 |
|
|
| |
| PART 1 - 2. STRATEGIC
CONTEXT AND PART 1 POLICIES |
| |
|
| |
Introduction |
| |
National,
South-East Regional and London Policy Context |
| |
Harrow's Role
Within London |
| |
Vision for
Harrow |
| |
Key Diagram |
| |
Population
Context |
| |
The HUDP's
Inter-Relationships With Other Strategies/Plans |
| |
Strategic
Objectives |
| |
Indicators
and Targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
INTRODUCTION |
| 2.1 |
The Introduction to this Plan referred
to the global and European context for the development of a sustainable
development strategy and policies in the UK. Planning policy guidance
notes include advice on their practical application. |
| 2.2 |
Sustainable development is a concept that
aims to ensure that land use planning practices create and maintain:- |
| |
1. |
economic well-being through the equitable
distribution of economic resources and infrastructures. |
| |
2. |
inclusive communities and a cohesive society
through regeneration initiatives, helping people to help themselves,
thus becoming part of the mainstream of society and enhancing their
development without compromising the natural world. |
| |
3. |
effective protection of the environment
and natural systems. |
| |
4. |
prudent use of the given stock of resources
such as energy, water, trees, soil quality etc. and a reduction in
the use of inappropriate materials which contribute towards global
warming. |
| 2.3 |
The link between these individual objectives
are important as they all overlap, and thus mixed use schemes, mixed
tenure, sustainable transport networks, renewable energy installations
etc are all techniques which will be promoted and employed by the
Council to ensure that sustainability is being secured. |
| 2.4 |
These four sustainable development objectives
need to be addressed at the same time if we are to meet the
needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations
to meet their own needs. |
| 2.5 |
It is important to acknowledge that the
1994 HUDP was essentially a character-based document, primarily reflecting
concerns about the form and location of new development and its effect
on the existing character of the Borough. Since the production of
that Plan, however, greater understanding of the principles of sustainable
development has resulted in a review of such matters as the need to
use and conserve resources more effectively and efficiently, to reduce
the need to travel, and how the form and location of development can
contribute to delivering these. Government thinking has increasingly
focused on the need to secure more sustainable development in social,
economic and environmental terms, reflected in recent PPGs. Following
publication of the Urban Task Force's report, the Government's latest
thinking on the way forward was set out in the Urban White Paper
Our Towns and Cities: The Future Delivering an Urban Renaissance,
(2000). The Government's Green Paper 'Quality and Choice - a Decent
Home for All' provided an important approach to the development of
more sustainable communities. The challenge for the production of
this replacement Plan is to identify the appropriate future role that
Harrow should play in order to help make London a more vibrant and
attractive place to live, and to develop policies which secure development
that is compatible with a more sustainable way of living whilst paying
due regard to issues of character and communities in the Borough.
|
| 2.6 |
This chapter identifies the strategic policies
which will help deliver the key objectives for Harrow's future development.
There is a need to ensure that the policies and proposals in the Plan
are consistent with national, regional and strategic London objectives.
Cross-Borough co-operation to provide consistent policy guidance on
issues of mutual interest, together with facilitating joint-Borough
schemes, should secure more effective use of resources. Where other
strategies are subject to revision, the Plan will be monitored to
ensure that appropriate policies and proposals, consistent with good
land use planning practice, support them. |
| 2.7 |
Strategic objectives and policies are
of little value unless mechanisms are in place to enable an assessment
to be made of action being taken to achieve them. Indicators perform
this function, and headline indicators relevant to the circumstances
in Harrow have been identified. In order to provide a firm direction
for implementation of the Plan's policies, key targets have also been
identified. |
|
|
| |
NATIONAL, SOUTH-EAST REGIONAL
AND LONDON POLICY CONTEXT |
| 2.8 |
Underpinning individual national PPGs
is the Strategy for Sustainable Development for the UK: A Better Quality
of Life (1999), which identified the following four main aims: |
| |
- Social progress which recognises the needs of everyone;
- Effective protection of the environment;
- Prudent use of natural resources; and
- Maintenance of high and stable levels of economic growth and
employment.
|
| 2.9 |
To assist the measurement of progress
towards more sustainable development, the strategy identified a number
of headline indicators. A menu of more local indicators for measuring
sustainable development and quality of life in local communities was
subsequently published in July 2000. These inform a number of local
authority strategies, or strategies in which the Council is a partner.
The HUDP will be an important mechanism for enabling necessary development
which secures identified and inter-related objectives. |
| |
|
| |
NATIONAL PLANNING POLICY
GUIDANCE NOTES (PPGs) AND STATEMENTS |
| 2.10 |
Reviews of PPGs provide an up to date
context for reviewing the strategic and policy content of development
plans. PPG1, PPG3 and PPG13 in particular encompass some of the latest
thinking on the practical application of sustainable development principles:- |
| |
PPG1:General Policy and Principles (1997)
set out the revised agenda for the planning system which has fundamentally
determined the form and content of the replacement HUDP. It sets out
the Government's approach under three main themes-sustainable development,
mixed-use and design. It is currently under review. It states that:- |
| |
Sustainable development aims to deliver
economic development which will secure higher living standards while
protecting and enhancing the environment. PPG1 reiterated the importance
of the UK Strategy for Sustainable Development, first produced in
1994 and now superseded by the 1999 Strategy (see above). Objectives
for creating a more sustainable pattern of development are highlighted,
including:- |
| |
- concentrating development for uses which generate a large number
of trips in places well-served by public transport, especially
town centres, rather than in out-of-centre locations; and
- preferring the development of land within urban areas, particularly
on previously-developed sites, provided that this creates or maintains
a good living environment, before considering the development
of greenfield sites.
|
| |
Mixed-use developments are seen as a means
of creating greater vitality and diversity and reducing the need to
travel. They are seen as being more sustainable than development consisting
of a single use, and development plans should include policies to
promote new mixed-uses and retain existing ones, particularly in town
centres and in areas highly accessible by means of transport other
than the private car. |
| |
Good Design is seen as the aim of everyone
engaged in the development process and can help promote sustainable
development, improve the quality of the existing environment, attract
business and investment and reinforce civic pride and a sense of place.
Importantly, good design is seen as one way of securing public acceptance
of necessary new development. |
| |
PPG13:Transport (2001) sets down objectives
to integrate planning and transport at all levels in order to promote
more sustainable transport and reduce the need to travel, especially
by car. This will assist the Government's strategy on sustainable
development, including promoting social inclusion, and revitalising
towns and cities as places to live and work. Development plan policies
should ensure close linkages with the local transport plan, whilst
a range of more detailed advice aims to secure location of new development
in order to reduce travel by car. Priority for people over traffic
in town centres and other locations is also encouraged. |
| |
PPG3:Housing (2000) set out the Government's
housing objectives, including the need to create more sustainable
patterns of development, the need to secure the most efficient and
effective use of land, seeking to reduce car dependence, and the promotion
of good design in new housing developments. |
| |
Our Towns and Cities: The Future
Delivering an Urban Renaissance was published as an Urban White Paper.
It included a new vision of urban living to meet the following five
main issues:- |
| |
1. |
To accommodate the new homes we will need
by 2021; |
| |
2. |
To encourage people to remain and move
back into urban areas; |
| |
3. |
To tackle the poor quality of life and
lack of opportunities in certain urban areas; |
| |
4. |
To strengthen the factors in all urban
areas which will enhance their economic success; and |
| |
5. |
To make sustainable urban living practical,
affordable and attractive. |
| |
The new vision is of towns, cities and
suburbs which offer a high quality of life and opportunity for all,
not just a few. The Government wishes to see:- |
| |
- people shaping the future of their community, supported by strong
and truly representative local leaders;
- people living in attractive, well kept towns and cities which
use open space and buildings well;
- good design and planning which makes it practical to live in
a more environmentally sustainable way, with less noise, pollution
and traffic congestion;
- towns and cities able to create and share prosperity, investing
to help all citizens reach their full potential; and
- good quality services health, education, housing, transport,
finance, shopping, leisure and protection from crime that
meet the needs of the people and businesses wherever they are.
|
| |
The Government considers that the urban
renaissance will benefit everyone, making towns and cities vibrant
and successful, and protecting the countryside from development pressure. |
| |
|
| |
The South East and London
Regional Context |
| 2.11 |
Relevant guidance is provided by the Regional
Planning Guidance for the South East (RPG9 2001), and the Mayor's
London Plan (February 2004). |
| |
|
| |
Regional Planning Guidance
for the South East (RPG9 - 2001) |
| 2.12 |
This provides a context for planning in
London, and identified 12 main principles that should govern the continuing
development of the region. It reflects a variety of guidance related
to achieving sustainable development, embracing the urban renaissance
and the need to concentrate development in urban areas, securing economy
in the use of land, and integrating land use and transport. |
| |
|
| |
Adjoining Local Planning
Authorities in Hertfordshire |
| 2.13 |
In addition to paying due regard to RPG9,
the Council will also continue to liaise with adjoining authorities
in Hertfordshire, and in particular comment on reviews of their development
plans. |
| |
|
| |
The London Plan |
| 2.14 |
The regional strategic planning context
is provided by the spatial development strategy for London, the Mayors
London Plan (February 2004). The policies in this Plan have been drafted
in the light of the vision, objectives and strategic policy content
of the London Plan. |
|
|
| |
HARROW'S ROLE WITHIN LONDON |
| 2.14b |
Harrow has developed primarily as a residential
area, and continues to perform an important role within the overall
housing market of London. Its network of shopping centres contribute
to the dynamism of retail activity in north-west London. As an outer
suburban area it performs many similar dormitory functions as neighbouring
boroughs (see Text Map 1).
However, in respect of its economic, employment and regeneration activities,
it is a more integral part of West London, a position reflected in
its role as part of West London Leadership and the West London Alliance.
The London Plan sets out a strategic framework for London's development
and regeneration, and recognises the role of the West London corridors. |
| 2.15 |
As part of its role, Harrow performs a
number of other important strategic functions. Its high quality Green
Belt provides important areas of accessible open space. Of similar
importance are pockets of Metropolitan Open Land, whilst Green Chains
link with Hillingdon to the west. The increased importance attached
to the functions of a variety of open spaces includes recognition
of their diverse roles, and in various instances the need to acknowledge
their value to people outside the Borough and vice versa. In developing
appropriate objectives and policies, due recognition has been paid
to the opportunities and challenges in north-west and west London. |
| 2.16 |
Developing a vision for Harrow requires
paying due regard to the continuing need for development, the changing
emphasis required by national guidance as briefly outlined above,
together with a clear understanding of the role Harrow should play
in London. It also reflects the extent to which the current pattern
of land use and relationship with transport networks in Harrow is
sustainable. |
|
|
| |
VISION FOR HARROW |
| 2.17 |
A Borough that : |
| |
- Performs a dynamic role as part of a more sustainable world
city.
- Plays a part in securing the sustainable use of natural resources.
- Provides a healthy and safe environment.
- Continues to be an attractive, vibrant and enjoyable place to
live and work in.
- Secures more sustainable communities, with greater access to
local facilities.
- Protects open spaces, affords improved access to them, and facilitates
their more effective use and management.
- Uses valuable land resources and buildings as effectively as
possible, including by higher density of development in appropriate
locations.
- Protects its rich biodiversity.
- Protects, and where necessary, enhances its rich built and natural
heritage.
- Provides better links between activities, with a choice of transport
modes both to encourage more sustainable travel patterns and reduce
the demand for, and necessity to, travel.
- Provides a better choice of good quality housing that promotes
developments with an appropriate mix of housing to cater for local
needs thereby contributing to London's overall housing provision.
- Provides more local job opportunities in order to reduce the
need to travel.
- Fosters and promotes appropriate economic development, which
may include retailing, that is efficient, innovative and competitive.
- Contains vibrant and healthy town centres which have a wide
mix of uses.
- Promotes development that contributes to improving the overall
quality of life for residents, workers and visitors.
- Contains a range of local community, educational, social and
health facilities which are more easily accessible by sustainable
means.
- Secures development that enhances the sense of belonging through
social, cultural and physical environmental links.
- Provides good access to facilities and services for all.
- Optimises the investment of resources in the Borough.
- Responds positively to changing circumstances.
|
|
|
| |
KEY DIAGRAM |
| 2.18 |
Reflecting Harrow's role in London, the
Key Diagram (see Map 2) identifies
the main strategic elements:- |
| |
- Areas of Special Character.
- Green Belt.
- Metropolitan Open Land.
- Green Chains.
- Sites of Metropolitan Importance for Nature Conservation, including
Sites of Special Scientific Interest.
- Regionally Important Geological Site (RIGS)
- London Distributor Roads/Strategic Road.
- Railway/Underground Stations.
- Major Transport Interchanges.
- Metropolitan and Major Shopping Centres.
- Preferred Industrial Location.
- Industrial Business Park.
|
|
|
| |
POPULATION CONTEXT |
| 2.19 |
Significant changes are occurring in the
structure and composition of Harrows population. The population
of Harrow has been steadily increasing in the last ten years. The
2001 Census recorded a resident population of 206,800, but the subsequent
2002 Mid-Year Estimate for Harrow records a population nearly 5,000
higher, at 211,600. This latter figure accounts for under enumeration
in the 2001 Census. Projections (currently based on the 2001 Census
figures) show that Harrows population could further increase
by 5% in the 14 years to 2016. The number of people of retirement
age is currently predicted to fall slightly in the same period. Other
noteworthy changes are likely to be an increase in the number of people
aged 15-29 and 45-64. A corresponding rise in the number of households
is also taking place. In 1991, there were approximately 75,500 households
in Harrow rising to over 79,100 by 2001. |
| 2.20 |
Demographic changes need to be taken into
account in the development of planning policies and proposals so that
the Plan is appropriate to the needs of Harrows population.
In particular, the changing household structure, with an on-going
growth in single person and other multi-person households, will need
to be reflected in housing policies. It is likely that the amount,
type and size of housing provided at the end of the Plan period will
need to be appreciably different from the current situation, if the
housing needs of residents are to be more adequately addressed. Results
from recent Housing Needs and Housing Condition Surveys have informed
the preparation of the Plan and further results from the 2001 Census
and subsequent household and population projections, based on the
2002 Mid-Year Estimates will supplement this information in due course. |
| 2.21 |
Harrow is culturally diverse, with over
41% of residents of non-white ethnic origin in 2001. In four of Harrows
21 wards over 50% of residents are from non-white minority ethnic
groups. Community services policies, in particular, need to address
the diverse cultural backgrounds and aspirations of Harrows
residents. |
| 2.22 |
In 2001, 68.5% of residents aged 16-74
in Harrow were economically active (in work or seeking work)
103,000 people and this proportion is expected to increase by 2016,
in line with the overall population projections. With over 65,000
jobs provided in more than 7,500 businesses in Harrow (Annual Business
Inquiry, 2001), significant proportions of residents already work
outside the Borough. An increasing economically active workforce could
lead to higher levels of out-commuting, which sustainable employment
and transport policies will seek to address. Unemployment levels in
Harrow are traditionally lower than in many other London Boroughs,
with a current unemployment rate of 3.1% (ONS, October 2003). This
compares to rates of 6.7% in neighbouring Brent, 4.2% in Ealing and
4.1% in Barnet. |
|
|
| |
THE HUDP'S INTERRELATIONSHIPS
WITH OTHER STRATEGIES/PLANS |
| 2.23 |
Local authorities have a duty to prepare
'community strategies' for promoting or improving the economic, social
and environmental well-being of their areas, and contributing to the
achievement of sustainable development in the UK. Just as PPGs are
built around the principles of sustainable development, it is fundamentally
important that all other strategies increase awareness and understanding
of these principles, and promote action which is consistent with them.
The key plans and strategies that integrate with the HUDP (and with
which the HUDP integrates) include the Housing Strategy Statement
2000-2005, Local Transport Strategy (June 2000) and annual Local (Transport)
Implementation Plan, Regeneration Strategy and its annual Action Plans,
Community Care Plan and Children's Services' Plan, the Education Development
Plan, and the Community Plan. Facilitating the economic, social and
environmental well-being of the Borough in accordance with the principles
of sustainable development is a primary purpose of the Plan. Whilst
land use planning can help deliver many new initiatives which help
to make Harrow a more sustainable community over time, it will require
fundamental changes in lifestyles to occur in order for the quality
of life of Harrow's residents to be enhanced. The constraints on effecting
such changes within the remit of planning legislation needs to be
recognised. The Council's Community Strategy is also likely to increasingly
focus on sustainable development as its overarching theme, and embrace
the principles of Local Agenda 21. |
|
|
| |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES |
| 2.24 |
Having paid due regard to the above, and
in order to address the problems and challenges facing the Borough,
the following strategic objectives for the Plan have been formulated.
Many are cross-cutting, reflecting their implementation through a
number of policies in different chapters. Each strategic objective
is accompanied by a detailed explanation of what is being sought:-
|
| |
|
| |
1. To support and enable a more sustainable
pattern of land use in the Borough. |
| 2.25 |
Sustainable development encompasses a
wide range of aims impacting on the environmental, economic, health
and social well-being of the Borough. In land use planning terms,
the main challenges are securing the more effective use of land and
buildings, including by higher residential densities, protecting open
space and facilitating their most effective use and management, reducing
travel demand and achieving development which is accessible by public
transport. Priority should also be given to bringing empty property,
and particularly housing, back into effective use, including by conversion
or change of use if appropriate, as this would contribute to reducing
pressures for new-build development. Securing more sustainable communities
will be achieved, in part, by facilitating a better distribution of
facilities and services accessible to all sections of the community.
The use of finite natural resources, including sources of energy and
water, should be minimised. In turn this should help to reduce pollution
levels. There is also a need to secure the protection of wildlife
and diversity of species (biodiversity) in the Borough. Sometimes
attempting to achieve a variety of aims whilst promoting economic
regeneration results in conflicts which have to be considered most
carefully before allowing development to occur. As the rate of change
in the land use in the Borough is slow, securing a more sustainable
pattern of development will only be achieved over a considerable length
of time. The purpose of the Plan's policies is to protect those elements
of Harrow's land use pattern which already promote a sustainable way
of living. For example, local parks which provide recreational opportunities
within walking distance of residents' homes, promote health and well-being
and provide a home for wildlife. Despite the suburban residential
nature of much of the Borough, there is a need to maintain an appropriate
balance between different types of land uses, and to recognise the
fact that, if new residential development takes place, it requires
infrastructure to support it (schools, shops, open spaces, community
facilities etc). The Council, therefore, seeks to promote mixed-use
developments which combine dwellings with other, complementary, uses.
Securing increased access to local jobs is particularly important
in reducing the need to travel. All the following strategic objectives
also reflect aspects of sustainable development. |
| |
|
| |
2. To protect and enhance the natural and
built environment. |
| 2.26 |
Part of the overall aim to achieve sustainable
development involves protecting what is good about Harrow's existing
environment. Areas important for nature conservation, Conservation
Areas and Listed Buildings fall into this category. Open spaces have
their own intrinsic value as wildlife habitats, absorbers of carbon
dioxide, amenity space and easy to reach local recreational areas.
Much of the Borough has a good suburban character. But there is much
that can be done to enhance the natural and built environment, too.
Examples include: improving air quality and mitigating the water pollution
effects of developments, influencing the design and layout of buildings
on site so that energy consumption and waste production are minimised;
and requiring that new developments are designed to a high standard,
taking account of the surrounding environment and the need to minimise
the opportunities for crime. |
| |
|
| |
3. To improve integration between land
uses and the transport routes that serve them, particularly non-car
routes, and reduce the need to travel. |
| 2.27 |
Motor traffic is one of the major sources
of pollution. The Government's aim is to reduce the need to travel,
especially by car, and to promote more sustainable transport choices.
In order to achieve this, workplaces, shops, schools, parks, for example,
should be accessible to people's homes by public transport, or close
enough and safe enough for walking or cycling to be viable options.
Over time, the planning process can enable accessibility to be improved.
Clustering potential journey destinations at locations such as town
centres can also help to cut down the number of journeys by allowing
several activities to be undertaken during one trip. A restraint based
approach to both on-site and on-street parking will be taken to complement
the measures taken to improve other modes. |
| |
|
| |
4. To provide all new-build homes on previously-developed
land with all homes (including affordable housing) built to a good
quality. |
| 2.28 |
Projected household growth in the London
and South East region means that there is rising pressure for additional
residential accommodation in Harrow, as elsewhere. The Housing Needs
Survey 2000 identified 6,258 households as currently being in housing
need, with a projected net housing need of an additional 6,659 households
by 2005. The 1999 London Housing Capacity Study identified a potential
of 5182 units in Harrow for the period 1997 to 2016. Protecting existing
stock from loss is an important part of the policies for accommodating
this demand. A balance is needed between the size and type of accommodation
available and the range of housing needs; in particular, there is
a need for a greater supply of affordable housing to meet the social
inclusion goals for the Borough. The size and types of new housing
units will need to address priority housing need, as well as securing
a better fit between the overall household profile of the area and
the housing stock. Current forecasts for household formation over
the period of the Plan would suggest that many, though by no means
all, of the new housing units will need to accommodate smaller households.
But whilst there is an undoubted need for additional housing units,
there needs to be a balance with other land uses in order to achieve
a sustainable land use pattern. New homes will need access to local
workplaces, shops, open space etc. The Council aims to secure all
new housing for the Borough to be built on previously-developed sites,
and will consider higher density housing in appropriate locations,
such as in town centres, and other places with high accessibility
to public transport. Housing development which has no, or very little,
car parking provision will be encouraged where the mix of housing
and location are appropriate. The design, construction and maintenance
of new homes should achieve the optimum use of natural resources,
and pay full regard to the needs of their occupants and visitors. |
| |
|
| |
5. To promote economic development and
facilitate a balanced economy, and help contribute to the provision
of a range of jobs and training opportunities. |
| 2.29 |
Securing appropriate economic development,
including retail and commercial development, that is efficient, innovative
and competitive, is vital to improving the overall quality of life
for residents, workers and visitors. The service sector dominates
the local economy, but the manufacturing sector still has a significant
presence in Harrow, and retention of land in business or industrial
use is vital. The aim is to create a balanced economy, with a variety
of different jobs suiting a range of skills. It is also to increase
the range and number of jobs. In particular, in encouraging new business
developments, the Council favours job provision which matches the
skills of the local workforce, or incorporates training for new skills.
This is a vital part of equipping people to take up the challenge
of new technologies in business, and is a key ingredient in tackling
social exclusion. Through the Harrow Strategic Partnership, the Council
will work with other key partners such as the local Colleges, the
University of Westminster Harrow Campus, the Learning and Skills Council,
the Small Business Service and the North West London Chamber of Commerce
to foster new businesses, and to help equip existing ones to thrive.
The growth of other areas of the local economy, such as tourism, will
also be encouraged, where they can contribute to overall sustainability
aims. Appropriate retail development is encouraged, particularly as
a contribution to the vitality and viability of Town Centres (see
below), and the existence of appropriate retail facilities in other
areas is also important in securing sustainable communities in the
Borough. |
| |
|
| |
6. To maintain and enhance the vitality
and viability of the Borough's town centres. |
| 2.30 |
The Government now places far more emphasis
on the importance of town centres, not just as the preferred location
for new shopping development, but as the favoured location for a range
of mixed-uses, typically to a higher density than elsewhere. Town
centres are key employment areas - being the main office locations
of the Borough, as well as providing retailing employment - and the
proximity of uses such as shops, offices, residential units, leisure
and community facilities can be of mutual benefit and help to maintain
the vitality and viability of centres as a whole. |
| |
|
| |
7. To improve the quality of life, the
health and the safety of those who live, work and spend their leisure
time in the Borough. |
| 2.31 |
Quality of life encompasses a wide range
of 'well-being' factors: pleasant surroundings, access to jobs and
facilities, good sports and leisure facilities, a healthy environment
free from pollution, good provision for the arts, culture and entertainment,
and many more. Open spaces not only perform an important range of
functions but can contribute to the sense of belonging in an area.
This sense of community should be enhanced. Safety from crime and
danger, both perceived and actual, are also important components.
Land use planning cannot deliver all these, but in the design of new
schemes in deciding on what uses should or should not go on any given
site, and in promoting improvements to the streetscape and the public
realm, careful planning can contribute significantly to crime reduction,
creating a safer environment which helps to provide a good quality
of life. |
| |
|
| |
8. To encourage community activity in the
Borough and to ensure adequate provision of community services. |
| 2.32 |
The Borough benefits from a rich cultural
diversity, which the Council wishes to foster. Cultural and religious
facilities which enhance this diversity are welcomed, together with
a full range of community services such as educational and medical
facilities. Such facilities should ideally be located within easy
access for their users, preferably within walking or cycling distance.
Given the land use pattern of the Borough, this will usually mean
a location within a residential area, town centre or local shopping
parade. Promoting ease of accessibility to services and fostering
community initiatives are important elements in helping to increase
social inclusion. |
| |
|
| |
9. To secure more sustainable communities
by providing equality of opportunity to access facilities and services
which address the diverse needs of the local community, ensure access
for all to new development, and improved access elsewhere. |
| 2.33 |
Achieving more sustainable communities
involves ensuring that facilities and services are distributed and
located in ways that allow easy access to them by all sections of
the community, particularly housing, employment and medical opportunities.
Securing appropriate access, in all senses, to facilities and services
will encompass the needs of a diverse range of communities. These
include a variety of ethnic communities who form a major part of Harrow's
community, and an array of different groups within them. Ensuring
easy access into, and around, buildings and open areas, benefits everyone,
not just those who may have either permanent or temporary difficulties
in getting about. Easy access involves not just level or ramped walkways,
but the careful selection of surface treatments, clear and consistent
signing and the design of logical and easily understood routes through
an area. The needs of all persons with learning or physical disabilities
(e.g. visually impaired, speech impaired, hearing impaired) should
be accommodated in order to enable them to maximise their potential
as members of the community. |
| |
|
| |
10. To monitor effectively the performance
of the Plan and in association with Harrow's Partners seek the resources
to implement it. |
| 2.34 |
Central government recommends that UDPs
are reviewed fully every five years, but in reality the performance
of policies needs to be monitored more frequently than that as pressure
for certain types of development becomes apparent, and as Government
policy changes, policies may need to be amended to retain their relevance.
The policies and proposals in the replacement HUDP are aiming to bring
about improvements in the environment and move towards greater sustainability.
The success or otherwise of these policies and proposals will be assessed
against a set of indicators and targets. Most of the proposals will
require resources from the private and voluntary sector to achieve
them, particularly from those working with the Council in the Harrow
Partnership. Other ways to achieve a better environment are through
Planning Obligations under Section 106 of the Town & Country Planning
Act 1990, or other Legal Agreements, which are negotiated with developers,
and form part of the grant of planning permission. |
|
|
| |
INDICATORS AND TARGETS |
| 2.35 |
Harrow's indicators and targets are based
on the UK Strategy for Sustainable Development (1999), the report
'Quality of Life Counts' (1999), and the handbook for a menu of local
indicators of sustainable development entitled 'Local Quality of Life
Counts (2000). All indicators and targets are specific and measurable.
Wherever possible, baseline data available at the time of the first
deposit of the Plan will be used. Baseline data in respect of indicators
and targets is available on request. |
| |
|
| |
1. To support and enable a more sustainable
pattern of land use in the Borough. |
| |
Indicators |
| |
|
1. Density of new residential development. |
| |
|
2. Density of residential development in
and around town centres with good public transport accessibility. |
| |
|
3. Amount of mixed-use development. |
| |
|
4. Number of proposals for, or which incorporate,
renewable energy. |
| |
|
5. Number of car-free housing schemes. |
| |
Targets |
| |
|
1. New residential development to be built
at a density of at least 150 habitable rooms per hectare. |
| |
|
2. Increase the average density of new
residential development in locations with good public transport accessibility
by at least 10% over the average residential density achieved in the
5-year period 1996-2000. |
| |
|
3. Net increase in the amount of mixed-use
development. |
| |
|
4. Reduction in use of non-renewable resources,
particularly fossil fuel energy |
| |
|
5. Increased use and generation of renewable
energy in Harrow. |
| |
|
| |
2. To protect and enhance the natural and
built environment. |
| |
Indicators |
| |
|
1. Loss of open space. |
| |
|
2. Change in number of Sites of Nature
Conservation Importance. |
| |
|
3. Change in the area of the Borough covered
by sites of Nature Conservation Importance. |
| |
|
4. % of Conservation Areas with policy
guideline statements. |
| |
|
5. Number of trees covered by new Tree
Preservation Orders (TPOs). |
| |
Targets- |
| |
|
1. No net loss of open space. |
| |
|
2. Increase in area of the Borough covered
by Sites of Nature Conservation Importance and no loss in area of
existing sites. |
| |
|
3. Increase in number of Sites of Nature
Conservation Importance. |
| |
|
4. 100% of Conservation Areas to be covered
by policy guideline statements by March 2004. |
| |
|
5. Net increase in number of trees covered
by TPOs. |
| |
|
| |
3. To improve integration between land
uses and the transport routes that serve them, particularly non-car
routes, and reduce the need to travel. |
| |
Indicators- |
| |
|
1. The amount of traffic overall. |
| |
|
2. Number of passenger kilometres travelled
by public transport. |
| |
|
3. Number of medium/large development schemes
designed to maximise integration of different modes and with pedestrian,
cyclist and public transport user priority over the car. |
| |
|
4. Number of Travel Plans being prepared/implemented. |
| |
Targets- |
| |
|
1. 10% reduction on 1997 road traffic levels
by 2010 (in terms of vehicle numbers). |
| |
|
2. Reduce the proportion of urban journeys
undertaken by car to 35% by 2020. |
| |
|
3. All medium/large development schemes
to be designed to maximise integration of different modes, with pedestrian,
cyclist and public transport user priority over the car. |
| |
|
4. 10 Travel Plans to be implemented by
employers, schools and community facilities over Plan period through
the development control process. |
| |
|
| |
4. To provide all new-build homes on previously
developed land with all homes (including affordable housing) built
to a good quality. |
| |
Indicators |
| |
|
1. Amount of additional housing to contribute
to regional requirement. |
| |
|
2. % of new homes built on previously developed
land. |
| |
|
3. % of new housing permissions and completions
classed as affordable housing. |
| |
|
4. Number of empty homes brought back into
occupation. |
| |
Targets- |
| |
|
1. At least 6620 net additional homes to
be provided in the period 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2016. |
| |
|
2. 100% of new homes to be provided on
previously developed land. |
| |
|
3. At least 50% of all new units to be
provided as affordable housing. |
| |
|
4. Bring 1,000 empty homes back into occupation
in the period 1996-2006. |
| |
|
| |
5. To promote economic development and
facilitate a balanced economy, and help contribute to the provision
of a range of jobs and training opportunities. |
| |
Indicators |
| |
|
1. Loss of designated employment land. |
| |
|
2. Numbers of jobs provided by developments. |
| |
|
3. Number of training places created through
new developments. |
| |
Targets- |
| |
|
1. No net loss in designated employment
land. |
| |
|
2. No net decrease in the number of jobs
as a result of development. |
| |
|
3. 200 training places to be created through
new developments. |
| |
|
| |
6. To maintain and enhance the vitality
and viability of the Borough's town centres. |
| |
Indicators |
| |
|
1. Proportion of gross retail floorspace
out of town centres. |
| |
|
2. Vacancy levels in town centres. |
| |
|
3. Footfall levels. |
| |
Targets- |
| |
|
1. No more than 5% of gross retail floorspace
out of town centre. |
| |
|
2. Vacancy rate overall for each centre
to be no more than 10% of total measured retail frontage. |
| |
|
3. Within centres where such data is collected,
average footfall levels not to fall significantly below 1999 levels. |
| |
|
| |
7. To improve the quality of life, the
health and the safety of those who live, work and spend their leisure
time in the Borough. |
| |
Indicators |
| |
|
1. Air quality levels (measured against
National Air Quality Strategy (NAQS) levels). |
| |
|
2. Area of Closed Circuit Television (CCTV)
coverage. |
| |
|
3. % of new educational, sports and cultural
facilities that are dual use and accessible to the community. |
| |
Targets- |
| |
|
1. No incidents of nitrogen dioxide particulates
exceeding the Government's objective levels by 2005. |
| |
|
2. Net increase in the area of the Borough
covered by CCTV. |
| |
|
3. 100% of new educational, sports and
cultural facilities should be capable of dual use and accessible to
the community. |
| |
|
|
| |
8. To encourage community activity in the
Borough and to ensure the adequate provision of community services. |
| |
Indicator |
| |
|
1. Changes in the amount of land/buildings
in community use/community service use e.g doctors surgeries. |
| |
Target- |
| |
|
1. Net increase in the number of community
uses. |
| |
|
| |
9. To secure more sustainable communities
by providing equality of opportunity to access facilities and services
which address the diverse needs of the local community, ensure access
for all to new development, and improve access elsewhere. |
| |
Indicator |
| |
|
1. Number of public buildings accessible
to the public. |
| |
Targets- |
| |
Net increase in the number of accessible
public buildings. |
| |
Net increase in the number of existing
buildings and open spaces where accessibility is improved. |
| |
|
|
| |
10. To effectively monitor the performance
of the Plan, and seek the resources to implement it, in association
with Harrow's Partners. |
| |
Indicator |
| |
|
1. Comprehensive set of indicators and
targets incorporated in Plan and monitored on an annual basis. |
| |
Target- |
| |
|
1. To achieve overall attainment of the
targets in the Plan. |
| |
|
| |
PART 1 POLICIES |
|
|
|
| |
The Form of Development
and Pattern of Land Use |
| |
S1 |
THE COUNCIL SEEKS TO
SECURE A FORM AND PATTERN OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE BOROUGH THAT ACCORDS
WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, AND ACHIEVES THE FOLLOWING:- |
| |
|
A) |
DEVELOPMENT THAT REDUCES
THE NEED TO TRAVEL, AND FACILITATES AND ENCOURAGES TRAVEL BY MORE
SUSTAINABLE MODES; |
| |
|
B) |
FULL AND EFFECTIVE USE OF
LAND AND BUILDINGS; |
| |
|
C) |
CONSERVATION AND ENHANCEMENT
OF NATURAL RESOURCES; |
| |
|
D) |
DEVELOPMENT THAT MINIMISES
WASTE AND REDUCES POLLUTION; AND |
| |
|
E) |
INCREASED SOCIAL INCLUSION. |
| |
|
| 2.36 |
Sustainable development is the idea of
ensuring a better quality of life for everyone, now and for generations
to come. However, this must be achieved within the environmental carrying
capacity of global and local eco-systems. The key to achieving this
will be finding ways to accommodate and work with natural processes
rather than against them. In order to determine whether a development
makes a positive contribution, it is necessary to consider a wide
range of factors that contribute to a development's 'ecological footprint',
that is its wider impact on the environment. In particular, the location,
design and built form of development should secure sustainable use
of resources, facilitate sustainable lifestyles and complementary
economic activities and contribute to the creation of equitable, socially
inclusive communities. While it is clearly possible to enhance some
renewable resources such as air, land and water, securing an improved
quality of life for residents in the Borough requires that this is
carried out at every opportunity. The best that can be hoped for of
non-renewable resources such as coal and other minerals is that they
are conserved or their rate of depletion is reduced. The pattern and
distribution of land uses influences the need to travel, and the mode
of transport used, and has resource implications and environmental
impacts. The Council will therefore seek development that secures
a distribution of land uses that reduces the need to travel, thereby
saving energy and time, reducing pollution and helping to provide
good air quality and which takes due account of current population
trends. With regard to local biodiversity, some sites will also be
non renewable or incapable of replacement. Furthermore,
encouragement will be given to modes of travel, such as walking and
cycling, which reduce reliance on the use of the private motorcar. |
| 2.37 |
Land is a finite resource and quality
of land is a factor influencing where development occurs, and in what
form. Full and effective use of existing land and buildings will need
to be made. This will involve maximising the use of previously developed
land and buildings in order to accommodate future needs. This will
help to reduce pressures for development on greenfield sites, many
of which will need to be subject to more effective management and
use if the vision and strategic objectives of the Plan are to be achieved.
At the same time, it is recognised that increased development may
well conflict with other Plan objectives, for example, protecting
and enhancing the nature conservation interest. It is important that
a balanced view is taken in assessing individual proposals. The Council
recognises the many valuable roles performed by, and uses that depend
upon, open land, and is committed to ensuring that practically all
built development in the Borough takes place on previously-developed
land, since open land once lost is virtually irreplaceable. In Harrow,
redevelopment will form a significant proportion of new development,
particularly in locations where higher densities are to be encouraged,
and offers an opportunity to secure a more ecologically sensitive
and sustainable form of development and pattern of land use across
the Borough. In other situations, however, it will be preferable to
conserve resources by the retention, refurbishment, adaptation and
extension of buildings. Bringing empty property of all types back
into effective use will also contribute significantly to securing
the effective use of all buildings. |
| 2.38 |
The location, design (including built
form) and layout of buildings should minimise resource consumption,
including energy and water resources, and the amount of waste and
pollution produced. New development can provide an opportunity to
enhance natural resources, including local biodiversity. Use of sustainable
construction materials and techniques, including where possible, use
of local materials and resources and disposal of waste in line with
the proximity principle, will also secure the conservation of resources.
The Council wishes to see good practice in all new development, encourages
renewable energy and low energy schemes, and will seek demonstration
projects exemplifying the principles of sustainable design, use and
construction. Developments are more likely to contribute towards sustainability
where they provide local employment and use local labour in their
construction and maintenance. More effective use of land and resources
will also be achieved by flexible forms of development that can accommodate
dual or multi-use or future changes of use, new technologies or other
changed requirements. |
| 2.39 |
Development that reduces the need to travel
should increase access to local employment, shops, services and facilities,
and so raise local living standards. Key factors likely to contribute
to sustainable communities include social inclusion, a vibrant local
economy and environmental protection. Commercial viability should
not be achieved at the expense of an unacceptable impact on the environment
or wider community. Where possible, a long-term approach should be
taken as schemes which appear more expensive in the short term are
often cost effective over the long term. Flexible, well-designed buildings
and public spaces will extend accessibility to all sections of the
community, and lead to more durable and useable buildings and spaces.
Greater social inclusion will also be achieved where housing developments
accommodate a variety of housing types and mix, by providing appropriate
levels of affordable housing, and providing a better choice of good
quality housing. |
|
|
|
| |
Energy Use and Conservation (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
SEP1 |
IN ASSESSING THE IMPACT
OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS THE COUNCIL WILL TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THEIR
CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS REDUCING THE USE OF AND RELIANCE ON FOSSIL FUEL
ENERGY. |
| |
|
| 2.40 |
Many, including the UK Government, consider
Climate Change to be the most serious environmental problem we face.
To achieve the reduction in CO2 emissions required to stabilise the
climate, overall energy consumption will have to be reduced. Meeting
Kyoto targets for CO2 emissions requires large reductions in greenhouse
gas emissions and a shift away from fossil fuel energy to using less
or non-polluting forms of energy. Planning has an important role to
play in facilitating this shift, by providing a framework that maximises
opportunities for energy efficiency, renewable energy and low energy
schemes through the development process. Buildings account for the
majority of energy use, through their construction, extraction and
quarrying for building materials, and subsequent maintenance and use.
Sustainable development requires greater recognition of the environmental,
social and economic impacts that arise from exploiting resources,
burning fossil fuels, transporting fuels, power generating facilities
and inefficient use of energy. |
| 2.41 |
The Council considers energy conservation,
energy efficiency and sustainable resource uses are a material consideration
in determining planning applications, an approach that is endorsed
by PPG12. Whilst new buildings obviously offer significant opportunities
for incorporating energy and resource conservation measures, opportunities
may also arise in relation to adaptations of and extensions to existing
properties, and changes of use. However, it is acknowledged that with
existing buildings the scope for securing major improvements is likely
to be more limited. The type of measures considered appropriate will
depend on the scale and nature of the proposed development. Statements
made in support of applications, demonstrating how these matters have
been considered, including a description of how energy demand and
reliance on fossil fuels are minimised, will assist the Council in
evaluating proposals. Reliance on securing conservation of energy
resources solely under the requirements of building control legislation
or other legislation will not necessarily satisfy the requirements
of the policies, as design considerations can play an important part
in securing such benefits. |
|
|
|
| |
Water (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
SEP2 |
THE COUNCIL WILL ENSURE
DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NEED TO CONSERVE WATER RESOURCES,
SAFEGUARD FLOODPLAINS, WATERTABLES, WATERCOURSES AND RIVER CORRIDORS,
MINIMISE FLOOD RISK AND REDUCE WATER POLLUTION. |
| |
|
| 2.42 |
Water is a renewable, but not unlimited,
resource. Factors affecting quality and quantity of supply include
run-off and leaching from roads, agricultural and urban areas and
water abstraction. New development and changes of use can add to existing
pressures, placing demands on water supply, quality, drainage and
sewerage infrastructure. Water conservation is likely to become increasingly
important as climate change and increased water consumption affect
stability of supply. Water conservation measures will thus be essential
to safeguarding supply and ensuring supplies continue to be available
in future. |
| 2.43 |
Inappropriate development can be at risk
of flooding or, by increasing surface water run-off, increasing the
risk of flooding elsewhere, endangering lives and damaging property.
New development will not be allowed in areas prone to flooding, nor
in floodplains (essential for overflow purposes), and where development
could lead to flooding downstream. Areas at risk in Harrow include
not only the floodplain but some areas outside it. Flooding in the
Borough is not restricted to main rivers and can be from ordinary
watercourses, public sewers and highway drains. Council records indicate
that flooding from all sources potentially affects more than 2000
properties and over 100 roads. Determining flood risk requires consideration
of the water run-off for the whole catchment area of rivers, not just
floodplains. The Council will consult statutory and other organisations
in assessing flood risk, the suitability of proposed development and
any mitigation measures necessary. |
| 2.44 |
The Council supports the Environmental
Objectives as set out in the North London Local Environment Agency
Plan. In determining planning applications, regard will be given to
the requirements of the Environment Agency, Thames Water Utilities
and water undertakers concerning development on floodplains, the effect
of new development on drainage, and the protection of watercourses,
river corridors, wet areas and the water cycle from adverse effects,
including pollution and tipping. The views of nature conservation
interests will also be sought. Environment Agency objectives as set
out in the North London Local Environment Agency Plan (2001) are:
to promote development that provides long term environmental gain,
to protect and enhance natural areas around rivers, to improve poor
water quality; and to ensure water resources are managed so that the
needs of the environment and waterway users are in balance with supply.
Key concerns identified include climate change, managing water resources,
enhancing biodiversity and delivering integrated river basin management. |
| 2.45 |
Climate change is likely to impact upon
water quality, water resources and flood defences and be manifested
in more extreme weather patterns. There may be an increase in the
severity and frequency of storms, leading to flash flooding and storm
sewer overflows. Periods of drought may also be more common. Information
currently available suggests that areas at risk are not expected to
change much, rather, it is the level of risk that is expected to increase.
The Council will support proposals that help to restore water tables
to former levels where appropriate, that is where this would be beneficial
and there would be no danger to human life or damage to properties.
Consultation and regular exchange of information will be essential
to maintaining or improving water quality, preventing increased flood
risk and managing water resources in the Borough, and ensuring all
relevant data and expertise are brought to bear in the decision making
process. |
| 2.46 |
The Boroughs floodplains are shown
on the Proposals Map. The Council will work with the Environment Agency,
drainage and sewerage authorities and other organisations to identify
other areas at risk from flooding, and preventative measures needed. |
|
|
|
| |
Waste - General Principles (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
SEP3 |
PROPOSALS FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT
FACILITIES WILL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BEST PRACTICABLE
ENVIRONMENTAL OPTION. THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE WASTE
MANAGEMENT WILL BE USED AS A BASIS FOR ASSESSMENT:- |
| |
|
A) |
THE WASTE HIERARCHY - WASTE
MANAGEMENT OPTIONS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER, FROM
THE MOST TO THE LEAST SUSTAINABLE: WASTE REDUCTION, RE-USE, RECYCLING/COMPOSTING,
ENERGY RECOVERY FROM WASTE, DISPOSAL BY LANDFILL; |
| |
|
B) |
THE PROXIMITY PRINCIPLE
- WASTE SHOULD BE MANAGED AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO WHERE IT IS PRODUCED;
AND |
| |
|
C) |
REGIONAL SELF-SUFFICIENCY
- WASTE SHOULD BE MANAGED AND DISPOSE DISPOSED OF WITHIN THE REGION
IN WHICH IT IS PRODUCED. |
| |
|
| 2.47 |
Types of waste management facilities include
waste separation and recycling facilities, composting facilities,
incinerators, waste to energy facilities, including newer technologies
such as fluidised bed combustion and energy recovery from anaerobic
digestion, landfill or landraising and waste transfer stations. Their
impact varies considerably, depending on the type of facility, size,
scale of operations and location and measures taken to minimise adverse
effects. Much of the impact of larger operations will arise from the
movement of traffic. |
| 2.48 |
The above principles of sustainable waste
management reflect those set out in the Government's Waste Strategy
and PPG10 (1999) and provide a basis for assessing the best practicable
environmental option (BPEO). They should be considered in conjunction
with one another. Other factors to consider include impact on the
local environment and residential amenity. Local authorities are advised
by the Government not to become too reliant on a single waste management
option. |
| 2.49 |
The waste hierarchy does not rule out
disposal by landfill, but assumes that for most wastes, this would
be used as a last resort and only after considering other options
first. In view of the shortage of landfill sites in and around Harrow,
waste reduction, re-use, recycling and composting offer ways to achieve
the proximity principle and work towards greater self-sufficiency.
|
| 2.50 |
Energy recovery from waste technologies,
such as incineration with combined heat and power (CHP), may have
a role to play in reducing the amount of waste being landfilled, but
development of these technologies should not be to the detriment of
expanding options higher up the waste hierarchy. Incineration should
only be considered for materials that cannot be re-used or recycled
and should normally incorporate heat and/or energy recovery such as
CHP. Incineration without energy recovery is wasteful of resources
and unlikely to represent BPEO, with the exception of certain clinical
and hazardous wastes. Modern incinerators are much cleaner than older
models, but require expensive technology to meet emissions standards.
There remains some concern and uncertainty about the health effects
of dioxins which incinerators produce in small amounts. |
| 2.51 |
Waste should be dealt with as close as
possible to where it is produced, to reduce environmental costs associated
with transporting it. Longer distances may be acceptable where transport
is by rail. Consideration also needs to be given to the acceptability
of a particular type of facility in a particular location, in terms
of ecological impact and impact on residential amenity. |
| 2.52 |
Proposals for facilities, falling within
the scope of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
(England and Wales) Regulations 1999, likely to give rise to significant
environmental effects, will require an Environmental Impact Assessment
(EIA). In such cases, the Council may consult the Environment Agency
and other relevant bodies to ensure all issues are identified and
addressed before advising developers as to whether an EIA is required
and of measures they might take to minimise environmental impact.
Developers are advised to prepare planning and pollution control applications
concurrently, drawing on the same information to minimise delays and
costs. |
|
|
|
| |
Biodiversity and Natural
Heritage (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
SEP4 |
THE COUNCIL IS COMMITTED
TO CONSERVING AND ENHANCING THE BIODIVERSITY AND NATURAL HERITAGE
OF THE BOROUGH FOR THE BENEFIT OF CURRENT AND FUTURE GENERATIONS AND
WILL ENSURE THAT EFFECTS UPON BIODIVERSITY, WILDLIFE, WILDLIFE HABITATS
AND SITES OF GEOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE ARE GIVEN FULL WEIGHT WHEN DETERMINING
PLANNING APPLICATIONS. |
| |
|
| 2.53 |
Biodiversity (variety of wildlife) is
important throughout Harrow and therefore all development has a potential
impact on nature conservation. Biodiversity is considered an essential
component of environmental quality. The impact of development proposals
on priority species and habitats identified in Harrow, and the London,
Regional or National Biodiversity Action Plans (BAPs) will be a material
consideration when determining planning applications. Developers will
be encouraged to incorporate measures to enhance biodiversity. The
Council will protect sites of nature conservation importance as shown
on the Proposals Map, and other areas supporting priority species
and habitats, and will encourage organisations and individuals to
participate in wildlife conservation throughout the Borough. There
is one regionally important geological site (RIGS) at Pinner Chalk
Mines which requires protection. |
| 2.54 |
The Borough's natural heritage makes a
major contribution to local identity and quality of life. Accessible
natural areas provide valuable recreational and educational opportunities.
Growing awareness of the damage inflicted on the environment and the
resulting harm to wildlife has occurred alongside greater appreciation
of the value of wildlife and natural areas, and the contribution these
make to individual and community life and well being. Securing protection
of the Borough's natural heritage is therefore important. |
|
|
|
| |
Structural Features
|
| |
SEP5 |
THE COUNCIL WILL SEEK
THE PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT OF THE FOLLOWING STRUCTURAL FEATURES:- |
| |
|
A) |
AREAS OF SPECIAL CHARACTER; |
| |
|
B) |
GREEN BELT; |
| |
|
C) |
METROPOLITAN OPEN LAND; |
| |
|
D) |
GREEN CHAINS; |
| |
|
E) |
PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, HISTORIC
PARKS AND GARDENS; |
| |
|
F) |
PRIVATE OPEN SPACE; |
| |
|
G) |
EDUCATIONAL OPEN SPACE; |
| |
|
H) |
ALLOTMENTS; |
| |
|
I) |
CEMETERIES; |
| |
|
J) |
INFORMAL OPEN SPACE; |
| |
|
K) |
TREE MASSES AND SPINES; |
| |
|
L) |
REAR GARDEN INTERFACES; |
| |
|
M) |
AREAS EXHIBITING A HIGH
QUALITY OF STREETSIDE GREENNESS AND FORECOURT GREENERY; |
| |
|
N) |
WATERCOURSES, RIVER CORRIDORS,
WETLANDS AND OTHER WATER FEATURES; AND |
| |
|
O) |
SITES OF SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC
INTEREST (SSSIS) AND OTHER SITES OF NATURE CONSERVATION IMPORTANCE,
NAMELY THE COUNTRYSIDE CONSERVATION AREA, SITES OF LOCAL AND METROPOLITAN
IMPORTANCE AND SITES PENDING SUCH DESIGNATION. |
| |
IN CONSIDERING PROPOSALS
WHICH AFFECT A STRUCTURAL FEATURE, AN ASSESSMENT WILL BE UNDERTAKEN
OF THE CONTRIBUTION THE SITE MAKES TO THE DISTRIBUTION OF LAND USES
AND PHYSICAL CHARACTER OF THE LOCALITY AND TO THE CUMULATIVE VALUE
OF THE CATEGORY OF THE STRUCTURAL FEATURE IN WHICH IT FALLS. |
| |
|
| 2.55 |
Achieving a more sustainable pattern of
land use will be strongly influenced by the need to protect, and secure
the appropriate management of, a range of open areas and natural features
which perform a vital role in relation to the overall urban fabric,
not only of Harrow, but London as a whole. The above list contains
comparatively large areas of open space of strategic land use importance
for London (A-D). It also includes features which have a more local
impact both in terms of their importance to the district and locality
in which they are situated but, because of their cumulative impact,
are of structural importance to the overall character of the Borough
(E-N). Features A-D above are shown on the Proposals Map. The other
defined areas of open space (E-K), are largely undeveloped and their
open nature reflects the key role they perform in ensuring
that the whole of the existing urban area does not become developed
and reflects the concept of containing the spread of development embodied
in Green Belt policies. They are also shown on the Proposals Map.
Features L-N, whilst not constituting specific land uses in their
own right, are often important elements within areas of residential
land use. Because of their potential impact on the design of development
proposals, detailed consideration of these matters are contained in
Chapter 4 - Design and the Built Environment. |
| 2.56 |
In assessing the contribution an individual
site makes to securing the strategic objectives of the Plan, the Council
will consider a variety of factors. These are set down in the relevant
Part 2 policies. |
|
|
|
| |
Areas of Special Character,
Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
SEP6 |
THE COUNCIL WILL IDENTIFY
APPROPRIATE USES ON LAND DESIGNATED AS AN AREA OF SPECIAL CHARACTER,
GREEN BELT OR METROPOLITAN OPEN LAND. IN CONSIDERING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
IN THESE AREAS, THE COUNCIL WILL ENSURE THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENTS HAVE
NO SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE INTEGRITY, CHARACTER, APPEARANCE,
AMENITY AND NATURE CONSERVATION VALUE OF THE SITE AND THE SURROUNDING
AREA, OR ON PUBLIC ACCESS AND ENJOYMENT OF THE COUNTRYSIDE. |
| |
|
| 2.57 |
There will be a general presumption against
inappropriate development on land designated as an Area of Special
Character, Green Belt or Metropolitan Open Land. The Council will
consider the impact of the proposed development on the character,
amenity and appearance of the area. However, the Council welcomes
appropriate uses which maintain and enhance these areas by acceptable
forms of development (e.g. informal recreation facilities), and wishes
to ensure that all forms of development are appropriate to the size,
scale and character of the protected area. The Council will wish to
minimise any adverse effects upon the character of the location of
the development to the greatest extent possible through careful site
detailing, landscaping and sympathetic architectural design. |
| 2.58 |
The boundaries of the Green Belt have
been reviewed, and the extent of Metropolitan Open Land reviewed in
accordance with criteria in the London Plan. The revised boundaries
are shown on the Proposals Map. |
|
|
|
| |
Quality of Design (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
SD1 |
THE COUNCIL WILL SEEK
AN APPROPRIATE STANDARD OF DESIGN AND LAYOUT IN ALL DEVELOPMENT REQUIRING
PLANNING PERMISSION WITH THE AIM OF IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF THE BUILT
ENVIRONMENT, FACILITATING ACCESS, ESPECIALLY BY SUSTAINABLE MODES,
AND ENHANCING THE CHARACTER AND APPEARANCE OF THE BOROUGH. |
| |
|
| 2.59 |
Much of the Boroughs attraction
lies in the consistent quality of the design and layout of its buildings
and public spaces. The Council is committed to securing the highest
quality of development throughout the Borough, which maintains and
enhances the variety and diversity of Harrow's built environment.
It is important to ensure that all new development achieves a high
standard of design which has proper regard to the particular characteristics
of the site and its integration with the surrounding area. It applies
both to the design of individual buildings and wider urban design
considerations, including the relationship between buildings and the
public spaces around them where people meet and move about. The Council
will therefore promote a design-based approach to development that
encourages quality and innovation rather than the application of prescribed
standards. Good design has wide benefits, improving the quality of
the environment, reinforcing civic pride and helping to secure a more
sustainable pattern of development. It should also help to preserve
the character of areas where the design and layout of existing development
is of a high standard. |
|
|
|
| |
Conservation Areas,
Listed Buildings, Sites of Archaeological Importance, and Historic
Parks and Gardens (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
SD2 |
THE COUNCIL WILL PRESERVE
OR ENHANCE THE CHARACTER OR APPEARANCE OF CONSERVATION AREAS, PRESERVE
THE SPECIAL INTEREST OF LISTED BUILDINGS AND PROTECT SITES OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL
IMPORTANCE AND HISTORIC PARKS AND GARDENS. |
| |
|
| 2.60 |
Conservation Areas, Listed Buildings,
archaeological features and Historic Parks and Gardens are of strategic
importance as part of Londons built heritage and will be rigorously
protected from harm, and enhancements sought where possible. The Council,
as Local Planning Authority, has powers to designate parts of the
Borough as Conservation Areas and, in the exercise of its functions
under the Planning Acts, has a general duty to pay special attention
to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance
of such areas. This duty will be given priority over other planning
policies. In addition to the Statutory List compiled by the Secretary
of State for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, the Council
maintains a local list of buildings of special architectural or historic
interest. Both are published as Supplementary Planning Guidance to
this Plan. |
| 2.61 |
Change of use under these circumstances
may fall within the category of "Enabling Development".
Enabling Development is not a statutory term, although it has been
established in the courts as a legitimate planning tool. It is generally
used to denote a development that would be unacceptable in planning
terms but for the fact that it would bring benefits to a heritage
asset such as a listed building, sufficiently to justify it being
carried out. The benefit to be secured by enabling development is
typically the survival of the asset through rescue from decay, bringing
it into beneficial use, securing its long-term future by some form
of endowment, enhancing it, or its setting, by reversing inappropriate
past development, or making it more accessible to the public. Enabling
development will only be acceptable where the benefits to the community
are clear, and clearly outweigh any disbenefits, and where the heritage
asset and its setting are not materially harmed. |
| 2.62 |
In addition, the applicant will have to
demonstrate that the proposals will secure the long term future of
the site in beneficial use, and without detrimental fragmentation;
that the development proposed is the minimum necessary to secure the
future of the heritage asset; that sufficient financial assistance
to secure the future of the heritage asset is not available from another
source; and that the need for the development stems from the nature
of the heritage asset, rather than from the circumstances of the owner.
Further information on enabling development is available in English
Heritage's Policy Statement "Enabling Development and the Conservation
of Heritage Assets", and detailed practical guidance in their
"Proposals for Enabling Development Affecting Heritage Assets". |
|
|
|
| |
Mixed-Use Development (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
SD3 |
THE COUNCIL WILL PROMOTE
MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT, PARTICULARLY IN TOWN CENTRES AND OTHER AREAS
WITH GOOD PUBLIC TRANSPORT ACCESSIBILITY, AND SEEK TO RETAIN DEVELOPMENT
ALREADY IN MIXED-USE. IN OTHER LOCATIONS, A MIXTURE OF USES MAY BE
SOUGHT. |
| |
|
| 2.63 |
Harrow is predominantly a residential
suburb, with relatively little tradition of mixed-use development,
except in town centre locations and some employment locations. |
| 2.64 |
Mixed-use developments can play a significant
role in securing more sustainable development. They can help reduce
overall travel needs, and in appropriate locations, encourage the
use of public transport, cycling, or walking as sustainable alternatives
to the car. Within town centres they can help to increase vitality
and viability and improve public safety by increasing the level of
activity, particularly during the evenings. The mixture of uses can
be very diverse and, provided that they are compatible, will stimulate
the economic, social, leisure and community welfare of such areas.
They can also assist in creating more sustainable communities than
exist at present, by increasing the range and nature of activities
in a more accessible form. In areas with good access to public transport,
mixed-use schemes can provide an opportunity to increase densities
and the general intensity of development. There may also be opportunities
to promote mixed-use development in the regeneration of other areas,
for example, in work/live schemes. |
| 2.65 |
In promoting mixed-use developments, either
in conversions or on redevelopment, the Council will require a satisfactory
relationship to be achieved between the constituent uses and with
adjoining properties and the surrounding area, such that the amenities
of occupiers and nearby residents are not adversely affected. The
Council acknowledges that the mix, proportion and relationship between
uses in any individual proposal will differ, depending on the location,
and that it would therefore be inappropriate to be unduly prescriptive
in its approach to assessing its merits. Innovative mixtures of uses
and design solutions which secure the most effective use of land will
generally be supported. |
| 2.66 |
Whilst the major opportunities for securing
mixed-use development lie in town centres and other areas with good
public transport accessibility, there may be situations where it is
appropriate to seek a mixture of uses over a wider area. For example,
proposals for new residential development may increase demand for
local employment and a variety of facilities and support services.
Increases in the demand for additional school places, doctors and
dental practices, community, sports and leisure facilities, for example,
may require local solutions. The Council may therefore enter into
an agreement with a developer to secure the provision of additional
facilities or an appropriate contribution to assist the provision
of facilities which meets this increased demand. |
|
|
|
| |
Land Uses and the Transport
Network (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
ST1 |
PROPOSALS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
AND REDEVELOPMENT OF LAND AND BUILDINGS IN THE BOROUGH MUST ACCORD
WITH THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA:- |
| |
|
A) |
MAJOR TRIP-GENERATING DEVELOPMENTS
SHOULD BE LOCATED WHERE THERE IS GOOD PUBLIC TRANSPORT, CYCLE AND
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS; |
| |
|
B) |
NEW DEVELOPMENTS WHICH EXPAND
THE RANGE OF FACILITIES, INCLUDING LOCAL FACILITIES, THAT CAN BE VISITED
IN ONE TRIP WILL BE ENCOURAGED TO LOCATE IN TOWN CENTRES; AND |
| |
|
D) |
MIXED-USE AND HIGHER DENSITY
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE ENCOURAGED TO LOCATE WHERE PUBLIC TRANSPORT ACCESS
IS GOOD. |
| |
|
| 2.67 |
The Council's overall aim is to improve
the quality of the local environment through promotion of alternative
modes of transport other than the car and the reduction in the amount
of journeys made. The Councils policy which seeks to concentrate
major facilities in areas of good accessibility complements its vision
for tackling the growing congestion, pollution and environmental damage
caused by motorised traffic, set out in the Local Transport Strategy.
It is essential to ensure that the land use implications of major
developments are fully assessed and that any proposals for development
do not prejudice other Council policies. The policy also supports
the wider strategic aims of traffic reduction, promoting and encouraging
walking and cycling and ensuring the vitality and viability of town
centres. |
| 2.68 |
The guiding principles for the location
of all new development as indicated in this policy, are in accordance
with current central government guidance. It should enable major trip-generating
developments to be located in a more sustainable way and without detrimental
effect on either traffic flows, the public highway network or the
public transport network. The location of complementary facilities
- whether in Harrow Metropolitan Centre or in the District and Local
Centres - encourages several journey purposes to be carried out in
one trip. Good local facilities can help to shorten distances travelled
and short distances are more likely to be walked or cycled. The careful
location of new developments in relation to the transport infrastructure
is one of the main contributions land use planning can make towards
creating a more sustainable Borough, where the impact of everyday
activities on the environment is minimised. |
|
|
|
| |
Traffic Management (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
ST2 |
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT MEASURES
WITH THE OBJECTIVES OF REDUCING GROWING CONGESTION, POLLUTION AND
ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE WILL BE IMPLEMENTED ON THE BOROUGHS HIGHWAY
NETWORK GIVING PUBLIC TRANSPORT, TAXIS, CYCLES AND PEDESTRIANS PRIORITY,
AND RECOGNISING SERVICING NEEDS. |
| |
|
| 2.69 |
PPG13 indicates that in town centres,
local neighbourhoods, and other areas with a mixture of land uses,
priority should be given to people over ease of traffic movement,
and more roadspace should be given to pedestrians, cyclists and public
transport. This will largely involve managing the existing highway
network by reallocating roadspace and installing priority measures
in favour of these three modes of transport. In some cases, increasing
the highway capacity slightly may also be necessary, but again only
in order to favour these sustainable modes of transport. It is recognised
that the immediate effect of some traffic management measures in some
locations may be to increase local congestion, and marginally to increase
pollution levels. But, in the longer term, as more motorists are persuaded
to use more sustainable means of transport by this reallocation of
roadspace and priority, the net effect on congestion, pollution and
environmental damage will be beneficial. Nevertheless, in certain
sensitive locations, the short-term disbenefits of congestion and
pollution may not be acceptable. In these cases, traffic management
measures will either not be implemented, or a different type will
be implemented to that which would normally have been considered for
that location. Excluding certain types of motorised traffic altogether
from these areas may be one option. See also Policy
T12. |
|
|
|
| |
London-Wide Highway
Network |
| |
ST3 |
THE COUNCIL HAS ADOPTED
THE LONDON ROAD HIERARCHY, AND WILL APPLY APPROPRIATE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
MEASURES FOR A PARTICULAR ROAD ACCORDING TO WHETHER IT IS DESIGNATED
FOR THROUGH, DISTRIBUTOR OR LOCAL TRAFFIC. |
| |
|
| 2.70 |
The London Plan sets out a London Road
Hierarchy, within which all the roads in the Borough have been designated
at one of three levels, according to the purpose of the road. The
three levels are: Strategic Routes; London Distributors; Borough Distributor/Local
Access roads. The Proposals Map and Text Map 15 show all the roads
in the Borough according to their classifications. |
| 2.71 |
The road network hierarchy is a fundamental
component of the highway strategy. This allocates particular journey
and vehicle types to an appropriate category of road depending on
their destination. The aim is to maintain or improve amenity for the
Boroughs residents and improve road safety by ensuring through
traffic and heavy goods vehicles are kept off inappropriate roads.
Balanced against this must be a recognition of the contribution made
to the economy, both national and local, of goods vehicles of all
sizes and that efficient movement of goods is essential to achieving
the regeneration objectives of the HUDP. |
| 2.72 |
The role of the Strategic Route network
is to: |
| |
i) |
provide London with efficient links to
the national road network; |
| |
ii) |
provide for long distance journeys on
the national road network; and |
| |
iii) |
reduce traffic demands on London Distributor
Roads. |
| 2.73 |
A short section of the M1 motorway is
the only length of Strategic Route in the Borough. The M25, A40, A406
and the M1 encircle the Borough and form a system of high capacity
Strategic Routes to destinations nationwide, enabling most through
traffic to avoid the Borough. |
| 2.74 |
London Distributor Roads are designed
to: |
| |
i) |
provide a link to the Strategic Route network; |
| |
ii) |
cater for through traffic, including heavy
goods vehicles; |
| |
iii) |
cater for the London Bus Priority Network
and other bus routes, and |
| |
iv) |
distribute traffic between different areas
of the Borough. |
| 2.75 |
The role of the local road network (Borough
Distributor and Local Access Roads) is to provide: |
| |
i) |
for local traffic; |
| |
ii) |
access to buildings; and |
| |
iii) |
access to the London Distributor Road
network, for motor vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians. |
| 2.76 |
Borough Distributor Roads serve to link
a group of Local Access Roads (such as a housing or industrial estate)
to the London Distributor Network. Whilst essentially local in nature,
and often with residential and other properties directly accessing
onto the highway, further direct accesses for certain types of development
may not be appropriate. Some are designated as B or classified
unnumbered roads in the national classification, and if that
is so, then new accesses to properties along them will require planning
permission. |
| 2.77 |
Borough Distributor Roads have been divided
into two categories, namely restricted and unrestricted. The majority
of the Borough Distributor network fall within the Heavy Goods Vehicle
(HGV) Ban Zones where goods vehicles over 7.5 tonnes are not permitted,
except for access and therefore are classified as restricted. It is
the Councils intention, subject, where necessary, to the agreement
of neighbouring local authorities, that most of the Borough Distributor
Road network should eventually become restricted by the introduction
of further HGV Ban Zones or width restrictions. Some Borough Distributors
will, however, remain unrestricted, as they are required as through
routes around the Ban Zones. |
| 2.78 |
All other roads in the Borough are Local
Access Roads. Most of these will be residential in character, and
can be expected increasingly to be the subject of a priority change,
so that pedestrians and cyclists have priority over motorised traffic.
Traffic calming measures and other traffic management techniques will
be appropriate in many cases. All Local Access Roads are subject to
the same HGV ban as restricted Borough Distributor Roads. |
|
|
|
| |
London-Wide Transport
Investment |
| |
ST4 |
THE COUNCIL WILL IMPLEMENT
THE PROVISIONS OF THE LONDON BUS PRIORITY NETWORK AND THE LONDON CYCLE
NETWORK IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE RELEVANT AUTHORITIES. THE COUNCIL
WILL ENCOURAGE INVESTMENT IN THE RAIL NETWORK, AND WILL IMPROVE THE
LONDON OUTER ORBITAL PATH AND CAPITAL RING STRATEGIC WALKING ROUTES
AS RESOURCES PERMIT. OTHER MEASURES WILL BE PURSUED THAT ENCOURAGE
INCREASED SWITCHING TO NON-CAR MODES OF TRANSPORT AND BETTER INTEGRATION
OF DIFFERENT MODES, AS SET OUT IN THE LOCAL TRANSPORT STRATEGY. |
| |
|
| 2.79 |
Essential to the achievement of Harrow's
Local Transport Strategy is the creation of a realistic alternative
to motor car use. This involves progressing towards the creation of
high quality networks for public transport users, cyclists and pedestrians
as an incentive to travel by these modes. These positive measures
complement the restrictions to car use which are put in place when
traffic and parking management measures are implemented. Such incentives
to travel by means other than the car need to be comprehensive to
be effective, and involve whole routes and networks. Since these do
not end at Borough boundaries, the Council will develop and seek finance
for the London Bus Priority Network and London Cycle Network with
its partners, Transport for London (TfL), West London Leadership;
bus operators, train operators; Network Rail(on integration of services
and interchange issues), and neighbouring local authorities. Routes
additional to those in the two Networks, as set out in the Local Transport
Strategy, will also be pursued. |
| 2.80 |
The London Bus Priority Network is a network
of routes along which comprehensive, whole route, improvements are
carried out to benefit buses. These improvements can include bus lanes,
bus priority at junctions, a review of parking restrictions, waiting
environment improvements, kerbing changes at bus stops to allow for
level access to low floor buses; etc. The London Cycle Network is
a defined London-wide network on which cycle routes are signed and
marked out, ideally as off-road routes, but where this is not possible,
on the highway. It is a strategic network, co-ordinated across Borough
boundaries, and it links residential areas with major centres of employment,
retailing, leisure and transport interchange across the capital. Both
Networks are being implemented with central government finance, and
via inter-Borough co-operation. |
| 2.81 |
Text Map 13 shows the major recreational
routes identified by the London Walking Forum, a London-wide alliance
of local authorities, walkers and community groups. The two
key routes are the London Outer Orbital Path (LOOP), a section of
which runs through Harrows Green Belt, and the Capital Ring,
another London orbital route which runs inboard of the LOOP. A small
section of this runs through the Borough at Harrow on the Hill/Sudbury
Hill. As resources permit, the Council will improve the quality of
these and linking routes, seeking funding from appropriate sources.
Improvement of the routes will be linked to the Councils Local
Walking Strategy. |
| 2.82 |
A key objective will be to ensure that
none of these networks is developed in isolation from the others.
The aim is to create good (i.e. safe and convenient) interchange facilities
between different modes of transport at as many appropriate points
as are realistically feasible, to achieve an attractive network where
it is possible to transfer easily and conveniently from one mode of
transport to another. |
|
|
|
| |
London-Wide Traffic
Restraint Proposals |
| |
ST5 |
THE COUNCIL SUPPORTS
THE INTRODUCTION OF WORKPLACE PARKING CHARGES AND/OR ROAD USER CHARGES
IN PRINCIPLE, AS APPROPRIATE MEASURES FOR SECURING ROAD TRAFFIC RESTRAINT,
BUT ONLY IF THEY ARE PART OF A COMPREHENSIVE SCHEME INTRODUCED CONSISTENTLY
THROUGHOUT ALL GREATER LONDON AND RELEVANT PARTS OF NEIGHBOURING COUNTIES,
AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH MAJOR INVESTMENT IN MEASURES TO IMPROVE SIGNIFICANTLY
THE RELIABILITY, PERFORMANCE, QUALITY AND EXTENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT
SERVICES. |
| |
|
| 2.83 |
Workplace parking charges and road user
charges are very powerful tools in the regulatory toolkit available
to restrain car usage. However, any scheme for their introduction
will have to be very carefully planned, because they also have the
potential to cause major economic harm and exacerbate inequality,
contrary to the principles of sustainable development, including social
inclusion. The introduction of charges is likely to cause firms to
move to areas where they are not in force, or are lower. Therefore,
a comprehensively planned approach is required so that at least the
Greater London area, and an area around it, is the subject of a comprehensive
scheme (particularly for workplace parking charges). There must be
realistic options for travelling by modes other than the car, so that
there are ways of avoiding being charged, otherwise the charge would
become an additional, unacceptable tax, stultifying the economy. Significant
improvements to the quality of the public transport network would
need to include the creation of new bus routes in residential areas,
as well as increases in the frequency and reliability of existing
ones. |
|
|
|
| |
Housing Provision and
Housing Need (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
SH1 |
THE COUNCIL WILL SECURE
THE PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL HOUSING, INCLUDING AFFORDABLE HOUSING,
TO MEET THE NEEDS OF PROSPECTIVE OCCUPANTS THROUGH NEW DEVELOPMENT
AND BY MAINTAINING THE EXISTING STOCK. THE COUNCIL IN DECIDING APPLICATIONS
FOR NEW HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS WILL TAKE INTO ACCOUNT:- |
| |
|
A) |
THE OVERALL HOUSING NEEDS
OF LONDON; |
| |
|
B) |
THE POTENTIAL FOR THE PROVISION
OF 6620 ADDITIONAL HOUSING UNITS IN THE PERIOD 1ST JANUARY 1997 TO
31ST DECEMBER 2016 AS INDICATED IN THE 1999 HOUSING CAPACITY STUDY; |
| |
|
C) |
THE NEED FOR EFFECTIVE USE
OF PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED LAND AND EMPTY PROPERTY; |
| |
|
D) |
THE NEED FOR THE PROPOSAL
TO MEET OTHER SUSTAINABILITY OBJECTIVES, INCLUDING ACCESS BY NON-CAR
MODES TO LOCAL FACILITIES AND EMPLOYMENT; |
| |
|
E) |
THE NEED FOR THE PROVISION
OF APPROPRIATE LEVELS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCLUDING KEY WORKER ACCOMMODATION
AND SHARED OWNERSHIP ACCOMMODATION; |
| |
|
F) |
THE NEED TO PROTECT AND
SAFEGUARD THE CHARACTER AND AMENITY OF SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL AREAS;
AND |
| |
|
G) |
THE DESIRABILITY OF REDUCING
THE COST OF THE OPERATION OF DWELLINGS THROUGH ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES. |
| |
THE COUNCIL WILL AIM,
THROUGH A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT SOURCES, TO SECURE AN ANNUAL AVERAGE
OF AT LEAST 330 ADDITIONAL HOUSING UNITS IN THE 10-YEAR PERIOD FROM
THE DATE OF ADOPTION OF THE PLAN. |
| |
|
| 2.84 |
Additional housing provision is required
to meet a wide range of housing need and demand. There is continuing
population increase and growth in the numbers of households requiring
housing in both London as a whole, and Harrow in particular. Because
of its attractiveness, the Borough is faced with on-going housing
demand from people outside the Borough, as well as housing needs and
demand from Borough residents. The Council recognises that the Boroughs
economic welfare and maintenance of quality public services is dependent
on sufficient housing being available for key workers, whilst continued
provision of affordable housing will help secure sustainable communities
in the Borough. Such housing will include social rented and shared
ownership accommodation. |
| 2.85 |
PPG3 requires Local Planning Authorities
to derive a housing provision figure from a capacity based study.
The 1999 LPAC Housing Capacity Study fulfils this requirement. The
results are reflected in the Policy SH1 (Criterion B). However, the
London Plan sets out the distribution of provision between Boroughs.
Therefore the level of provision indicated in the Policy will be kept
under review. It is anticipated that all new housing provision in
the foreseeable future will be built on previously developed land.
|
| 2.86 |
New housing in the Borough will be secured
from a variety of sources, as reflected in the Housing Capacity Study.
Increasingly development has not only involved recycled urban land,
but also recycled urban buildings such as vacant units over shops,
disused offices and residential conversions, and this will continue
to be encouraged in appropriate circumstances. In order to protect
greenfield sites and open space in the Borough, new building will
be concentrated on previously developed sites, and maximised by securing
the most efficient and effective use of this. Reflecting the approach
to maximising additional housing provision set down in RPG9 and the
London Plan, the Council will aim to exceed the total capacity estimate
of 6,620 additional units in the period 1st January 1997 31st
December 2016 (Table 13 1999 London Housing Capacity Study).
Monitoring of development activity will indicate whether a revised
figure in excess of 6,620 units is achievable. The results of the
2004 London Housing Capacity Study will inform an early revision of
the figure and indicate whether the figure included in the London
Plan is appropriate. Maximising housing provision on sites being brought
forward for development will go some way to alleviating a continued
unsatisfied demand in all sectors, whilst also achieving full and
effective use of land. This reflects the emphasis placed by PPG3 on
the importance of the sequential test for new housing and favouring
the re-use of previously developed land and buildings. Reduced parking
or car free developments can in some cases help to increase density.
This approach will be pursued in areas which are well served by public
transport. |
| 2.87 |
The London Plan requirement for Harrow
to provide a minimum of 6,620 additional dwellings in the twenty-year
period 1997-2016, equates to an annual average of at least 330 dwellings.
The 1999 Housing Capacity Study identified a range of potential sources
of housing provision, and a number of policies promoting suitable
provision from these sources have been included in the Plan. The Council
considers that the annual average of at least 330 additional housing
units can be secured in the 10-year period from the date of adoption
of the Plan. On-going monitoring of housing provision under the plan,
monitor and manage approach has informed, and will continue
to inform, the Council of the ways in which it is maximising housing
provision through a variety of sources. Such monitoring also assists
the Council to identify those sources which might help exceed the
annual average figure. The range of policies in the Plan meets the
requirements of the London Plan and PPG3. With regard to existing
housing, there are also policies to resist the loss of residential
land and buildings, to ensure that there is effective use and maintenance
of property there are policies on empty homes and maintenance and
improvement, whilst more effective use of land and buildings is to
be secured through encouraging higher residential densities in appropriate
locations. |
| 2.88 |
In addition to the sources outlined above,
proposal sites including residential development have been identified
on the Proposals Map. The Council is also very mindful of the Governments
increased emphasis on the requirement for local planning authorities
to have an up-to-date review of employment land (consultation paper
on proposed change to PPG3 July 2003). The Council considers
that it generally meets this requirement as such an exercise was undertaken
in formulating the policies in the Plan. |
| 2.89 |
The Council acknowledges that the provision
of additional housing should be assessed against the possible requirements
for additional school facilities, higher educational establishments,
medical facilities of all types, recreational and leisure facilities
and shopping facilities. A balance between housing and other complementary
land uses needs to be achieved in order to move towards a more sustainable
land use pattern. The Council accepts that the ability of the Borough
to achieve the figures set out in the Capacity Study may be influenced
by the fact that some sites identified for housing purposes may also
be suitable for other important land uses, such as community facilities,
institutional facilities and other land uses. |
| 2.90 |
Whilst a positive approach to housing
is being emphasised, the Government has asked Boroughs to balance
the need for housing with the objective of protecting the environment
and safeguarding amenity. The Council therefore takes the view that
new housing proposals, including extensions, should take account of
economic, environmental and social factors. This would ensure the
provision of homes which is consistent with the principles of sustainable
development. Since the majority of property is in a satisfactory or
good physical condition it is in keeping with these principles to
ensure that the stock is maintained in this state. Therefore the Council
considers it appropriate that, where the quality of the residential
stock is generally good, there should be a presumption in favour of
its protection. |
| 2.91 |
The need for energy conservation, waste
minimisation and sustainability has become an important consideration
in residential development. The Council is not only keen to increase
housing developments but to ensure that the standard of design, quality
and types of housing assist in achieving the overall objective of
promoting sustainable communities. In pursuance of this objective
the Council will encourage development which optimises building design,
renewable energy, natural lighting and the orientation of buildings.
The energy efficiency and overall environmental performance of developments
can be optimised utilising building design, layout and orientation,
to minimise energy use, and by incorporating other features, such
as renewable energy technologies and natural lighting and ventilation.
The Council wishes to encourage such development. |
|
|
|
| |
Housing Types and Mix (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
SH2 |
THE COUNCIL WILL ENCOURAGE
THE PROVISION OF A RANGE OF TYPES AND SIZES OF HOUSING TO MEET THE NEEDS OF ALL RESIDENTS, TO ENHANCE SOCIAL INCLUSION AND PROMOTE MIXED AND BALANCED COMMUNITIES. |
| |
|
| 2.92 |
In applying this policy, the Council acknowledges
that site specific considerations, marketability and viability might
well affect the extent to which the policy aims could practically
be advanced in each individual case. |
| 2.93 |
The need for a choice of new housing available
to a variety of household types has been emphasised in PPG3. The Council
agrees with the principles enshrined in PPG3 regarding provision of
greater choice and avoiding the danger of using housing to reinforce
social distinction. Housing needs and demand in the Borough vary considerably
according to individual circumstances and household sizes. The Councils
policy, in addition to general housing needs, aims to meet the need
of special groups by encouraging the provision of accommodation for
all household sizes. |
| 2.94 |
There are indications that a large proportion
of future households will contain one or two persons. However, there
is a need to strike a balance between the demands for accommodation
for smaller households and the need to ensure a mixed/balanced community
by retaining the stock of the existing larger houses, which are suitable
for occupation by larger households. It is important for new developments
to cater for different households and provide a wide range of types
of housing which will ensure greater flexibility. In view of changing
circumstances in Harrow, providing for a wide range of housing needs
is essential, including the needs of ethnic minorities, large families,
couples, single people and those on low incomes. In addition, there
is a need to cater for specific housing needs, such as those of single
parent families, homeless people and overcrowded households. |
|
|
|
| |
Development and the
Boroughs Regeneration Strategy |
| |
SEM1 |
THE COUNCIL WILL PURSUE
THE REGENERATION OF THOSE AREAS OF THE BOROUGH WHERE INVESTMENT IS
REQUIRED AND WILL SUPPORT PROPOSALS WHICH CONTRIBUTE TO THE REGENERATION
OF THOSE AREAS. THIS WILL INCLUDE SUPPORTING BUSINESSES IN THE BOROUGH
BY PROTECTING LAND AND BUILDINGS SUITABLE FOR EMPLOYMENT USE FROM
LOSS TO OTHER USES. |
| |
|
| 2.95 |
The Council is keen to see an holistic
approach to improving those parts of the Borough which currently experience
higher levels of unemployment, poor housing, social exclusion and
environmental decline sufficient to give cause for concern, and to
encourage training and job opportunities in growth industries. A Regeneration
Strategy and Action Plan was adopted by the Council and its partners
in 1999, and the Action Plan is reviewed and updated annually. The
Strategy sets out the vision, strategy and area-based programmes for
a partnership of agencies, including the Council, to achieve, transport,
training, housing and business promotion actions as well as land use
based improvements. Proposals which are not specifically set out in
the Action Plan, but which would contribute to achieving its aims,
are likely to be considered favourably. As well as promoting regeneration,
the Council wishes to promote sustainable development. There are possible
adverse impacts associated with some types of regeneration projects,
particularly the generation of traffic, and the Council will require
that the most sustainable solution to coping with the traffic generated
is sought. |
| 2.96 |
In the specific context of employment,
regeneration involves supporting and retaining existing businesses
as well as encouraging new ones. The limited amount of land for employment
use in the Borough means that land and buildings suitable for such
use need to be protected. When one business vacates a site, that site
should be retained for employment purposes for the benefit of new
businesses. Loss of land from employment use means that fewer jobs
can be located within the Borough, so residents have to travel further
a-field to work. Forcing local people to travel further to seek employment
increases their travel costs and disadvantages those on lower incomes.
Local job creation and retention also helps to support other parts
of the local economy, as firms buy from local suppliers and employees
buy from local shops, etc. The only exception to the retention of
employment land may be where small sites, undesignated by the Council
(see Policy EM15), are not viable
for continued employment use, or would create significant amenity
problems for surrounding residents. |
|
|
|
| |
Hierarchy of Town Centres |
| |
SEM2 |
A TOWN CENTRE HIERARCHY
HAS BEEN ADOPTED COMPRISING HARROW METROPOLITAN CENTRE, DISTRICT CENTRES,
LOCAL CENTRES, LOCAL PARADES AND SHOPS. THE COUNCIL WILL PROMOTE AND
SUSTAIN THE HEALTH OF TOWN CENTRES AND LOCAL PARADES. PROPOSALS WHICH
PREJUDICE THEIR VITALITY AND VIABILITY WILL BE RESISTED. |
| |
|
| 2.97 |
The term Town Centres denotes,
collectively, Harrow Metropolitan Centre, the District Centres and
the Local Centres. The hierarchy reflects the London Plan. Harrow
Metropolitan Centre, District and Local Centres and local parades/shops
provide the major locations for shopping and office employment in
the Borough. The hierarchy is shown on the Proposals Map. The Town
Centre hierarchy is not a rigid assessment of the differing sizes
and strengths of individual centres. It is acknowledged that the position
of a centre in the hierarchy may change in time, according to the
relative health of its retail and other town centre functions, or
as they adapt to emerging trends and roles. The Council regularly
monitors the health of all the town centres, in order to gain early
warning of any problems, and address them. However, a change in the
functions of the centre could still occur, after consultation, including
with local community organisations, and the Council will consider
reclassifying a centre if this would be beneficial to its vitality
and viability. For example, housing could be a beneficial use to take
the place of some retail units once a permanent and structural reduction
in the retail element has been identified. The Council proposes to
keep the hierarchy under review and modify it if necessary. |
| 2.98 |
Harrow is one of ten Metropolitan Centres
identified within Greater London as strategic centres with shopping,
employment, cultural and administrative roles. The catchment area
of Harrow Metropolitan Centre extends beyond the confines of the Borough
boundary, drawing shoppers, workers and those seeking entertainment
from a wide area, assisted by good public transport links allowing
easy access. The Council will, with its partners, strive to improve
the facilities within the centre so as to ensure that the Centre adapts
to changing needs. |
| 2.99 |
Local parades and shops play an important
role in maintaining local community interest and provide basic shopping
facilities to residents, including people with restricted mobility.
Town centres can also act as foci for regeneration, because of the
opportunities for different activities to take place there, to their
mutual benefit. Wealdstone is one town centre where a comprehensive
assessment of land uses and activities has taken place in preparation
for bringing forward proposals for regeneration. |
| 2.100 |
Some centres are shared between two or
more administrative areas (Burnt Oak with Brent and Barnet; Edgware
with Barnet; Sudbury Hill with Ealing; Kenton and Kingsbury with Brent
London Boroughs). Liaison regularly takes place with these authorities
to ensure that their policies and designations result in a co-ordinated
approach for those centres. |
| 2.101 |
A considerable amount of expenditure on
shopping in the Borough now takes place either in the Metropolitan
Centre, Harrow, or in the superstores or retail warehouses. Some of
the latter lie within, or on the edge of District or Local Centres
and help to maintain the vitality and viability of these centres.
However, the competitiveness of District and Local Centres, especially
those without the benefit of a major superstore, has been declining
in recent years. In order to ensure their continued health, the Plans
policies reflect Government policy in PPG6 by allowing other uses
appropriate to town centres, particularly at their periphery. This
will help to increase the numbers of people visiting those centres,
and ensure the continued viability and vitality of remaining retail
units. |
| 2.102 |
The Town centres are not, however, purely
retailing centres. Government guidance is to promote diversity in
centres by encouraging mixed-uses. Developments could include: housing;
leisure; educational; employment (usually those within the B1 Use
Class); cultural; administrative; and healthcare uses. This list is
not exhaustive, and other uses could be appropriate. The net effect
of encouraging this diversity is to introduce greater activity into
the town centre, leading to mutual benefit. For example, further housing
will provide more potential customers for the existing shops, whilst
the shops themselves provide a convenient, local facility to those
residents. The opportunity to visit a number of destinations - for
example, the shops, the doctor, the library - in one trip, all in
a location easily accessible by all modes of transport, will lead
to fewer trips in general, and journeys by car in particular. This
is in line with the Government's aim of promoting more sustainable
lifestyles. |
| 2.103 |
Diversity is important to the future of
the District and Local Centres, as well as the Metropolitan Centre,
as they face competition from superstores. The Council will be preparing
Town Centre Strategies for the enhancement and development of the
Metropolitan Centre and for certain District and Local Centres. |
|
|
|
| |
Proposals for New Employment-Generating
Development (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
SEM3 |
THE COUNCIL WILL CONSIDER
FAVOURABLY PROPOSALS FOR EMPLOYMENT-GENERATING USES IN SUITABLE LOCATIONS
WITH GOOD ACCESS BY MODES OF TRAVEL OTHER THAN THE CAR. THE COUNCIL
MAY REQUIRE THAT ACCESS BY MODES OF TRAVEL OTHER THAN THE CAR IS IMPROVED. |
| |
|
| 2.104 |
New business and industrial development
in suitable locations other than established places of employment
is to be encouraged where these are accessible by public transport.
This will help to maximise the opportunities available to Harrows
resident workforce, and foster the Boroughs economic health.
Concentrating on the needs of the local workforce will help to achieve
London-wide strategic employment aims. Retail or leisure developments
sited in suitable locations can also contribute to the regeneration
of certain areas. It is an objective of the Plan to increase the range
and number of jobs. |
| 2.105 |
However, the construction of new employment-generating
development should not be at the expense of an unacceptable impact
on the environment. Possible detrimental effects can take many forms.
New employment development in some locations might result in adverse
effects on the surrounding road network, with delivery vehicles and
employees cars attempting to gain access, causing unacceptable
levels of congestion and nuisance. Adequate servicing and good road
access are therefore essential prerequisites for new business, industrial
and warehousing development. |
| 2.106 |
Good public transport provision nearby,
giving access to a wide area, will assist in limiting congestion by
reducing the numbers driving to work. Improving access by foot and
by cycle will also help to achieve this, especially from surrounding
residential areas where employees may live. Where it is appropriate,
the Council will require that the developer make improvements to the
access arrangements and/or put in place arrangements to restrict car
use by employees, such as by the preparation of a Travel Plan. |
|
|
|
| |
Open-Air Leisure and
Sporting Activities (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
SR1 |
LAND FOR ACTIVE AND INFORMAL
OPEN-AIR LEISURE AND SPORTING ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING PLAYING FIELDS,
WILL BE PRESERVED AND WHERE POSSIBLE IMPROVED, PARTICULARLY WHERE
STRATEGIC OPEN SPACE NEEDS CAN BE MET OR WHERE THERE IS A LOCAL DEFICIENCY.
THE COUNCIL WILL ENCOURAGE USE BY ALL SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY. |
| |
|
| 2.107 |
Parks and open spaces are an important
part of community life, providing opportunities for people to enjoy
organised recreation, informal leisure pursuits and contact with nature.
They contribute to the attractive, open character of the Borough.
The Council attaches considerable importance to the retention of adequate
recreational open space and considers that neither neglect nor lack
of use are acceptable grounds for change from open recreational use
since a fall in demand for a certain open space or leisure activity
at one time does not preclude a rise in demand in future. In view
of the current rise in residential development and the population
increase in the Borough, the Council will endeavour to protect all
valuable open spaces to allow for future community needs, as once
it is lost it is difficult to replace. |
| 2.108 |
Compared with some London Boroughs, Harrow
is well provided for in terms of open space and outdoor recreational
facilities. Nevertheless, provision of outdoor recreational space
falls below the National Playing Fields Associations recommended
minimum of 2.4 hectares (6 acres) per thousand population. The Council
has identified areas lacking in public open space and will identify
sites for additional provision of open space. The Council recognises
that some open space fulfils a strategic role, in that it is used
by people living outside the Borough. In accordance with the Mayors
Guidance on Producing Open Spaces Strategy, consideration will be
given to open spaces within 1km of the borough boundary when assessing
availability to facilitate cross boundary planning protection of such
sites. |
| 2.109 |
The Council is committed to improving
access to open space with amenity, recreational or nature conservation
value, while at the same time ensuring that such space is protected
from damage that might arise from increased use. Any increase in public
access to sites will be monitored carefully, and where necessary measures
taken to minimise conflict. It may not be appropriate to increase
public access to all sites and in some instances partial or restricted
access, for example, at a particular time or by arrangement, may be
sought. Accessibility for disabled persons will be examined to ensure
compliance with the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA). |
|
|
|
| |
Arts, Cultural, Entertainment,
Tourist and Recreational Activities |
| |
SR2 |
PROVISION AND IMPROVEMENT
OF ARTS, CULTURAL, ENTERTAINMENT, TOURIST AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
WILL BE ENCOURAGED. FACILITIES PROPOSED SHOULD BE:- |
| |
|
A) |
ACCESSIBLE TO ALL; |
| |
|
B) |
ACCEPTABLE IN TERMS OF THEIR
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, ON RESIDENTIAL AMENITY, WILDLIFE, AND TRAVEL
TO AND FROM THOSE FACILITIES; AND |
| |
|
C) |
LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE
FOLLOWING CRITERIA:- |
| |
|
|
1) |
HIGH INTENSITY ACTIVITIES SHOULD BE
LOCATED IN TOWN CENTRES OR OTHER AREAS OF GOOD PUBLIC TRANSPORT ACCESSIBILITY. |
| |
|
|
2) |
LOW INTENSITY ACTIVITIES OR ACTIVITIES
THAT REQUIRE LARGE AREAS OF OPEN LAND BUT FEW BUILDINGS, SUCH AS GOLF
COURSES, SPORTS PITCHES AND RIDING STABLES, MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN
THE GREEN BELT AND METROPOLITAN OPEN LAND, PROVIDED THESE DO NOT CONFLICT
WITH GREEN BELT AND METROPOLITAN OPEN LAND AIMS. |
| |
|
|
3) |
FOR OTHER TYPES OF ACTIVITY (THOSE NOT
COVERED BY THE ABOVE) PREFERENCE WILL BE GIVEN TO LOCATIONS EASILY
REACHED BY PUBLIC TRANSPORT, WALKING OR CYCLING. |
| |
|
| 2.110 |
The Council will encourage the development
of a range of arts, cultural, entertainment tourist and recreational
facilities for the benefit of the Borough's residents, workers and
visitors. Developments will be sought that contribute to the Borough's
overall attractiveness and complement existing facilities. The Council
will ensure that proposals comply with other policies, particularly
on environment, transport, accessibility and equal opportunities.
Planning, design and management of facilities should meet the needs
of all sections of the community. In assessing environmental impact,
regard will be given to such matters as external appearance, siting,
the amenity and nature conservation value of the area and transport
impact. |
| 2.111 |
To encourage more sustainable travel patterns
(more walking, cycling and use of public transport) and to widen access
to facilities to people with mobility difficulties or without access
to a car, a Borough-wide distribution of arts, leisure and recreational
facilities in appropriate locations is sought. Siting leisure uses
in town centres can help maintain the vitality of the centre. PPG17
advises Local Planning Authorities to give sympathetic consideration
to applications for intensive use sports facilities while giving full
weight to the amenity of the area, the wishes of local residents and
proximity to public transport. Formal leisure facilities should be
located where possible in built up areas. |
| 2.112 |
For the purposes of applying criterion
C) of the above policy, high intensity activities include uses that
require a substantial building, or buildings, have large numbers of
visitors and frequent activity, such as theatres, cinemas, bowling
alleys, skating rinks, night clubs, sports centres and swimming pools.
Low intensity uses are quiet, casual, informal or passive activities,
such as picnicking, horse riding, walking and cycling. Activities
that require small buildings, but are subject to continuous or intermittent
use by large numbers of people, e.g. community halls, small scale
indoor sports facilities should be located in built up areas, in locations
easily reached by public transport, walking or cycling. |
|
|
|
| |
Provision of Community
Services (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
SC1 |
THE COUNCIL WILL SEEK
TO ENSURE THE PROVISION OF APPROPRIATE AND ACCESSIBLE COMMUNITY SERVICES
AND FACILITIES TO MEET THE NEEDS OF ALL WHO LIVE, WORK IN OR VISIT
THE BOROUGH. |
| |
|
| 2.113 |
Adequate and accessible services and facilities,
such as shops, schools, community or religious buildings, health services,
recreation facilities, open space, community protection and emergency
services etc are all the hallmarks of a more sustainable community.
The land use implications of community services are difficult to assess,
particularly in the light of recent changes in legislation and restrictions
on finance. The Council wishes to ensure that adequate community,
social and health services are provided to meet the needs of the Boroughs
population. There is a variety of facilities already available within
the Borough, but pressure for more provision is likely to occur during
the Plan period. The provision of additional facilities should be
catered for without any adverse environmental impact. |
|
|
|
| |
Implementation and
Resources |
| |
SI1 |
THE COUNCIL WILL SEEK
TO ENSURE THAT THE NECESSARY RESOURCES ARE ATTRACTED THAT SECURE THE
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF POLICIES AND PROPOSALS IN THE PLAN. |
| |
|
| 2.114 |
In preparing the policies and proposals
in the Plan, the Council has taken into account a number of other
Council strategies, together with those strategies with other agencies
and bodies in which the Council is a partner. Of particular importance
will also be the need for co-ordination and co-operation with adjoining
authorities on implementing policies and proposals in the Plan. There
will also be various situations where development proposals are worked
up jointly with such authorities. The Council undertakes some development
as part of its service departmental plans and programmes. Investment
decisions by the private sector and other public sector bodies will
also facilitate development during the Plan period. Much investment
in the Borough will be undertaken by house owners, and appropriate
resources will be needed to be secure the effective upgrading and
improvement of some of the poorer quality housing stock. In implementing
planning policies in relation to affordable housing provision, due
regard will need to be had to the financial support available from
the Housing Corporation and other sources for Registered Social Landlords
to implement schemes. With regard to continued economic development,
the Council, through a Regeneration Strategy and Action Plan, will
promote activity through a variety of methods and agencies. The Council
will continue to explore opportunities and funding for development
through a variety of funding sources and partnership arrangements.
These include initiatives that contribute to sustainable development
undertaken by the community as part of the work of Harrow Agenda 21
Environmental Forum, the Local Agenda 21 organisation in Harrow supported
by the Council. |
|
|
|
| |
Monitoring and Review (Date of deletion 28th September 2007) |
| |
SI2 |
THE COUNCIL WILL REGULARLY
MONITOR AND REVIEW THE EFFECTIVENESS OF POLICIES AND PROPOSALS IN
THE PLAN TO ENSURE THAT IT IS KEPT UP-TO-DATE. |
| |
|
| 2.115 |
Local Planning Authorities are required
to keep their plans under review and up-to-date. Consistent with monitoring
the Borough's role in north-west London and London as a whole, the
Council will ensure that due regard is paid to the policies being
implemented in adjoining Local Planning Authorities, and the Mayor's
emerging Spatial Development Strategy. In order to evaluate the effectiveness
of the policies in the Plan, it will be essential to undertake regular
monitoring of development activity and other trends affecting the
environment of the Borough. Particular importance will be attached
to the review of the extent to which the strategic objectives, policies
and targets of the Plan are being met. Following the evaluation of
available information, and taking into account other changed circumstances,
such as new national and regional policy guidance, decisions will
be made as to whether there is a need to alter the Plan's policies.
Just as an environmental appraisal was undertaken in formulating appropriate
policies to be included in the Plan, a similar appraisal process will
be applied to any suggested policy changes which need to be brought
forward prior to the next statutory review of the Plan. An integral
part of the monitoring process will be an analysis of the rate and
way in which land and buildings are brought forward for development. |
| |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |