 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| Chapter 4 |
| TRANSPORTATION |
| |
|
| |
Introduction |
| 4.1 |
Since the preparation and adoption of
the first Erewash Borough Local Plan, in 1994, transportation has
become one of the key issues of the new millennium and consequently
has been subject to Government advice as set out in PPG 12 (Development
Plans and Regional Planning Guidance) and PPG 13 (Transport). These
PPGs provide the framework within which the Local Plan is prepared
and are therefore of particular importance to this chapter. The principal
elements of the PPGs are set out below as objectives. |
| |
Objectives |
| 4.2 |
In preparing the Local Plan transportation
chapter, the following objectives shall apply:- |
| |
- to reduce the need to travel, especially by car;
- to foster development which encourages walking, cycling and
public transport use;
- to promote development in areas accessible by means other than
the car;
- to locate major generators of travel demand in existing centres
accessible by means other than the car;
- to maintain or improve the choice for people to walk, cycle
or use public transport;
- limit parking provision to discourage car journeys where there
are alternatives;
- to safeguard land for improvements to the transportation system;
- to facilitate improvements to the public transport network;
- to accord with the principles of sustainable development;
- to meet the needs of all sectors of society, particularly people
with special needs, people who do not own a car, children and
retired people;
- to prohibit development which would prejudice the restoration
of railway routes.
- to reduce the environmental impact of transport.
|
| 4.3 |
Responsibility for transport lies with
a number of organisations and transportation issues must therefore
be addressed in a co-ordinated manner. The Highways Agency is responsible
for trunk roads (M1, A52 and A38) and Derbyshire County Council, as
the local highway authority, is responsible for all other roads in
the borough. Bus and rail services are provided by the private sector.
The Borough's role is largely restricted to ensuring that proposed
transport infrastructure improvements are not prevented by land use
decisions made during the plan period. The Borough Council also facilitates
transport improvements through activities such as car parking, provision
of bus shelters, cycle parking and other joint initiatives with the
Highway Authority. |
| 4.4 |
The Structure Plan transport policies
provide a strategic context for transportation in the Borough. In
preparing the Erewash Borough Local Plan, account has to be taken
of these policies. Briefly, the relevant Structure Plan transport
policies are:- |
| |
- reducing the need to travel (Transport Policy 1);
- integration (Transport Policy 2);
- safety and health (Transport Policy 3);
- land use and transport (Transport Policy 4);
- bus and taxi services (Transport Policy 5);
- passenger rail services (Transport Policy 6);
- freight (Transport Policy 7);
- traffic management (Transport Policy 8);
- pedestrians (Transport Policy 9);
- cycling (Transport Policy 10);
- people with special needs (Transport Policy 11);
- environmental impact (Transport Policy 12);
- new highway infrastructure (Transport Policy 13);
- new infrastructure (Transport Policy 15);
- parking and servicing (Transport Policy 16);
- disused transport routes (Transport Policy 17);
- route protection (Transport Policy 18).
|
| 4.5 |
The Government recently introduced a new
system of bidding for highway/transport related funding. Local Transport
Plans replace the former Transport Policies and Programme (T.P.P.).
Local Transport Plans have been prepared for two areas of Erewash;
the Derby area, which includes Borrowash, Breadsall, Little Eaton
and Morley; and South East Derbyshire, which includes the Ilkeston
and Long Eaton areas. It is important to take account of the Local
Transport Plans in this Local Plan, although Local Transport Plans
will generally be more appropriate for integration into the Structure
Plan (PPG12 para 5.5). |
| 4.6 |
The Borough Council has to include a statement
in each Local Transport Plan about how it will implement the plan.
This will be through:- |
| |
- the implementation of proposals in the Erewash Borough Local
Plan;
- negotiation of Section 106 Obligations with developers;
- planning conditions attached to planning permissions;
- engineering works to highways;
- provision and management of off-street parking;
- increased security in town centres through the provision of
close circuit television cameras;
- development of off-highway cyclepaths and cycle parking;
- reopening railway stations (in conjunction with partners);
- provision of bus shelters;
- low emission vehicle policy;
- cycle user scheme for council employees.
|
| 4.7 |
Local Transport Plans will be integrated
with the Local Plan through land use planning and the limited powers
open to the Borough Council, as a non-highway authority. |
| |
Ilkeston - Awsworth Link
Road |
| 4.8 |
The A6096 Ilkeston-Awsworth Link road
is included in the Structure Plan (Transport Policy 15) as a strategic
local road. This important new road will link Chalons Way on the eastern
side of Ilkeston to the Awsworth bypass, relieving Station Road, Ilkeston
of heavy traffic and associated danger and pollution. Journey times
from Ilkeston to the M1 at Junction 26 would also be improved and
the new road would provide an opportunity to provide better access
next to a reopened Ilkeston railway station. The new road should therefore
be viewed as a vital part of an integrated transportation system. |
| 4.9 |
The route of the Ilkeston-Awsworth Link
was protected in the 1994 Erewash Local Plan and it remains protected
in this local plan. It is envisaged that, as funding has now been
made available and design work commenced, construction will begin
within the lifetime of this plan. |
|
|
| |
POLICY T1 - ILKESTON-AWSWORTH
LINK ROAD |
| |
LAND AS IDENTIFIED ON THE
PROPOSALS MAP IS PROTECTED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ILKESTON-AWSWORTH
LINK ROAD. IN CONSIDERING APPLICATIONS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT WHICH AFFECT
THE ILKESTON-AWSWORTH LINK ROAD, THE LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY WILL
TAKE ACCOUNT OF THE NEED TO SECURE NEW HIGHWAY PROPOSALS AND IMPROVEMENTS,
AND WILL REFUSE PERMISSION FOR DEVELOPMENT WHICH WOULD PREJUDICE THE
CONSTRUCTION OR IMPROVEMENT OF THE HIGHWAY. |
| |
|
| |
Parking |
| 4.10 |
The Borough Council, as the responsible
body for off-street public car parking, aims to effectively manage
car parking spaces in the town centres, through charging systems.
PPG13 sets out national maximum parking standards for various forms
of land use and development. It advises that in locations either readily
accessible to public car parking provision, or which are well-served
by public transport, car parking provision in conjunction with development
should be significantly below the maximum standard. A level of parking
in excess of the maximum standard will only be acceptable in exceptional
circumstances, and where it is demonstrated that it is needed in the
interests of public amenity, safety or to otherwise clearly benefit
the town centre as a whole. In the interests of protecting the environment,
car parking will not be provided where it could lead to traffic congestion
and associated environmental pollution. Further, consideration has
to be given to encouraging alternative forms of transport, other than
by car, as a means to reducing the demand for car parking. Therefore,
all new car parks will be required to include an element of cycle
parking and parking for motorcycles. The current parking standards
were agreed by Derbyshire County Council and accepted by the Borough
Council for the purposes of development control. The County Council
will need to have regard to the latest PPG13, together with the conclusions
of the work carried out at regional level, in considering revisions
to the current standards. When revised standards are agreed, these
will then need to be further considered by the Borough Council. Guidelines
for car parking provision required by the Council will be set out
in the Parking Supplementary Planning Document. |
|
|
| |
POLICY T2 - PARKING
|
| |
TO MAINTAIN THE VITALITY
AND VIABILITY OF THE TOWN CENTRES, OFF-STREET CAR PARKING WILL BE
MANAGED TO ENSURE EFFICIENT USE OF CAR PARKING SPACES THROUGH THE
OPERATION OF CHARGING SYSTEMS. IN CONSIDERING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS,
THE BOROUGH COUNCIL WILL HAVE REGARD TO THE MAXIMUM PARKING STANDARDS
SET OUT IN THE PARKING SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT. WHERE DEVELOPMENT
IS PROPOSED IN LOCATIONS WHICH ARE READILY ACCESSIBLE TO EXISTING
CAR PARKING OR ARE WELL SERVED BY PUBLIC TRANSPORT, LEVELS OF CAR
PARKING PROVISION MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNIFICANTLY BELOW THE MAXIMUM
LEVEL. A LEVEL OF PARKING IN EXCESS OF THE MAXIMUM STANDARD WILL ONLY
BE ACCEPTABLE IN EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES, AND WHERE IT IS DEMONSTRATED
THAT IT IS NEEDED IN THE INTERESTS OF PUBLIC AMENITY, SAFETY OR TO
OTHERWISE CLEARLY BENEFIT THE TOWN CENTRE AS A WHOLE. PARKING SPACES
TO MEET THE NEEDS OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES WILL BE CONVENIENTLY
LOCATED. |
| |
|
| |
Public Transport |
| 4.11 |
Results from the 1991 Census revealed
that 30% of households within the Borough did not have access to a
car and that certain wards such as Ilkeston North have a higher figure
(56.5%) than the Borough average. Initial results from the 2001 Census
have indicated that the Borough-wide figure has fallen to 24.1%. Notwithstanding
this, it is clear that a large proportion of the community depend
on public transport, comprising of bus and rail services. It is therefore
essential that public transport services continue to serve the Borough
and, wherever possible, facilities should be improved and integrated,
in the interests of promoting and providing an efficient public transport
system and protecting the environment. The Borough Council will work
in partnership with public transport providers, operators and others
with the aim of maximising the use of public transport as required
in PPG13. |
|
|
| |
POLICY T3 - PUBLIC
TRANSPORT |
| |
PUBLIC TRANSPORT FACILITIES
WILL BE IMPROVED WHEREVER OPPORTUNITIES ARISE. THIS WILL BE PRIMARILY
THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PROCESS BUT MAY ALSO INCLUDE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPROVEMENT SCHEMES AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT. NEW DEVELOPMENTS SHOULD
BE DESIGNED IN SUCH A WAY AS TO ENSURE THAT WHEREVER POSSIBLE PUBLIC
TRANSPORT FACILITIES ARE WITHIN CONVENIENT WALKING DISTANCE OF THE
WHOLE SITE. THE BOROUGH COUNCIL, IN CONSIDERING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS,
WILL SEEK TO NEGOTIATE SECTION 106 OBLIGATIONS TO SECURE, WHERE APPROPRIATE,
THE PROVISION OF OR FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS TOWARDS MEASURES TO ENHANCE
EXISTING PUBLIC TRANSPORT PROVISION, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSALS. |
| |
| |
Railways |
| 4.12 |
Within the Borough, there is only one
passenger rail station, at Long Eaton, but there are several former
stations which may provide opportunities for reopening passenger services.
In particular, the reopening of a station to serve Ilkeston would
be beneficial to the town and Borrowash station could be reopened
as a commuter route to Derby and as a link into the wider railway
network. However, the former stations at Trowell and Sandiacre are
situated outside the administrative boundary of the Borough Council.
Although the increased use of railways is supported, in the interests
of the rail user and the environment, within the context of preparing
a Local Plan only a general policy can be put forward. However, at
Long Eaton, in the interest of keeping options open, a disused railway
line off Meadow Lane is afforded protection as it may be needed in
connection with any reopening of a central Long Eaton station (see
Proposal Map). |
|
|
| |
POLICY T4 - RAILWAYS |
| |
THE BOROUGH COUNCIL SUPPORTS
THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE RAILWAY NETWORK, PARTICULARLY THE REOPENING
OF RAILWAY STATIONS. APPLICATIONS FOR REOPENING FORMER RAILWAY STATIONS
WILL BE APPROVED, SUBJECT TO SATISFACTORY ACCESS, LANDSCAPING AND
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS. A DISUSED RAILWAY LINE OFF MEADOW
LANE, LONG EATON WILL BE PROTECTED FROM DEVELOPMENT WHICH MAY PREJUDICE
ITS RE-USE AS A RAILWAY ROUTE. |
| |
|
| |
Disused railways and canals |
| 4.13 |
Disused railway lines and canals may present
opportunities for improving the transportation network, and may be
reopened if there is sufficient demand and available resources. It
is therefore important to prevent development on disused routes if
such development would prejudice a route being reopened in its entirety.
Consideration will be given to the following criteria: |
| |
1. |
The need to maintain a continuous route; |
| |
2. |
The likelihood of the route being reopened; |
| |
3. |
The possibility of an alternative route
being provided; |
| |
4. |
The need for the proposed development; |
| |
5. |
The impact on wildlife; |
| |
6. |
The impact on residential or recreational
amenities; |
| |
7. |
The impact on the historic environment. |
|
|
| |
POLICY T5 - DISUSED
TRANSPORT ROUTES |
| |
IN CONSIDERING APPLICATIONS
FOR DEVELOPMENT ON A DISUSED TRANSPORT ROUTE, CONSIDERATION WILL BE
GIVEN TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: |
| |
1. |
THE NEED TO PROTECT AND
MAINTAIN A CONTINUOUS ROUTE FOR WALKING, CYCLING OR HORSE RIDING; |
| |
2. |
THE LIKELIHOOD OF THE ROUTE
BEING REOPENED; |
| |
3. |
THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ALTERNATIVE
ROUTE BEING PROVIDED; |
| |
4. |
THE NEED FOR THE PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT; |
| |
5. |
THE IMPACT ON WILDLIFE; |
| |
6. |
THE IMPACT ON RESIDENTIAL
OR RECREATIONAL AMENITIES; |
| |
7. |
THE NEED TO PROTECT THE
CONTINUITY OR RESTORATION OF DISUSED RAILWAY LINES OR CANALS FROM
PREJUDICIAL DEVELOPMENT; |
| |
8. |
THE IMPACT ON THE HISTORIC
ENVIRONMENT. |
| |
|
| |
Cycling |
| 4.14 |
Cycling is an efficient form of transport
over a short distance and is environmentally sustainable. Therefore,
it is particularly suitable in urban areas as a means of reducing
congestion on the roads and pollution to the air. However, it can
also be a dangerous method of transport if the cyclist has to compete
with road vehicles for space. Segregated cycling lanes and cycling
priority areas are required to encourage greater use of cycles in
towns. The identification and implementation of such schemes on highways
is the responsibility of the Highways Authority. Accordingly it is
beyond the scope of this Local Plan to propose specific improvements
for cyclists, through the designation of cycling lanes on highways.
However, over the plan period, the Borough Council will seek improvements
for the cyclist wherever opportunities arise and resources are available.
This will include cyclepaths/lanes arising from development control
decisions and the provision of cycle parking and changing facilities
at new developments. |
|
|
| |
POLICY T6 - CYCLING |
| |
IN CONSIDERING APPLICATIONS
FOR DEVELOPMENT, FACILITIES FOR CYCLISTS WILL BE SOUGHT BY NEGOTIATING
SECTION 106 PLANNING OBLIGATIONS WITH DEVELOPERS, PROVIDED THAT THE
OBLIGATIONS ARE DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ARE
NECESSARY TO MAKE IT ACCEPTABLE IN LAND-USE PLANNING TERMS. |
| |
|
| |
Pedestrians and Disabled
People |
| 4.15 |
In line with the Government's commitment
to reducing social exclusion, there is a need to ensure that all development
proposals take into proper account the varying needs of the local
community regardless of any physical impairment and to ensure that
developments are physically accessible. It is the policy of the Borough
Council to improve facilities for pedestrians and disabled people,
both in towns and the countryside, through the development process,
recreational trails, ongoing maintenance of the rights of way network
and other opportunities as they arise. |
|
|
| |
POLICY T7 - PEDESTRIANS
AND DISABLED PEOPLE |
| |
FACILITIES FOR PEDESTRIANS
AND DISABLED PEOPLE WILL BE IMPROVED WHEREVER OPPORTUNITIES ARISE.
IN PARTICULAR, NEW DEVELOPMENT TO WHICH THE PUBLIC IN GENERAL EXPECTS
TO HAVE ACCESS, ESPECIALLY SHOPS, SPORTS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY
FACILITIES, WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED IF IT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE NEEDS
OF PEOPLE WITH IMPAIRED MOBILITY, BY THE PROVISION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING
SPACES, CONVENIENT MOVEMENT ALONG PATHWAYS AND AN UNHINDERED APPROACH
TO BUILDINGS. WHERE APPROPRIATE, CONDITIONS WILL BE IMPOSED ON PLANNING
PERMISSIONS TO ACHIEVE THESE OBJECTIVES. |
| |
|
| |
Traffic Calming |
| 4.16 |
Traffic calming may be defined as "the
process which seeks to control motor vehicles in a number of ways
for safety and amenity reasons." In practice this means reducing the
speed and movement of traffic along streets rather than adapting streets
to the demands of the motor vehicles. The purpose of traffic calming
is therefore to redress the balance away from the motor vehicle and
towards the quality of life. Measures may include, for example, road
humps, mini-roundabouts, chicanes, pedestrian refuges and crossing
facilities for cyclists. Across the Borough, it is important to improve
road safety and the environment of residential areas, wherever problems
occur and opportunities arise. Such measures would have to be undertaken
in conjunction with the Highway Authority. |
|
|
| |
POLICY T8 - TRAFFIC
CALMING AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT |
| |
TRAFFIC CALMING AND TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT MEASURES WILL BE INTRODUCED IN ORDER TO IMPROVE ROAD SAFETY
AND THE ENVIRONMENT OF RESIDENTIAL AREAS, WHERE IT IS DESIRABLE, IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE HIGHWAY AUTHORITY. |
| |
|
| |
Travel Plans |
| 4.17 |
In line with PPG13: Transport, it is important
to promote the use of travel plans, at all major development proposals
for employment, retail, leisure or services. A definition of major
development can be found in the glossary at the rear of this document.
The objectives for travel plans are: |
| |
- reductions in car usage, particularly single occupancy journeys;
- increased use of walking, cycling and public transport;
- more environmentally friendly means of transportation;
- reduction in traffic speeds and improved safety.
|
| 4.18 |
The provision of travel plans will arise
through the development control process and may take the form either
of a planning condition or planning obligation. In either case, travel
plans will be discussed with applicants or developers prior to a planning
application being formerly considered. |
|
|
| |
POLICY T9 - TRAVEL
PLANS |
| |
TRAVEL PLANS WILL BE REQUIRED
FOR ALL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS FOR EMPLOYMENT, RETAIL, LEISURE
OR SERVICES, INCLUDING SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS, OR WHEREVER A TRAVEL
PLAN WOULD HELP TO ALLEVIATE A LOCAL TRAFFIC PROBLEM ASSOCIATED WITH
A PLANNING APPLICATION. WHERE A TRAVEL PLAN IS NECESSARY TO MAKE A
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL ACCEPTABLE, ITS PROVISION AND IMPLEMENTATION
WILL BE SECURED BY MEANS OF A SECTION 106 PLANNING OBLIGATION OR A
PLANNING CONDITION. |
| |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| top |