 |
|
|
| |
| PART 2 - 6. HOUSING |
| |
|
|
|
| |
INTRODUCTION |
| 6.1 |
Housing constitutes the largest single
component of the Borough's built-up area (about 50%). The need for
good quality housing is one of the most important issues for the majority
of the Borough's residents. This Chapter details general concerns
for the quality of the residential environment in relation to the
provision of new dwellings, conversions, change of use and the implications
for design and layout, parking and amenity space. |
| |
|
| |
TENURE AND HOUSING CONDITIONS |
| 6.2 |
There are nearly 82,000 dwelling units
in the Borough and almost two-thirds of these were constructed during
the inter-war period. Whilst there is some variety in the housing
stock, it consists mainly of three-bedroom, two-storey semi-detached
houses. In general terms the housing stock is in good condition. There
are some older pre-1919 dwellings, particularly cottages and large
houses, in the Borough's historic village centres such as Harrow-on-the-Hill,
Pinner and Stanmore. There is a belt of older housing between Wealdstone
and Harrow Metropolitan Centre and stretching down to South Harrow,
where the condition of some housing is considered to be less satisfactory. |
| |
|
| |
DTLR/ LRC HOUSEHOLD PROJECTIONS |
| 6.3 |
According to the projections by the London
Research Centre and DTLR, the number of households in the Borough
is expected to increase from 81,000 in 1996 to 88,000 (10%) by 2006.
A further increase is expected and the projected total for 2011 is
91,000. A significant proportion of the increase is attributed to
single person households. LRC (Projection 2) indicates that, of a
total of 125,300 households to be formed by 2016, approximately 43,000
(34%) will be single person households. The Council recognises the
need to match housing supply to household sizes, but it is not necessarily
the case that a small household will require a small dwelling. Therefore
the Council acknowledges the need to encourage the provision of a
range of housing types in new developments in the Borough and will
apply this approach in all large housing sites. |
| |
|
| |
HOUSE PRICES AND AFFORDABILITY |
| 6.4 |
House prices in Harrow have risen sharply
in the last 2 years. Figures published by the Land Registry show the
average price of a property in the Borough was -163,634 in the period
January to March 2000, compared with -129,522 (26% rise) in the same
period a year earlier. The price increase was steeper than that nationally.
Although the interest rate is relatively low, the increase in prices
has no doubt exacerbated the problems of purchasing suitable housing,
particularly by low-income households and key workers. Whilst the
average gross annual earnings in Harrow is about -23,300, first time
buyers need to earn about -33,000 in order to be able to secure a
95% mortgage to buy a flat or maisonette. This huge gap between earnings
and the cost of a mortgage makes it difficult for those on average
incomes to access the housing market. |
| |
|
| |
RENT LEVELS |
| 6.5 |
The choice of homes in the private rented
sector is extremely limited, while the Council stock has also contracted.
There is substantial demand for privately rented homes in Harrow and
rents are consequently high. According to London Research Centre,
information for the third quarter of 1999, the average rent for two
bedroom homes was about -184 per week compared with -161 a year earlier.
Given the current buoyancy of the private rented sector and the dearth
of affordable housing, it may increasingly become more difficult for
those on low incomes or those who rely on Housing Benefit to obtain
reasonably priced accommodation in Harrow. |
| 6.6 |
Opportunities for privately rented accommodation
in Harrow are very limited and the rent sought by landlords is not
only high but also rising rapidly. The shortage of property and high
rent levels continue to indicate the inability of many households
in need to afford a home in the Borough. This is illustrated by the
large number of families in temporary accommodation. |
| |
|
| |
SUPPLY OF NEW HOUSING-
COMPLETIONS (JAN 1992 TO DEC 2002) |
| |
| |
CONVERSIONS
/CH. USE
|
NEW BUILD
|
TOTAL
|
| |
GROSS
|
NET
|
GROSS
|
NET
|
GROSS
|
NET
|
| 1992 |
25
|
16
|
340
|
289
|
365
|
305
|
| 1993 |
9
|
1
|
230
|
211
|
239
|
212
|
| 1994 |
34
|
-5
|
292
|
272
|
326
|
267
|
| 1995 |
57
|
13
|
155
|
146
|
212
|
159
|
| 1996 |
39
|
25
|
141
|
110
|
180
|
135
|
| 1997 |
23
|
-2
|
185
|
172
|
208
|
170
|
| 1998 |
102
|
69
|
239
|
212
|
341
|
281
|
| 1999 |
64
|
43
|
83
|
57
|
147
|
100
|
| 2000 |
31
|
17
|
60
|
22
|
91
|
39
|
| 2001 |
136
|
112
|
365
|
354
|
501
|
466
|
| 2002 |
61
|
37
|
346
|
316
|
407
|
353
|
| TOTAL |
581
|
326
|
2436
|
2161
|
3017
|
2487
|
|
| |
|
| 6.7 |
The housing completion rates in the last
five years have been variable (see table above). Following an average
completion rate of 461 between 1986-1990, the rate declined to an
average of 306 (gross) between 1991-1995. In the period between 1996-2000
the average fell to 193 (gross). This, among other things, is an indication
that the scope for increasing housing supply was very limited in Harrow,
under the policies then in force. In the period 1997-2001, a total
of 1288 (gross) or 1056 (net) additional dwellings were completed,
an annual average of 257 (gross) (210 net). However in the last two
years completions have averaged 454 (gross) per annum. The supply
of additional housing has come largely from new build, which accounted
for over 80% of total completions between 1989 and 2000 but 78% in
2001-02. The remainder has been provided by a combination of conversion
of houses into flats and changes of use of buildings. |
| 6.8 |
Harrow has the least number of Council
and Housing Association dwellings compared to other London Boroughs.
The Council stock has suffered a steady decline due to tenants exercising
their rights to buy Council property. In the period between 1980 and
1998 about 37% (3,587 units) of the Council stock was lost through
this process. |
| |
|
| |
HOUSING NEEDS |
| |
Harrow Housing Needs Survey
2000 |
| |
|
| |
SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS |
| 6.9 |
Profile of Borough |
| |
- The London Borough of Harrow is characterised by low levels
of Council rented stock. (7% compared to 19% across London).
- Since 1991 household population has increased (7%) while average
household size has decreased (2.5 persons).
- A high proportion of households are non-white (33%).
|
| |
Current Housing Need |
| |
- Currently, 6,258 households are in housing need.
- Local Authority households are more likely to be in housing
need, as are those requiring larger properties and lone parent
households.
|
| |
Projected Housing Need |
| |
- Projected gross housing need at 2005: Increased by 9,234 households.
- Supply at 2005: Additional 2,575 units.
- Projected net housing need at 2005: Increased by 6,659 households.
- Projected supply therefore falls a long way short of projected
need by 2005.
|
| |
Total Need and Affordable
Housing |
| |
- Total current and projected net housing need: 12,917 households.
- Total dwellings required by 2005 to meet all need: 6950.
- The majority will need to be social housing.
- Low-cost market and discounted housing would not meet housing
need.
|
| 6.10 |
The 2000 Housing Needs Survey has demonstrated
that Harrow is placed in an extremely disadvantageous position to
tackle the demand for more housing. It identified a total (current
and projected) need up to 2005 for housing for 15,492 households.
Having taken supply factors into account, the net unmet housing need
is reduced to 12,917 units. The survey also identified that around
7,000 households will require additional affordable housing dwellings
by the year 2005. Further implications of the study are set out in
the section dealing with affordable housing. |
| 6.11 |
The levels of current and projected need,
according to the survey, are significant in scale and will require
the Council to consider various policy options if it is to make an
inroad into the level of housing need in the future. The Housing Needs
Survey identified a total of 12,917 households in need by 2005. This
comprised 6,258 households in current need, and 6,659 households in
projected need. 94% of these households (12,086) were living in non-Council
accommodation, and the remaining 6% of households identified (831)
were Local Authority tenants. The Housing Needs Survey further indicated
a net unmet need for additional affordable dwellings by the year 2005,
if the Borough's need is to be fully met. |
| 6.12 |
The 1999 Housing Capacity Study indicated
that the Borough has a capacity for 5,182 additional dwellings (conventional
capacity) and 6,610 (including conventional and non-conventional capacity)
to be provided in the period from 1st January 1997 to 31st December
2016. The levels of need outlined above have to be considered against
the background of potential overall housing capacity. A comparison
of the figures shows a serious deficit and the lack of opportunity
to meet or satisfy identified housing need in general and affordable
housing in particular. |
| 6.13 |
Given the major constraints on housing
supply in Harrow, including opportunities in relation to the use of
the existing stock, it is clear that the threshold size set in Circular
6/98 (Planning and Affordable Housing) for sites qualifying for inclusion
under the affordable policy is too high. Additional affordable housing
will be only one, though perhaps the most significant, component of
an overall package of provision. |
| |
|
| |
NATIONAL POLICY CONTEXT |
| 6.14 |
PPG3: Housing (2000) - This sets out the
Government's housing objectives, stating that local planning authorities
should:- |
| |
- Plan to meet the housing requirements of the whole community,
including those in need of affordable housing and special needs
housing;
- Provide wider housing opportunity and choice and a better mix
in the size, type and location of housing than is currently available,
and seek to create mixed and balanced communities;
- Provide sufficient housing land but give priority to re-using
previously-developed land within urban areas, bringing empty homes
back into use and converting existing buildings;
- Create more sustainable patterns of development;
- Secure the most efficient and effective use of land;
- Place the needs of people before ease of traffic movement in
designing the layout of residential developments;
- Seek to reduce car dependence; and
- Promote good design in new housing developments.
|
| 6.15 |
PPG1: General Policy and Principles (1997)
emphasises the need for high quality design in new developments. The
guidance recommends that, in planning for housing, local authorities
should identify an adequate supply of land, make effective use of
land within urban areas, promote land that is well served by public
transport with good access to local facilities and include a mix of
housing. |
| 6.16 |
PPG12: Development Plans (1999) states
that, for housing, Part 1 of UDPs should include figures for additional
housing requirements, and targets for development on previously-developed
sites, together with securing the conservation and improvement of
the natural and built environment, including through better urban
design. |
| 6.17 |
Circular 6/98 and PPG3 state that a community's
need for affordable housing is a material planning consideration which
may properly be taken into account in formulating development plan
policies and deciding planning applications. Whilst the primary objective
is to ensure that there is sufficient land for housing to meet agreed
need in terms of numbers, the Circular reiterates the need to ensure
that local authorities provide a mix of dwellings and encourage mixed
and balanced communities, to avoid social exclusion. |
| |
|
| |
REGIONAL POLICY CONTEXT |
| |
South East Regional Guidance |
| 6.18 |
RPG9 (2001) sets out the housing requirements,
based on a 'Plan, Monitor and Manage' approach, emphasising the need
for the provision of a range of dwelling types and sizes to promote
a mixed and balanced community. It also makes reference to affordable
housing and reiterates the need for local authorities to carry out
a regular assessment of the local need for affordable housing and
to develop strategies for meeting these needs, as part of overall
housing strategies. |
| |
|
| |
London Regional Guidance |
| 6.19 |
The regional strategic planning context
is provided by the spatial development strategy for London, the Mayor's
London Plan (February 2004). The policies in this chapter have been
drafted in the light of the vision, objectives and strategic policy
content of the Plan. |
| |
|
| |
HOUSING OBJECTIVES |
| 6.20 |
i) |
To provide sufficient housing land to
meet identified housing needs, give priority to the re-use of previously-developed
land, bring empty homes back into use and promote the conversion of
existing buildings within urban areas, in preference to the development
of Greenfield sites; |
| |
ii) |
To meet the housing requirements of the
whole community including those in need of affordable and special
needs housing including key workers; |
| |
iii) |
To provide wider housing opportunity and
choice and a better mix in the size, type and location of housing
and seek to create mixed communities; |
| |
iv) |
To provide for higher density housing
in locations with good public transport accessibility and/or access
to town centre facilities and to reduce reliance on the use of the
motor car; |
| |
v) |
To promote housing in town centres by,
for example, converting space above shops and vacant commercial buildings,
and including housing in mixed-use developments; |
| |
vi) |
To secure the effective use of vacant
land and buildings; |
| |
vii) |
To improve the existing dwelling stock;
and |
| |
viii) |
To restrict the loss of residential accommodation. |
| |
|
| |
PART 1 POLICIES |
| 6.21 |
Strategic policies for Housing (Policies
SH1 & SH2) and reasoned justifications are set out in Chapter 2 of
the Plan. They cover the following matters:- |
| |
SH1 - Housing Provision and Housing Need
SH2 - Housing Types and Mix. |
| |
|
| |
PART 2 POLICIES |
|
|
|
| |
New Housing Provision
- Land Identified for Housing and Vacant Sites |
| |
H3 |
IN ADDITION TO THE SITES
SHOWN ON THE PROPOSALS MAP, THE COUNCIL WILL CONTINUE TO IDENTIFY
SITES WHERE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WILL BE APPROPRIATE. THE COUNCIL WILL
INITIATE ACTION TO ACHIEVE DEVELOPMENT WHERE LAND OR BUILDINGS SUITABLE
FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REMAIN VACANT OR A PLANNING PERMISSION
FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS UNIMPLEMENTED FOR A LONG PERIOD. |
| |
|
| 6.22 |
To demonstrate its commitment to securing
and contributing towards meeting the Borough's total housing provision,
the Council has identified specific sites appropriate for housing
development and these are shown on the Proposals Map and in Chapter
10. Many of these sites have been drawn from the work done as part
of the 1999 Housing Capacity Study. Continued liaison with landowners,
developers, Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) and the House Builders
Federation will assist the process of identifying more housing sites
throughout the Plan period. The Council acknowledges the continuing
need for sites to be identified within the Council land-holding for
housing, including affordable housing, whenever opportunities arise.
The greatest need is for social rented housing and this should be
a priority for sites released by the Council. |
| 6.23 |
Land for new housing is severely limited
in Harrow, and recognising the number of additional dwellings that
should be provided, the Council wishes to ensure that appropriate
vacant sites with or without planning permission, remaining un-developed
for long periods, are fully utilised. In exceptional circumstances
the Council may resort to the use of compulsory purchase powers in
order to encourage development. Such sites include institutional land,
which has been identified as surplus to operational requirements. |
|
|
|
| |
Residential Density (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
H4 |
THE COUNCIL WILL EXPECT
THAT RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES IN NEW DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE NOT LESS THAN
150 HABITABLE ROOMS PER HECTARE. |
| |
|
| 6.24 |
In order to secure the effective use of
land, PPG3 prescribes a minimum density figure of 30 dwellings per
hectare. It is appropriate to include a density minimum which satisfies
this requirement. Furthermore, the policy should also reflect the
approach adopted in the regional spatial strategy, the London Plan,
as well as national guidance. Accordingly a minimum figure of 150
habitable rooms per hectare is included in the policy. The Council
does acknowledge, however, that there may be exceptional circumstances
when this minimum may not be achievable. |
| 6.25 |
Whilst the primary intention of the policy
is to secure the effective use of land by setting a minimum figure,
the Council wishes also to ensure that the maximum contribution is
made by each site to overall housing provision. Maximum housing provision
will thus be sought on each site consistent with design and amenity
considerations and other policies in the Plan. With the emphasis in
the Plan being placed on a design-led approach to development, it
is considered that it is inappropriate to include a maximum density
figure. |
| 6.26 |
PPG3 prescribes a density range of 30
- 50 dwellings per hectare. Assuming an average of 4 habitable rooms
per dwelling, the density range indicated by the Council is in line
with Government advice. Setting a density range also recognises local
variation in built form and allows flexibility in the application
of policy. It will safeguard local character and protect residential
amenity. The policy also creates opportunities on specific sites to
achieve higher levels than the range indicated in the policy where
this is considered to be appropriate. On appropriate sites the Council
may prepare a planning brief for developers or in conjunction with
a landowner. The Council also acknowledges that there may be situations
involving mixed-use developments where the strict application of density
policy would be inappropriate. This may particularly be the case where
the residential element is a subsidiary component of the overall scheme.
In such situations, density levels in excess of the 200 HRPH may be
permitted. |
| 6.27 |
Due consideration will have to be given
to the design and appearance of new development to ensure that this
does not detract from established character. The protection of local
character and amenity is an important part of the design-led approach.
In areas such as the Green Belt, MOL and Conservation Areas, other
policy considerations may take precedence over density and the need
to protect the integrity of the area may impose restrictions on the
level of residential density to be achieved. |
|
|
|
| |
Affordable Housing (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
H5 |
THE COUNCIL WILL SEEK
THE MAXIMUM REASONABLE PROPORTION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON SUITABLE
SITES OF 0.5 HECTARES OR MORE, OR ON DEVELOPMENTS OF 15 OR MORE DWELLINGS.
PROVISION SHOULD NORMALLY BE ON-SITE. IN AGREEING THE LEVEL AND FORM
OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROVISION ON ANY INDIVIDUAL SITE, THE COUNCIL
WILL HAVE REGARD TO:- |
| |
|
A) |
BOROUGH-LEVEL, SUB-REGIONAL
AND REGIONAL TARGETS (SEE POLICIES SH1
AND H6); AND |
| |
|
B) |
INDIVIDUAL SITE COSTS AND
ECONOMIC VIABILITY, INCLUDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SUBSIDY AND
OTHER PLANNING OBJECTIVES. |
| |
|
THE COUNCIL CONSIDERS
THAT THE LIKELY MINIMUM PERCENTAGE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO BE NEGOTIATED
ON SUITABLE SITES SHOULD BE 30%. |
| |
|
THE COUNCIL WILL ENSURE,
THROUGH THE USE OF PLANNING OBLIGATIONS, THAT THE OCCUPATION OF AFFORDABLE
HOUSING IS RESTRICTED TO PEOPLE WHO ARE REGARDED BY THE COUNCIL AS
IN NEED OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING. |
| |
|
THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING
PROVIDED SHOULD BE AVAILABLE TO PROSPECTIVE OCCUPANTS (TO BOTH INITIAL
AND SUBSEQUENT OCCUPIERS). |
| |
|
THE REQUIREMENT SET OUT
IN THE LAST TWO PARAGRAPHS ABOVE WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN MET IF
THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS TRANSFERRED TO A REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORD
APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL. |
| |
|
| 6.28 |
The Government's commitment to changing
the approach to sustainable communities in order to create and maintain
places where people want to live and stay was set out in 'Sustainable
Communities: Building for the Future' (2003). The Government's plans
to de-centralise power and strengthen regional policy was further
set out in 'Sustainable Communities in London: Building for the Future'
(2003). This document also set out a regional programme of action
for achieving sustainable communities in London. It further recognised
that in London there is an urgent need for more affordable homes all
over the capital to accommodate London's growing population, reduce
homelessness and ensure that workers who are key to the delivery of
the capital's essential services are able to afford to live and work
in its communities. |
| 6.29 |
Reflecting both Housing Needs Surveys
in Harrow and other West London Boroughs, continued provision of affordable
housing, both in terms of the numbers and types of accommodation provided,
is central to the aim to create more mixed and inclusive communities,
meeting regional housing requirements, and providing housing choice.
It is, however, important to acknowledge that in Harrow low cost market
housing is unlikely to address any housing needs in the Borough, whilst
shared ownership is only affordable to a decreasing number of those
in need, as a result of rising land and property prices. The London
Plan provides the strategic framework for developing the appropriate
policy to ensure necessary provision in Harrow. It further sets down
the policy direction for the sub-regions within London, including
the West London sub-region in which Harrow is located. |
| 6.30 |
The Council defines affordable housing
as: Housing that meets the needs of households whose incomes are not
sufficient to allow them to access decent and appropriate housing,
and comprises social housing, intermediate housing and may include
low cost market housing. The definition also includes key workers.
In identifying the needs of households in unsuitable accommodation
this will be defined as the smallest number of rooms required to address
their requirements. With regard to income levels, households in need
of affordable housing are defined as those who cannot pay the equivalent
of a periodic outgoing for the household on rent, lease or mortgage
equivalent to that for accommodation of similar size and quality to
meet their needs provided by a registered social landlord in the Borough.
Reflecting the above definition, an appropriate proportion of key
worker accommodation may be acceptable as part of the affordable housing
requirement where there is a recognised local need for such provision. |
| 6.31 |
Reflecting the government's latest thinking,
and particularly as expressed in the consultation paper 'Influencing
the Size, Type and Affordability of Housing', the Council considers
that the appropriate site size threshold for negotiating an element
of affordable housing should be set at developments of 15 or more
dwellings, or sites or 0.5 hectare and above. This is also generally
in line with the approach taken in those Boroughs who are signed up
to the West London Housing Strategy. Setting the threshold at this
level also reflects the urgent need to address the continuing shortfall
of affordable housing accommodation to meet the identified levels
of need. The London Plan sets down the total housing demand and need
for affordable housing in London, whilst the West London Housing Strategy
identifies the sub regional situation. Locally, the 2003 update of
the 2000 Harrow Housing Needs Survey, supplemented by a variety of
other local sources of information, confirms the scale of on-going
need within Harrow. In addition to purely residential schemes, the
Council will also negotiate an element of affordable housing in mixed
use schemes incorporating 15 or more dwellings. |
| 6.32 |
The Council promotes the efficient use
of sites, and also wishes to avoid sub-division of sites to avoid
the need to comply with the policy requirements. Where part of a site,
which is large enough for the purpose of this policy, is developed
through a phasing of development or where the site is split into different
ownerships, the Council will still expect the provision of the same
proportion of affordable housing over the site as a whole as if it
had been a single development. |
| 6.33 |
For suitable sites, the element of affordable
housing should be provided on-site wherever possible. In assessing
whether a site is suitable for affordable housing, the Council will
take into account:- the quality of the site; size of the site; the
number of units proposed; the location of the site; other relevant
land use criteria; Government guidelines; economic viability of the
scheme and market conditions, and proximity to local services and
facilities and to public transport. With the aim of creating more
mixed and sustainable communities, on-site provision, by definition,
is more likely to secure this objective than off-site provision. Where
design solutions can be devised which secures the on-site provision
of affordable housing, appropriate integration of such housing should
be achieved. Off-site provision, either by development on another
site or receipt of cash-in-lieu, is likely to be more complex and
result in the delay of the provision of the affordable housing. Whilst
the presumption in favour of on-site provision of affordable housing
is set down in PPG3, the preference in Harrow is also for such provision,
reflecting the shortage of sites, and lack of vacant or under-used
sites in the Borough. |
| 6.34 |
There may be exceptional circumstances,
however, where the Council and prospective developer agree that on-site
provision is impracticable. In such circumstances the Council may
be prepared, through negotiation, to accept proposals for the affordable
housing to be provided elsewhere in the Borough. The onus, however,
is on the developer to justify the exceptional circumstances. Should
the Council agree with the developer that such circumstances exist,
it is for the developer to ensure that an alternative site is available
which can be developed in a manner that will guarantee the construction
of the affordable housing units, or the agreed element of affordable
housing provided in another manner acceptable to the Council. If the
affordable housing element of a scheme cannot be provided on the application
site, or an alternative site, the Council may accept cash-in-lieu
provision. The Council will prepare Supplementary Planning Guidance
setting out how it will calculate cash-in-lieu contributions. |
| 6.35 |
The Council expects the delivery of affordable
housing in a reasonable time and would, therefore, ensure the completion
of a Planning Obligation or agreement before any planning permission
is granted for any scheme, or the provision of another site. It must
be recognised that it may not always be possible to attract public
subsidy on every site involving affordable housing, and the developer
may be required to demonstrate the scheme could deliver the affordable
housing without this. |
| 6.36 |
In determining the mix of accommodation
on any individual site, due regard will be paid to Policy H7 - Dwelling
Mix. On qualifying sites the Council will normally seek a mix of family
and non-family accommodation, and a split of 35%:15% of social rented
to intermediate housing, consistent with the scale of identified housing
need. This split also reflects the guidance (70% : 30%) set down in
the London Plan. In agreeing the amount and form of affordable housing
to be provided, due regard will be paid to the particular circumstances
and characteristics applicable to each individual site in determining
the financial viability to accommodate an agreed element of affordable
housing. |
| 6.37 |
Government guidance stresses the importance
of retaining the affordability of the housing units. Therefore, the
Council will need to be satisfied that secure arrangements are made
to ensure that the affordable housing will be available for occupation
by those defined by the Council as in need of affordable housing during
the lifetime of the property. The Council will seek the involvement
of Housing Associations or RSLs in the management of affordable housing
and by the use of Planning Obligations will ensure that developers
transfer ownership of the proportion of the site or units to these
bodies. Such agencies' continuing interest in the property will ensure
control over subsequent changes in occupation. |
| 6.38 |
The Council will expect that appropriate
housing development proposals should be managed by RSLs. Where this
is not the case, the owners/developers are expected to demonstrate,
to the satisfaction of the Council, that the scheme's terms and conditions
are at least equal to those administered by the Council or RSLs. |
|
|
|
| |
Affordable Housing
Target (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
H6 |
THE COUNCIL WILL AIM
TO SECURE AN AVERAGE ANNUAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROVISION OF AT LEAST
165 NET ADDITIONAL UNITS IN THE 10-YEAR PERIOD FROM THE ADOPTION OF
THE PLAN. |
| |
|
| 6.39 |
In recent years Circular 6/98 has provided
the raison d'etre for local planning authorities to include a target
for affordable housing in their development plans. Paragraph 9b) states
that local authorities should indicate how many affordable homes need
to be provided throughout the Plan period and/or set indicative targets
for suitable specific sites (expressed either as a number of homes
or a percentage of the homes on the site). |
| 6.40 |
In 2000 the Harrow Housing Needs Survey
estimated that there would be 1,847 households in need per year up
to 2005. The 2003 update shows a slight increase in projected housing
need of 1,923 households per annum over the next 5 years. The update
included a table which summarised the need for affordable housing
over the next 5 years. |
| 6.41 |
The London Plan will require boroughs
to have regard to regional and sub-regional housing needs as well
as borough specific needs in undertaking housing needs assessments,
and will require boroughs, in setting affordable housing targets,
to have regard to the London-wide targets set out in the London Plan.
The increasing scale of housing need in London suggests that current
levels of affordable housing provision are inadequate. Even accepting
that it would be impracticable to suggest that all needs will be met,
there is a need to increase provision. |
| 6.42 |
Within Harrow, the trend for both affordable
housing completions and funding approvals is upwards. The annual monitoring
targets contained in the Council's 2002-7 Housing Strategy Statement
are a reasonable starting point for determining the precise target,
given that the HUDP should encourage an increase in the amount of
affordable housing brought forward. In addition, there continue to
be a number of schemes in the pipeline where an affordable housing
contribution will be negotiated, as well as housing association schemes
which will deliver 100% affordable housing. The implementation of
a lower threshold than has been applied for development control purposes
in recent years should also contribute to increased levels of provision.
The Council considers that it would be realistic to aim for a provision
of at least 50% of total provision as being affordable. Taking the
figure of 6,620 contained in SH1B), this would equate to an annual
figure of at least 165 units. In suggesting this figure, the Council
acknowledges that housing need and demand are not borough-specific,
and that there is a geographical mismatch between housing need and
demand and development opportunities in London, including in the West
London sub-region. This has also been recognised by the 2003 London
Housing Strategy and by the new arrangements for a regional and sub-regional
framework for Housing Corporation investment decisions in London.
The latter will continue to dictate the levels of public subsidy/investment
which will be available in West London. In determining the appropriate
target for affordable housing, due regard has to be paid to the wide
range of need and demand; the aim of giving everybody a decent home;
the need to avoid reinforcement of social distinctions, create mixed
and balanced communities, and the requirement to provide choice. |
| 6.43 |
Importantly, the London Plan, EIP Panel
report, concluded that in the context of an overall target of 30,000
additional homes per year for London, a target for providing 50% of
affordable housing could be justified on the basis of the scale of
housing need in London as a whole. The Council fully acknowledges
that, in order to achieve a target of 50% in Harrow, affordable housing
will need to be provided from a variety of sources, including Section
106 proposals. On qualifying/suitable sites, where an element of affordable
housing is to be provided, the Council will sensitively negotiate
the amount and form of affordable housing provided, taking into account
site costs, economic viability, including the availability of public
subsidy. Where appropriate, regard will also be paid to other planning
obligations being sought as part of the scheme. |
|
|
|
| |
Dwelling Mix |
| |
H7 |
THE COUNCIL WILL SEEK
THE PROVISION OF A MIX OF DWELLINGS, TYPES, SIZES AND TENURES IN LARGE
HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS. THE APPROPRIATE MIX IN ANY SCHEME SHOULD REFLECT:- |
| |
|
A) |
THE HOUSING NEEDS OF THE
BOROUGH; |
| |
|
B) |
THE DEMOGRAPHIC AND POPULATION
STRUCTURE; |
| |
|
C) |
THE NATURE OF THE PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT AND MARKET CONSIDERATIONS; AND |
| |
|
D) |
THE CHARACTERISTICS OF
THE SITE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE SURROUNDING AREA. |
| |
|
|
| 6.44 |
PPG3 recognises the need to achieve a
better balance between the range of dwellings and household types.
Those living in Harrow have a range of housing needs which can only
be met through the provision of a variety of housing types. It is
therefore important that a variety of dwellings is provided, on larger
development sites. This will ensure a range of accommodation appropriate
to the needs of a balanced and mixed community. A mix of unit sizes
is particularly needed in the Borough to help to respond to change
in household composition and ensure flexibility and movement within
the housing stock, both at present and in the future. Whilst the precise
housing mix required is likely to alter during the Plan period, due
to changes in the population structure and household composition,
effective monitoring should ensure that the application of the policy
responds to the most up-to-date situation. |
| 6.45 |
Available information indicates that the
majority of the projected household growth will be in one-person households
and there is likely to be a strong demand for smaller dwelling units.
Whilst the need to respond to demographic changes may indicate the
need for growth in the amount of one particular dwelling type/size,
the guiding principle will be 'plan, monitor and manage'. Therefore,
the Council, in determining the range and types of units and the balance
between rented and non-rented, private and social housing required
over the Plan period, will carry out a regular monitoring and appraisal
of development activity. In implementing this policy due consideration
will be given to the Council's Annual Housing Strategy statement to
ensure that the needs of the community are adequately met. |
|
|
|
| |
Empty Homes and Property
in the Borough |
| |
H8 |
THE COUNCIL WILL SUPPORT
INITIATIVES TO BRING EMPTY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IN THE BOROUGH BACK
INTO USE. WHERE APPROPRIATE, THE COUNCIL WILL ENCOURAGE THE CONVERSION
OF OTHER EMPTY PREMISES ABOVE SHOPS TO RESIDENTIAL USE. |
| |
|
|
| 6.46 |
The Council regards vacant residential
accommodation as a waste of valuable housing resources. In order to
make full and effective use of resources, vacant property in the Borough
should be kept to the minimum that allows mobility in the overall
housing market. The Council will continue to implement its successful
corporate Empty Homes Strategy and may also initiate action utilising
its statutory powers such as issuing Repair Notices, or in exceptional
cases, by making Compulsory Purchase Orders. |
| 6.47 |
In appropriate circumstances, the Council
will encourage the conversion of empty non-residential premises above
shops to residential use in order to enhance the viability of town
centres. An important characteristic of lively town centres is the
maintenance of a residential population within them. PPG6: Town Centres
and Retail Developments (1996) encourages schemes designed to bring
vacant and unused accommodation above shops into use. The Council
supports and will encourage schemes which result in retaining and
increasing residential accommodation in town centres. Where the former
above ground use was within the 'B' Use Class, that is office, industrial
or warehousing, the provision of Policy EM16 will apply. The Council
recognises that, on the one hand, some premises above shops provide
low-cost accommodation for small businesses, but, on the other hand,
certain accommodation is not really suited to continued commercial
use, and should be put to a more beneficial use. |
| 6.48 |
Apart from providing small size housing,
such proposals will enhance the vitality, security and liveliness
of the town centres as a result of extending the normal range of activities
outside working hours. Of equal importance is that these provide suitable
and small units of accommodation for those who wish to live close
to shops and other services traditionally provided in town centres
and therefore reduce the need to travel. |
|
|
|
| |
Conversions of Houses
& Other Buildings to Flats (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
H9 |
THE COUNCIL WILL PERMIT
THE CONVERSION OF DWELLING HOUSES OR OTHER BUILDINGS INTO FLATS IN
ORDER TO MAINTAIN A VARIETY OF UNIT TYPES, CONTRIBUTE TO OVERALL HOUSING
PROVISION, AND SECURE EFFECTIVE USE OF THE BOROUGH'S HOUSING STOCK.
PROPOSALS WILL BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE FOLLOWING FACTORS:- |
| |
|
A) |
THE SUITABILITY OF THE
NEW UNITS CREATED IN TERMS OF SIZES, CIRCULATION AND LAYOUT; |
| |
|
B) |
THE STANDARD OF SOUND INSULATION
MEASURES BETWEEN UNITS; |
| |
|
C) |
THE LEVEL OF USABLE AMENITY
SPACE AVAILABLE; |
| |
|
D) |
TRAFFIC AND HIGHWAY SAFETY;
AND |
| |
|
E) |
THE LANDSCAPE TREATMENT
AND THE IMPACT OF ANY PROPOSED FRONT GARDEN/ FORECOURT CAR PARKING. |
| |
|
FURTHER SUB-DIVISION
OF PROPERTIES WHICH HAVE ALREADY BEEN CONVERTED WILL ALSO BE ASSESSED
AGAINST THE ABOVE FACTORS. |
| |
|
| 6.49 |
The Council acknowledges the potential
contribution that conversions make to overall housing provision and
wishes to secure acceptable conversions as well as maintain the quality
of the existing residential environment. In Harrow, it is anticipated
that one of the ways of continuing to increase the supply of units
is through the conversion of existing houses into flats. The Council
will therefore allow the creation of more units, throughout the Borough,
by allowing the conversion of houses into self-contained flats. |
| 6.50 |
Conversions will help to achieve a better
balance in the housing types as well as sizes of units created. Converted
flats also provide accommodation for smaller households, and can be
a valuable source of less expensive accommodation, relative to the
overall housing stock. The term "conversion" is taken to mean the
sub-division of a building into two or more residential units, whether
this involves any physical alteration or otherwise, or other building
works. Generally there is no planning control over the internal alterations
and building work involved in a residential conversion, only the subsequent
use of the property. |
| 6.51 |
The Council will encourage the provision
of satisfactory living space in the units created. The standards of
accommodation should be comparable to those recommended by the Institute
of Environmental Health Officers, and the standard of accommodation
to be provided must be reasonable in terms of shape and layout. The
layout of accommodation should be such that a neighbourly relationship
is achieved. The size of the property will influence the number of
units which can be created and the consequent impact of conversions
on surrounding properties. In addition, the space within buildings
should provide satisfactory amenities for the occupiers of the flats
created and the ground floor flat should be accessible to disabled
people (to comply with Part M of the Building Regulations). |
| 6.52 |
With regard to noise, there is a need
to ensure that noise transmission through floors and walls, both within
and between adjoining properties, is minimised. Sound insulation measures
which minimise noise transmission should be undertaken and the horizontal
and vertical arrangements of rooms would also enable this to be achieved. |
| 6.53 |
The Council acknowledges that access to
rear gardens in conversions involving terraced houses could be a problem
especially for those flats above the ground floor level. Whilst it
is important that ground floor units should have direct pedestrian
access to rear gardens, it would be inappropriate to insist on all
the units in a conversion to have their own private garden. The Council
also acknowledges that some residents may prefer access to an area
of outdoor recreational or amenity space adjacent to their dwelling
rather than a private garden. |
| 6.54 |
The Council recognises the contribution
which front gardens can make to the particular character of an area
or locality and will therefore seek their retention in proposals for
conversion. Landscaping proposals associated with parking areas should
be submitted and where these involve front garden parking the choice
of materials should be agreed with the Local Planning Authority. Additional
tree and shrub planting may be required in the forecourt areas or
front gardens where this can enhance the attractiveness of the locality. |
| 6.55 |
The Council considers that the effect
of residential conversions on highway safety and movement is a significant
factor given the possible intensification of occupation resulting
from an increase in the number of units. In the case of car parking
for residential conversions, there is often difficulty accommodating
extra off-street parking required without causing undue environmental
damage to the front garden and street scene. In many cases, therefore,
on-street parking is the solution, but can only be acceptable in relation
to traffic and safety considerations on the street. The Council will
assess all the above factors against the need for additional accommodation
and efficient use of the housing stock. As with new build development,
a flexible approach will be adopted to the application of these factors. |
| 6.56 |
Securing the full and effective use of
existing properties may also require further sub-division of properties
which have already been converted. This may particularly be the case
where there is a need for one-person accommodation, such as bedsits.
The Council will consider each proposal against the factors outlined
in the policy. |
| 6.57 |
In the case of conversion of offices or
other buildings to residential use, the Council may need to negotiate
with the developer on the level or nature of amenity space to be provided,
(such as roof terraces and balconies), and so long as the principle
of change of use does not conflict with other policies of the Plan. |
|
|
|
| |
Maintenance and Improvement
to Existing Housing Stock |
| |
H10 |
THE COUNCIL WILL CONSIDER
FAVOURABLY PROPOSALS FOR THE EXTENSION, ALTERATION AND/OR ADAPTATION
OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS, IN PREFERENCE TO REDEVELOPMENT, PROVIDING
THIS WOULD NOT LEAD TO AN UNACCEPTABLE IMPACT ON ADJACENT PROPERTY
OR THE LOCAL ENVIRONMENT. |
| |
|
|
| 6.58 |
Maintenance of the existing housing stock
in a sound condition and with adequate modern facilities is a primary
sustainability objective. Keeping stock in good condition will extend
the life of the buildings and avoid premature redevelopment. The Council
would normally prefer to see the full and effective use of land and
buildings achieved by good maintenance and improvements, such as extensions,
rather than redevelopment. This accords with sustainable development
principles, by achieving savings on the use of natural or finite resources. |
| 6.59 |
In general, housing redevelopment should
only be deemed sustainable where stock is in poor condition, the cost
of repair makes their reuse uneconomical or where higher densities
are sought through redevelopment. Much of the Borough's housing stock
is in good condition and any deterioration would not accord with the
principles of sustainable development. Good quality buildings should
be protected from premature redevelopment. |
| 6.60 |
The Council recognises that some of the
existing dwellings in the Borough can be modified or extended, both
to improve them and to help meet specific housing needs. Extensions
can also enable housing to be adapted for specialist needs, such as
for disabled people. The Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration
Act 1996 allows local authorities to use their discretionary power
in allocating maintenance and improvement grants, except for the Disabled
Facilities Grants which are still mandatory. Grants, however, are
only provided in respect to unfitness, disrepair, energy efficiency
and for up-grading Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs). The Council
continues to see the improvement grants scheme as an important means
of promoting and facilitating the repair and improvement of properties
in the private sector. |
| 6.61 |
The Council will continue to implement
a programme for the maintenance and improvement of its own estates,
and assist owner-occupiers, landlords and tenants with financial aid
under the house renovation grant scheme. Where circumstances and financial
resources permit, the Council will undertake environmental improvement
schemes in residential areas in order to complement improvements to
the housing stock. |
|
|
|
| |
Presumption Against
the Loss of Residential Land and Buildings |
| |
H11 |
THE COUNCIL WILL NORMALLY
REFUSE PROPOSED CHANGES OF USE RESULTING IN THE LOSS OF LAND AND/OR
BUILDINGS FROM RESIDENTIAL TO NON-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
|
| 6.62 |
The need to achieve more sustainable development
and to make the best use of existing resources calls for a general
presumption against the loss of existing housing and land allocated
for housing. Given the continued demand for residential accommodation
in the Borough and the diminishing supply of suitable housing land,
the Council considers that it is imperative to resist the loss of
existing residential land and accommodation. The Council will normally
refuse proposals involving the loss of residential accommodation,
and where demolition of existing housing occurs it will seek suitable
replacement. |
| 6.63 |
The Council recognises and accepts that
there may be exceptional circumstances where appropriate community
uses, such as a local day care centre or a doctors' surgery, would
be allowed to locate within residential units or on land allocated
for housing. The onus will be upon the developer to prove that there
is a need and that the facility cannot reasonably be accommodated
elsewhere. |
|
|
|
| |
Houses in Multiple
Occupation (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
H12 |
THE COUNCIL WILL ENCOURAGE
THE RETENTION OF EXISTING HOUSES IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION AND FAVOURABLY
CONSIDER APPLICATIONS FOR THE CONVERSION OF BUILDINGS TO HOUSES IN
MULTIPLE OCCUPATION, PROVIDING THAT:- |
| |
|
A) |
THERE IS NO ADVERSE IMPACT
ON ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS OR ON THE AMENITY OF THE SURROUNDING AREA; |
| |
|
B) |
THERE IS NO ADVERSE IMPACT
ON TRAFFIC, HIGHWAY SAFETY AND PARKING; AND |
| |
|
C) |
THE BUILDING AND ACCOMMODATION
PROVIDED IS SUITABLE IN TERMS OF SIZE, LAYOUT AND LOCATION. |
| |
|
|
| 6.64 |
Houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) provide
appropriate accommodation for those on low incomes or those who wish
to share housing accommodation. The Council recognises that some property
established in multiple occupation may be lacking in terms of the
amenities provided and, in some instances, may also be in a bad state
of repair. In such circumstances the Council will seek improvement
of the physical condition and the provision of basic amenities and
will expect the owner or developer to bring the property to a reasonable
standard and comply with the Council's registration requirements.
Such improvement should also help to increase the property's life
expectancy. |
|
|
|
| |
Sheltered Accommodation |
| |
H13 |
THE COUNCIL WILL, IN
CONSIDERING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS (INCLUDING CONVERSION) FOR SHELTERED
ACCOMMODATION (CLASS C3), ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE MET:- |
| |
|
A) |
THE PROPOSED SITE IS CLOSE
TO ESSENTIAL FACILITIES AND SERVICES AND AREAS OF GOOD PUBLIC TRANSPORT
ACCESSIBILITY; |
| |
|
B) |
THERE ARE NO SIGNIFICANT
ADVERSE EFFECTS ON SURROUNDINGS PROPERTIES OR ON THE CHARACTER OF
A LOCALITY; |
| |
|
C) |
THERE IS ADEQUATE OFF-STREET
PARKING AND NO ADVERSE IMPACT ON HIGHWAY SAFETY; AND |
| |
|
D) |
THE SHELTERED ACCOMMODATION
IS DESIGNED TO MOBILITY STANDARDS AND PROVIDED WITH A HIGH LEVEL OF
ACCESSIBILITY. |
| |
|
|
| 6.65 |
The Council recognises the need for adequate
housing provision for elderly people and other vulnerable people and
will seek their provision on appropriate sites in the Borough. It
will be necessary to monitor changes in demand for sheltered housing,
as with other housing needs, throughout the Plan period. In recent
years, increasing emphasis has been given to catering for elderly
people by improving their existing housing. Nevertheless, a significant
proportion of elderly people will require specialist accommodation
in the form of sheltered housing. |
| 6.66 |
Residential accommodation which caters
for elderly people should be of good quality and located as close
as possible to facilities such as shops and bus stops and accessible
to users of wheelchairs. It is important that new sheltered accommodation
is well designed and does not unduly affect the character of the locality
(see Policy D4). |
| 6.67 |
In the case of sheltered housing for very
elderly people (i.e. 'Category A Sheltered Housing') where residents
tend to be frail or less mobile, the need for private gardens or amenity
space may be less, and the provision of a communal area may be more
satisfactory for their requirements. In these situations, the space
required will be determined by the character of the locality. It is
important to ensure that homes for elderly people are designed to
mobility standards and are provided with a high level of accessibility. |
|
|
|
| |
Residential Institutions
|
| |
H14 |
CONVERSION OF DWELLINGS
AND/OR REDEVELOPMENT INTO RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL USES SUCH AS RESIDENTIAL
CARE HOMES, NURSING HOMES AND GROUP HOMES (WITH MORE THAN 6 SHARERS)
WILL NORMALLY BE PERMITTED PROVIDING:- |
| |
|
A) |
THERE ARE NO SIGNIFICANT
ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ON SURROUNDING PROPERTIES OR ON THE
CHARACTER OF A LOCALITY (SEE ALSO POLICY
D4); |
| |
|
B) |
THERE IS GOOD PUBLIC TRANSPORT
ACCESSIBILITY; |
| |
|
C) |
OTHER FACILITIES SUCH AS
SHOPS, DAY CENTRES AND HEALTHCARE SERVICES ARE SUFFICIENTLY CLOSE;
AND |
| |
|
D) |
THERE IS ADEQUATE OFF-STREET
PARKING. |
| |
|
|
| 6.68 |
The Council recognises the need for residential
accommodation to be provided for a variety of people in need of care
and will pursue policies which will enable this to be achieved. The
Council will therefore support the use and/or the redevelopment of
existing residential dwellings for uses such as residential care homes,
nursing homes, group homes (for more than 6 sharers) or other homes
for those who have learning difficulties, are mentally ill, or who
have physical disabilities, and children in care. The use of an existing
dwellinghouse as a group home, with not more than six residents living
together as a single household, does not require planning permission.
Permission would be required for a new-build group home or change
from a non-residential use. |
| 6.69 |
In Harrow there is a range of people with
special accommodation requirements whose needs may be adequately met
through converted flats. The Council, however, wishes to ensure that
the character of the area or locality in which the property is located
is protected. Where it can be shown that no demonstrable harm to the
character of the locality would occur, the Council will normally consider
such proposals favourably. |
| 6.70 |
The Council, whilst accepting the need
to cater for this housing category, considers over-concentration of
any activity goes against the grain of the principles of a mixed and
balanced community. There is thus a need to limit the number of conversions
in any area. The Council acknowledges that there are some areas in
which the level of conversions historically is already high and it
is therefore the Council's intention to continue to encourage a good
spread of residential institutions in the Borough rather than a concentration
of these in any particular area. |
| 6.71 |
The location of residential care homes
close to facilities such as those in town centres, medical facilities
and day centres will reduce the need to travel as well as improve
the accessibility of people who may be less mobile. Location is important
from the point of view of the residents as well as those who provide
ancillary services to meet their needs. Ambulances, medical personnel
and carers need to have easy access and the residents need to be able
to move about with little or no restriction. |
|
|
|
| |
Hostels |
| |
H15 |
THE COUNCIL WILL FAVOURABLY
CONSIDER PROPOSALS FOR PURPOSE-BUILT HOSTELS OR THE CONVERSION OF
AN EXISTING BUILDING TO A HOSTEL USE PROVIDING:- |
| |
|
A) |
THE PROPOSAL IS LOCATED
IN OR NEAR TO THE METROPOLITAN OR DISTRICT CENTRES OR AREAS OF GOOD
PUBLIC TRANSPORT ACCESSIBILITY; AND |
| |
|
B) |
THERE WILL BE NO HARMFUL
CONCENTRATION OF SUCH USES OR UNACCEPTABLY ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL OR
AMENITY PROBLEMS IN THE SURROUNDING AREAS. |
| |
|
|
| 6.72 |
The provision of special accommodation
such as a foyer, supervised short-term accommodation for young employed,
hostel accommodation for single homeless or families, youth hostels
and accommodation for students is an essential component of housing
strategy. These types of accommodation can make a significant contribution
to dealing with particular housing needs. Hostels are particularly
suitable for meeting the needs of people such as asylum seekers, the
homeless and transient population, and could cater for other vulnerable
groups or individuals prone to crime or drug and alcohol misuse. |
| 6.73 |
The demand for such specialist accommodation
is expected to rise and the Council will support initiatives for their
development, especially in areas around town centres and areas with
good public transport accessibility. The Council is aware of the particular
accommodation difficulties of students and nurses in Harrow. It will
therefore support the provision of purpose-built accommodation in
close proximity to colleges and hospitals, where needs cannot be met
by existing housing. |
|
|
|
| |
Travellers |
| |
H16 |
PROPOSALS FOR SITES TO
MEET THE ACCOMMODATION REQUIREMENTS OF TRAVELLERS WILL BE JUDGED AGAINST
THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA:- |
| |
|
A) |
THE SUITABILITY OF THE
SITE AND THE EFFECT ON THE AMENITY OF SURROUNDING AREAS; |
| |
|
B) |
THE LOCATION IN RELATION
TO FACILITIES SUCH AS SHOPS, SCHOOLS AND OTHER SERVICES; |
| |
|
C) |
THE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT ON THE SURROUNDING AREAS; AND |
| |
|
D) |
THE IMPACT ON HIGHWAY SAFETY
AND TRAFFIC FLOW. |
| |
|
| 6.74 |
As part of the Government strategy to
create an inclusive society there is a need to give due regard to
accommodation for travellers. Local authorities can and do make provision
for travellers. The Council will work in conjunction with neighbouring
local authorities to seek to identify suitable locations for facilities
for travellers. |
|
|
|
| |
Access for Special
Households with Particular Needs |
| |
H17 |
THE COUNCIL WILL ENCOURAGE
THE PROVISION OF SUITABLE ACCOMMODATION FOR THOSE WITH PARTICULAR
HOUSING NEEDS SUCH AS LARGE FAMILIES, SINGLE PEOPLE AND STUDENTS. |
| |
|
|
| 6.75 |
Housing needs and demand in the Borough
vary considerably according to individual circumstances and household
sizes. The Council's policy, in addition to general housing needs,
aims to meet the needs of special groups by encouraging the provision
of accommodation for different households. |
| 6.76 |
The number of small households comprising
only one or two people has continued to rise in the Borough. In particular,
the number of single parent families headed by women is on the increase
and there is a growing number of women who seek small housing units
for a variety of reasons. In order to help cater for these, the Council
will encourage the retention, as well as the further provision, of
small size accommodation containing up to three habitable rooms in
appropriate locations in the Borough. |
| 6.77 |
Women who are the victims of domestic
violence may also require secure separate accommodation. Access to
housing by single women is, however, still very limited as they generally
have lower incomes and are therefore more dependent on public housing
or low cost, privately rented accommodation. Mixed-use developments
with housing components can be ideal for women with young children
who prefer to work close to home, so that they can more easily combine
work with caring responsibilities, and can enhance personal security. |
| 6.78 |
Large family dwellings with many rooms,
suitable for ethnic minorities and others with extended families,
are also required in the Borough. This is often necessary for the
social and economic functioning of family and community life. There
is, however, the need to strike a balance between the demand for small
accommodation and the need to retain houses for occupation by large
families. |
|
|
|
| |
Accessible Homes (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
H18 |
THE COUNCIL WILL ENCOURAGE
NEW HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING CHANGES OF USE AND CONVERSIONS
OF BUILDINGS INTO FLATS, TO BE ACCESSIBLE TO ALL. IN LARGER RESIDENTIAL
SCHEMES, THE COUNCIL WILL SEEK TO ENSURE THAT A PROPORTION OF THESE
ARE BUILT AS LIFETIME HOMES OR CAPABLE OF ADAPTATION TO WHEELCHAIR
HOUSING. ALL WHEELCHAIR HOUSING, PROVIDED AS PART OF A NEW RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT, SHOULD BE IN A SUITABLE LOCATION IN ORDER TO MEET THE
NEEDS OF THE OCCUPANTS. |
| |
|
| 6.79 |
Due to the growth in the size of elderly
population and people with long-term illness the demand for accessible
housing is likely to rise. Older persons and disabled people require
housing designed as lifetime, accessible or wheelchair housing in
order to help them retain their maximum independence. These kinds
of housing are in short supply in the Borough. According to the 2001
Census the number of people with long-term illness in the Borough
is about (30,800) 15%. Thus the potential number of people who would
benefit from these types of housing is substantial. The Council's
strategy is to promote the opportunity of choice and increase flexibility
in the housing stock. Accessible and Lifetime homes are houses designed
to meet the needs of their occupiers to cope with life events such
as physical disabilities, throughout their life. Provision of housing
that accommodates various stages of the human life cycle and different
circumstances can contribute to a stable and sustainable community. |
| 6.80 |
Although Part M of the Building Regulations
requires improved access to buildings, its scope is limited to specific
issues such as means of access into the dwelling, circulation within
the entrance storey, accessible switches, lifts and downstairs toilet.
Such requirements only allow disabled persons to gain access into
dwellings, but do not guarantee their ability to live there. Accessible
and Lifetime homes are houses designed to meet the needs of their
occupiers to cope with events such as physical disabilities, throughout
their life. Provision of housing that accommodates various stages
of the human life cycle and different circumstances can contribute
to a stable and sustainable community. The Council's intention is
to enable disabled people to be able to live in their homes with minimum
adaptations, if their circumstances change. Therefore, accessible
and lifetime homes represent a sustainable and flexible approach to
meeting the vast majority of general housing needs and could reduce
the cost of adaptations and enable people to remain in their homes
because the accommodation is adaptable and flexible. Such property
will offer greater choice to those whose mobility needs may change
and can be more readily and cheaply converted if disability becomes
more severe. |
| 6.81 |
In order to increase the stock of housing
available for occupation by disabled people, the Council will seek
to ensure that at least 10% of all social housing are designed as
wheelchair housing. The needs of wheelchair users are often better
catered for by housing purposely designed to meet their needs. In
addition, the Council will therefore negotiate with developers to
ensure that a proportion of new housing in the Borough, is designed
to meet the needs of disabled people. |
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |