|
|
|
| 8. TOWN CENTRES AND SHOPPING |
| |
|
| |
|
|
top
|
| |
INTRODUCTION |
| 8.1 |
The town centres of Alsager, Congleton,
Middlewich and Sandbach, plus Holmes Chapel Village Centre, form the
focal points for shopping and commercial activities within the Borough.
Whilst this role has continued to be maintained, surveys have revealed
that, in recent years, these town centres have come under considerable
pressure because of changes in economic and retail trends, including
the growth and popularity of out-of-centre retail parks and factory
outlets. |
| 8.2 |
An important aim of this Local Plan, therefore,
is to continue to protect and improve the viability and attractiveness
of the Boroughs town centres to ensure that they can maintain
their role in the future. |
|
top
|
| |
NATIONAL CONTEXT |
| 8.3 |
National Planning Policy Guidance Note
6 Town Centres and Retail Development (PPG 6) defines
the Governments objectives in respect of this particular subject,
and puts forward a means of achieving those objectives. |
| 8.4 |
The Governments objectives are: |
| |
- to sustain and enhance the vitality and viability of town centres;
- to focus retail development in locations where the proximity
of businesses facilitates competition, to the benefit of all consumers,
and maximises the opportunity to use means of transport other
than the car;
- to maintain an efficient, competitive and innovative retail
sector, and;
- to ensure the availability of a wide range of shops, services
and facilities to which people have easy access by a choice of
means of transport.
|
| 8.5 |
PPG 6 advises, firstly, that these objectives
should be met through the plan-led approach. Local Plans
should consider existing retail provision and identify sites for new
development. It further advises that Local Planning Authorities should,
after considering the need for new retail development, adopt a sequential
approach to the selection of appropriate sites. This means that first
preference should be given to town centre sites, followed by edge-of-centre
sites, district and local centres, and only if these are not available
should consideration be given to out-of-centre sites which are accessible
by a choice of means of transport. |
|
top
|
| |
STRATEGIC CONTEXT |
| 8.6 |
The Cheshire 2011 Replacement Structure
Plan identifies a hierarchy of centres within the County, and states
that the scale, nature and location of new retail developments should
reflect this hierarchy (Policy TCR1). |
| 8.7 |
The hierarchy identifies Alsager, Congleton,
Middlewich and Sandbach (plus seven other towns in the County) as
Secondary Town Centres where retail development should be to serve
the needs of the town and its catchment, and be of a size and scale
appropriate to the character and function of the centre (Policy TCR6).
The Replacement Structure Plan, stresses the need to protect and enhance
the viability and attractiveness of existing town centres, and to
reduce the reliance on the car as a means of transport. |
|
top
|
| |
LOCAL CONTEXT |
| |
Congleton Borough Retail
Study |
| 8.8 |
A Retail Study of the Borough was commissioned
by the Council and was completed in June 1999. It assesses the current
performance of the five main shopping centres of the Borough, and
provides base data which has assisted in the formulation of the policies
concerning Town Centres and Shopping comprised within this First Review
of the Congleton Borough Local Plan (details of retail floorspace
data are set out in the Appendix). |
| 8.9 |
The study concluded that the five main
shopping areas of the Borough are unable to retain high levels of
expenditure as a consequence of many local residents choosing to shop
in larger centres such as Stoke, Crewe and Macclesfield. In respect
of food shopping it is estimated that some 47% of expenditure generated
by residents of the Borough is leaked to surrounding areas, with only
Congleton and Sandbach attracting a majority of local main food shopping
trips owing to the presence of the large Safeway stores. The leakage
in general non-food retailing is estimated to be some 90% of locally
generated expenditure; and the survey also concluded that the lack
of specialist retail warehousing in the Borough indicates that up
to 91% of bulky goods expenditure leaks outside the Borough
at present. |
| |
| Table 4 Retail Capacity
Estimates |
| |
Convenience Non-Food
SQ.M.(Net) |
Retailing Retailing
SQ.M.(Net) |
| Congleton |
1,800-2,600 |
2,550-4,450* |
| Sandbach |
760-1,330 |
1,500-2,300 |
| Middlewich |
130-820 |
990 |
| Alsager |
1,100-1,180 |
1040 |
| Holmes Chapel |
None |
500 |
|
|
| 8.10 |
The study examined future capacity for
retail development within the five main shopping centres of the Borough
up to the year 2011, assuming that each centre would either retain
their existing market share of expenditure (ie not lose trade) or
be able to clawback an element of expenditure currently
lost to the centre. Table 4 summarises estimates of future capacity
within each of the centres. |
| |
|
| |
Economic Development Strategy |
| 8.11 |
The promotion and regeneration of town
centres is a key element of the Borough of Congleton Economic Development
Strategy 2000 and Beyond. This was developed by South East
Cheshire Enterprise, which was jointly formed by the Borough Council,
Congleton Borough Chamber of Commerce and Enterprise and Cheshire
County Council. |
| 8.12 |
The Strategy contains positive objectives
aimed at revitalising the Boroughs towns as centres of business
and social activity through the following measures: |
| |
- Targeting inward investment
- raising the profile of the Borough and its assets as a business
environment
- supporting the revitalisation of the 5 town centres through
town centre projects
- supporting the Heritage Economic Regeneration schemes in Middlewich
and Sandbach
- Enhancing the marketing and promotion of the town centres
|
| |
|
| |
Community Safety Strategy
|
| 8.13 |
The Local Plan Review also takes into
account the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 which introduced a statutory
duty on a number of statutory authorities to work together to implement
a three year Community Safety Strategy for reducing crime and disorder.
The Councils current strategy for this Borough covers the years
1999-2002. Local Plan policies should therefore seek to ensure that
the design of new development and environmental works is carried out
in such a way as to discourage crime in town centres. |
| |
|
| |
Improving the Attractiveness
of the Town Centres |
| 8.14 |
One of the central objectives of the Local
Plan is to improve the attractiveness of the Boroughs Town Centres.
In order to achieve this objective it is necessary, in addition to
the allocation of limited amounts of land for further development,
to introduce measures which will help make town centres more attractive
to their users. |
| 8.15 |
Traffic congestion and a shortage of parking
spaces may deter many people from visiting a town centre and measures
are therefore needed to alleviate such problems and to make the environment
more attractive to pedestrians by minimising conflict with vehicles.
Environmental improvement may also be brought about within the town
centres by the implementation of schemes to preserve and enhance the
historic and visual quality of the town centre and by ensuring that
new development is carried out in a sympathetic manner, particularly
in the architecturally and historically important parts of the towns.
|
| 8.16 |
Shop fronts and advertisements also contribute
greatly to the overall character and appearance of any town centre
and poor design and unsympathetic alterations on even a small number
of units can easily debase the overall visual quality of the town
centre. To preserve and improve the quality of the street scene, particularly
within the Boroughs conservation areas, it is necessary to ensure
that any proposals affecting shop fronts take into account the character
and appearance of the building and general street scene, and that
the use of unsympathetic and garish advertising material does not
detract from the appearance of the area. |
| 8.17 |
The influx of non-retail uses into the
town centres is also an important issue although it is recognised
that certain types of non-retail uses such as banks, building societies
and food and drink businesses are now part of the established shopping
scene. The Local Plan seeks to ensure that they should not be totally
excluded from the principal shopping streets but that there should
be sufficient flexibility to enable a reasonable and attractive balance
of uses to be maintained. As part of the review of the Local Plan
all Central Area and Principal Shopping Area boundaries have consequently
been reviewed and, where appropriate, amended to consolidate them
and reflect current circumstances. |
| 8.18 |
The vitality of town centres can also
be achieved by maintaining residential uses. The upper floors of commercial
premises within the town centres are often vacant or under-utilised
contributing little to the overall appearance or vitality of the town
centres. Given the current demand for smaller, cheaper units of accommodation
the Local Plan encourages the conversion of upper floors to self-contained
flats in appropriate circumstances. Such a use could not only improve
the appearance of the street scene, but also generate activity within
the town centres outside of normal shopping hours which in turn creates
a safer environment with more frequent surveillance by passers-by,
and offering less opportunity for violence and crime. |
| 8.19 |
The use of upper floors for office development
is also considered to be acceptable particularly within the principal
shopping areas where such uses are not acceptable at ground floor
level. |
| |
|
| |
Local Facilities |
| 8.20 |
Elsewhere in the Borough, the Local Plan
seeks to provide for a range of local shopping facilities to serve
the day to day needs of residents, and to ensure that existing levels
of services and facilities are maintained and where possible improved
to meet the requirements of the plan area, particularly in those areas
where there is currently considered to be a shortage of such facilities.
|
|
top
|
|
| |
TOWN CENTRES AND SHOPPING
POLICIES |
|
|
| S1 |
|
| PROPOSALS FOR SHOPPING AND
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE THE SCALE, NATURE
AND LOCATION REFLECTS THE FOLLOWING HIERARCHY OF SETTLEMENTS AND AREAS
AS SPECIFIED IN THE SUBSEQUENT POLICIES OF THE LOCAL PLAN: |
| |
TOWNS (POLICIES S2
TO S6)
VILLAGES (POLICIES S7 & S8)
OPEN COUNTRYSIDE AND GREEN BELT (POLICY S9) |
| 8.21 |
The above hierarchy
and policies S2 to S9 identify the scale, nature and location of shopping
considered appropriate to each area and is in accordance with the
Structure Plan Policy TCR1 and the plan strategy of the Local Plan
as established in Policy PS3 which seek to maintain the function of
the Boroughs towns as the main shopping and commercial centres
of the Borough, but also recognising that facilities intended to serve
the needs of local communities and specialist needs may also be appropriate
elsewhere. |
|
|
| SHOPPING AND COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT OUTSIDE TOWN CENTRES |
| S2 |
|
| ANY NEW SHOPPING AND COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT OUTSIDE THE TOWN CENTRES OF CONGLETON, SANDBACH, ALSAGER
AND MIDDLEWICH, OTHER THAN SITES ALLOCATED FOR RETAIL USE AS DEFINED
ON THE PROPOSALS MAP, WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE IT IS FOR; |
| |
I) |
NEW SHOPPING OR COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE SETTLEMENT ZONE LINE OF A TOWN, OF AN APPROPRIATE
SCALE INTENDED TO SERVE THE NEEDS OF A LOCALLY RESIDENT COMMUNITY
OR; |
| |
II) |
NEW SHOPPING OR COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT AS PERMITTED UNDER POLICIES S7,
S8 & S9
OR; |
| |
III) |
THE REDEVELOPMENT OR MODEST
EXTENSION OF AN EXISTING SHOPPING OR COMMERCIAL FACILITY. |
| IN ADDITION, ANY SIGNIFICANT
SHOPPING OR COMMERCIAL PROPOSAL WILL NEED TO MEET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
CRITERIA; |
| |
A) |
THERE IS A PROVEN NEED
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT; |
| |
B) |
NO TOWN CENTRE SITE OR
OTHER SITE ALLOCATED FOR RETAIL USE IN POLICY DP4 IS AVAILABLE AND
SUITABLE. IN SUCH INSTANCES PREFERENCE WILL BE GIVEN TO EDGE OF CENTRE
SITES, FOLLOWED BY EXISTING DISTRICT CENTRES, AND FINALLY OUT OF CENTRE
SITES IN LOCATIONS THAT ARE ACCESSIBLE BY A CHOICE OF MEANS OF TRANSPORT; |
| |
C) |
THE PROPOSAL WOULD NOT
UNDERMINE, EITHER INDIVIDUALLY OR CUMULATIVELY THE VITALITY AND VIABILITY
OF ANY EXISTING CENTRE; |
| |
D) |
IT WOULD NOT BE SIGNIFICANTLY
DETRIMENTAL TO THE AMENITY OF LOCAL RESIDENTS OR TO THE OVERALL CHARACTER
OR APPEARANCE OF THE SETTLEMENT; |
| |
E) |
IT SHOULD BE ACCESSIBLE
BY A CHOICE OF MEANS OF TRANSPORT INCLUDING FOOT, CYCLE AND PUBLIC
TRANSPORT FROM ITS CATCHMENT AREA OR INCLUDE MEASURES TO MAKE IT ACCESSIBLE
IN THIS WAY; |
| |
F) |
IT WOULD NOT GIVE RISE
TO UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS OF VEHICULAR TRAFFIC EITHER IN RELATION TO
LOCAL FLOWS OR TO OVERALL DISTANCE TRAVELLED; |
| |
G) |
THE PROPOSAL ACCORDS WITH
OTHER POLICIES OF THE LOCAL PLAN. |
| 8.22 |
The Borough Council
will strongly resist any proposals to provide new or extended shopping
and commercial facilities outside the Town Centres which would, in
the opinion of the Borough Council, either individually or collectively
, be of sufficient magnitude to attract shoppers and trade away from
the Town Centres and therefore prejudice their separate or combined
long term viability. Such proposals will only be considered where
there is a demonstrable quantitative and qualitative need for such
a development and will be determined in accordance with the sequential
approach advocated in PPG6 and the detailed criteria listed in the
above policy. Individual shops and neighbourhood centres which serve
the needs of the local community are, however, considered to be valuable
to supporting communities and help promote sustainability. Proposals
for such facilities will be supported where they are not of detriment
to the amenity of nearby residents or to the viability of the Boroughs
Town Centres. Significant shopping and commercial proposals
are considered to be those in excess of 500 square metres net floorspace. |
|
|
| SHOPPING AND COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT WITHIN TOWN CENTRES |
| S3 |
|
| WITHIN THE TOWN CENTRES
OF CONGLETON, SANDBACH, MIDDLEWICH AND ALSAGER AS DEFINED ON THE PROPOSALS
MAP, PROPOSALS FOR NEW SHOPPING AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXTENSIONS
TO EXISTING RETAIL ACTIVITIES WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE THEY ACCORD
WITH THE OTHER POLICIES OF THE LOCAL PLAN AND IN PARTICULAR POLICIES
S4 AND S5. |
| 8.23 |
The Borough Council
wishes to maintain the viability of the Boroughs town centres
as the main shopping centres of the Borough, and to increase and strengthen
the range of shopping facilities to an appropriate level within the
town centres. Proposals for new shopping and commercial development
and extensions to existing retail activities within town centres will
therefore be permitted where in accordance with the appropriate policies
of the local plan. |
|
|
| Principal Shopping
Areas |
| S4 |
|
| WITHIN THE PRINCIPAL SHOPPING
AREAS AS DEFINED ON THE PROPOSALS MAP PROPOSALS FOR FURTHER NON-RETAIL
USES AT GROUND FLOOR WILL NOT BE PERMITTED (OTHER THAN PROPOSALS INVOLVING
THE CHANGE OF USE OF A1 PREMISES TO A2 OR A3 USES). |
| PROPOSALS FOR THE CHANGE
OF USE OF EXISTING A1 GROUND FLOOR RETAIL USES TO A2 OR A3 USES WILL
ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE SATISFIED: |
| |
I) |
THE PROPOSED USE IS COMPLIMENTARY
TO ADJACENT SHOPPING USES IN TERMS OF ITS OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS;
|
| |
II) |
THE PROPOSED USE RETAINS
A DISPLAY FRONTAGE APPROPRIATE TO A SHOPPING AREA; |
| |
III) |
THE PROPOSED USE DOES NOT
LEAD TO A CONCENTRATION OF NON A1 USES; |
| |
IV) |
THE PROPOSAL ACCORDS WITH
OTHER POLICIES OF THE LOCAL PLAN. |
| 8.24 |
The Principal Shopping
Area as defined on the Town Centre Inset Maps, represent those areas
which contain the towns main convenience and durable shopping
outlets. The Borough Council wishes to improve shopping facilities
generally within Town Centres, but especially within the Principal
Shopping Areas which contain the greatest concentration of A1 retail
uses. Priority is, therefore, given to maintaining and protecting
these areas from inappropriate non-retail development. |
| 8.25 |
Whilst some non A1
uses may be appropriate within such areas, it is important that these
central shopping areas do not become dominated by groups of non retail
uses which may lead to a loss of pedestrian flow and reduce the dominant
shopping characteristics and vitality of the town centres. In this
regard, the Borough Council considers that a row of more than two
non A1 retail uses would represent an inappropriate concentration
of such uses within the Principal Shopping Areas. |
|
|
| Other Town Centre Areas |
| S5 |
|
| WITHIN THE TOWN CENTRE NOT
OTHERWISE DEFINED AS A PRINCIPAL SHOPPING AREA, PROPOSALS FOR NON-RETAIL
USES AT GROUND FLOOR LEVEL WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE THE PROPOSED USE
IS A COMMERCIAL, LEISURE, ENTERTAINMENT, COMMUNITY OR CIVIC USE APPROPRIATE
TO THE TOWN CENTRE, OR FOR RESIDENTIAL USE ON THE PERIPHERY OF THE
TOWN CENTRE, WHERE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE SATISFIED: |
| |
I) |
THE PROPOSED USE DOES NOT
ON ITS OWN OR IN COMBINATION WITH OTHER EXISTING NON-RETAIL USES DETRACT
FROM THE OVERALL TOWN CENTRE FUNCTION OF THE AREA; |
| |
II) |
THERE IS NO DETRIMENTAL
IMPACT ON THE AMENITIES OF ANY FUTURE OCCUPIER FROM EXISTING ADJACENT
USES; |
| |
III) |
THE PROPOSAL HAS NO DETRIMENTAL
IMPACT ON THE AMENITIES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES; |
| |
IV) |
THE PROPOSAL ACCORDS WITH
OTHER POLICIES OF THE LOCAL PLAN. |
| 8.26 |
These areas provide
a suitable location for a number of appropriate town centre activities,
but which may be unacceptable in the Principal Shopping Areas. In
the case of residential uses, these may also be appropriate within
the town centre providing they are situated on the fringes rather
than near to the Principal Shopping Areas. In addition policy S5 allows
for non-retail and residential uses above the ground floor level in
all parts of the town centres. |
|
|
| The Use of Upper Floors
Within Town Centres |
| S6 |
|
| PROPOSALS FOR THE USE OF
UPPER FLOORS WITHIN TOWN CENTRES FOR NON-RETAIL USE, INCLUDING B1
OFFICE USE OR CONVERSION INTO SELF-CONTAINED FLATS, WILL BE PERMITTED
WHERE THE PROPOSAL MEETS THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: |
| |
I) |
A REASONABLE STANDARD OF
ACCOMMODATION IS CAPABLE OF BEING PROVIDED; |
| |
II) |
NO DETRIMENTAL IMPACT ON
THE AMENITIES OF ANY FUTURE OCCUPIER, FROM EXISTING ADJACENT USES; |
| |
III) |
NO DETRIMENTAL IMPACT ON
THE AMENITIES OF OTHER OCCUPIERS OF THE PROPERTY OR ADJACENT PROPERTIES;
|
| |
IV) |
SEPARATE ACCESS TO THE
ACCOMMODATION IS PROVIDED; |
| |
V) |
NO DETRIMENTAL ALTERATIONS
ARE REQUIRED ON PRINCIPAL FACADES; |
| |
VI) |
AVAILABILITY OF CAR PARKING
IN THE VICINITY; |
| |
VII) |
ACCORDANCE WITH OTHER POLICIES
OF THE LOCAL PLAN. |
| 8.27 |
The upper floors
of premises within town centres are often vacant or under-utilised
and it is considered that their re-use would improve the appearance
and vitality of the Town Centre. The Borough Council will therefore
support, where appropriate, the conversion of such premises into selfcontained
flats or appropriate commercial uses where the proposal would be able
to provide a reasonable standard of accommodation with satisfactory
access, and adequate parking provision. It is also important to ensure
that no significant alterations are required to the front of the premises
which would be of detriment to the appearance and character of the
building, particularly where the proposed development is within a
conservation area or affects a building of special architectural or
historic interest. |
|
|
| SHOPPING AND COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT IN VILLAGES |
| S7 |
|
| WITHIN THE SETTLEMENT ZONE
LINE OF THOSE SETTLEMENTS DEFINED IN POLICY PS5,
PROPOSALS FOR SHOPPING AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED
WHERE THE PROPOSAL IS CLEARLY INTENDED TO SERVE PRINCIPALLY THE NEEDS
OF LOCAL RESIDENTS, SUBJECT TO THE PROPOSAL ACCORDING WITH POLICY
S2 AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES OF THE
LOCAL PLAN. |
| 8.28 |
This policy supports
the development of small scale, local shopping facilities within existing
villages to meet the needs of local residents where they will not
have a significantly detrimental impact upon the amenity of local
residents or the character and appearance of the area. |
|
|
| Holmes Chapel |
| S8 |
|
| WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF
THE HOLMES CHAPEL VILLAGE CENTRE, AS DEFINED ON THE VILLAGE CENTRE
INSET MAP, PLANNING PERMISSION WILL BE GRANTED FOR SHOPPING AND COMMERCIAL
ACTIVITIES WITHIN USE CLASSES A1, A2 AND A3, PROVIDED THAT THE LAND
AND BUILDINGS IN QUESTION ARE SUITABLE IN ALL RESPECTS FOR THE INTENDED
USE OR USES. PLANNING PERMISSION WILL ONLY BE GRANTED FOR USE CLASS
B1 OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ABOVE GROUND FLOOR LEVEL. |
| 8.29 |
The village of Holmes
Chapel is distinct in that it is not only the largest rural settlement
within the Borough, but also contains a clearly defined village centre
which provides a range of shops and services, serving both the residents
of the village and of the surrounding settlements. |
| 8.30 |
In recognition of
the Holmes Chapel Village Centres importance in providing retail
and associated services to the village and surrounding settlements,
the policy seeks to define those uses which will generally be allowed.
Priority is given to maintaining shopping frontages within the village
centre, with the exception of Use Class A2 and A3 uses which usually
require ground floor locations. Within the Village Centre general
office uses are considered better suited to upper floors which might
otherwise remain vacant. A definition of the various use classes is
contained in the Appendix. |
|
|
| SHOPPING AND COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT IN THE OPEN COUNTRYSIDE AND GREEN BELT |
| S9 |
|
| WITHIN THE OPEN COUNTRYSIDE
AND GREEN BELT, PROPOSALS FOR SHOPPING AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS
WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE THE PROPOSAL IS FOR: |
| |
A) |
FARM SHOPS WHICH ASSIST
WITH THE DIVERSIFICATION OF THE RURAL ECONOMY PROVIDED THAT THE GOODS
SOLD ARE PREDOMINANTLY PRODUCED LOCALLY AND THE RETAILING USE IS ANCILLARY
TO THE MAIN AGRICULTURAL USE OF THE FARM; OR |
| |
B) |
NEW SHOPPING DEVELOPMENT
WITHIN THE INFILL BOUNDARY LINE OF THOSE SETTLEMENTS DEFINED IN POLICY
PS6, INTENDED TO SERVE THE NEEDS OF
LOCAL RESIDENTS |
| SUBJECT TO THE PROPOSAL
ACCORDING WITH POLICY S2 AND OTHER RELEVANT
POLICIES OF THE LOCAL PLAN. |
| 8.31 |
This policy supports
the development of small scale local shopping facilities within existing
settlements where intended to meet the needs of the local community,
where they will not have a detrimental impact upon the amenity of
local residents or the character and appearance of the area, and of
those farm shops requiring planning permission, which are assisting
with the diversification of the rural economy. However, it is recognised
that farm shops may be an exception where they form part of an existing
farm unit selling farm produce as they can assist with the diversification
of the rural economy. Proposals for farm shops in the Green Belt will
be restricted to the re-use of existing buildings. |
| 8.32 |
The Borough Council
will strongly resist any proposals to provide significant, inappropriate
new shopping facilities within the open countryside or Green Belt.
Such developments are generally not considered to be acceptable in
the open countryside because of their detrimental effect upon the
amenity and character of the area, and their potential effect on the
viability of existing town centres in the Borough. Proposals for such
development will only be acceptable where the developer is able to
demonstrate a proven need for the development, and that a sequential
approach to site selection has been undertaken which clearly demonstrates
that the proposal cannot be accommodated within or on the edge of
an existing settlement. It is considered that the existing and proposed
shopping facilities within the Congleton Borough and in those larger
centres adjoining the Plan area should be sufficient to meet demand.
Developments such as garden centres and nurseries may, in principle
be more appropriate within the open countryside competing less directly
with existing retail provision within town centres, however such proposals
will still be required to comply with those criteria set out in Policy
S2. |
|
|
| COMMITTED SHOPPING
SITES |
| S10 |
|
| ON SITES WHICH ARE CURRENTLY
COMMITTED TO SHOPPING USES, APPLICATIONS FOR THE RENEWAL OF PLANNING
PERMISSION FOR SUCH USES WILL BE REVIEWED TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE
EXISTING PLANNING PERMISSION SHOULD BE RENEWED BY ASSESSING THE PROPOSAL
AGAINST THE RELEVANT POLICIES OF THE LOCAL PLAN, HAVING FULL REGARD
TO ANY MATERIAL CHANGES IN PLANNING CIRCUMSTANCES AND NATIONAL PLANNING
GUIDANCE. |
| 8.33 |
The aim of this policy
is to maintain the supply of land for retail development, and to bring
into beneficial use land which has been deemed to be appropriate for
retail development. |
|
|
| SHOP FRONTS AND SECURITY
SHUTTERS |
| Shop Fronts |
| S11 |
|
| PROPOSALS FOR NEW SHOP FRONTS
OR ALTERATIONS OR REPLACEMENTS TO EXISTING ONES REQUIRING CONSENT
SHOULD SATISFY THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: |
| |
I) |
SHOP FRONTS SHOULD RESPECT
THE SCALE, PROPORTIONS, CHARACTER AND MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION OF
THE UPPER PART OF THE STRUCTURE AND WHERE RELEVANT THE SETTING OF
THE BUILDING IN RELATION TO ADJOINING BUILDINGS AND THE STREET SCENE
IN GENERAL; |
| |
II) |
SHOP FRONTS OF ARCHITECTURAL
OR HISTORIC INTEREST SHOULD ONLY BE REMOVED IN EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES; |
| |
III) |
FASCIA SIGNS: |
| |
|
A) |
SHOULD NOT BE SO DEEP AS TO BE DETRIMENTAL
TO THE PROPORTIONS OR SCALE OF THE BUILDING; |
| |
|
B) |
SHOULD NOT LINK TWO BUILDINGS WITH
SEPARATE ARCHITECTURAL IDENTITIES; |
| |
|
C) |
SHOULD, WHERE APPROPRIATE BE OF A COMMON
DEPTH ON SINGLE BUILDINGS CONSISTING OF TWO OR MORE SHOP UNITS; |
| |
IV) |
WINDOWS TO UPPER FLOORS
SHOULD NOT BE ENLARGED FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES. |
| 8.34 |
The Borough Council
wishes to ensure that any proposals for new shop fronts or alterations
to existing shop fronts take into account the character and appearance
of the building and general street scene particularly where the development
is within a Conservation Area or affects a building of special architectural
or historic interest. |
|
|
| Security Shutters -
Solid Lath |
| S12 |
|
| THE INSTALLATION OF SOLID
LATH OR SIMILAR SECURITY SHUTTERS ON SHOP FRONTS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED
UNLESS ALTERNATIVE PHYSICAL PROTECTIVE MEASURES, INCLUDING THE USE
OF CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION SURVEILLANCE, ARE DEMONSTRABLY INAPPROPRIATE
OR INADEQUATE. |
| 8.35 |
To maintain the vitality
of the Boroughs towns, the Borough Council wishes to extend
the time during which the town centres are in active use and therefore
consider it to be important that the attractiveness of the town centres
are maintained in the evenings and on Sundays. Shop fronts are an
important feature of any street scene and have many roles. They permit
after hours window shopping, allow supervision by Police and passers-by
and allow additional illumination of the street which is itself a
disincentive to crime - against both the property and users of the
town centre. It is considered, therefore, that the use of solid lath
shutters within town centres would be inappropriate. The Borough Councils
adopted Supplementary Planning Guidance Note on shop front security
in the Appendix of the Local Plan gives advice on the design of alternative
security measures. |
| 8.36 |
The use of such shutters
in neighbourhood shops are also considered to be inappropriate given
their often prominent position within primarily residential areas.
|
|
|
| Security Shutters -
Lattice/Mesh Grilles |
| S13 |
|
| PROPOSALS FOR THE ERECTION
OF EXTERNAL LATTICE GRILLE (ROLLER GRILLE OR DEMOUNTABLE MESH SCREENS)
WITHIN CONSERVATION AREAS, OR ON LISTED BUILDINGS WILL BE RESISTED
UNLESS THEIR USE IS SHOWN TO BE IMPERATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE PHYSICAL
PROTECTIVE MEASURES, INCLUDING THE USE OF CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION
SURVEILLANCE, ARE DEMONSTRABLY INAPPROPRIATE OR INADEQUATE. |
| ELSEWHERE SUCH PROPOSALS
WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED IF THEY SATISFY ALL THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: |
| |
I) |
THE GRILLE, WHEN IN THE
CLOSED POSITION, SHOULD NOT COVER THE FASCIA, PILASTERS OR STALL-RISERS; |
| |
II) |
THE GRILLE SHOULD BE INTEGRATED
INTO THE OVERALL COLOUR SCHEME OF THE PREMISES AND NOT BE GALVANISED
OR UNPAINTED; |
| |
III) |
THE GRILLE SPINDLE BOX
IS, WHEREVER POSSIBLE, LOCATED BEHIND THE FASCIA OR INTEGRATED INTO
THE OVERALL DESIGN OF THE SHOP FRONT. |
| 8.37 |
The Borough Council
considers the use of external lattice grilles to be inappropriate
within the Boroughs Conservation Areas and on listed buildings
where they would detract from the architectural and historical character
and appearance of the areas. The Borough Councils adopted Supplementary
Planning Guidance Note on shop front security in the Appendix of the
Local Plan gives advice on the design of alternative security measures.
|
| 8.38 |
Elsewhere the erection
of lattice grilles or demountable mesh screens will only be permitted
where the proposed grille is not of significant detriment to the overall
character and appearance of the shop front. The Borough Councils
adopted Supplementary Planning Guidance Note on shop front security
in the Appendix of the Local Plan gives advice on the design of alternative
security measures. |
| 8.23 |
|
|
|
| ADVERTISEMENTS |
| S14 |
|
| PROPOSALS FOR THE DISPLAY
OF NEW, OR THE RETENTION OF EXISTING, ADVERTISEMENTS WILL ONLY BE
PERMITTED WHICH SATISFY ALL THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: |
| |
I) |
THE PROPOSAL IS NOT OUT
OF KEEPING WITH THE STYLE OR CHARACTER OF A BUILDING OR ITS SURROUNDING;
|
| |
II) |
THE PROPOSAL WOULD NOT
BE DETRIMENTAL TO AMENITY OR SAFETY, BY REASON OF GENERAL DESIGN,
SIZE, COLOUR, POSITION OF SIGN, TYPE OR DEGREE OF ILLUMINATION; |
| |
III) |
THE PROPOSAL WOULD NOT
AFFECT VIEWS INTO OR OUT OF A CONSERVATION AREA; |
| |
IV) |
IN THE CASE OF PROPOSALS
WITHIN A CONSERVATION AREA, IT COMPLIES WITH POLICY S15.
|
| 8.39 |
The aim of this policy
is to prevent the display of advertisements in areas where the design
and location of the advertisement is considered to be inappropriate.
Such advertisements can be visually obtrusive and in some circumstances
constitute a hazard to road users and pedestrians. |
|
|
| Advertisements in Conservation
Areas |
| S15 |
|
| IN ITS CONSIDERATION OF
APPLICATIONS FOR EXPRESS CONSENT MADE UNDER THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING
(CONTROL OF ADVERTISEMENT) REGULATIONS WITHIN CONSERVATION AREAS,
THE BOROUGH COUNCIL WILL ONLY ALLOW SIGNS WHICH SATISFY ALL THE FOLLOWING
CRITERIA: |
| |
I) |
SIGNS SHALL BE EITHER PAINTED
OR INDIVIDUALLY LETTERED IN A SUITABLE MATERIAL AND SHALL BE OF AN
APPROPRIATE SIZE AND DESIGN IN RELATION TO THE BUILDING UPON WHICH
THEY ARE TO BE DISPLAYED AND THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA IN WHICH THE
BUILDING IS SITUATED; |
| |
II) |
SIGNS SHALL PREFERABLY
BE NON-ILLUMINATED BUT WHERE ILLUMINATION IS JUSTIFIED, IT SHOULD
BE DISCREET AND IN THE FORM OF UNCOLOURED ILLUMINATION INTEGRATED
INTO THE DESIGN OF THE SHOP FRONT; |
| |
III) |
THE FORM OF SIGNS SHALL
BE OF A TRADITIONAL FASCIA OR HANGING TYPE DEPICTING, BY MEANS OF
PAINTING OR THREE DIMENSIONAL TECHNIQUES, THE TRADE OR SERVICE OFFERED;
|
| |
IV) |
SIGNS SHALL, OTHER THAN
IN THE MOST EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES, BE OF A MINIMUM SIZE NECESSARY
TO CONVEY THEIR MESSAGE. |
| 8.40 |
While it is recognised
that many of the Boroughs Conservation Areas include parts of
commercial town centres, it is important to ensure that the use of
garish and unsympathetic advertising material does not detract from
the appearance of areas of architectural and historic interest. |
|
|
| ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS
AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT MEASURES |
| S16 |
|
| THE BOROUGH COUNCIL WILL
SEEK TO IMPLEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SCHEMES
WITHIN THE TOWN CENTRES OF THE BOROUGH AND HOLMES CHAPEL VILLAGE CENTRE
AND TO IMPROVE CONDITIONS FOR PEDESTRIANS BY INTRODUCING TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
MEASURES WHERE APPROPRIATE. WHERE REQUIRED, PLANNING PERMISSION WILL
NORMALLY BE GRANTED FOR SUCH APPROPRIATELY DESIGNED SCHEMES. |
| CONSIDERATION WILL BE GIVEN
TO THE NEEDS OF THE LESS MOBILE SECTIONS OF THE POPULATION IN ANY
SUCH WORKS. OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE PROVISION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS WILL
BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN THE CONSIDERATION OF ANY APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSALS WITHIN THESE AREAS. |
| 8.41 |
The Borough Council
wishes to bring about environmental improvements within each of the
Boroughs towns and the village centre of Holmes Chapel, to further
enhance each of the Boroughs Town Centres. The introduction
of traffic management measures to reduce unnecessary through traffic
flows, parking and servicing conflicts within the town centres are
also considered to be important to improving the environment of the
Boroughs Town Centres and would form part of wider environmental
improvement schemes within the Town Centres. Large parts of the town
centres are designated as Conservation Areas and their special interest
will be considered in all proposals for environmental improvement
and enhancement. Such measures would be implemented within each of
the towns as and when resources are available and opportunities arise.
|
|
|
| Access and Facilities
For The Disabled |
| S17 |
|
| WHEN CONSIDERING ANY PROPOSALS
FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT OR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT WITHIN TOWN CENTRES,
THE BOROUGH COUNCIL WILL GIVE CONSIDERATION TO THE NEEDS OF DISABLED
PEOPLE WITH REGARD TO EXTERNAL FEATURES SUCH AS PARKING, PATHS, KERBS,
STREET FURNITURE, ENTRANCES TO BUILDINGS, AND OPEN SPACE BETWEEN BUILDINGS.
WHERE PLANNING PERMISSION IS REQUIRED THIS WILL ONLY BE GRANTED IF
APPROPRIATE PROVISION IS MADE FOR THE DISABLED AS PART OF THE SCHEME
OR IT CAN BE REQUIRED BY CONDITION. |
| 8.41 |
The Borough Council
wishes to increase the attractiveness of the Boroughs towns
to people with disabilities by improving where possible accessibility
and facilities for disabled persons within town centres. |
| |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |