the development itself or the pedestrian movements which are generated and attracted by it;
  vii) replacement of open space, nature conservation habitat or other suitable recreational facility in situations where such land is lost or harmed in a proposal;
  viii) conservation and re-use of buildings or places of historic or architectural interest, and preservation and establishment of areas of nature conservation significance;
  ix) making a contribution towards the provision of school accommodation for additional school places, or additional education provision, generated by a development;
  x) commuted payments to meet the full cost of the additional activity arising from the development and its implications for transport and infrastructure, including the need for highway access and public transport;
  xi) employment training and/or apprenticeship provisions to meet the requirements of model agreements developed in the light of local and London-wide inefficiencies in the labour market;
  xii) support to the upgrading of poorer quality accommodation for employment related activity, for which otherwise there would be no effective demand;
  xiii) requiring major employers and institutions to prepare and implement a Travel Plan which promotes less vehicle use and will contribute effectively to the Council's Local Transport Strategy;
  xiv) provision of childcare and other indoor community facilities related to the development;
  xv) requiring agreements on building envelopes on appropriate sites e.g. education and Green Belt sites;
  xvi) requiring agreements on proposals for doctors' surgeries relating to the size of the patient list, the number of practitioners in the practice, the number of non-medical staff, and the opening hours;.
  xvii) provision for appropriate public art.
  xviii) energy-saving measures and other matters promoting good practice towards achieving sustainable development.
  xix) improvements to local water quality.
  xx) measures that will improve land quality.
  xxi) waste and re-cycling initiatives.
  In seeking a Planning Obligation on any individual proposal, the Council will indicate the problem which it is addressing and the effect that the proposed development would have. In this way the Council will be clearly identifying a direct link between the proposed development and the Planning Obligation being sought. The range of problems which may form the subject of a Planning Obligation have been identified throughout the Plan.
  Enforcement (Date of deletion 28th September 2007)
  I 4 THE COUNCIL WILL TAKE ENFORCEMENT ACTION IN THE FOLLOWING SITUATIONS :-
    1) WHERE THERE HAS BEEN A BREACH OF PLANNING CONTROL GIVING RISE TO HARM TO AN INTEREST OF ACKNOWLEDGED IMPORTANCE AND WHERE THE COUNCIL CONSIDERS IT EXPEDIENT TO DO SO; AND
    2) WHERE THE CONDITION OF A SITE IS DETRIMENTAL TO THE AMENITIES OF THE AREA IN WHICH IT IS LOCATED.
     
10.16 In assessing whether it is expedient to take enforcement action, or not, the Council will take into account the objectives of the Plan. The public has a right to expect that the implementation of development proposals which have been the subject of a planning permission should proceed in accordance with the conditions imposed on that permission. There are also situations where development or works are undertaken which are unauthorised and where there will be a need to secure a planning permission. Where a planning permission is not being implemented in accordance with a permission and in situations where necessary planning consents have not been sought, the Council will consider the appropriate enforcement action required, having taken into account what measures would be appropriate in the public interest. Wherever possible, the Council will seek to negotiate fully with those in breach of planning control.
10.17 The main enforcement powers available to the Council as Local Planning Authority under planning legislation include the right to:-
  i) Enter onto privately-owned land to investigate possible or alleged breaches of planning control;
  ii) Serve a 'planning enforcement notice' - this would specify the actions need to remedy an alleged breach of planning legislation;
  iii) Serve a 'breach of condition notice' - this would apply where there has been a failure to properly discharge a planning condition attached to a planning permission;
  iv) Serve a 'stop notice' - this can prevent the continuation of any activity which is specified in an accompanying enforcement notice; and
  v) Seek an 'injunction' - this can cause the cessation of an unacceptable activity, in appropriate circumstances.
10.18 The Council will also consider pursuing enforcement action to secure an improvement in the appearance of any site which is vacant and detrimental to the amenities of the area in which it is located. It will consider the value of vacant and derelict land for its nature conservation interest, both while it is temporarily vacant and in determining its future use. In some cases the Council would hope to involve local residents' and amenity groups in clearance, nature conservation and landscaping works. In other cases where new building is appropriate, the Council will seek to ensure speedy development, taking into account the most suitable use for a particular site. In the Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land, the fact that land is lying vacant or is under-used is not a sufficient reason to allow an inappropriate change of use.
  Proposals Map and Proposal Sites Schedule
  I 5 THE COUNCIL WILL CONSIDER APPLICATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT ON SITES LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE OF PROPOSAL SITES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROPOSALS, DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND CONSTRAINTS THERE SET OUT.
     
10.19 The Schedule at the end of this Chapter contains sites where the Council expects to see development in the next 15 years, or where a particular use is to be safeguarded, or where the Council is currently considering alternative uses. The Schedule is based on an assessment of the availability of land that is known to the Council; the development of the sites will be dependent on obtaining necessary planning permissions. All the sites shown in the schedule can be identified on the Proposals Map by the appropriate site reference number.
  Supplementary Planning Guidance and Planning Briefs (Date of deletion 28th September 2007)
  I 6 THE COUNCIL, WHERE APPROPRIATE, WILL PREPARE SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING GUIDANCE AND PLANNING BRIEFS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICIES IN THE PLAN.
     
10.20 Whilst the Plan sets out a wide range of policies which will be applied to development proposals, depending on location, there will be situations where it will be helpful to a wide range of interested persons such as developers, local residents and amenity groups, to set down how policies may be applied on a particular site. Planning briefs, which may also be subject to public consultation, will be used to provide guidance which supplements and expands upon the policies in the Plan. As set out in Government good practice, planning briefs should be consistent with, and referenced to the Plan. This reflects the fact that planning briefs are normally adopted as Supplementary Planning Guidance, and are therefore produced outside the Plan. This also enables individual briefs to be revised and updated to take account of changed circumstances. It is the Council's intention to consult on Supplementary Planning Guidance and planning briefs.
10.21 A planning brief may, therefore, set down how general policies in the Plan are to be applied and interpreted in a specific location. It is important to acknowledge that such a brief should not contradict, rewrite or introduce new policies. To highlight the importance attached to planning briefs, the Council will subject development briefs on major sites to public consultation. To enhance their significance, individual planning briefs will normally be prepared in liaison with site owners. The Proposal Sites Schedule (see below) provides an indication of sites where the preparation of planning briefs would be helpful.
  Public Consultation (Date of deletion 28th September 2007)
  I 7 THE COUNCIL WILL CONSULT THE PUBLIC ON MAJOR CHANGES TO THE PLANNING POLICIES IN THE ADOPTED PLAN AND APPROVED SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING GUIDANCE.
     
10.22 Whilst the statutory processes ensure that the public can play a full and effective part in the policies and proposals included in the adopted Plan, wide public or neighbour consultation also takes place on individual planning applications. However, it is equally important that members of the public and interested bodies are also given the opportunity to comment on major policy changes, as these are brought forward when individual policies in the Plan are reviewed. Whilst it would be inappropriate to introduce such changes through a full statutory process, substantial weight should be accorded at planning appeals and inquiries to policies which have been the subject of appropriate public consultation and revised accordingly. Full weight would then attributed to such policies if they went unaltered through the statutory planning process at a later stage.
 
PROPOSAL SITES
 
Site Ref. Site Address Area
(ha)
Proposal Development Objectives and Constraints
Central Harrow
PS 1
Land south of Greenhill Way, r/o Debenhams. 0.8 Mixed use scheme that could include, amongst others commercial, leisure or residential use, or other appropriate town centre uses, including replacement parking and the option for a central lending library. The site is currently in use as a public pay and display car park. It is a key town centre site and its development potential forms an essential part of the Council's strategy to revitalise the northern part of Station Road. The urban design of the site should be of the highest quality, and special attention should be paid to the elevation to Greenhill Way. The current access arrangements to the site are inadequate and would need to be improved to serve a major development. Development of the site may also require highway improvements on Station Road and Greenhill Way.
PS 2 Land north of Greenhill Way. 0.2 Small scale, commercial, residential or community use. The release of this site is unlikely to be considered until the redevelopment of land to the rear of Debenhams (Proposal Site 1) has been completed and related car parking and access issues have been resolved. Development potential is constrained by poor access and the awkward shape of the site.
PS 3 2 St John's Road. 0.05 Small scale commercial, community or residential use. Due to its restricted size, the site is unlikely to attract office development, though it is well located in this respect. Other commercial or community uses would be suitable and there may be opportunities to utilise part of the adjoining highway in conjunction with the development of the site. Residential use would also be appropriate within a mixed use scheme. Proposals must retain the mature tree on the St John's Road frontage.
PS 4 9-11 St John's Road. 0.2 Office, leisure, residential or community use. This is an under-utilised site in an area of mixed development, just outside the main shopping core. The site is well-located and suitable for a range of town centre uses. Development of up to four storeys would be appropriate and restraint-based parking would apply. Any development must provide for the completion of a rear service road, as shown on the Proposals Map.
PS 5 Gayton Road car park, lending library and Sonia Court. 1.3 Mixed use scheme, which could include commercial and residential uses including replacement housing.

The site is located on the south east edge of Harrow Metropolitan Centre in an area of mixed commercial/residential character. It comprises a long-stay public car park and central lending library, separated by a block of 9 flats, and has good accessibility especially by rail.

The site has the potential to be developed comprehensively for a range of town centre uses, though preference would be given to a mixed use scheme, including replacement housing. A small element of retail use may be appropriate but should be restricted to the western part of the site. Development would need to ensure a suitable transition between commercial activities to the west and the predominant residential character of land to the north and east.

The release of the site for development would be subject to decisions regarding the future of the car park and library.

PS 6 Harrow-on-the-Hill Station, and land in College Road and Lowlands Road. 5.8 Public transport improvements and mixed use development for office, education, civic, residential, leisure and retail use and open space.

This significant site and major public transport interchange provides the opportunity for high quality, higher density, mixed use development and enhanced interchange facilities. In order to achieve these objectives, the Council in conjunction with landowners and key stakeholders, will prepare an urban design framework for the site to facilitate a comprehensive approach to development and enable developments on any part of the site to be brought forward provided that they are in accordance with the development objectives. The design framework should apply Transport Development Area (TDA) principles, to optimise the development potential of the site, integrate land use and transport functions and ensure an appropriate built form at a key town centre location. A wide range of uses would be suitable, particularly those that attract large numbers of people, including office, retail, leisure, civic and residential uses.

Specifically, the site offers the potential for Harrow College to locate its core functions at a single site within Harrow Metropolitan Centre.

Harrow Baptist Church occupies an important position within the Proposal Site boundary and represents a significant community asset in the town centre. The retention of the church and the opportunity to integrate it with other proposed facilities, as part of the development framework, should be carefully considered. However, if a suitable scheme cannot be designed to respect the church's presence, relocation to a more appropriate part of the site, or elsewhere within the town centre, will be encouraged.

The ground floor to College Road should provide commercial activities that create an active and vibrant frontage, including retail, food and drink and other service uses. Pedestrian access thorough the development, and links to that part of the site to the south of the station, should be enhanced to overcome the railway barrier and ensure the integration of the whole development within the town centre boundary.

The site includes Lowlands Recreation Ground, an area of Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) within the Harrow Town Centre boundary. This provides a visual break within the commercial frontage to Lowlands Road and a link to the more extensive area of open space on the lower slopes of Harrow on the Hill. The current amount of open space would need to be retained in any comprehensive development of the site and laid out in a manner that reflects its MOL characteristics. However, there may be scope to remodel the open space as part of the detailed design, to provide a landscaped setting for development, improve pedestrian access to the town centre, and secure an enhanced open space that would make a positive contribution to the range of town centre facilities.

Lowlands Recreation Ground also forms part of the Roxborough Park and The Grove Conservation Area. In addition, the Harrow College site includes a Grade II listed building - the "White House". Proposals for the site must preserve the character and setting of the listed building and preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area.

Harrow-on-the Hill station is a key interchange and has been identified for priority treatment in the West London Transport Strategy. Significant infrastructure improvement should be made to ensure the modernisation of the station to fulfil its function as a modern interchange and as a key part of the town centre.

PS 7 Land north of Junction Road. 0.3 Residential, commercial or leisure use. This is a very prominent site on the western edge of the town centre but is constrained by the adjoining elevated section of the Roxborough Bridge flyover.
PS 8 16-24 Lowlands Road. 0.1 Residential.

The site occupies a prominent position on the boundary of Harrow Metropolitan Centre and a high standard of design would be required in any scheme.

Development for residential purposes would make a useful addition to the housing stock and would extend the range and choice of housing in the area. Use of the whole site for affordable housing may be appropriate. The site is well-related to public transport, and within the town centre Controlled Parking Zone, which may justify a lower parking requirement. "Resident Permit Restriction" would apply in these circumstances. The limited site depth will also restrict the amount of amenity space available and particular care will need to be taken to ensure the privacy of adjoining occupiers.

Permission was granted in June 2000 for 8 flats in a 2/3 storey building.

PS 9 St Ann's Service yard & College Rd frontage. 0.7 Mixed use scheme for retail, leisure or commercial use, including an element of residential.

The St Ann's Centre is serviced from two large service areas on either side of the main mall, with the yard to east of the Centre accessed from Havelock Place. Havelock Place also provides rear service access to properties fronting College Road and Station Road and to several other sites, most notably the Fitz Health Club.

The closure of Havelock Place is a long-standing Council objective which would enable the complete pedestrianisation of St Ann's Road. Alternative access would have to be provided which could only be achieved on the redevelopment of some or all of the properties at 2-36 College Road.

With modern servicing methods, the St Ann's service yard is a much under-used asset, bearing in mind its location immediately adjoining the main retail part of the town centre, and its proximity to Harrow-on-the-Hill station. Together with the properties in College Road, it offers considerable scope to expand retail or other town centre facilities and sufficient land to justify redevelopment and provision of the alternative access to Havelock Place. An element of replacement residential accommodation would be appropriate as part of a mixed use scheme.

PS 10 YWCA Sheepcote Road. 0.1 Residential or community use. The site is located on the eastern edge of Harrow Metropolitan Centre. Three storey residential uses adjoin to the east and west. Interim access arrangements were adopted in 1997 on a left-in, left-out basis, following the widening of Sheepcote Road. On any redevelopment of the site for residential purposes, access will be required from the rear, from Brandreth/Hanbury Court.
Belmont
PS 11
Belmont Health Centre and adjacent land, Belmont Circle. 0.6 Appropriate Local Centre uses and car parking. The proposed service road to the rear of Belmont Circle adjoins the site, and it is also affected by the designated Green Chain along the former Belmont Line. Although site constraints restrict its development potential, the site is suitable for a range of uses, including education, that could support the vitality and viability of Belmont Local Centre. The Health Centre should be retained in any proposals, and public car parking should be retained to serve the Local Centre. Any development should not impinge on the adjacent nature trail.
PS 12 Prince Edward Playing Fields Whitchurch Lane/Camrose Avenue. 17.3 Outdoor leisure use, incorporating community stadium, tennis courts and sports pitches.

This large area of open space is located to the west of Edgware District Centre, close to Canons Park underground station. The Jubilee Line runs along the western boundary. Prior to its closure in early 1997 the site was intensively used, providing pitches for both football and cricket, and hardsurfaced tennis/netball courts.

The amount of built development should be restricted in order to maintain the open character of the site and should be ancillary to any outdoor leisure activities. Vehicular access should be from Camrose Avenue. The site is well served by bus and tube and restraint based parking will apply. Development of the site for leisure use would safeguard its future as a focus for local sports provision.

Outline planning permission was granted in May 2001, subject to the completion of a legal agreement, for a football stadium with clubhouse, health & fitness facilities, artificial pitch, tennis courts and sports pitches.

The Edgware Brook runs through the site and the Environment Agency has submitted proposals for flood storage works as part of the Silk Stream Flood Alleviation Scheme.

Harrow on the Hill
PS 13
Former Harrow Hospital, and nurses hostel, Roxeth Hill. 1.5 Residential or community use.

The Harrow Hospital site lies within the Roxeth Hill Conservation Area and Area of Special Character, and is accessed from Roxeth Hill, a borough distributor road. The main hospital building is Grade II listed and the site is adjoined to the west by the Grade II listed Christ Church and to the east by Siddons House, a locally listed building. The main hospital building is also included on the English Heritage Register of Buildings at Risk in Greater London. The former nurses hostel is located some 55m west of the hospital site.

There would be a strong presumption against the demolition of the main part of the hospital, and any other buildings that make a positive contribution to the Conservation Area. Conversion of retained buildings to residential use would be appropriate. Residential infill over the remainder of the site may be acceptable but would require careful design to take account of the amenities of adjoining properties, especially to the south and east, and the location of the site on the lower slope of Harrow on the Hill. Vehicular access to Roxeth Hill presents a particular constraint. This is likely to affect developments which would result in significant peak-time traffic generation. The aim should be for an imaginative scheme achieving high density provision whilst suitably recognising the prevailing constraints and design implications of all these factors.

The Council has endorsed a Planning Brief for the site prepared on behalf of the Harrow and Hillingdon Healthcare NHS Trust.

PS 14 Former Kings Head Hotel, High Street, Harrow on the Hill. 0.56 Hotel, A3, Residential.

The Kings Head Hotel is a Grade II listed building, and an architecturally and historically important site at Harrow on the Hill. The Kings Head is also included on the English Heritage Register of Buildings at Risk in Greater London.

The Council's first preference for the site would be for a development of a viable hotel. Should the development of an hotel not be viable, then the Council will consider as an alternative scheme based on the following principles:
a) The conversion of the most historic parts of the building for residential and A3 use (subject to viability/sustainability issues being addressed);
b) The demolition of Assembly Rooms as part of a comprehensive scheme; and
c) The provision of purpose built new housing on the site consistent with the need to ensure the character of the Conservation Area and historic interest of the listed building is preserved; the relationship with adjacent properties is not materially harmed; adequate areas are set aside for amenity purposes and account is taken of existing trees covered by TPO's.

This is a key site in the context of Harrow on the Hill. Comprehensive development is required to ensure that the special historic interest of the former hotel, and all land within its curtilage, is preserved. If necessary, the Council will consider using its compulsory purchase powers to ensure that this is achieved. Before any scheme is considered there should be a thorough site evaluation, including a detailed historic buildings survey.

Harrow Weald
PS 15
Harrow Weald Park, Brookshill. 6.9 Public open space. This Green Belt site is being improved as public woodland by annual incremental work with the intention of bringing it into public use at a future date.
Hatch End
PS 16
Harrow Arts Centre, Uxbridge Road and associated land and buildings. 3.4 Arts and leisure development.

The site provides one of the main focal points for arts and leisure activity in the Borough. Elliott Hall is the principal building on site and is Grade II listed. The southern part of the site, and playing fields to the east, are located in the Green Belt. Vehicular access is shared with the adjacent Safeway retail store. A purpose-built Medical Centre occupies part of the Uxbridge Road frontage.

A number of buildings within the complex are in poor condition and there are opportunities to rationalise and develop the arts and leisure facilities currently available in conjunction with existing uses.

Kingsbury
PS 17
TA Centre, Honeypot Lane. 1.4 Retail, housing or community use.

The Ministry of Defence has announced that, following the review of the future structure of the Territorial Army, the site in Kingsbury is to close. No indication has been received about the likely closure date.

As an edge of centre location, the site offers a clear opportunity for retail development, subject to the need for additional facilities being established. The views of the London Borough of Brent, where the greater part of Kingsbury District Centre is located, will also be relevant. Residential (including affordable housing) and community use would both be viable options, given the good public transport links. The site is surrounded on three sides by housing, some very close, and this will influence the type and form of development, especially the siting of any new buildings. Vehicular access, which can only be achieved from Honeypot Lane, may also affect the site's development potential and will require further study.

North Harrow
PS 18
149 and 151 Pinner View. 0.16 Residential or community use.

The site occupies a prominent position on the main vehicular access to Headstone Manor. Two storey residential uses adjoin to the south and east, museum storage uses abut the site directly to the north and Metropolitan Open Land and a car park to the west. The site is currently in use as a builders yard and car repair workshop. Headstone Manor is a Grade I Listed Building and Scheduled Ancient Monument, and redevelopment of the site would provide an opportunity to enhance the "gateway" to this important visitor attraction and so improve the amenity of the area.

Although close to Headstone Manor, the surrounding area is predominantly residential in character. Residential or community uses would therefore be appropriate new development for the site. The site has housing on two sides, particularly close to the eastern boundary, and this will influence the siting of any new buildings. Development of up to two storeys would be appropriate, with continued use of the access from Pinner View.

Any development proposal should be of the highest quality of design and create an attractive frontage to Pinner View and the access to the Headstone Manor complex. Special attention should be paid to the landscape design on the road frontage due to the site's visual prominence in the context of the Headstone Manor complex.

South Harrow
PS 19
Eastern Electricity Plc land, the Brember Day Centre and land in Stanley Road. 1.5 Industrial development.

The Eastern Electricity site is an unused parcel of land which has only limited access to Roxeth Green Avenue. This would not be suitable to serve a more extensive use of the site. The Brember Road Industrial Estate adjoins to the east and land adjoining the Piccadilly Railway Line forms the western boundary.

Biro House, located south of the Eastern Electricity site, is allocated for Industrial and Business Use in the UDP. A planning application for two 3 storey blocks of 24 flats was dismissed at appeal in January 2000.

The Brember Day Care Centre is located within the Brember Road Industrial Estate. Replacement facilities are planned to be completed in 2002-2004, when the centre will close.

The redevelopment of all or part of the Brember Centre would provide an appropriate access to the vacant Eastern Electricity site to the rear and create an opportunity for a comprehensive industrial development of the combined site.

Provision for a new access road, linking the Brember Road Estate with Northolt Road, and thereby removing industrial traffic from Stanley Road, is shown on the Proposals Map. Development of the site in advance of the link road would not be acceptable.

PS 20 Roxeth Allotments. 0.8 Public Open Space, subject to release from allotment use. Release from allotment use would allow the site to be developed for public open space purposes in conjunction with the adjoining park.
PS 21 201-209 Northolt Road. 0.08 Housing, B1 offices or Class A uses.

This near derelict site forms part of the Northolt Road Business Use Area and is located just outside the boundary of South Harrow District Centre, north of South Harrow tube station. Two storey residential properties adjoin the north and east and a Public House car park abuts the southern boundary. Mixed B1 offices and retail use lie opposite.

The site would be suitable for a range of uses, including B1 offices, housing and all types of Class A use. Development potential and opportunities for a mixed-use scheme are limited by the size of the site and its shallow depth. On-site parking may not be required due to the proximity of tube and bus services. Continued use of the existing site access is unsuitable on highway safety grounds.

If necessary, the Council will consider using its compulsory purchase powers to secure the assembly of the site for redevelopment.

PS 22 Roxeth Nursery,
The Arches.
0.38 Residential and/or business use.

The site is located north of South Harrow town centre. The Rayners Lane Estate is directly to the west and the South Harrow Arches (Industrial and Business Use Area) located to the east of the site. The site is currently in use as a nursery. In the event of the current use ceasing, development for residential or business use would be appropriate. Business use should be limited to B1 use to safeguard the amenity of the surrounding residential area.

The redevelopment of the site provides an opportunity to contribute to the wider regeneration of the area. A regeneration strategy has been prepared for the South Harrow Arches and Rayners Lane Estate. This includes proposals for the comprehensive redevelopment of the Estate, replacing the flats with housing.

The existing vehicular access to the site from Roxeth Green Avenue presents a particular constraint and would need improving to cater for any increase in use. Any development for business use should be accessed from Roxeth Green Avenue, and highway improvements would be required at this access and along the railway arches. This access would be unsuitable for any redevelopment of the site for residential purposes, and access would then be required from Coles Crescent. Although the site is capable of independent development, particularly for commercial uses, if a residential development is proposed a comprehensive scheme in conjunction with the Rayners Lane Estate project would be preferred due to the access from Coles Crescent.

The site is bounded by railway arches which will influence the type and form of development, especially the siting of buildings. Business development would need to ensure a suitable buffer and transition between the residential uses to the west and commercial uses to the east.

Redevelopment of the site would provide an opportunity to upgrade the pedestrian link from Coles Crescent as this is an important link from the Rayners Lane Estate to South Harrow. Particular attention would have to be paid to the area along the railway arches in terms of highway safety, lighting and landscaping.

Stanmore
PS 23
Glenthorne, Common Road. 3.3 Use in association with Bentley Priory Open Space. The site was transferred to the Council as part of the agreement to construct new and replacement facilities at RAF Bentley Priory. It is currently being assessed to identify any items of public nuisance, arising from its previous military use, or areas that may have particular environmental importance. When the site is in a suitable condition, restricted access will be made available for nature conservation use.
PS 24 Land at Stanmore Station and adjacent land, London Road. 6.6 Residential or B1 use with the retention of the station use and adequate parking.

This narrow site includes the station buildings, car park and the airspace over the railway. Housing adjoins to the east, although there is a significant difference in site levels, and part of the site is of nature conservation interest.

A footpath should be provided through the site between its frontages to London Road and Dalkeith Grove, as part of a link to Canons Park and Stanmore Country Park.

PS 25 BAE Systems Site, Warren Lane, Stanmore. 4.4 Housing. The site has been identified as a Major Developed Site in the Green Belt. It is intensively developed, containing approximately 35,000sq.m (375,000 sq.ft.) of B1 accommodation. PPG2 recognises that redevelopment of Major Developed Sites offers the opportunity for environmental improvements without adding to their impact on the openness of the Green Belt. Affordable housing policy would apply. In view of the site's isolated location, public transport services and other measures to improve the site's accessibility for housing will be sought.
PS 26 Anmer Lodge. 0.6 Housing or community use.

The site is located just outside the boundary of Stanmore District Centre. The Broadway multi storey car park adjoins to the south with housing on its northern boundary, off Rainsford Close. Housing or community use would be appropriate in the longer term. The site may be suitable for wholly affordable housing purposes.

Planning permission was granted in October 1999 for a change of use of the building from care home to residential hostel for a temporary period of 5 years.

PS 27 Former Government Offices, Honeypot Lane. 4.1 Comprehensive development for B1/B2/B8 use or business/Residential.

The site occupies a prominent location to the east of Honeypot Lane and forms part of the Stanmore Industrial Business Park. It is the largest vacant industrial site in the Borough and has considerable potential to be developed for business, industrial or warehousing use.

Planning permission was granted in June 2000 for an affordable housing scheme of some 1.2 hectares on the eastern part of the site. An element of residential use, including work/live units, would therefore be acceptable, as part of the comprehensive development of the whole site, principally for employment use. This form of development would require employment-related activities immediately adjacent to any residential use, to be restricted to B1 use to safeguard the residential component of the scheme.

In order to improve public transport accessibility, the footpath link in the north east corner of the site to Canons Park station would need to be maintained and enhanced in any future development. Particular attention would also have to be paid to the eastern and western boundaries of the site to protect the nature conservation interest of adjacent land.

Wealdstone
PS 28
24-38 Station Road. 0.4 Community use (place or worship) and affordable housing.

There is an opportunity for the adjoining Central Mosque to expand on to the site as their facilities are currently constrained. All residential development on the site should be affordable housing. It will be important to improve the frontage to Station Road.

Planning permission for a mosque and ancillary facilities was granted in June 2000.

PS 29 Land adjacent to the Leisure Centre/former outdoor pool. 0.6 Leisure or Housing.

The site consists of a former outdoor swimming pool and ancillary Leisure Centre uses. The main Leisure Centre building abuts the eastern boundary of the site, which may affect the layout of development. Any adverse impact on future occupants could be overcome by sensitive design and orientation of new buildings.

The initial presumption would be to retain the former pool site for recreational use, although its relative isolation from the main Leisure Centre building and car park would have to be taken into account.

PS 30 Parks depot site & former mortuary, Peel Road. 0.3 Community Use.

The site is considered suitable for a community use. Building height should not exceed two storeys. The boundary with residential property in Byron Road should be suitably fenced and landscaped.

Planning permission was granted in November 2000 for a 60 place Community Resource Centre for people with learning difficulties and an ancillary 12 bed residential unit, with associated car parking.

PS 31 Land north of the Bridge Day Care Centre adjacent to the Leisure Centre car park. 0.23 Leisure or community use. This is a small vacant site adjacent to The Bridge Day Care Centre in Christchurch Avenue and was formed following the development of the Driving Centre and re-organisation of the Leisure Centre car park. The operation of the Leisure Centre car park, and the need to share vehicular access, will limit the site's development potential. Use in conjunction with the Leisure Centre or for the development of a community facility to complement the adjoining Bridge Centre would be appropriate.
PS 32 Driving Centre, Christchurch Avenue. 1.4 Mixed use scheme which could involve educational, leisure, community or residential use.

The site is a purpose-built driving centre that is surplus to Council requirements. It is largely open in character with a small, ancillary building near the site entrance. The site is accessed from Christchurch Avenue via a private road, which also serves the Leisure Centre complex and The Bridge Day Centre.

The site would be suitable for use in connection with the Leisure Centre, as would an independent leisure activity. Residential, community or business use would also be appropriate, individually or as part of a mixed use scheme. If the southern part of the site is developed for residential use, a small number of dwellings could be accessed from Coxe Place. Current access arrangements may need to be revised and enhanced to serve the larger part of the site.

Development must not affect the nature conservation interest of the adjoining Belmont Walk.

PS 33 Land west of High Street. 1.5 Retail use and Housing.

Sainsburys submitted a planning application in July 2000 for a food store of 2940 sq m with 134 parking spaces and 52 residential units above.

The foodstore should be directly accessible by pedestrians from High Street, with vehicular access via Ellen Webb Drive and Headstone Drive. A foodstore is an integral part of the Wealdstone Regeneration Strategy, and the Council will seek to ensure that affected businesses can be relocated within Wealdstone.

PS 34 Ex BR Site, Cecil Road. 0.6 Business Use.

The site adjoins the Tudor Business Park and is allocated in the UDP for Business Use. Any proposed use of the site should not give rise to adverse effects on the surrounding residents. A railway access strip to the west of 23 Cecil Road should be retained.

Planning permission for a scheme comprising 11 B1 units was granted in November 1997.

PS 35 Wealdstone Library/Youth Centre and Canning Road car park. 0.6 Residential.

The site occupies a prominent position fronting Grant Road and George Gange Way. If a replacement library and youth centre could be secured elsewhere in Wealdstone, the site has considerable potential for residential use. Development should create a strong frontage to George Gange Way and make a significant contribution to the street scene.

The site has good access to public transport and higher density development would be appropriate. Restraint-based parking would apply, subject to Resident Permit Restrictions.

If developed comprehensively, access should be from Grant Road.

PS 36 1-33 The Bridge & 6-14 Masons Avenue. 0.15 Residential, B1 offices or commercial use.

The site would be suitable for residential development, with no car parking, due to its location opposite Harrow and Wealdstone station. A high density block of flats would be appropriate, which could be up to three storeys high. The site also has commercial development potential, possibly within a mixed use scheme, which would avoid the loss of employment land. However, the lack of occupier demand outside Harrow Metropolitan Centre is likely to discourage office development.

Redevelopment of the site would provide an opportunity to improve the bus/rail interchange with Harrow and Wealdstone station. Land should be safeguarded for this purpose along The Bridge frontage. Vehicle access to the redeveloped site should be from Masons Avenue.

PS 37 Land at Oxford Road and Byron Road. 0.38 Business use and residential. The site forms part of the Palmerston Road/Oxford Road industrial area. The principal building has been vacant for some years and could be retained/redeveloped for a number of business/industrial uses. Residential use, in the form of work/live space accommodation, would be appropriate on the Byron Road frontage, ideally as part of a comprehensive development of the whole site, principally for business/industrial use.
PS 38 87-111 High Street and land to the rear. 0.45 Residential, B1 offices or commercial use.

The site is located in a prominent High Street position on the northern edge of the town centre. The ground floor units are relatively small and few have been modernised to current standards. Most are occupied by 'tertiary' uses and have poor townscape value. Land to the rear comprises a number of competing uses in a muddled site layout.

The site would be suited to high density housing, small B1 offices, or other commercial/service use. This would improve the street frontage at a key entry point to the town centre, create a better relationship with adjoining housing, and help to focus retail interest in the more central part of the town centre. Completion of the rear service road would also be secured, improving traffic flows on the adjacent road network.

West Harrow
PS 39
Land r/o 121-255 Pinner Road. 0.9 Nature Reserve. The site forms part of a Green Corridor, and has planning permission for use as a nature reserve. This will secure the site's nature conservation value, protect and enhance the various environments and species and promote its effective management.
PS 40 Vaughan Centre, Vaughan Road
Wilson Gardens.
0.3 Community Use. The site is occupied by the Vaughan Centre, a locally listed building, and is currently in use as a day centre for people with learning difficulties. It is proposed to refurbish the building to enable it to remain in its current use and to construct an ancillary residential unit fronting Vaughan Road. Building height will be restricted to two storeys and the design should reflect the Edwardian terraced character of the surrounding area. Additional landscaping will be required to the Wilson Gardens frontage and along the boundary with properties in Drury Road. Planning permission was granted in November 2000 for a 12 place residential unit, and ancillary works, on the remainder of the site.
   
   
   
Top