 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| Chapter 3 |
| EMPLOYMENT |
| |
|
| |
Introduction |
| 3.1 |
It is the policy of the Borough Council
to promote economic activity and job creation within its area. The
Local Plan is concerned primarily with land use issues and includes
the allocation of suitable land for employment use throughout the
plan period, policies to assist that development and policies for
the detailed control of such development. |
| 3.2 |
As with housing, a sequential approach
has been used in drawing up employment proposals. Brownfield sites
have been given priority, followed by edge of development sites, and
finally greenfield sites. |
| 3.3 |
Sustainability is also very important and
therefore new jobs should be created at employment sites which are
accessible by public transport, close to centres of population and
of minimal impact on wildlife resources and the environment in general. |
| 3.4 |
The sites proposed for employment use
have therefore been tested to ensure that they are compatible with
sustainable principles. |
| 3.5 |
It is also important to protect jobs in
the countryside, and foster new employment opportunities in rural
areas in order to prevent rural decline and provide local jobs. However,
in Erewash nearly all the countryside is designated Green Belt. Therefore
it is essential that any employment proposals for rural areas do not
conflict with Green Belt policies. |
| 3.6 |
The amount of land to be allocated in
the Local Plan is determined by the economy policies in the Structure
Plan and by Regional Planning Guidance (RPG8) which covers the period
2001-2021. |
| |
Structure Plan Provision
for Industrial and Business Development |
| 3.7 |
The Structure Plan makes provision for
100 hectares (250 acres) of land for industrial and business development
throughout the Borough, in the 1991-2011 period. Industry and business
being generally defined as firms falling within classes B1, B2 and
B8 of the Use Classes Order, 1987 (business, general industry, storage
and distribution). |
| |
Industrial and Business
Land Requirements |
| 3.8 |
The Structure Plan in making provision
for industrial and business development includes land with planning
permission in April 1997 and other sites proposed for industrial or
business development but without the benefit of planning permission. |
| 3.9 |
For the Ilkeston sub-area, the Structure
Plan makes provision for 80 hectares of industrial and business land.
Since April 1991, 7 hectares of the provision has been developed,
21 hectares have the benefit of planning permission and 26 hectares
were available on redevelopment sites. The remaining provision for
Ilkeston to be allocated in the Local Plan is therefore about 26 hectares. |
| 3.10 |
In the Long Eaton sub-area, the Structure
Plan allocation is for 20 hectares of industrial and business land.
Since 1991, 2.1 hectares of land has been developed for industry and
12.15 hectares of industrial land has the benefit of planning permission
or is allocated in the 1994 Erewash Borough Local Plan for industrial
development. The remaining part of the provision, amounting to 5.75
hectares needs to be allocated in this replacement Local Plan together
with any unimplemented sites identified in the 1994 Erewash Borough
Local Plan considered appropriate for taking forward in this Local
Plan. |
| 3.11 |
In the Ilkeston sub-area, the allocation
of land for industrial and business purposes will be achieved primarily
through the development of low-grade and derelict land at Stanton
Ironworks. (See Proposal E4). |
| 3.12 |
At Long Eaton, an undeveloped Local Plan
proposal off Meadow Lane of 1994, is carried forward in this replacement
plan. It requires infrastructure investment and is complicated by
having a protected railway line route flanking its northern boundary.
Its development may therefore not take place until the latter part
of the plan period. |
|
|
| |
POLICY E1 - INDUSTRIAL
AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT |
| |
APPLICATIONS FOR INDUSTRIAL
AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED ON THE SITES IDENTIFIED
BELOW, SUBJECT TO THE COUNCIL BEING SATISFIED AS TO THE DETAILS OF
ACCESS, DRAINAGE, SEWERAGE, LANDSCAPING AND OTHER MATTERS AS APPROPRIATE: |
| |
| MEADOW LANE |
3.70 HECTARES INDUSTRY/BUSINESS |
|
| |
|
| |
Existing Industrial and
Business Sites |
| 3.13 |
It is important to protect the stock of
industrial and business sites within the Borough, especially in the
Long Eaton area where employment land is at a premium. However, there
may be occasions where the redevelopment of an industrial and business
site would remove a nonconforming use. Each case will be considered
on its merits against Policies E2 and E3. |
| 3.14 |
There is also strong pressure from other
sectors such as retailing for the redevelopment of industrial and
business sites. It is the Council's intention to resist such proposals
insofar as this is necessary to support the business sector and ensure
that existing established shopping centres are not adversely affected. |
|
|
| |
POLICY E2 - PROTECTION
OF INDUSTRIAL AND BUSINESS USES |
| |
ON EXISTING INDUSTRIAL AND
BUSINESS SITES, INCLUDING THOSE WITH PLANNING PERMISSION FOR EMPLOYMENT
USES, PLANNING PERMISSION WILL BE GRANTED FOR ALTERNATIVE USES IF
THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA CAN BE MET: |
| |
1. |
THE PROPOSAL WILL NOT PREJUDICE
THE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF LAND IDENTIFIED FOR INDUSTRIAL OR BUSINESS
PURPOSES; |
| |
2. |
THE PROPOSAL WILL NOT RESULT
IN REDEVELOPMENT FOR RETAIL PURPOSES, UNLESS ALL RELEVANT CRITERIA
IN PROPOSALS S1, S2 & S3 CAN BE MET; |
| |
3. |
IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED
THAT AN ALTERNATIVE USE WOULD RESULT IN THE SUBSTANTIAL RELIEF OF
ANY SERIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXISTING USE
OF THE SITE; |
| |
4. |
IN RESPECT OF VACANT SITES,
IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT THE PREMISES ARE NO LONGER CAPABLE OF
PROVIDING AN ACCEPTABLE STANDARD OF ACCOMMODATION FOR INDUSTRIAL OR
BUSINESS PURPOSES. |
| |
|
|
| |
Relocation of Poorly Sited
Businesses |
| 3.15 |
Within the urban areas of the Borough
and in some rural locations, there are a number of businesses that
have operated for many years in areas which are otherwise predominantly
residential or agricultural. Such businesses can seriously affect
the amenities of adjoining residents by reason of noise, smell, traffic
congestion and general disturbance, or can seriously detract from
the otherwise rural character of open countryside. |
| 3.16 |
This can be addressed by encouraging the
relocation of such businesses to more acceptable locations within
either the existing or proposed industrial areas and by allowing more
appropriate alternative uses or redevelopment of their existing sites. |
|
|
| |
POLICY E3 - RELOCATION
OF POORLY SITED BUSINESSES |
| |
PLANNING PERMISSION WILL
BE GRANTED FOR EITHER THE REDEVELOPMENT OR ALTERNATIVE USE OF EXISTING
INDUSTRIAL OR BUSINESS PREMISES, WHERE THE CURRENT USE CREATES UNACCEPTABLE
ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS AND CAN BE SUITABLY RELOCATED TO AN ALTERNATIVE
SITE. |
| |
|
| |
Stanton Ironworks |
| 3.17 |
Stanton Ironworks is the largest development
opportunity in Erewash and is of both countywide and regional importance.
It is a brownfield site comprising 67 hectares of land officially
derelict (Derelict Land Survey 1993) and an additional 38 - 68 hectares
of land which could be released for development through rationalisation
and consolidation of the operational plant, making a total site availability
of between 105 - 135 hectares. But, as noted in paragraphs 3.9 and
3.11, only 26 hectares of additional provision of industrial and business
land is relied upon during the Plan period. |
| 3.18 |
However, major land reclamation is required
together with substantial infrastructure improvements. The Stanton
site is therefore a long term development proposal which will not
be available until the latter part of the plan period (2005 - 2011). |
| 3.19 |
This scale of redevelopment or regeneration
is not considered to be an over-provision of employment land as the
complex used to employ approximately 10,000 people and occupy a much
larger area. |
| 3.20 |
The regeneration of the Stanton Ironworks
site will require major works to the infrastructure (surface water,
drainage, energy supplies) significant landscaping, a high quality
of design, and remedial works to the land in order to create a quality
environment and ensure that the environmental impact is kept to a
minimum. Recycling of waste materials and efficient use of energy
are important considerations in developing the site in a sustainable
way. In order for a development of this scale to be successfully integrated
within the local environment, improvements will need to be made to
the local transport network to ensure that the development is adequately
connected to the surrounding road and rail network. Given the size
and strategic importance of the site, improvements to the highway
network will be necessary, to accommodate the associated increase
in traffic volumes, avoiding the creation of unacceptable levels in
traffic in nearby settlements. It is important that alongside potential
highway improvements, sustainable methods of travel to and from the
site are also enhanced, helping to provide links with nearby settlements.
This will involve encouraging cycle and pedestrian access through
new or enhanced routes and improving the level of public transport
serving the site. To achieve this, S106 agreements will be sought
from developers to help create sustainable transport links to the
surrounding road and rail network. It is also important to provide
public transport and cycle path/footpath links to nearby settlements
where employees may be recruited from. Similarly, further development
of the private railway line to the works should be considered as part
of the regeneration package, ensuring that the maximum amount of finished
goods and imported materials are transported by rail. Any opportunities
for introducing a passenger rail service should also be examined to
further increase the available transport choices to those wishing
to access the site. Any sustainable transport proposals which help
to link the site with its surroundings should be actively encouraged. |
| 3.21 |
Stanton Ironworks may provide an important
source of industrial archaeological information and therefore, in
line with the requirements of PPG16, provision will be made for an
archaeological evaluation of the site. |
| 3.22 |
All these elements will be drawn together
in a master plan to be prepared by the landowner in co-operation with
the Borough Council. Therefore, it is not possible to be more prescriptive
about the redevelopment of this site in this Local Plan. The task
is to provide a land use policy for the Stanton Ironworks development
site, which provides clarity about the type of acceptable uses, whilst
remaining flexible to changing circumstances. Accordingly, a broad
land use approach is used, designating the development area and identifying
which land uses will be permitted. |
|
|
| |
POLICY E4 - STANTON
IRONWORKS REGENERATION |
| |
LAND AT STANTON IRONWORKS,
AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSALS MAP, IS PROPOSED, AS A MAJOR CENTRE OF REGENERATION
TO SERVE THE BOROUGH AND THE WIDER REGION. WITHIN THIS AREA THE FOLLOWING
USES WILL BE PERMITTED:- |
| |
| B2 GENERAL INDUSTRY |
) |
|
| B1 LIGHT INDUSTRY |
) |
105 - 135 HECTARES |
| B8 STORAGE |
) |
|
|
| |
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE
SHOULD INCLUDE IMPROVED ROAD LINKS TO THE M1 MOTORWAY, A RAIL LINK
FOR FREIGHT, IMPROVED INFRASTRUCTURE, EXTENSIVE LANDSCAPING, IMPROVED
PUBLIC TRANSPORT, FOOTPATH AND CYCLE PATH LINKS, AND HABITAT IMPROVEMENT
IN CONNECTION WITH SURFACE WATER TREATMENT. NEW BUILDINGS SHOULD BE
OF A HIGH STANDARD OF DESIGN, ENERGY EFFICIENT AND WHERE APPROPRIATE
HAVE FACILITIES FOR WASTE RECYCLING. |
| |
|
| |
West Hallam Storage Depot |
| 3.23 |
An extensive area of warehousing at West
Hallam provides a valuable source of employment. Access to the depot
can however lead to local problems of heavy goods vehicles using roads
not designed for heavy goods traffic. A further consideration is that
the depot is surrounded by open countryside comprising Green Belt.
It is therefore appropriate that the depot, which is long established,
continues mainly to be used for warehousing. |
| 3.24 |
It is considered appropriate however to
permit a relatively small proportion of the site (less than 20%) to
be redeveloped for light industrial use in order to provide a broader
range of local employment in this predominantly rural area in accordance
with PPS7. |
| 3.25 |
Full consideration needs to be given to
the ecology of the site in any redevelopment proposals. Existing landscape
features should be retained and a high standard of design will be
required in accordance with the location surrounded by the green belt.
Any proposals for light industrial development or significant intensification
of warehousing/storage will need to be accompanied by a Traffic Impact
Assessment. Any new development will require a flood risk assessment. |
|
|
| |
POLICY E5 - WEST HALLAM
STORAGE DEPOT |
| |
APPLICATIONS FOR NEW WAREHOUSES
OR THE REPLACEMENT OF WAREHOUSING (B8) WILL BE PERMITTED AT THE WEST
HALLAM DEPOT AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE (B1) WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED
ON THAT PART OF THE SITE ADJACENT TO THE EASTERN BOUNDARY, AS SHOWN
ON THE PROPOSALS MAP. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA BEING MET: |
| |
1. |
THE DEVELOPMENT IS OF AN
ACCEPTABLE SCALE, MATERIAL AND DESIGN AND WILL NOT HARM THE RURAL
ENVIRONMENT OR RESIDENTIAL AMENITY; |
| |
2. |
THE TRAFFIC GENERATED BY
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CAN BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE LOCAL ROAD NETWORK; |
| |
3. |
THERE IS NO ADVERSE EFFECT
ON THE ECOLOGY OR BIODIVERSITY OF THE SITE. |
| |
4. |
THERE ARE NO ADVERSE EFFECTS
IN TERMS OF DRAINAGE AND FLOODING, AS SHOWN BY A FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT. |
| |
|
| |
Mixed Uses |
| 3.26 |
The Government is encouraging local authorities
to facilitate mixed use development in appropriate locations. The
principal aim of such development is to provide jobs close to where
people live in order to reduce journeys to work and to foster a more
sustainable way of life less dependent on the car as a means of transport.
Typically, mixed use developments will be close to town centres and
developed on brownfield sites where a high density of residential
development would be envisaged. It is paramount that any mixed use
development does not create environmental problems for the future
and therefore it follows that mixed use will normally be associated
with class B1 (Business) development. It may be appropriate in certain
situations to also consider mixed use in association with retail and
leisure development, where residential use may occupy upper storeys
of buildings. |
|
|
| |
POLICY E6 - MIXED USE |
| |
APPLICATIONS FOR MIXED USE
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED SUBJECT TO THE COUNCIL BEING SATISFIED
THAT THE MIXED USES ARE COMPATIBLE IN TERMS OF NOISE, HOURS OF WORKING,
ACCESS AND EGRESS, PARKING, EMISSION OF FUMES, SMELL OR DUST, VIBRATION
AND ANY OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETER. A HIGH QUALITY OF DESIGN IS
SOUGHT, WITH FULL REGARD BEING GIVEN TO LANDSCAPING, MATERIALS OF
CONSTRUCTION, SCALE OF BUILDINGS AND SPACE BETWEEN BUILDINGS. IN PARTICULAR,
THE INTERFACE BETWEEN USES NEEDS CAREFUL ATTENTION TO DETAIL. |
| |
|
| |
Rural Employment |
| 3.27 |
Although traditionally, most of the employment
opportunities within the Borough are located within the main urban
areas, rural areas can accommodate many forms of development if its
location and design are handled sensitively. However, in sensitive
areas new development needs to be strictly controlled. These include: |
| |
- Open countryside away from settlements
- Green Belt land
- Areas of the best and most versatile agricultural land
|
| 3.28 |
'Planning Policy Statement 7 - Sustainable
Development in Rural Areas (PPS7) states that wealth creation and
environmental quality are increasingly interconnected. The appeal
of the countryside is central to its economic prosperity. Healthy
economic activity in rural areas facilitates investment to protect
and improve the countryside. Rural development should be sustainable
in accordance with the Governments objectives. |
| 3.29 |
The Borough Council will seek to encourage
rural enterprise, strengthen rural communities and achieve good quality
development that respects the character of the countryside. However,
most rural employment sites would be situated in the Green Belt and
therefore be the subject of special scrutiny when considered against
the Green Belt policies contained in this document, at Chapter 10. |
|
|
| |
POLICY E7 - RURAL EMPLOYMENT |
| |
OUTSIDE THE SETTLEMENTS
AS DEFINED ON THE PROPOSALS MAP OR AN ESTABLISHED EMPLOYMENT AREA,
PROPOSALS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIAL OR BUSINESS PREMISES (B1,
B2 & B8) THROUGH EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW SITE, BY REDEVELOPMENT
OR CONVERSION OR BY THE EXTENSION OF EXISTING PREMISES, WILL BE PERMITTED
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA BEING SATISFIED: |
| |
1. |
THE DESIGN, SCALE AND SITING
OF THE NEW DEVELOPMENT RESPECTS THE CHARACTER OR APPEARANCE OF THE
LOCALITY, ITS SETTING AND THE SURROUNDING COUNTRYSIDE; |
| |
2. |
THERE IS NO HARM TO THE
AMENITIES OF NEARBY RESIDENTS OR OTHER LAND USERS; |
| |
3. |
IT WILL NOT GENERATE TRAFFIC
OF A TYPE OR AMOUNT INAPPROPRIATE TO RURAL ROADS OR REQUIRE IMPROVEMENTS
WHICH WOULD HARM THE CHARACTER OF RURAL ROADS IN THE AREA; |
| |
IF THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN
THE GREEN BELT, AS DEFINED ON THE PROPOSALS MAP, THE PROPOSAL WILL
BE ASSESSED AGAINST POLICY GB1, IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE CRITERIA. |
| |
|
| 3.30 |
The diversification of farms will be considered
against Policy E8. |
|
|
| |
POLICY E8 - FARM DIVERSIFICATION |
| |
PLANNING PERMISSION WILL
BE GRANTED FOR PROPOSALS TO DIVERSIFY THE OPERATION OF AN EXISTING
AGRICULTURAL USE PROVIDED THAT: |
| |
1. |
IT MAKES FULL AND EFFECTIVE
USE OF EXISTING ON-HOLDING BUILDINGS IN PREFERENCE TO THE CONSTRUCTION
OF NEW BUILDINGS, AND; |
| |
2. |
IT DOES NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE
IMPACT UPON THE CHARACTER AND APPEARANCE OF THE IMMEDIATE OR WIDER
LANDSCAPE; |
| |
3. |
IT DOES NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE
IMPACT UPON THE AMENITY OF NEARBY RESIDENTS OR OTHER RURAL BUSINESSES
THAT MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY NEW TYPES OF ON-FARM DEVELOPMENT. |
| |
4. |
IT DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT
THE OPENNESS OF THE GREEN BELT. |
| |
PLANNING PERMISSION WILL
ONLY BE GRANTED FOR PROPOSALS INVOLVING THE USE OF EXISTING BUILDINGS
IF THEIR FORM, BULK AND GENERAL DESIGN MAKES A POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION
TO THE CHARACTER AND APPEARANCE OF ITS SURROUNDINGS AND THE PROPOSAL
DOES NOT RESULT IN A DETRIMENTAL IMPACT ON THE CHARACTER AND APPEARANCE
OF THE BUILDINGS. |
| |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| top |